A non-linear pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of metformin in healthy volunteers: An open-label, parallel group, randomized clinical study

Hyewon Chung, Jaeseong Oh, Seo Hyun Yoon, Kyung-Sang Yu, Joo-Youn Cho, Jae-Yong Chung, Hyewon Chung, Jaeseong Oh, Seo Hyun Yoon, Kyung-Sang Yu, Joo-Youn Cho, Jae-Yong Chung

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to explore the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationship of metformin on glucose levels after the administration of 250 mg and 1000 mg of metformin in healthy volunteers.

Methods: A total of 20 healthy male volunteers were randomized to receive two doses of either a low dose (375 mg followed by 250 mg) or a high dose (1000 mg followed by 1000 mg) of metformin at 12-h intervals. The pharmacodynamics of metformin was assessed using oral glucose tolerance tests before and after metformin administration. The PK parameters after the second dose were evaluated through noncompartmental analyses. Four single nucleotide polymorphisms in MATE1, MATE2-K, and OCT2 were genotyped, and their effects on PK characteristics were additionally evaluated.

Results: The plasma exposure of metformin increased as the metformin dose increased. The mean values for the area under the concentration-time curve from dosing to 12 hours post-dose (AUC0-12h) were 3160.4 and 8808.2 h·μg/L for the low- and high-dose groups, respectively. Non-linear relationships were found between the glucose-lowering effect and PK parameters with a significant inverse trend at high metformin exposure. The PK parameters were comparable among subjects with the genetic polymorphisms.

Conclusions: This study showed a non-linear PK-PD relationship on plasma glucose levels after the administration of metformin. The inverse relationship between systemic exposure and the glucose-lowering effect at a high exposure indicates a possible role for the intestines as an action site for metformin.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02712619.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. CONSORT flowchart.
Fig 1. CONSORT flowchart.
Fig 2. Mean concentration profile of metformin…
Fig 2. Mean concentration profile of metformin administered at 250 mg (Δ) and 1000 mg (●).
(Inlet: log-linear scale; error bars present standard deviation).
Fig 3. Relationships between pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters after…
Fig 3. Relationships between pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters after metformin administration at 250 mg (triangle) and 1000 mg (circle). Reduction in (a) AUG0-3h, (b) Gmax, and (c) PP2 versus AUC0-12h; reduction in (d) AUG0-3h, (e) Gmax, and (f) PP2 versus Cmax.
(The solid lines and dashed lines represent the linear and quadratic models, respectively. The black circle represents data included in the linear regression at high exposure. P-values are from the F-tests, and r2 represents the coefficient of determination.).

References

    1. American Diabetes Association. 7. Approaches to glycemic treatment. Diabetes care. 2016;39 (Suppl 1):S52–S9. doi: .
    1. Bailey CJ, Turner RC. Metformin. The New England journal of medicine. 1996;334(9):574–9. doi: .
    1. Grant PJ. The effects of high- and medium-dose metformin therapy on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type II diabetes. Diabetes care. 1996;19(1):64–6. .
    1. McIntyre HD, Ma A, Bird DM, Paterson CA, Ravenscroft PJ, Cameron DP. Metformin increases insulin sensitivity and basal glucose clearance in type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus. Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine. 1991;21(5):714–9. .
    1. Garber AJ, Duncan TG, Goodman AM, Mills DJ, Rohlf JL. Efficacy of metformin in type II diabetes: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response trial. The American journal of medicine. 1997;103(6):491–7. .
    1. Hong Y, Rohatagi S, Habtemariam B, Walker JR, Schwartz SL, Mager DE. Population exposure-response modeling of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of clinical pharmacology. 2008;48(6):696–707. doi: .
    1. Lee SH, Kwon KI. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling for the relationship between glucose-lowering effect and plasma concentration of metformin in volunteers. Archives of pharmacal research. 2004;27(7):806–10. .
    1. He R, Zhang D, Lu W, Zheng T, Wan L, Liu F, et al. SLC47A1 gene rs2289669 G>A variants enhance the glucose-lowering effect of metformin via delaying its excretion in Chinese type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2015;109(1):57–63. doi: .
    1. Tkac I, Klimcakova L, Javorsky M, Fabianova M, Schroner Z, Hermanova H, et al. Pharmacogenomic association between a variant in SLC47A1 gene and therapeutic response to metformin in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2013;15(2):189–91. doi: .
    1. Chung JY, Cho SK, Kim TH, Kim KH, Jang GH, Kim CO, et al. Functional characterization of MATE2-K genetic variants and their effects on metformin pharmacokinetics. Pharmacogenet Genom. 2013;23(7):365–73. doi:
    1. Yoon H, Cho HY, Yoo HD, Kim SM, Lee YB. Influences of organic cation transporter polymorphisms on the population pharmacokinetics of metformin in healthy subjects. The AAPS journal. 2013;15(2):571–80. doi: .
    1. Christensen MM, Hojlund K, Hother-Nielsen O, Stage TB, Damkier P, Beck-Nielsen H, et al. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of metformin is independent of the OCT1 genotype in healthy volunteers. European journal of clinical pharmacology. 2015;71(6):691–7. doi: .
    1. Chiou WL. Critical evaluation of the potential error in pharmacokinetic studies of using the linear trapezoidal rule method for the calculation of the area under the plasma level—time curve. Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics. 1978;6(6):539–46. .
    1. Le Floch JP, Escuyer P, Baudin E, Baudon D, Perlemuter L. Blood glucose area under the curve. Methodological aspects. Diabetes care. 1990;13(2):172–5. .
    1. Lalonde RL. Pharmacodynamics In: Burton ME, Shaw LM, Schentag JJ, Evans WE, editors. Applied Pharmacokinetics & Pharmacodynamics: Principles of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 62–4.
    1. Rao N, Chou T, Ventura D, Abramowitz W. Investigation of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between memantine and glyburide/metformin in healthy young subjects: a single-center, multiple-dose, open-label study. Clinical therapeutics. 2005;27(10):1596–606. doi: .
    1. Nakamaru Y, Hayashi Y, Davies M, Jurgen Heuer H, Hisanaga N, Akimoto K. Investigation of Potential Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Teneligliptin and Metformin in Steady-state Conditions in Healthy Adults. Clinical therapeutics. 2015;37(9):2007–18. doi: .
    1. El Messaoudi S, Russel FG, Colbers A, Bandell CC, van den Broek PH, Burger DM, et al. The effect of dipyridamole on the pharmacokinetics of metformin: a randomized crossover study in healthy volunteers. European journal of clinical pharmacology. 2016;72(6):725–30. doi: .
    1. Marathe PH, Wen Y, Norton J, Greene DS, Barbhaiya RH, Wilding IR. Effect of altered gastric emptying and gastrointestinal motility on metformin absorption. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2000;50(4):325–32. doi: .
    1. Stepensky D, Friedman M, Raz I, Hoffman A. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of the glucose-lowering effect of metformin in diabetic rats reveals first-pass pharmacodynamic effect. Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals. 2002;30(8):861–8. .
    1. Duca FA, Cote CD, Rasmussen BA, Zadeh-Tahmasebi M, Rutter GA, Filippi BM, et al. Metformin activates a duodenal Ampk-dependent pathway to lower hepatic glucose production in rats. Nature medicine. 2015;21(5):506–11. doi: .
    1. Buse JB, DeFronzo RA, Rosenstock J, Kim T, Burns C, Skare S, et al. The Primary Glucose-Lowering Effect of Metformin Resides in the Gut, Not the Circulation: Results From Short-term Pharmacokinetic and 12-Week Dose-Ranging Studies. Diabetes care. 2016;39(2):198–205. doi: .
    1. Cook MN, Girman CJ, Stein PP, Alexander CM. Initial monotherapy with either metformin or sulphonylureas often fails to achieve or maintain current glycaemic goals in patients with Type 2 diabetes in UK primary care. Diabetic medicine: a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2007;24(4):350–8. doi: .
    1. Graham GG, Punt J, Arora M, Day RO, Doogue MP, Duong JK, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of metformin. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 2011;50(2):81–98. doi: .
    1. Cho SK, Kim CO, Park ES, Chung JY. Verapamil decreases the glucose-lowering effect of metformin in healthy volunteers. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2014;78(6):1426–32. doi: .
    1. Zhou Y, Ye W, Wang Y, Jiang Z, Meng X, Xiao Q, et al. Genetic variants of OCT1 influence glycemic response to metformin in Han Chinese patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus in Shanghai. International journal of clinical and experimental pathology. 2015;8(8):9533–42. .
    1. Goswami S, Yee SW, Stocker S, Mosley JD, Kubo M, Castro R, et al. Genetic variants in transcription factors are associated with the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metformin. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. 2014;96(3):370–9. doi: .
    1. Tkac I, Javorsky M, Klimcakova L, Zidzik J, Gala I, Babjakova E, et al. A pharmacogenetic association between a variation in calpain 10 (CAPN10) gene and the response to metformin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. European journal of clinical pharmacology. 2015;71(1):59–63. doi: .

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren