A clinical trial of lovastatin for modification of biomarkers associated with breast cancer risk

Shaveta Vinayak, Erich J Schwartz, Kristin Jensen, Jafi Lipson, Elizabeth Alli, Lisa McPherson, Adrian M Fernandez, Vandana B Sharma, Ashley Staton, Meredith A Mills, Elizabeth A Schackmann, Melinda L Telli, Ani Kardashian, James M Ford, Allison W Kurian, Shaveta Vinayak, Erich J Schwartz, Kristin Jensen, Jafi Lipson, Elizabeth Alli, Lisa McPherson, Adrian M Fernandez, Vandana B Sharma, Ashley Staton, Meredith A Mills, Elizabeth A Schackmann, Melinda L Telli, Ani Kardashian, James M Ford, Allison W Kurian

Abstract

Pre-clinical and epidemiologic studies provide rationale for evaluating lipophilic statins for breast cancer prevention. We conducted a single-arm, biomarker modulation trial of lovastatin among women with increased risk of breast cancer. Eligibility criteria included a deleterious germline mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, or TP53; lifetime breast cancer risk of ≥20 % as estimated by the Claus model; or personal history of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer. Participants received 40 mg of lovastatin orally twice daily for 6 months. We evaluated the following biomarkers before and after lovastatin use: breast duct cytology (primary endpoint), serum lipids, C-reactive protein, insulin-like growth factor-1, IGF binding protein-3, lipid peroxidation, oxidative DNA damage, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase genotype, and mammographic density. Thirty women were enrolled, and 26 (86.7 %) completed the study. For the primary endpoint of changes in breast duct cytology sampled by random periareolar fine needle aspiration, most participants [57.7 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 38.9-74.5 %] showed no change after lovastatin; 19.2 % (CI 8.1-38.3 %) had a favorable change in cytology, 7.7 % (95 % CI 1.0-25.3 %) had an unfavorable change, and 15.4 % (95 % CI 5.5-34.2 %) had equivocal results due to acellular specimens, usually after lovastatin. No significant changes were observed in secondary biomarker endpoints. The study was generally well-tolerated: 4 (13.3 %) participants did not complete the study, and one (3.8 %) required a dose reduction. This trial was technically feasible, but demonstrated no significant biomarker modulation; contributing factors may include insufficient sample size, drug dose and/or duration. The results are inconclusive and do not exclude a favorable effect on breast cancer risk.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study schema. BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2), estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor (ER/PR), C-reactive protein (CRP), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase (HMGCR)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Example of non-proliferative breast disease (Masood score 6–10) from Participant #20, and b Example of proliferative breast disease without atypia (Masood score 11–14) from Participant #18

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren