Diagnostic yield of screening for SARS-CoV-2 among patients admitted to hospital for alternate diagnoses: an observational cohort study
Philip Davis, Rhonda Rosychuk, Jeffrey P Hau, Ivy Cheng, Andrew D McRae, Raoul Daoust, Eddy Lang, Joel Turner, Jaspreet Khangura, Patrick T Fok, Maja Stachura, Baljeet Brar, Corinne M Hohl, CCEDRRN investigators, and for the Network of Canadian Emergency Researchers and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, Philip Davis, Rhonda Rosychuk, Jeffrey P Hau, Ivy Cheng, Andrew D McRae, Raoul Daoust, Eddy Lang, Joel Turner, Jaspreet Khangura, Patrick T Fok, Maja Stachura, Baljeet Brar, Corinne M Hohl, CCEDRRN investigators, and for the Network of Canadian Emergency Researchers and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the diagnostic yield of screening patients for SARS-CoV-2 who were admitted with a diagnosis unrelated to COVID-19 and to identify risk factors for positive tests.
Design: Cohort from the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network registry.
Setting: 30 acute care hospitals across Canada.
Participants: Patients hospitalised for non-COVID-19-related diagnoses who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 between 1 March and 29 December 2020.
Main outcome: Positive nucleic acid amplification test for SARS-CoV-2.
Outcome measure: Diagnostic yield.
Results: We enrolled 15 690 consecutive eligible adults who were admitted to hospital without clinically suspected COVID-19. Among these patients, 122 tested positive for COVID-19, resulting in a diagnostic yield of 0.8% (95% CI 0.64% to 0.92%). Factors associated with a positive test included presence of fever, being a healthcare worker, having a positive household contact or institutional exposure, and living in an area with higher 7-day average incident COVID-19 cases.
Conclusions: Universal screening of hospitalised patients for COVID-19 across two pandemic waves had a low diagnostic yield and should be informed by individual-level risk assessment in addition to regional COVID-19 prevalence.
Trial registration number: NCT04702945.
Keywords: COVID-19; Diagnostic microbiology; EPIDEMIOLOGY; Organisation of health services.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Figures
References
- Puylaert CAJ, Scheijmans JCG, Borgstein ABJ, et al. . Yield of screening for COVID-19 in asymptomatic patients before elective or emergency surgery using chest CT and RT-PCR (SCOUT): multicenter study. Ann Surg 2020;272:919–24. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004218
- Sutton D, Fuchs K, D'Alton M, D’Alton M, et al. . Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 in women admitted for delivery. N Engl J Med 2020;382:2163–4. 10.1056/NEJMc2009316
- Ravani P, Saxinger L, Chandran U, et al. . COVID-19 screening of asymptomatic patients admitted through emergency departments in Alberta: a prospective quality-improvement study. CMAJ Open 2020;8:E887–94. 10.9778/cmajo.20200191
- Goldfarb IT, Diouf K, Barth WH, et al. . Universal SARS-CoV-2 testing on admission to the labor and delivery unit: low prevalence among asymptomatic obstetric patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020;41:1095–6. 10.1017/ice.2020.255
- Ossami Saidy RR, Globke B, Pratschke J, et al. . Successful implementation of preventive measures leads to low relevance of SARS‐CoV‐2 in liver transplant patients: observations from a German outpatient department. Transpl Infect Dis [Internet] 2020;22
- Gruskay JA, Dvorzhinskiy A, Konnaris MA, et al. . Universal testing for COVID-19 in essential orthopaedic surgery reveals a high percentage of asymptomatic infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020;102:1379–88. 10.2106/JBJS.20.01053
- London V, McLaren R, Atallah F, et al. . The relationship between status at presentation and outcomes among pregnant women with COVID-19. Am J Perinatol 2020;37:991–4. 10.1055/s-0040-1712164
- Bianco A, Buckley AB, Overbey J, et al. . Testing of patients and support persons for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection before scheduled deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2020;136:283–7. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003985
- Lee DD, Jung H, Lou W, et al. . The impact of COVID-19 on a large, Canadian community emergency department. West J Emerg Med 2021;22:572-579 10.5811/westjem.2021.1.50123
- Sun BC, Hsia RY, Weiss RE, et al. . Effect of emergency department crowding on outcomes of admitted patients. Ann Emerg Med 2013;61:605–11. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.10.026
- Shao F, Xu S, Ma X, et al. . In-Hospital cardiac arrest outcomes among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Resuscitation 2020;151:18–23. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.005
- Hanson KE, Caliendo AM, Arias CA, et al. . The infectious diseases Society of America guidelines on the diagnosis of COVID-19: molecular diagnostic testing. Clin Infect Dis 2021:ciab048. 10.1093/cid/ciab048
- Hohl CM, Rosychuk RJ, McRae AD, et al. . Development of the Canadian COVID-19 emergency department rapid response network population-based registry: a methodology study. CMAJ Open 2021;9:E261–70. 10.9778/cmajo.20200290
- Health Regional Archive (Public View) . [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jun 4]. Available:
- McRae AD, Hohl CM, Rosychuk RJ, et al. . Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict SARS-CoV-2 infection in emergency department patients: The CCEDRRN COVID-19 Infection Score (CCIS) [Internet]. Emergency Medicine 2021. (cited 2021 Aug 9).
- Struyf T, Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, et al. . Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19 disease.. In: Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet, 2020. . (cited 2021 Jul 26).
Source: PubMed