Culprit vessel revascularization first with primary use of a dedicated transradial guiding catheter to reduce door to balloon time in primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Jincheng Guo, Guozhong Wang, Zixuan Li, Zijing Liu, Yujie Wang, Senhu Wang, Yuntao Wang, Yongxia Wu, Haotian Wang, Yuping Wang, Libin Zhang, Qi Hua, Jincheng Guo, Guozhong Wang, Zixuan Li, Zijing Liu, Yujie Wang, Senhu Wang, Yuntao Wang, Yongxia Wu, Haotian Wang, Yuping Wang, Libin Zhang, Qi Hua

Abstract

Background: The effect of a single transradial guiding catheter (STGC) for culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) first on door-to-balloon (D2B) time remains unclear.

Materials and methods: Between February 2017 and July 2019, 560 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were randomized into either the STGC group (n = 280) or the control group (n = 280) according to direct culprit vessel PCI with a STGC. In the STGC group, a dedicated transraidal guiding catheter (6F either MAC3.5 or JL3.5) was used for the treatment of electrocardiogram (ECG)-guided culprit vessel first and later contralateral angiography. In the control group, a universal diagnostic catheter (5F Tiger II) was used for complete coronary angiography, followed by guiding catheter selection for culprit vessel PCI. The primary endpoint was D2B time, and the secondary endpoint included catheterization laboratory door-to-balloon (C2B), procedural, fluoroscopy times, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days.

Results: The median D2B time was significantly shorter in the STGC group compared to the control group (53.9 vs. 58.4 min; p = 0.003). The C2B, procedural, and fluoroscopy times were also shorter in the STGC group (C2B: 17.3 vs. 24.5 min, p < 0.001; procedural: 45.2 vs. 49.0 min, p = 0.012; and fluoroscopy: 9.7 vs. 11.3 min, p = 0.025). More patients achieved the goal of D2B time within 90 min (93.9% vs. 87.1%, p = 0.006) and 60 min (61.4% vs. 51.1%, p = 0.013) in the STGC group. Radial artery perforation (RAP) was significantly reduced in the STGC group compared with the control group (0.7% vs. 3.2%, P = 0.033). MACE at 30 days was similar (2.5% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.172) between the two groups.

Conclusion: ECG-guided immediate intervention on culprit vessel with a STGC can reduce D2B, C2B, procedural, and fluoroscopy times (ECG-guided Immediate Primary PCI for Culprit Vessel to Reduce Door to Device Time; NCT03272451).

Keywords: ST-elevation myocardial infarction; culprit vessel; door-to-balloon time; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Guo, Wang, Li, Liu, Wang, Wang, Wang, Wu, Wang, Wang, Zhang and Hua.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Trial flowchart. CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; ITT, intention-to-treat; PP, per-protocol.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Difference of treatment time between two groups. (A) D2B time, (B) C2B time, (C) procedural time, and (D) fluoroscopy time. C2B, catheterization laboratory door-to-balloon; D2B, door to balloon; STGC, single transradial guiding catheter.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Proportion of patients achieving door-to-balloon (D2B) target. Proportion of patients with D2B time within 90 and 60 min were significantly higher in the STGC group than in control group (p = 0.006 and p = 0.013, respectively). D2B, door-to-balloon; STGC, single transradial guiding catheter.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Median door-to-balloon (D2B) time for each operator. D2B was not significantly different between operators (p > 0.05), D2B, door-to-balloon.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Proportions of C2B time in the SO2B time. The proportion of C2B time in the SO2B time was significantly different for patients with SO2B time ≤3, 3–6, and ≥6 h (15.6% vs. 9.0% vs. 4.6%, p < 0.001, respectively). In subgroup analysis, the proportion was also significant different between the STGC group and the control group (p < 0.001, respectively). C2B, catheterization laboratory door-to-balloon; SO2B, symptom to balloon; STGC, single transradial guiding catheter.

References

    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. (2018) 39:119–77. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
    1. Foo CY, Bonsu KO, Nallamothu BK, Reid CM, Dhippayom T, Reidpath DD, et al. Coronary intervention door-to-balloon time and outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Heart. (2018) 104:1362–9. 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312517
    1. Park J, Choi KH, Lee JM, Kim HK, Hwang D, Rhee TM, et al. Prognostic implications of door-to-balloon time and onset-to-door time on mortality in patients with ST -segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Heart Assoc. (2019) 8:e012188. 10.1161/JAHA.119.012188
    1. Pulia M, Salman T, O’Connell TF, Balasubramanian N, Gaines R, Shah F, et al. Impact of emergency medical services activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory and a 24 h/Day in-hospital interventional cardiology team on treatment times (Door to Balloon and Medical Contact to Balloon) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. (2019) 124:39–43. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.03.046
    1. Di Santo P, Simard T, Wells GA, Jung RG, Ramirez FD, Boland P, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. (2021) 14:e009994. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009994
    1. Shroff AR, Gulati R, Drachman DE, Feldman DN, Gilchrist IC, Kaul P, et al. SCAI expert consensus statement update on best practices for transradial angiography and intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. (2020) 95:245–52. 10.1002/ccd.28672
    1. Singh S, Singh M, Grewal N, Khosla S. The fluoroscopy time, door to balloon time, contrast volume use and prevalence of vascular access site failure with transradial versus transfemoral approach in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. (2015) 16:491–7. 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.08.013
    1. Le May M, Wells G, So D, Chong AY, Dick A, Froeschl M, et al. Safety and efficacy of femoral access vs radial access in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the SAFARI-STEMI randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. (2020) 5:126–34. 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4852
    1. Guo J, Chen W, Wang G, Liu ZJ, Hao MH, Xu M, et al. Safety and efficacy of using a single transradial MAC guiding catheter for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. J Interv Cardiol. (2017) 30:33–42. 10.1111/joic.12346
    1. Lee KH, Torii S, Oguri M, Miyaji T, Kiyooka T, Ono Y, et al. Reduction of door-to-balloon time in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction by single-catheter primary percutaneous coronary intervention method. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. (2022) 99:314–21. 10.1002/ccd.29797
    1. Chow J, Tan CH, Tin AS, Ong SH, Tan VH, Goh YS, et al. Feasibility of transradial coronary angiography and intervention using a single Ikari left guiding catheter for ST elevation myocardial infarction. J Interv Cardiol. (2012) 25:235–44. 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00710.x
    1. Couture EL, Berube S, Dalery K, Gervais A, Harvey R, Nguyen M, et al. Culprit vessel revascularization prior to diagnostic angiography as a strategy to reduce delays in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity-matched analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. (2016) 9:e003510. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003510
    1. Han Y, Guo J, Zheng Y, Zang HY, Su X, Wang Y, et al. Bivalirudin vs heparin with or without tirofiban during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: the BRIGHT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. (2015) 313:1336–46. 10.1001/jama2015.2323
    1. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedettoet U. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. (2019) 40:87–165. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394
    1. Huded CP, Kumar A, Johnson M, Abdallah M, Ballout JA, Kravitz K, et al. Incremental prognostic value of guideline-directed medical therapy, transradial access, and door-to-balloon time on outcomes in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. (2019) 12:e007101. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007101
    1. Foo CY, Andrianopoulos N, Brennan A, Roquelaure Y, Descathaet A. Re-examining the effect of door-to-balloon delay on STEMI outcomes in the context of unmeasured confounders: a retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:19978. 10.1038/s41598-019-56353-7
    1. Nallamothu BK, Normand SL, Wang Y, Hofer TP, Brush JE, Jr., Messenger JC, et al. Relation between door-to-balloon times and mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention over time: a retrospective study. Lancet. (2015) 385:1114–22. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61932-2
    1. McLaren JTT, Kapoor M, Yi SL, Chartier LB. Using ECG-To-activation time to assess emergency physicians’ diagnostic time for acute coronary occlusion. J Emerg Med. (2021) 60:25–34. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.09.028
    1. Kontos MC, Gunderson MR, Zegre-Hemsey JK, Lange DC, French WJ, Henryet TD. Prehospital activation of hospital resources (PreAct) ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): a standardized approach to prehospital activation and direct to the catheterization laboratory for STEMI recommendations from the american heart association’s mission: lifeline program. J Am Heart Assoc. (2020) 9:e011963. 10.1161/JAHA.119.011963
    1. Jacobs AK, Ali MJ, Best PJ, Bieniarz MC, Bufalino VJ, French WJ, et al. Systems of care for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. (2021) 144:e310–27. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001025
    1. Chyrchel M, Bartus S, Dziewierz A, Legutko J, Kleczyński P, Januszek R, et al. Safety and efficacy of four different diagnostic catheter curves dedicated to one-catheter technique of transradial coronaro-angiography-prospective, Randomized Pilot study. TRACT 1: trans RAdial coronary angiography trial 1. J Clin Med. (2021) 10:4722. 10.3390/jcm10204722
    1. Mason PJ, Shah B, Tamis-Holland JE, Bittl JA, Cohen MG, Safirstein J, et al. An update on radial artery access and best practices for transradial coronary angiography and intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. (2018) 11:e000035. 10.1161/HCV0000000000000035
    1. Alushi B, Lauten A, Ndrepepa G, Leistner DM, Kufner S, Xhepa E, et al. Procedural and clinical performance of dual- versus single-catheter strategy for transradial coronary angiography: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. (2020) 96:276–82. 10.1002/ccd.28458
    1. Torii S, Fujii T, Murakami T, Nakazawa G, Ijichi T, Nakano M, et al. Impact of a single universal guiding catheter on door-to-balloon time in primary transradial coronary intervention for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. (2017) 32:114–9. 10.1007/s12928-016-0395-z
    1. Roberts EB, Wood A. Use of a single Q guide catheter for complete assessment and treatment of both coronary arteries via radial access during acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: a review of 40 consecutive cases. J Interv Cardiol. (2011) 24:389–96. 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00655.x
    1. Moon KW, Kim JH, Kim JY, Jung MH, Kim GH, Yoo KD, et al. Reducing needle-to-balloon time by using a single guiding catheter during transradial primary coronary intervention. J Interv Cardiol. (2012) 25:330–6. 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00717.x
    1. Malaiapan Y, Leung M, Ahmar W, Hutchison AW, Prasad S, Katticaran T, et al. Guideline recommended door-to-balloon time can be achieved in transradial primary PCI–the usefulness of a dedicated radial guide catheter. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. (2013) 14:27–31. 10.1016/j.carrev.2012.10.012
    1. Plourde G, Abdelaal E, Bataille Y, MacHaalany J, Déry JP, Déry U, et al. Effect on door-to-balloon time of immediate transradial percutaneous coronary intervention on culprit lesion in ST-elevation myocardial infarction compared to diagnostic angiography followed by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. (2013) 111:836–40. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.11.059
    1. Sandoval Y, Bell MR, Gulati R. Transradial artery access complications. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. (2019) 12:e007386. 119.007386 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS
    1. Vives-Borras M, Maestro A, Garcia-Hernando V, Jorgensen D, Ferrero-Gregori A, Moustafa AH, et al. Electrocardiographic distinction of left circumflexand right coronary artery occlusion in patients with inferior acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. (2019) 123:1019–25. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.12.026
    1. Huang X, Ramdhany SK, Zhang Y, Yuan Z, Mintz GS, Guo N. New ST-segment algorithms to determine culprit artery location in acute inferior myocardial infarction. Am J Emerg Med. (2016) 34:1772–8. 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.06.005
    1. Zeymer U, Ludman P, Danchin N, Kala P, Laroche C, Sadeghi M, et al. Reperfusion therapies and in-hospital outcomes for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Europe: the ACVC-EAPCI EORP STEMI Registry of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. (2021) 42:4536–49. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab342
    1. Lemaire A, Vagaonescu T, Ikegami H, Volk L, Verghis N, Lee LY. Delay in coronary artery bypass grafting for STEMI patients improves hospital morbidity and mortality. J Cardiothorac Surg. (2020) 15:86. 10.1186/s13019-020-01134-x
    1. Thielmann M, Wendt D, Slottosch I, Welp H, Schiller W, Tsagakis K, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with acute coronary syndromes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a current report from the north-rhine westphalia surgical myocardial infarction registry. J Am Heart Assoc. (2021) 10:e021182. 10.1161/JAHA.121.021182
    1. Ahmad Y, Howard JP, Arnold A, Prasad M, Seligman H, Cook CM, et al. Complete revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials. . J Am Heart Assoc. (2020) 9:e015263. 10.1161/JAHA.119.015263
    1. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Ottervanger JP, Antman EM. Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: every minute of delay counts. Circulation. (2004) 109:1223–5. 10.1161/01CIR.0000121424.76486.20
    1. Zandecki L, Sadowski M, Janion M, Kurzawski J, Gierlotka M, Poloński L, et al. Survival benefit from recent changes in management of men and women with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary interventions. Cardiol J. (2019) 26:459–68. 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0057
    1. Meisel SR, Kleiner-Shochat M, Abu-Fanne R, Frimerman A, Danon A, Minha S, et al. Direct admission of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction to the catheterization laboratory shortens pain-to-balloon and door-to-balloon time intervals but only the pain-to-balloon interval impacts short- and long-term mortality. J Am Heart Assoc. (2021) 10:e018343. 10.1161/JAHA.120.018343
    1. Kapur NK, Davila CD. Timing, timing, timing: the emerging concept of the ‘door to support’ time for cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. (2017) 38:3532–4. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx406

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren