Rectus Muscle Reapproximation at Cesarean Delivery and Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Deirdre J Lyell, Mariam Naqvi, Amy Wong, Renata Urban, Brendan Carvalho, Deirdre J Lyell, Mariam Naqvi, Amy Wong, Renata Urban, Brendan Carvalho

Abstract

Objective Rectus muscle reapproximation at cesarean delivery (CD) is performed frequently by some obstetricians; however, the effect on postoperative pain is unclear. To this end, we investigated whether rectus muscle reapproximation increases postoperative pain. Materials and Methods This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of women undergoing primary CD with singleton or twin pregnancy at >35 weeks' gestation. Women were randomized to rectus muscle reapproximation with three interrupted sutures or no reapproximation. Exclusion criteria were prior cesarean, prior laparotomy, vertical skin incision, active labor, chronic analgesia use, allergy to opioid or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and body mass index ≥ 40. Intra- and postoperative pain management was standardized within the study protocol. The primary outcome was a combined movement pain and opioid use score averaged over the 72-hour study period, called the Silverman integrated assessment. Movement pain scores were assessed at 24, 48, and 72 postoperative hours. Results In total, 63 women were randomized, of whom 35 underwent rectus muscle reapproximation and 28 did not. Demographic and obstetric variables were similar between groups. Silverman integrated assessment scores during the 72-hour postoperative period were higher in the rectus muscle reapproximation group (15 ± 100% vs. -31 ± 78% difference from the mean; p = 0.04). Operative times were similar between groups (63 ± 15 vs. 65 ± 15 minutes; p = 0.61), and there were no surgical complications in either group. Maternal satisfaction with analgesia at 72 hours was high in both groups (85% [73-90] rectus muscle reapproximation vs. 90% [75-100]; p = 0.16). Conclusion Rectus muscle reapproximation increased immediate postoperative pain without differences in operative time, surgical complications, or maternal satisfaction. Benefits of rectus muscle reapproximation should be weighed against increased postoperative pain, and analgesia should be planned accordingly.

Keywords: cesarean delivery; pain; rectus closure; rectus reapproximation.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient enrollment flow diagram.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.National Center for Health StatisticsAvailable at. Accessed December 9, 2015
    1. Demers S, Roberge S, Afiuni Y A, Chaillet N, Girard I, Bujold E. Survey on uterine closure and other techniques for caesarean section among Quebec's obstetrician-gynaecologists. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(04):329–333.
    1. Boissonnault J S, Blaschak M J. Incidence of diastasis recti abdominis during the childbearing year. Phys Ther. 1988;68(07):1082–1086.
    1. Spitznagle T M, Leong F C, Van Dillen L R. Prevalence of diastasis recti abdominis in a urogynecological patient population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18(03):321–328.
    1. Berghella V, Baxter J K, Chauhan S P. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(05):1607–1617.
    1. Dahlke J D, Mendez-Figueroa H, Rouse D J, Berghella V, Baxter J K, Chauhan S P. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(04):294–306.
    1. Lyell D J, Caughey A B, Hu E, Blumenfeld Y, El-Sayed Y Y, Daniels K. Rectus muscle and visceral peritoneum closure at cesarean delivery and intraabdominal adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(06):5150–5.15E7.
    1. Gordon D B, Stevenson K K, Griffie J, Muchka S, Rapp C, Ford-Roberts K. Opioid equianalgesic calculations. J Palliat Med. 1999;2(02):209–218.
    1. Silverman D G, O'Connor T Z, Brull S J. Integrated assessment of pain scores and rescue morphine use during studies of analgesic efficacy. Anesth Analg. 1993;77(01):168–170.
    1. Encarnacion B, Zlatnik M G. Cesarean delivery technique: evidence or tradition? A review of the evidence-based cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012;67(08):483–494.
    1. Dai F, Silverman D G, Chelly J E, Li J, Belfer I, Qin L. Integration of pain score and morphine consumption in analgesic clinical studies. J Pain. 2013;14(08):767–7.7E9.
    1. Hull D B, Varner M W. A randomized study of closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77(06):818–821.
    1. Højberg K E, Aagaard J, Laursen H, Diab L, Secher N J. Closure versus non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section--evaluation of pain. A randomized study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77(07):741–745.
    1. Rafique Z, Shibli K U, Russell I F, Lindow S W. A randomised controlled trial of the closure or non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section: effect on post-operative pain. BJOG. 2002;109(06):694–698.
    1. Shahin A Y, Osman A M. Parietal peritoneal closure and persistent postcesarean pain. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;104(02):135–139.
    1. Lyell D J, Caughey A B, Hu E, Daniels K. Peritoneal closure at primary cesarean delivery and adhesions. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(02):275–280.
    1. Mackeen A D, Schuster M, Berghella V. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(05):6210–6.21E12.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren