Modafinil increases the latency of response in the Hayling Sentence Completion Test in healthy volunteers: a randomised controlled trial

Ahmed Dahir Mohamed, Chris Roberts Lewis, Ahmed Dahir Mohamed, Chris Roberts Lewis

Abstract

Background: Modafinil is a medication licensed for the treatment of narcolepsy. However, it has been reported that healthy individuals without wakefulness disorders are using modafinil off-label to enhance cognitive functioning. Although some studies have reported that modafinil improves cognitive task performance in healthy volunteers, numerous other studies have failed to detect cognitive enhancing effects of modafinil on several well-established neuropsychological tasks. Interestingly, several clinical and preclinical studies have found that improved cognitive task performance by modafinil is accompanied by slower response times. This observation raises the question as to whether this slowing of response time in healthy volunteers is a necessary and sufficient condition for cognitive enhancement with modafinil. The aim of the current experiment was to explore this question by investigating the effects of modafinil on the Hayling Sentence Completion Test (HSCT).

Methodology: Sixty-four healthy volunteers received either a single dose (200 mg) of modafinil (n = 32) or placebo (n = 32) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study in which the principal outcome measures were response latencies on the response initiation and response inhibition sections of the HSCT.

Principal findings: Participants dosed with modafinil had significantly longer mean response latencies on the HSCT for both the response initiation and response inhibition compared to participants dosed with placebo. However, participants in both groups made a similar number of errors on each of these measures, indicating that modafinil did not enhance the accuracy of performance of the task relative to placebo.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that administration of single 200 mg doses of modafinil to healthy individuals increased the latency of responses in the performance of the HSCT, a task that is highly sensitive to prefrontal executive function, without enhancing accuracy of performance. This finding may provide important clues to defining the limitations of modafinil as a putative cognitive enhancer.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02051153.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. CONSORT Diagram.
Figure 1. CONSORT Diagram.
Flow diagram graphically describes the design of the study: enrolment, intervention, follow-up and data analysis.
Figure 2. Latency.
Figure 2. Latency.
The figure depicts the effect of drug on the response latency in the performance of the Hayling Sentence Completion Task (HSCT). There was a significant effect of drug on latency in the completion of the task across sections, with modafinil-treated participants having longer response latencies across test sections (p = 0.035) **. Error bars represent the SEM.
Figure 3. Errors.
Figure 3. Errors.
The figure depicts the effect of drug on errors in the performance of the Hayling Sentence Completion Task (HSCT). There was a significant effect of test section on errors committed during the task, with participants across treatment groups making more errors in the response inhibition section of the task relative to the response initiation section of the task. **P

References

    1. Benerjee D, Vitiellob MV, Grunsteinc RR (2004) Psychopharmacology for Excessive daytime sleepiness. Sleep Medicine Reviews 8: 339–354.
    1. Minzenberg MJ, Carter CS (2008) Modafinil: A review of Neurochemical Action and Effects on Cognition. Neuropsychopharmacology 33: 1477–1502.
    1. Müller U, Steffenhagen N, Regenthal R, Bublak P (2004) Effects of modafinil on working memory processes in humans. Psychopharmacology 177: 161–169.
    1. Marchant N, Kamel F, Echlin K, Grice J, Lewis M, et al. (2009) Modafinil improves rapid shifts of attention. Psychopharmacology 202: 487–495.
    1. Winder-Rhodes S, Chamberlain S, Idris M, Robbins T, Sahakian B, et al. (2010) Effects of modafinil and prazosin on cognitive and physiological functions in healthy volunteers. Journal of Psychopharmacology 24: 1649–1657.
    1. Sugden C, Housden CR, Aggarwal R, Sahakian BJ, Darzi A (2011) Effect of Pharmacological Enhancement on the Cognitive and Clinical Psychomotor Performance of Sleep-Deprived Doctors: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Annals of Surgery Publish Ahead of Print: 10.1097/SLA.1090b1013e3182306c3182399.
    1. Economist T (2008) Cognitive enhancement: All on the mind. Prepare for drugs that will improve memory, concentration and learning. Accessed November 2011. London.
    1. Tindal B (2004) Better playing through chemistry. Available: .
    1. Norman C, Berger M (2008) Neuroenhancment: Status quo and Perspectives. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 258: 110–114.
    1. Baranski J, V., Pigeau R, Dinich P, Jacobs I (2004) Effects of modafinil on cognitive and meta-cognitive performance. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental 19: 323–332.
    1. Vastag B (2004) Poised to Challenge Need for Sleep, "Wakefulness Enhancer" Rouses Concerns. JAMA 291: 167–170.
    1. Lynch G, Palmer LC, Gall CM (2011) The likelihood of cognitive enhancement. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 99: 116–129.
    1. Franke A, Bagusat C, Dietz P, Hoffmann I, Simon P, et al. (2013) Use of illicit and prescription drugs for cognitive or mood enhancement among surgeons. BMC Medicine 11: 102.
    1. Greely H (2006) The social effects of advances in neuroscience: Legal problems, legal prespectives. In: Illis J, editor. Neuroethics: Defining the issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy. New York: Oxford University Press. pp.245–263.
    1. Randall DC, Shneerson JM, File SE (2005) Cognitive effects of modafinil in student volunteers may depend on IQ. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 82: 133–139.
    1. Randall DC, Fleck NL, Shneerson JM, File SE (2004) The cognitive-enhancing properties of modafinil are limited in non-sleep-deprived middle-aged volunteers. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 77: 547–555.
    1. Randall DC, Viswanath A, Bharania P, Elsabagh SM, Hartley DE, et al. (2005) Does Modafinil Enhance Cognitive Performance in Young Volunteers Who Are Not Sleep-Deprived? Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 25: 175–179.
    1. Turner D, Robbins T, Clark L, Aron A, Dowson J, et al. (2003) Cognitive enhancing effects of modafinil in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology 165: 260–269.
    1. Wesensten NJ, Killgore WDS, Balkin TJ (2005) Performance and alertness effects of caffeine, dextroamphetamine, and modafinil during sleep deprivation. Journal of Sleep Research 14: 255–266.
    1. Turner DC, Clark L, Dowson J, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ (2004) Modafinil improves cognition and response inhibition in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry 55: 1031–1040.
    1. Béracochéa D, Cagnard B, Célérier A, le Merrer J, Pérès M, et al. (2001) First evidence of a delay-dependent working memory-enhancing effect of modafinil in mice. Neuroreport 12: 375–378.
    1. Waters KA, Burnham KE, O′Connor D, Dawson GR, Dias R (2005) Assessment of modafinil on attentional processes in a five-choice serial reaction time test in the rat. Journal of Psychopharmacology 19: 149–158.
    1. Advokat C (2010) What are the cognitive effects of stimulant medications? Emphasis on adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 34: 1256–1266.
    1. Mohamed AD (2014) The Effects of Modafinil on Convergent and Divergent Thinking of Creativity: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of Creative Behavior: ahead of publication Doi: 10.1002/jocb.1073.
    1. Repantis D, Schlattmann P, Laisney O, Heuser I (2010) Modafinil and methylphenidate for neuroenhancement in healthy individuals: A systematic review. Pharmacological Research 62: 187–206.
    1. Mohamed AD, Sahakian BJ (2012) The ethics of elective psychopharmacology. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 15: 559–571.
    1. Mohamed AD (2012) The effects of modafinil on cold cognition, creativity and motivation in healthy subjects. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 15 (S1): 239–240.
    1. Mohamed AD (2012) Modafinil has the potential for addiction. American Journal of Bioethics:Neuroscience April 2012. DOI:10.1080/21507740.2012.666322.
    1. Mohamed AD (2014) Reducing Creativity With Psychostimulants May Debilitate Mental Health and Well-Being. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health 9: 146–163.
    1. Mohamed AD (2014) Neuroethical issues in pharmacological cognitive enhancement. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science DOI: 101002/wcs1306. Available: .
    1. Burgess P, Shallice T (1997) The Hayling and Brixton Tests. Thames Valley Test Company. Bury St. Edmunds, U.K.
    1. Hornberger M, Savage S, Hsieh S, Mioshi E, Piguet O, et al. (2010) Orbitofrontal Dysfunction Discriminates Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia from Alzheimer's Disease. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders 30: 547–552.
    1. Burgess PW, Shallice T (1996) Response suppression, initiation and strategy use following frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia 34: 263–272.
    1. Volle E, de Lacy Costello A, Coates LM, McGuire C, Towgood K, et al. (2012) Dissociation between Verbal Response Initiation and Suppression after Prefrontal Lesions. Cerebral Cortex 22: 2428–2440.
    1. Naumann A, Bellebaum C, Daum I (2006) Cognitive deficits in narcolepsy. Journal of Sleep Research 15: 329–338.
    1. Gabrieli JDE, Poldrack RA, Desmond JE (1998) The role of left prefrontal cortex in language and memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95: 906–913.
    1. Collette F, Van der Linden M, Delfiore G, Degueldre C, Luxen A, et al. (2001) The Functional Anatomy of Inhibition Processes Investigated with the Hayling Task. NeuroImage 14: 258–267.
    1. Nathaniel-James DA, Fletcher P, Frith CD (1997) The functional anatomy of verbal initiation and suppression using the Hayling Test. Neuropsychologia 35: 559–566.
    1. Collette F, Van der Linden M (2002) Brain imaging of the central executive component of working memory. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 26: 105–125.
    1. MHRA (2012) Modafinil (Provigil): Information to support safer use; now restricted to narcolepsy. Available: . Accessed February 2012. London Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.
    1. Nelson H (1982) National Adult Test Reading Manual: Winsor NFER-Nelson, UK.
    1. Roca M, Parr A, Thompson R, Woolgar A, Torralva T, et al. (2010) Executive function and fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions. Brain 133: 234–247.
    1. Bond A, Lader M (1974) The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings. British Journal of Medical Psychology 47: 211–218.
    1. Cella DF, Perry SW (1986) Reliability and concurrent validity of three visual-analogue mood scales. Psychological Reports 59: 827–833.
    1. Ahearn E (1997) The use of visual analogue scales in mood disorders: A critical review. Journal of Psychiatric Research 31: 569–579.
    1. Nelson HE, Willison JR (1991) The Revised National Adult Reading Test–Test manual. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
    1. Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O (2006) A Compendium of Neuropsychological Test: Administration, Norms, and Commentry: Oxford University Press.
    1. Deary IJ, Whalley LJ, Starr JM (2009) Validating the National Adult Reading Test. A lifetime of intelligence: Follow-up studies of the Scottish mental surveys of 1932 and 1947: Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. pp. 217–224.
    1. Blair JR, Spreen O (1989) Predicting premorbid IQ: A revision of the National Adult Reading Test. Clinical Neuropsychologist 3: 129–136.
    1. Crawford JR, Deary IJ, Starr J, Whalley LJ (2001) The NART as an index of prior intellectual functioning: a retrospective validity study covering a 66-year interval. Psychological Medicine 31: 451–458.
    1. Howell D (2007) Fundamental statistics for the Behavioural Sciences: Thompson Wadsworth.
    1. Howell D (2010) Statistical Methods for Psychology. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
    1. Olejnik S, Algina J (2003) Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological methods 8: 434.
    1. Turner DC, Robbins TW, Dowson J, Sahakian BJ (2003) Modafinil and adult ADHD: effects of a novel cognitive enhancer. Journal of Psychopharmacology 17: A71–a71.
    1. Randall DC, Shneerson JM, Plaha KK, File SE (2003) Modafinil affects mood, but not cognitive function, in healthy young volunteers. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental 18: 163–173.
    1. Randall DC, Cafferty FH, Shneerson JM, Smith IE, Llewelyn MB, et al. (2005) Chronic treatment with modafinil may not be beneficial in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychopharmacol 19: 647–660.
    1. Stoops W, Lile J, Fillmore M, Glaser P, Rush C (2005) Reinforcing effects of modafinil: influence of dose and behavioral demands following drug administration. Psychopharmacology 182: 186–193.
    1. Baranski JV, Pigeau R, Dinich P, Jacobs I (2004) Effects of modafinil on cognitive and meta-cognitive performance. Hum Psychopharmacol 19: 323–332.
    1. Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Burr R (2006) Improving the ecological validity of executive functioning assessment. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 21: 217–227.
    1. Hetzler RK, Stickley CD, Lundquist KM, Kimura IF (2008) Reliability and accuracy of handheld stopwatches compared with electronic timing in measuring sprint performance. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 22: 1969–1976.
    1. Mayhew JL, Houser JJ, Briney BB, Williams TB, Piper FC, et al. (2010) Comparison between hand and electronic timing of 40-yd dash performance in college football players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 24: 447–451.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren