Validation of Marathi Version of Stroke-specific Quality of Life

Suvarna Ganvir, Maheshwari Harishch, Chetana Kunde, Suvarna Ganvir, Maheshwari Harishch, Chetana Kunde

Abstract

Background and purpose: One of the most important patient-centered outcomes in patients with stroke is quality of life. Apart from physical affection, stroke affects cognitive, emotional language along with social functioning. Stroke-specific quality of life (SSQOL) is a measure to assess the quality of life in patients with stroke. The aim of this study is to investigate the reliability and validity of Marathi version of SSQOL in patients with stroke.

Methodology: Translation of SSQOL in Marathi language was performed in accordance with the published guidelines. Validation of Marathi version of SSQOL was carried out by 130 patients with stroke with minimum 1 year of duration of stroke. Reliability was measured with the help of 36 volunteers diagnosed with stroke.

Results: There were no major changes in the translated version, except in three items. Reliability was found to be 0.82 and validity was found to be 0.93. Floor and ceiling effects were found to be 11.3% and 6.3%, respectively.

Conclusion: Marathi version of SSQOL is a valid, reliable instrument for measuring self-reported health-related quality of life in patients with stroke.

Keywords: Marathi; stroke specific quality of life; validation.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Hopman WM, Verner J. Quality of life during and after inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2003;34:801–5.
    1. Buck D, Jacoby A, Massey A, Ford G. Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke. Stroke. 2000;31:2004–10.
    1. Samsa G, Edelman D, Rothman ML, Williams GR, Lipscomb J, Matchar D, et al. Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: A general approach with illustration to the health utilities index mark II. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;15:141–55.
    1. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global burden of disease study. Lancet. 1997;349:1436–42.
    1. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Støier M, Olsen TS, et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:399–405.
    1. Zorowitz RD. Neurorehabilitation of the stroke survivor. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 1999;13:83–92.
    1. Srikanth VK, Thrift AG, Saling MM, Anderson JF, Dewey HM, Macdonell RA, et al. Increased risk of cognitive impairment 3 months after mild to moderate first-ever stroke: A community-based prospective study of nonaphasic english-speaking survivors. Stroke. 2003;34:1136–43.
    1. Kase CS, Wolf PA, Kelly-Hayes M, Kannel WB, Beiser A, D'Agostino RB, et al. Intellectual decline after stroke: The Framingham study. Stroke. 1998;29:805–12.
    1. Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Clark DO, Biller J. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke. 1999;30:1362–9.
    1. Yu DS, Lee DT, Woo J. Issues and challenges of instrument translation. West J Nurs Res. 2004;26:307–20.
    1. Williams LS, Yilmaz EY, Lopez-Yunez AM. Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity with the NIH stroke scale. Stroke. 2000;31:858–62.
    1. Muus I, Ringsberg KC. Stroke specific quality of life scale: Danish adaptation and a pilot study for testing psychometric properties. Scand J Caring Sci. 2005;19:140–7.
    1. Cid-Ruzafa J, Damián-Moreno J. Disability evaluation: Barthel's index. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 1997;71:127–37.
    1. Cruz-Cruz C, Martinez-Nuñez JM, Perez ME, Kravzov-Jinich J, Ríos-Castañeda C, Altagracia-Martinez M. Evaluation of the stroke-specific quality-of-life (SSQOL) scale in Mexico: A preliminary approach. Value Reg Issues. 2013;2:392–7.
    1. Ewert T, Stucki G. Validity of the SS-QOL in Germany and in survivors of hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:161–8.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren