Autonomy among physically frail older people in nursing home settings: a study protocol for an intervention study

Mette Andresen, Lis Puggaard, Mette Andresen, Lis Puggaard

Abstract

Background: Experiencing autonomy is recognised to promote health and well-being for all age groups. Perceived lack of control has been found to be detrimental to physical and mental health. There is a lack of evidence-based knowledge elucidating how frail older people in nursing home settings themselves perceive autonomy in daily life. Further, there are no studies on the extent to which this perception can be influenced positively by participating in an individually tailored programme based on residents' own wishes for daily activities.

Methods and design: A total of 9 nursing homes and 55 participants aged 65 years or older were included in the study. All the participants were restricted in performing at least one P-ADL activity unassisted and had a Mini Mental State Examination-score above 16. Perceived autonomy was measured at baseline, after 12 weeks and after 24 weeks by The Autonomy Sub-dimension in the Measure of Actualisation of Potential test. Programmes were based on participants' individual assessment of their most important daily activities. Staff at all nursing homes who usually organize physical training, social or creative activities carried out individually tailored programmes using their usual methods and equipment. Participants in each nursing home were divided by lot into either a control group or an intervention group. The control groups received their usual care and treatment.

Discussion: This study is designed to assess the status of perceived autonomy at baseline and to provide information about the effectiveness of individually tailored programmes according to perceptions of autonomy registered in institutionalised physically frail older people. This will add knowledge to assist response to present and future challenges in relation to health promotion initiatives for this group.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00783055.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of study design.

References

    1. WHO . Ageing, Exploring the myths. WHO Ageing and health programme. Geneva; 1999.
    1. The Danish Technology Council, The Future Elderly, 2002 [Teknologirådet. Fremtidens ældre]
    1. Forster A, Bailey J, Smith J, Young J, Green J, Burns E. Rehabilitation for older people in long term care. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003. p. CD004294.
    1. Avlund K. Disability in old age – longitudinal population-based studies of the disablement process. Munksgaard Denmark. 2004.
    1. Johannesen A, Petersen J, Avlund K. Satisfaction in everyday life for frail 85-year-old adults: a Danish population study. Scand J Occup Ther. 2004;11:3–11. doi: 10.1080/11038120410019045.
    1. Kane RA. Autonomy and regulation in long-term care: Odd couple, an ambiguous relationship. In: Gamroth L, et al, editor. Enhancing autonomy in long-term care. New York Springer; 1995.
    1. Draper P. Compromise, massive encouragement and forcing: a discussion of mechanisms used to limit the choices available to older adults in hospital. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 1996;5:325–331.
    1. Rowels GD. Beyond performance: Being in place as a component of occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:265–271.
    1. Johannesen A. Master of Science thesis. Queen Margaret University College, Edinburgh; 2004. A study of old people who in spite of frailty are coping successfully with changes in their daily life.
    1. Svidén G, Wikström BM, Hjortensjö-Norberg M. Elderly persons' reflections on relocating to living at sheltered housing. Scand J Occup Ther. 2002;9:10–16. doi: 10.1080/110381202753505818.
    1. Scott PA, Välimäki M, Leini-Kilpi H, Dassen T, et al. Autonomy, privacy and informed concent 3: Elderly care perspective. British Journal of Nursing. 2003;12:158–168.
    1. Reinardy JR. Autonomy, choice and decision-making: How nursing home social workers view their role. Social work in health care. 1999;29
    1. Kane RA, Caplan AL, Urv-Wong EK, Freeman IC, Aroskar MA, Finch M. Everyday matters in lives of nursing home residents: wish for and perception of choice and control. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:1086–93.
    1. Shawler C, Rowels GD, High DM. Analysis of key decision-making incidents in the life of a nursing home resident. The Gerontologist. 2001;41:612–22.
    1. Legarth KH. The most important activity and the reasons for that experience reported by a Danish population at age 75 years. Br J Occup Ther. 2005;68:501–508.
    1. Lysack CL, Seipke HL. Communicating the occupational self: a qualitative study of oldest-old American women. Scand J Occup Ther. 2002;9:130–39. doi: 10.1080/11038120260246969.
    1. Davies S, Laker S, Ellis L. Promoting autonomy and independence for older people within nursing practice: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1997;26:408–417. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997026408.x.
    1. Agich G. Autonomy and long term care. Oxford: University Press; 1993.
    1. Jackson J. Living a meaningful existence in old age. In: Zemcke R, Clark F, editor. Occupational Science – The evolving discipline. FA Davis; 1996.
    1. Johnson BD, Stone GL, Altmaier EM, Berdahl LD. The relationship of demographic factors, locus of control and self-efficacy to successful nursing home adjustment. Gerontologist. 1998;38:209–216.
    1. Bean J, Kiely DK, Leveille SG, Morris J. Associating the onset of motor impairments with disability progression in nursing home residents. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81:696–704. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200209000-00010.
    1. Richardson J, Bedard M, Weaver B. Changes in physical functioning in institutionalized older adults. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23:683–9. doi: 10.1080/09638280110055084.
    1. Ruuskanen JM, Parkatti T. Physical activity and related factors among nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:987–991.
    1. Przybylski BR, Dumont ED, Watkins ME, Warren SA, Beaulne AP, Lier DA. Outcomes of enhanced physical and occupational therapy service in a nursing home setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:554–61. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90294-4.
    1. Lazowski DA, Ecclestone NA, Myers AM, Paterson DH, Tudor-Locke C, Fitzgerald C, Jones G, Shima N, Cunningham DA. A randomised outcome evaluation of group exercise programs in long-term care institutions. J Gerontol. 1999;54:M621–8.
    1. Baum EE, Jarjoura AE, Faur D, Rutchi G. Effectiveness of a group exercise in a long-term care facility:a randomised pilot trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003;4:74–80.
    1. Rydwik E, Frändin K, Akner G. Effects of physical training on physical performance in institutionalised elderly patients (70+) with multiple diagnoses. Age and Ageing. 2004;33:13–23. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afh001.
    1. Haak M, Fänge A, Iwarsson S, Ivanoff DS. Home as a significancation of independence and autonomy: experiences among very old Swedish people. Scand J Occup Ther. 2007;14:16–24. doi: 10.1080/11038120601024929.
    1. Beck AM, Damkjær K, El Kohly K, Schroll M. Plejetyngden på danske plejehjem [The nursing burden among older Danes living in nursing homes] Ugeskrift for læger. pp. 170–179.
    1. Leclerc G, Lefrançois R, Dubé M, Hébert R, Gaulin P. Self-actualization concept: A content validation. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1998;13:69–84.
    1. Lefrançois R, Leclerc G, Dubé M, Hébert R, Gaulin P. The development and validation of a self-report measure of self-actualization. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. 1997;25:353–366. doi: 10.2224/sbp.1997.25.4.353.
    1. Lefrançois R, Leclerc G, Dubé M, Hébert R, Gaulin P. Reliability of a new measure of self-actualization. Psychological Reports. 1998;82:875–878. doi: 10.2466/PR0.82.3.875-878.
    1. Leclerc G, Lefrançois R, Dubé M, Hébert R, Gaulin P. Criterion validity of a new measure of self-actualization. Psychological Reports. 1999;85:1167–1176. doi: 10.2466/PR0.85.7.1167-1176.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren