A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of breath powered nasal delivery of sumatriptan powder (AVP-825) in the treatment of acute migraine (The TARGET Study)

Roger K Cady, Peter J McAllister, Egilius L H Spierings, John Messina, Jennifer Carothers, Per G Djupesland, Ramy A Mahmoud, Roger K Cady, Peter J McAllister, Egilius L H Spierings, John Messina, Jennifer Carothers, Per G Djupesland, Ramy A Mahmoud

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of AVP-825, a drug-device combination of low-dose sumatriptan powder (22 mg loaded dose) delivered intranasally through a targeted Breath Powered device vs an identical device containing lactose powder (placebo device) in the treatment of migraine headache.

Background: Early treatment of migraine headaches is associated with improved outcome, but medication absorption after oral delivery may be delayed in migraineurs because of reduced gastric motility. Sumatriptan powder administered with an innovative, closed-palate, Bi-Directional, Breath Powered intranasal delivery mechanism is efficiently absorbed across the nasal mucosa and produces fast absorption into the circulation. Results from a previously conducted placebo-controlled study of AVP-825 showed a high degree of headache relief with an early onset of action (eg, 74% AVP-825 vs 38% placebo device at 1 hour, P<.01).

Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in adults with a history of migraine with or without aura, participants were randomized via computer-generated lists to AVP-825 or placebo device to treat a single migraine headache of moderate or severe intensity. The primary endpoint was headache relief (defined as reduction of headache pain intensity from severe or moderate migraine headache to mild or none) at 2 hours post-dose.

Results: Two hundred and thirty patients (116 AVP-825 and 114 placebo device) were randomized, of whom 223 (112 and 111, respectively) experienced a qualifying migraine headache (their next migraine headache that reached moderate or severe intensity). A significantly greater proportion of AVP-825 patients reported headache relief at 2 hours post-dose compared with those using the placebo device (68% vs 45%, P=.002, odds ratio 2.53, 95% confidence interval [1.45, 4.42]). Between-group differences in headache relief were evident as early as 15 minutes, reached statistical significance at 30 minutes post-dose (42% vs 27%, P=.03), and were sustained at 24 hours (44% vs 24%, P=.002) and 48 hours (34% vs 20%, P=.01). Thirty-four percent of patients treated with AVP-825 were pain-free at 2 hours compared with 17% using the placebo device (P=.008). More AVP-825 patients reported meaningful pain relief (patient interpretation) of migraine within 2 hours of treatment vs placebo device (70% vs 45%, P<.001), and fewer required rescue medication (37% vs 52%, P=.02). Total migraine freedom (patients with no headache, nausea, phonophobia, photophobia, or vomiting) reached significance following treatment with AVP-825 at 1 hour (19% vs 9%; P=.04). There were no serious adverse events (AEs), and no systemic AEs occurred in more than one patient. Chest pain or pressure was not reported, and only one patient taking AVP-825 reported mild paresthesia. No other triptan sensations were reported.

Conclusions: Targeted delivery of a low-dose of sumatriptan powder via a novel, closed-palate, Breath Powered, intranasal device (AVP-825) provided fast relief of moderate or severe migraine headache in adults that reached statistical significance over placebo by 30 minutes. The treatment was well tolerated with a low incidence of systemic AEs.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01462812.

Keywords: AVP-825; Bi-Directional nasal delivery; Breath Powered nasal delivery; intranasal delivery; migraine; sumatriptan powder.

© 2014 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Gamma camera image of deposition 2 minutes after delivery of a solution of 99mTcO4 in saline using a conventional liquid spray device (A) and 99mTc-labeled lactose powder delivered using the Breath Powered device (B). The image of the nasal cavity is superimposed on the corresponding sagittal MRI section. The images were from the same subject after each method of administration.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Patient disposition. The Safety Analysis Dataset includes all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. The Full Analysis Dataset includes all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug and recorded at least one post-treatment assessment of pain severity.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Patients with headache relief up to 120 minutes and sustained relief at 24 and 48 hours (FAS). *P < .05;†P < .01;‡P < .001. Headache relief  =  reduction from severe (grade 3) or moderate (grade 2) headache pain to mild (grade 1) headache pain or none (grade 0). Sustained relief at 24 or 48 hours was calculated for patients with headache relief at 120 minutes and required that patients had no recurrence of headache, or rescue medication usage during that timeframe.

References

    1. Thorlund K, Mills EJ, Wu P. Comparative efficacy of triptans for the abortive treatment of migraine: A multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis. Cephalalgia. 2014;34:258–267.
    1. Aurora SK, Kori SH, Barrodale P, McDonald SA, Haseley D. Gastric stasis in migraine: More than just a paroxysmal abnormality during a migraine attack. Headache. 2006;46:57–63.
    1. Silberstein SD, Marcus DA. Sumatriptan: Treatment across the full spectrum of migraine. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013;14:1659–1667.
    1. Rapoport A. New frontiers in headache therapy. Neurol Sci. 2011;32(Suppl. 1):S105–S109.
    1. Rapoport AM. The therapeutic future in headache. Neurol Sci. 2012;33(Suppl. 1):S119–S125.
    1. Djupesland PG, Skretting A. Nasal deposition and clearance in man: Comparison of a bidirectional powder device and a traditional liquid spray pump. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2012;25:280–289.
    1. Djupesland PG, Skretting A, Winderen M, Holand T. Breath actuated device improves delivery to target sites beyond the nasal valve. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:466–472.
    1. Aggrawal R, Cardozo A, Homer JJ. The assessment of topical nasal drug distribution. Clin Otolaryngol. 2004;29:201–205.
    1. Duquesnoy C, Mamet JP, Sumner D, Fuseau E. Comparative clinical pharmacokinetics of single doses of sumatriptan following subcutaneous, oral, rectal and intranasal administration. Eur J Pharm Sci. 1998;6:99–104.
    1. Obaidi M, Offman E, Messina J, Carothers J, Djupesland PG, Mahmoud RA. Improved pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan with Breath Powered nasal delivery of sumatriptan powder. Headache. 2013;53:1323–1333.
    1. Djupesland PG, Messina JC, Mahmoud RA. Breath powered nasal delivery: A new route to rapid headache relief. Headache. 2013;53(Suppl. 2):72–84.
    1. Luthringer R, Djupesland PG, Sheldrake CD. Rapid absorption of sumatriptan powder and effects on glyceryl trinitrate model of headache following intranasal delivery using a novel bi-directional device. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2009;61:1219–1228.
    1. Djupesland PG, Docekal P Czech Migraine Investigators Group. Intranasal sumatriptan powder delivered by a novel breath-actuated bi-directional device for the acute treatment of migraine: A randomised, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:933–942.
    1. Djupesland PG, Skretting A, Windern M, Holand T. A novel concept for nasal delivery of aerosols can prevent lung inhalation. Aerosol Med. 2004;17:249–259.
    1. 2013. MAXALT (rizatriptan benzoate) tablets [Prescribing Information], Merck & Co., Inc. (Whitehouse Station, NJ) (Accessed February 28, 2014)
    1. 2013. RELPAX (eletriptan hydrobromide) tablets [Prescribing Information]. Roerig, Division of Pfizer Inc. (New York, NY). (Accessed February 28, 2014)
    1. FROVA (frovatriptan succinate) tablets [Prescribing Information] 2013. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Malvern, PA) .
    1. Goadsby PJ. Therapeutic prospects for migraine. Ann Neurol. 2013;74:423–434.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Zanchin G, Geraud G. Early vs non-early intervention in acute migraine-“Act when Mild (AwM).” A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of almotriptan. Cephalalgia. 2008;28:383–391.
    1. AMERGE (naratriptan hydrochloride) tablets [Prescribing Information] 2013. GlaxoSmithKline (Research Triangle Park, NC). (Accessed February 28, 2014)
    1. ZOMIG (zolmitriptan) nasal spray [Prescribing Information] 2013. Astrazeneca, distributed by Impax Pharmaceuticals (Hayward, CA). (Accessed February 28, 2014)
    1. ZOMIG (zolmitriptan) tablets [Prescribing Information] 2012. Astrazeneca, distributed by Impax Pharmaceuticals (Hayward, CA). (Accessed February 28, 2014)
    1. Tepper SJ. Clinical implications for breath-powered powder sumatriptan intranasal treatment. Headache. 2013;53:1341–1349.
    1. IMITREX (sumatriptan succinate) Injection [Prescribing Information] 2012. GlaxoSmithKline (Research Triangle Park, NC) .
    1. Djupesland PG. Nasal drug delivery devices: Characteristics and performance in a clinical perspective-a review. Drug Deliv Trans Res. 2013;3:42–62.
    1. Illum L. Nasal drug delivery – Possibilities, problems and solutions. J Control Release. 2003;87:187–198.
    1. Ivanusic JJ, Kwok MM, Jennings EA. Peripheral targets of 5-HT(1D) receptor immunoreactive trigeminal ganglion neurons. Headache. 2011;51:744–751.
    1. Ivanusic JJ, Kwok MM, Ahn AH, Jennings EA. 5-HT(1D) receptor immunoreactivity in the sphenopalatine ganglion: Implications for the efficacy of triptans in the treatment of autonomic signs associated with cluster headache. Headache. 2011;51:392–402.
    1. Djupesland PG, Messina JC, Mahmoud RA. The nasal approach to delivering treatment for brain diseases – An anatomic, physiologic, and delivery technology overview. Ther Deliv. 2014;5:709–733.
    1. Goadsby PJ. Sphenopalatine (pterygopalatine) ganglion stimulation and cluster headache: New hope for ye who enter here. Cephalalgia. 2013;33:813–815.
    1. Schoenen J, Jensen RH, Lanteri-Minet M. Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH-1: A randomized, sham-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2013;33:816–830.
    1. Sarrouilhe D, Dejean C, Mesnil M. Involvement of gap junction channels in the pathophysiology of migraine with aura. Frontiers Physiol. 2014;5:78.
    1. Farrar JT, Young JP, Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149–158.
    1. Dahlof C. Sumatriptan nasal spray in the acute treatment of migraine: A review of clinical studies. Cephalalgia. 1999;19:769–778.
    1. Ferrari MD, Roon KI, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ. Oral triptans (serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists) in acute migraine treatment: A meta-analysis of 53 trials. Lancet. 2001;358:1668–1675.
    1. Autret A, Valade D, Debiais S. Placebo and other psychological interactions in headache treatment. J Headache Pain. 2012;13:191–198.
    1. Olanow CW. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trials for surgical interventions in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1343–1344.
    1. Diener HC. Placebo effects in treating migraine and other headaches. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2010;11:735–739.
    1. Sheftell FD, Dahlof CG, Brandes JL, Agosti R, Jones MW, Barrett PS. Two replicate randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of the time to onset of pain relief in the acute treatment of migraine with a fast-disintegrating/rapid-release formulation of sumatriptan tablets. Clin Ther. 2005;27:407–417.
    1. Ho TW, Mannix LK, Fan X. Randomized controlled trial of an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, MK-0974, in acute treatment of migraine. Neurology. 2008;70:1304–1312.
    1. Suren M, Kaya Z, Ozkan F, Erkorkmaz U, Arici S, Karaman S. Comparison of the use of the Valsalva maneuver and the eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA(R)) to relieve venipuncture pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Anesth. 2013;27:407–411.
    1. Wallasch TM, Beckmann P, Kropp P. Cerebrovascular reactivity during the Valsalva maneuver in migraine, tension-type headache and medication overuse headache. Funct Neurol. 2011;26:223–227.
    1. Djupesland PG, Chatkin JM, Qian W. Aerodynamic influences on nasal nitric oxide output measurements. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999;119:479–485.
    1. Shusterman D, Avila PC. Real-time monitoring of nasal mucosal pH during carbon dioxide stimulation: Implications for stimulus dynamics. Chem Senses. 2003;28:595–601.
    1. Spierings ELH, Cady RK, Goldstein J, Klapper JA, Rozen T. Abortive treatment of migraine headache with non-inhaled, intranasal carbon dioxide: A randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study [abstract] Headache. 2005;45:809.
    1. Vause C, Bowen E, Spierings E, Durham P. Effect of carbon dioxide on calcitonin gene-related peptide secretion from trigeminal neurons. Headache. 2007;47:1385–1397.
    1. Walling AD, Woolley DC, Molgaard C, Kallail KJ. Patient satisfaction with migraine management by family physicians. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005;18:563–566.
    1. Tepper S, Rapoport A. The triptans: A summary. CNS Drugs. 1999;12:403–417.
    1. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(Suppl. 1):9–160.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren