A multicenter, prospective, inpatient feasibility study to evaluate the use of an intra-colonoscopy cleansing device to optimize colon preparation in hospitalized patients: the REDUCE study

Helmut Neumann, Melissa Latorre, Tim Zimmerman, Gabriel Lang, Jason Samarasena, Seth Gross, Bhaumik Brahmbhatt, Haleh Pazwash, Vladimir Kushnir, Helmut Neumann, Melissa Latorre, Tim Zimmerman, Gabriel Lang, Jason Samarasena, Seth Gross, Bhaumik Brahmbhatt, Haleh Pazwash, Vladimir Kushnir

Abstract

Background: High quality bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy can be difficult to achieve in the inpatient setting. Hospitalized patients are at risk for extended hospital stays and low diagnostic yield due to inadequate bowel preparation. The Pure-Vu System is a novel device intended to fit over existing colonoscopes to improve intra-colonoscopy bowel preparation. The objective of the REDUCE study was to conduct the first inpatient study to evaluate optimization of bowel preparation quality following overnight preparation when using the Pure-Vu System during colonoscopy.

Methods: This multicenter, prospective feasibility study enrolled hospitalized subjects undergoing colonoscopy. Subjects recorded the clarity of their last bowel movement using a 5-point scale prior to colonoscopy. After one night of preparation, all enrolled subjects underwent colonoscopy utilizing the Pure-Vu System. The primary endpoint was improvement of colon cleanliness from baseline to post-cleansing with the Pure-Vu System as assessed by the improvement in Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). An exploratory analysis was conducted to assess whether the clarity of the last bowel movement could predict inadequate bowel preparation.

Results: Ninety-four subjects were included. BBPS analyses showed significant improvements in bowel preparation quality across all evaluable colon segments after cleansing with Pure-Vu, including left colon (1.74 vs 2.89; p < 0.0001), transverse colon (1.74 vs 2.91; p < 0.0001), and the right colon (1.41 vs 2.88; p < 0.0001). Prior to Pure-Vu, adequate cleansing (BBPS scores of ≥ 2) were reported in 60%, 62%, and 47% for the left colon, transverse colon, and right colon segments, respectively. After intra-colonoscopy cleansing with the Pure-Vu System, adequate colon preparation was reported in 100%, 99%, and 97% of the left colon, transverse colon, and right colon segments, respectively. Subjects with lower bowel movement clarity scores were more likely to have inadequate bowel preparation prior to cleansing with Pure-Vu.

Conclusions: In this feasibility study, the Pure-Vu System appears to be effective in significantly improving bowel preparation quality in hospitalized subjects undergoing colonoscopy. Clarity of last bowel movement may be useful indicator in predicting poor bowel preparation. Larger studies powered to evaluate clinical outcomes, hospital costs, and blinded BBPS assessments are required to evaluate the significance of these findings. Trial registration Evaluation of the Bowel Cleansing in Hospitalized Patients Using Pure-Vu System (NCT03503162).

Keywords: Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Colonoscopy preparation; Pure-Vu system; Quality improvement.

Conflict of interest statement

H.N., V.K., M.L.J.S. provided user feedback on next generation device development (this manuscript reports results of earlier generation product). S.G. is an advisor to Motus GI Holdings, Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pure-Vu® Sheath and Oversleeve
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Reference Scale used to evaluate clarity of the last bowel movement prior to colonoscopy using the 5-point Kakugawa Clarity Scale (subject self-assessment)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pre and post Pure-Vu scores: % of subjects
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patient flow/secondary endpoints
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Pre and post Pure Vu scores by pre-procedure clarity of bowel movement

References

    1. Harrison NM, Hjelkrem MC. Bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: balancing efficacy, safety, cost and patient tolerance. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;8:4–12. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i1.4.
    1. Baker FA, Mari A, Nafrin S, et al. Predictors and colonoscopy outcomes of inadequate bowel cleansing: a 10-year experience in 28,725 patients. Ann Gastroenterol. 2019;32:457–462.
    1. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:1797–1802. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03874.x.
    1. Jawa H, Mosli M, Alsamadani W, et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for inpatient colonoscopy. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017;28:460–464. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2017.17196.
    1. Garber A, Sarvepalli S, Burke CA, et al. Modifiable factors associated with quality of bowel preparation among hospitalized patients undergoing colonoscopy. J Hosp Med. 2019;14:278–283.
    1. Yadlapati R, Johnston ER, Gregory DL, et al. Predictors of inadequate inpatient colonoscopy preparation and its association with hospital length of stay and costs. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:3482–3490. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3761-2.
    1. Gross S, Gerson L, Lewis B, et al. A novel device for improving visualization in an inadequately prepared colon. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:883–888. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.10.028.
    1. van Keulen KE, Neumann H, Schattenberg JM, et al. A novel device for intracolonoscopy cleansing of inadequately prepared colonoscopy patients: a feasibility study. Endoscopy. 2019;51:85–92. doi: 10.1055/a-0632-1927.
    1. Pérez Jiménez J, Diego Bermúdez L, Gralnek IM, et al. An intraprocedural endoscopic cleansing device for achieving adequate colon preparation in poorly prepped patients. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019;53:530–534. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001114.
    1. Kakugawa Y, Saito Y, Saito S, et al. New reduced volume preparation regimen in colon capsule endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:2092–2098. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i17.2092.
    1. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, et al. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:620–625. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057.
    1. Calderwood AH, Jacobson BC. Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:686–692. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.06.068.
    1. Hernandez PV, Horsley-Silva JL, Snyder DL, et al. Effect of bowel preparation volume in inpatient colonoscopy. Results of a prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01373-1.
    1. Hernandez G, Gimeno-Garcia QE. Strategies to improve inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019;6:245. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00245.
    1. Hamdani U, Naeem R, Haider F, et al. Risk factors for colonoscopic perforation: a population-based study of 80118 cases. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:3596–3601. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i23.3596.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren