Sex and ApoE genotype differences in treatment response to two doses of intranasal insulin in adults with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease

Amy Claxton, Laura D Baker, Charles W Wilkinson, Emily H Trittschuh, Darla Chapman, G Stennis Watson, Brenna Cholerton, Stephen R Plymate, Matthew Arbuckle, Suzanne Craft, Amy Claxton, Laura D Baker, Charles W Wilkinson, Emily H Trittschuh, Darla Chapman, G Stennis Watson, Brenna Cholerton, Stephen R Plymate, Matthew Arbuckle, Suzanne Craft

Abstract

A previous clinical trial demonstrated that four months of treatment with intranasal insulin improves cognition and function for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but prior studies suggest that response to insulin treatment may differ by sex and ApoE ε4 carriage. Thus, responder analyses using repeated measures analysis of covariance were completed on the trial's 104 participants with MCI or AD who received either placebo or 20 or 40 IU of insulin for 4 months, administered by a nasal delivery device. Results indicate that men and women with memory impairment responded differently to intranasal insulin treatment. On delayed story memory, men and women showed cognitive improvement when taking 20 IU of intranasal insulin, but only men showed cognitive improvement for the 40 IU dose. The sex difference was most apparent for ApoE ε4 negative individuals. For the 40 IU dose, ApoE ε4 negative men improved while ApoE ε4 negative women worsened. Their ApoE ε4 positive counterparts remained cognitively stable. This sex effect was not detected in functional measures. However, functional abilities were relatively preserved for women on either dose of intranasal insulin compared with men. Unlike previous studies with young adults, neither men nor women taking intranasal insulin exhibited a significant change in weight over 4 months of treatment.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean change scores for delayed story recall from baseline to month 4, with standard errors of the mean (error bars), by sex and treatment group. Placebo indicates saline condition, Low Dose indicates 20 IU intranasal insulin, High Dose indicates 40 IU intranasal insulin. Note: A higher score represents cognitive improvement over time. *Significant treatment effect, p = 0.02. **Significant sex×treatment Interaction, p = 0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean change scores for ADCS-ADL from baseline to month 4, with standard errors of the mean (error bars), by sex and treatment group. Placebo indicates saline condition, Low Dose indicates 20 IU intranasal insulin, High Dose indicates 40 IU intranasal insulin. Note: A higher score represents functional improvement over time; scores are adjusted for age. *Significant sex×treatment interaction, p = 0.01. **Significant sex×treatment interaction, p

Figure 3

Mean change scores for delayed…

Figure 3

Mean change scores for delayed story recall from baseline to month 4, with…

Figure 3
Mean change scores for delayed story recall from baseline to month 4, with standard errors of the mean (error bars), by sex, treatment group, and ApoE 4 carriage. Placebo indicates saline condition, Low Dose indicates 20 IU intranasal insulin, High Dose indicates 40 IU intranasal insulin. Note: A higher score represents improvement over time. *Significantly improved over placebo (treatment effect). **Significant treatment×sex×ApoE status interaction, p
Similar articles
Cited by
Publication types
MeSH terms
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean change scores for delayed story recall from baseline to month 4, with standard errors of the mean (error bars), by sex, treatment group, and ApoE 4 carriage. Placebo indicates saline condition, Low Dose indicates 20 IU intranasal insulin, High Dose indicates 40 IU intranasal insulin. Note: A higher score represents improvement over time. *Significantly improved over placebo (treatment effect). **Significant treatment×sex×ApoE status interaction, p

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren