Measuring treatment effects on dual-task performance: a framework for research and clinical practice

Prudence Plummer, Gail Eskes, Prudence Plummer, Gail Eskes

Abstract

The relevance of dual-task walking to everyday ambulation is widely acknowledged, and numerous studies have demonstrated that dual-task interference can significantly impact recovery of functional walking in people with neurological disorders. The magnitude and direction of dual-task interference is influenced by the interaction between the two tasks, including how individuals spontaneously prioritize their attention. Therefore, to accurately interpret and characterize dual-task interference and identify changes over time, it is imperative to evaluate single and dual-task performance in both tasks, as well as the tasks relative to each other. Yet, reciprocal dual-task effects (DTE) are frequently ignored. The purpose of this perspective paper is to present a framework for measuring treatment effects on dual-task interference, specifically taking into account the interactions between the two tasks and how this can provide information on whether overall dual-task capacity has improved or a different attentional strategy has been adopted. In discussing the clinical implications of using this framework, we provide specific examples of using this method and provide some explicit recommendations for research and clinical practice.

Keywords: attention allocation; capacity sharing; cognition; cognitive-motor interference; gait rehabilitation; physical therapy; task prioritization.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of conceptual model for characterizing patterns of cognitive-motor dual-task interference. Figure is from Plummer et al. (2014), and adapted from conceptual framework of Plummer et al. (2013).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plots showing interaction between two tasks and the patterns of dual-task interference pre and post intervention. DTE refers to Dual-task effect. DTEg is relative DTE on gait measure; DTEc is relative dual-task effect on cognitive measure. (A) Pre = mutual interference, post = improved gait interference (no change in cognitive interference); (B) Pre = mutual interference, post = improved gait interference (with improved cognitive interference); (C) Pre = gait interference with cognitive-priority trade off, post = improved gait interference (no change in cognitive DTE); (D) Pre = mutual interference, post = improved gait interference at cost to cognitive interference (worsened), therefore, no improvement but a change in strategy for dual-task performance. Data are hypothetical.

References

    1. Abenethy B. (1988). Dual-task methodology and motor skills research: some applications and methodological constraints. J. Hum. Mov. Stud. 14, 101–132.
    1. Agmon M., Kelly V. E., Logsdon R. G., Nguyen H., Belza B. (2015). The effects of enhancefitness (EF) training on dual-task walking in older adults. J. Appl. Gerontol. 34, NP128–NP142. 10.1177/0733464812465921
    1. Al-Yahya E., Dawes H., Smith L., Dennis A., Howells K., Cockburn J. (2011). Cognitive motor interference while walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35, 715–728. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.008
    1. An H. J., Kim J. I., Kim Y. R., Lee K. B., Kim D. J., Yoo K. T., et al. . (2014). The effect of various dual task training methods with gait on the balance and gait of patients with chronic stroke. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 26, 1287–1291. 10.1589/jpts.26.1287
    1. Aström M., Adolfsson R., Asplund K. (1993). Major depression in stroke patients: a 3-year longitudinal study. Stroke 24, 976–982. 10.1161/01.str.24.7.976
    1. Bond M. J., Clark M. S., Smith D. S., Harris R. D. (1995). Lifestyle activities of the elderly: composition and determinants. Disabil. Rehabil. 17, 63–69. 10.3109/09638289509166629
    1. Brauer S. G., Morris M. E. (2010). Can people with Parkinson’s disease improve dual tasking when walking? Gait Posture 31, 229–233. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.011
    1. Brauer S. G., Woollacott M. H., Lamont R., Clewett S., O’sullivan J., Silburn P., et al. . (2011). Single and dual task gait training in people with Parkinson’s disease: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 11:90. 10.1186/1471-2377-11-90
    1. Godefroy O., Duhamel A., Leclerc X., Saint Michel T., Hénon H., Leys D. (1998). Brain-behaviour relationships. Some models and related statistical procedures for the study of brain-damaged patients. Brain 121(Pt 8), 1545–1556. 10.1093/brain/121.8.1545
    1. Kelly V. E., Eusterbrock A. J., Shumway-Cook A. (2012). A review of dual-task walking deficits in people with Parkinson’s disease: motor and cognitive contributions, mechanisms and clinical implications. Parkinsons Dis. 2012:918719. 10.1155/2012/918719
    1. Kelly V. E., Janke A. A., Shumway-Cook A. (2010). Effects of instructed focus and task difficulty on concurrent walking and cognitive task performance in healthy young adults. Exp. Brain Res. 207, 65–73. 10.1007/s00221-010-2429-6
    1. Meyer D. E., Kieras D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: part 1. basic mechanisms. Psychol. Rev. 104, 3–65. 10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.3
    1. Miller J., Ulrich R., Rolke B. (2009). On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies. Cogn. Psychol. 58, 273–310. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.003
    1. Pashler H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 10, 358–377. 10.1037//0096-1523.10.3.358
    1. Pashler H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol. Bull. 116, 220–244. 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
    1. Peirone E., Goria P. F., Anselmino A. (2014). A dual-task home-based rehabilitation programme for improving balance control in patients with acquired brain injury: a single-blind, randomized controlled pilot study. Clin. Rehabil. 28, 329–338. 10.1177/0269215513501527
    1. Perry J., Garrett M., Gronley J. K., Mulroy S. J. (1995). Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 26, 982–989. 10.1161/01.str.26.6.982
    1. Plummer P., Eskes G., Wallace S., Giuffrida C., Fraas M., Campbell G., et al. . (2013). Cognitive-motor interference during functional mobility after stroke: state of the science and implications for future research. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 94, 2565–2574. 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.002
    1. Plummer P., Villalobos R. M., Vayda M. S., Moser M., Johnson E. (2014). Feasibility of dual-task gait training for community-dwelling adults after stroke: a case series. Stroke Res. Treat. 2014:538602. 10.1155/2014/538602
    1. Plummer P., Zukowski L. A., Giuliani C., Hall A. M., Zurakowski D. (2015). Effects of physical exercise interventions on gait-related dual-task interference in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gerontology [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1159/000371577
    1. Plummer-D’Amato P., Kyvelidou A., Sternad D., Najafi B., Villalobos R. M., Zurakowski D. (2012). Training dual-task walking in community-dwelling adults within 1 year of stroke: a protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 12:129. 10.1186/1471-2377-12-129
    1. Roos M. A., Rudolph K. S., Reisman D. S. (2012). The structure of walking activity in people after stroke compared with older adults without disability: a cross-sectional study. Phys. Ther. 92, 1141–1147. 10.2522/ptj.20120034
    1. Tombu M., Jolicoeur P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 29, 3–18. 10.1037//0096-1523.29.1.3
    1. Tombu M., Jolicoeur P. (2005). Testing the predictions of the central capacity sharing model. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 790–802. 10.1037/0096-1523.31.4.790
    1. Yildiz A., Beste C. (2014). Parallel and serial processing in dual-tasking differentially involves mechanisms in the striatum and the lateral prefrontal cortex. Brain Struct. Funct. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1007/s00429-014-0847-0
    1. Yogev-Seligmann G., Hausdorff J. M., Giladi N. (2012). Do we always prioritize balance when walking? Towards an integrated model of task prioritization. Mov. Disord. 27, 765–770. 10.1002/mds.24963

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren