Surgical treatment of symptomatic pineal cysts without hydrocephalus-meta-analysis of the published literature

Riccardo Masina, Ali Ansaripour, Vladimír Beneš, Moncef Berhouma, Joham Choque-Velasquez, Per Kristian Eide, Stepan Fedorko, Steffen Fleck, Juha Hernesniemi, Andrzej Koziarski, Martin Májovský, Andrzej Podgorski, Henry Schroeder, Charles Teo, Andreas W Unterberg, Jacky T Yeung, Angelos Kolias, Thomas Santarius, Riccardo Masina, Ali Ansaripour, Vladimír Beneš, Moncef Berhouma, Joham Choque-Velasquez, Per Kristian Eide, Stepan Fedorko, Steffen Fleck, Juha Hernesniemi, Andrzej Koziarski, Martin Májovský, Andrzej Podgorski, Henry Schroeder, Charles Teo, Andreas W Unterberg, Jacky T Yeung, Angelos Kolias, Thomas Santarius

Abstract

Background: To examine published data and assess evidence relating to safety and efficacy of surgical management of symptomatic pineal cysts without hydrocephalus (nhSPC), we performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched Pubmed and SCOPUS for all reports with the query 'Pineal Cyst' AND 'Surgery' as of March 2021, without constraints on study design, publication year or status (PROSPERO_CRD:42,021,242,517). Assessment of 1537 hits identified 26 reports that met inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results: All 26 input studies were either case reports or single-centre retrospective cohorts. The majority of outcome data were derived from routine physician-recorded notes. A total of 294 patients with surgically managed nhSPC were identified. Demographics: Mean age was 29 (range: 4-63) with 77% females. Mean cyst size was 15 mm (5-35). Supracerebellar-infratentorial approach was adopted in 90% of cases, occipital-transtentorial in 9%, and was not reported in 1%. Most patients were managed by cyst resection (96%), and the remainder by fenestration. Mean post-operative follow-up was 35 months (0-228).

Presentation: Headache was the commonest symptom (87%), followed by visual (54%), nausea/vomit (34%) and vertigo/dizziness (31%). Other symptoms included focal neurology (25%), sleep disturbance (17%), cognitive impairment (16%), loss of consciousness (11%), gait disturbance (11%), fatigue (10%), 'psychiatric' (2%) and seizures (1%). Mean number of symptoms reported at presentation was 3 (0-9).

Outcomes: Improvement rate was 93% (to minimise reporting bias only consecutive cases from cohort studies were considered, N = 280) and was independent of presentation. Predictors of better outcomes were large cyst size (OR = 5.76; 95% CI: 1.74-19.02) and resection over fenestration (OR = 12.64; 3.07-52.01). Age predicted worse outcomes (OR = 0.95; 0.91-0.99). Overall complication rate was 17% and this was independent of any patient characteristics. Complications with long-term consequences occurred in 10 cases (3.6%): visual disturbance (3), chronic incisional pain (2), sensory disturbance (1), fatigue (1), cervicalgia (1), cerebellar stroke (1) and mortality due to myocardial infarction (1).

Conclusions: Although the results support the role of surgery in the management of nhSPCs, they have to be interpreted with a great deal of caution as the current evidence is limited, consisting only of case reports and retrospective surgical series. Inherent to such studies are inhomogeneity and incompleteness of data, selection bias and bias related to assessment of outcome carried out by the treating surgeon in the majority of cases. Prospective studies with patient-reported and objective outcome assessment are needed to provide higher level of evidence.

Keywords: Headache; Hydrocephalus; Non-hydrocephalic symptomatic pineal cyst; Pineal; Pineal cyst; Symptomatic pineal cyst.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

© 2021. Crown.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prisma flow diagram summarising the systematic review algorithm
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow-chart summarising the main decisions taken in the management of patients with nhSPC. This is broadly representative of the contributing series, but individual surgeons have developed their own specific management algorithms—see individual series for details [4, 8, 13, 14, 23, 24, 28, 46]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary of cohort characteristics. A Age at the time of operation. B Cyst size at the time of operation. C Duration of post-operative follow-up. D Symptom progression pre-operatively. E Surgical approach. F Gender at the time of operation. Forest plots report mean (diamonds) ± max/min (error bars). The absence of a diamond or error bars indicate that the information was not available for that study. In all graphs, the final entry represents a summary of all the available data. Yeung2021/Kalani2015 have been grouped together as Kalani’s case series [23] is fully contained within Yeung’s case series [46]. The figure is available in colour online. SCIT, SupraCerebellar Infra-Tentorial approach; OTT, occipital trans-tentorial approach; NR, not reported
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Summary of symptoms at presentation. A Summary of patient-specific demographic (top), presentation (middle) and outcome (bottom) features. Each patient is shown as a vertical segment along the x axis. Different features are labelled according to the legend. B Proportion of patients by presenting symptom. C Proportion of patients by number of symptoms at presentation. Of note, 5 patients reportedly had no symptoms at presentation. These are briefly described below. D Distribution of associated symptoms in patients presenting with only 1, 2 or 3 symptoms (from left to right, respectively). The distribution of patients presenting with 4 and 5 + symptoms is shown in Supplementary Fig. 5. E Co-occurrence of clinical characteristics at presentation. Data represented as correlation matrix, where the correlation coefficient (Pearson) between characteristics X and Y is shown on a colour scale ranging from blue (positive correlation) to red (negative correlation). White corresponds to a correlation coefficient of 0. Statistically significant correlations are marked by one or more ‘*’, according to a conventional notation of statistical significance (* < 0.05; ** < 0.01, *** < 0.005). *5 patients had no reported symptoms at presentation: (1) No symptom reported, surgical indication: ‘progressing cyst size’. (2) 4 years old asymptomatic, surgical indication: ‘cyst with partial solid enhancement’; (3) 54 years old asymptomatic, surgical indication: ‘solid posterior part of the cyst’; (4) 29 years old, no symptoms reported, surgical indication: ‘large cyst unspecified symptoms’; (5) 16 years old, presentation data not available, indication for surgery: not available. The figure is available in colour online. Size_mm_12: cyst size > 12 mm; Visual_sx, visual symptoms; Neurology_NOS, neurology not otherwise specified; Resection_extent, cyst resection, as opposed to cyst fenestration; Sleep, sleep disturbances; Pysch_depression, psychiatric symptoms of depression; Other_sx, any of the following symptoms: ‘Cognitive’, ‘Transient_LoC’, ‘Sleep’, ‘Pysch_depression’, ‘Seizure’, ‘Neurology_NOS’, ‘Fatigue’; LoC, loss of consciousness; HA, headache; V, visual symptoms; NV, nausea and vomiting; DV, dizziness and vertigo; P, psychiatric symptoms; F, fatigue; G, gait abnormalities; N, neurology not otherwise specified; Seiz, seizures; S, sleep disturbances
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Summary of the efficacy profile of surgical management for nhSPC. A Improvement rate for each study and overall cohort. Data shown as mean (diamonds) ± 95% CI (error bars). Eide2017_R refers to the patients of Eide’s cohort that were managed by resection, while Eide2017_F refers to those managed by fenestration. Analogously, Fedorko2018_R refers to the patients in Fedorko’s series that were managed by resection, and Fedorko2018_F to those managed by fenestration. B Proportion of patients presenting with each symptom pre-operatively (red bars), and proportion of patients who did not improve post-operatively (blue bar). C Association between presenting characteristics and post-operative improvement, quantified by univariate logistic regression. Data shown as OR (diamonds) ± 95% CI. Statistically significant associations are shown in red. OR > 1 indicates that the characteristic is associated with better outcomes, while OR < 1 indicates an association with worse outcomes. Raw data is available as scatterplots in Supplementary Fig. 6. In all cases, improvement is defined as reduced symptom-related burden, where both pre-existing and any newly acquired symptoms following surgery are considered. Only data from consecutive case series has been included in the outcome analysis. The figure is available in colour online. Size_mm_12, cyst size > 12 mm; Visual_sx, visual symptoms; Neurology_NOS, neurology not otherwise specified; Resection_extent, cyst resection, as opposed to cyst fenestration; Sleep_fatigue: sleep disturbances or fatigue; Pysch_depression, psychiatric symptoms of depression; Other_sx, any of the following symptoms: ‘Cognitive’, ‘Transient_LoC’, ‘Sleep’, ‘Pysch_depression’, ‘Seizure’, ‘Neurology_NOS’, ‘Fatigue’; LoC, loss of consciousness
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Summary of the safety profile of surgical management for nhSPC. A Complication rate for each study and overall cohort. As for ‘overall improvement’, complication rates were estimated from the subset of the cohort extracted from consecutive case series only (N = 277) to minimise the effect of reporting bias (see Methods). Data shown as mean (diamonds) ± 95% CI (error bars). Eide2017_R refers to the patients of Eide’s cohort that were managed by resection, while Eide2017_F refers to those managed by fenestration. Analogously, Fedorko2018_R refers to the patients in Fedorko’s series that were managed by resection, and Fedorko2018_F to those managed by fenestration. B Proportion of patients presenting with each complication. Here we included all cases (N = 294) to describe all reported complication that occurred during resection of nhSPCs. Complications that resolved by the last follow-up appointment are in blue, while those that persisted are in red. ‘Haematoma’ refers to an episode of bleeding into the 3rd ventricle that occurred in the early post-operative period in a 23-year-old female. EVD was placed for 7 days until the haematoma spontaneously resolved, and the patient had no neurological sequelae [28]. It is unclear whether the case of ‘Cerebellar stroke’ was merely a radiological finding or whether this was associated with clinical manifestations [15]. MI/mortality—mortality due to myocardial infarction [30]. ‘Chronic incisional pain’ refers to 3 cases reported by Yeung in which pain lasted beyond the peri-operative period. Of these, 2 patients underwent neuroma excision that resolved the pain, and 1 resolved spontaneously [29]. C Association between presenting characteristics and post-operative complications, quantified by univariate logistic regression. Data shown as OR (diamonds) ± 95% CI. Statistically significant associations are shown in red. OR > 1 indicates that the characteristic is associated with a higher-than-baseline risk of complications, while OR < 1 indicates an association with a lower risk of complications. Raw data is available as scatterplots in Supplementary Fig. 7. The figure is available in colour online. Size_mm_12, cyst size > 12 mm; Visual_sx, visual symptoms; Neurology_NOS, neurology not otherwise specified; Resection_extent, cyst resection, as opposed to cyst fenestration; Sleep_fatigue, sleep disturbances or fatigue; Pysch_depression, psychiatric symptoms of depression; Other_sx, any of the following symptoms: ‘Cognitive’, ‘Transient_LoC’, ‘Sleep’, ‘Pysch_depression’, ‘Seizure’, ‘Neurology_NOS’, ‘Fatigue’; LoC, loss of consciousness
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Summary of the effects of age on safety and efficacy of nhSPC surgery. A Age distribution across the cohort. B Proportion of improved patients for each age group. C Proportion of cases with complications in each age group. The figure is available in colour online

References

    1. Al-Holou WN, Terman SW, Kilburg C, et al. Prevalence and natural history of pineal cysts in adults: clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2011;115(6):1106–1114. doi: 10.3171/2011.6.JNS11506.
    1. Ayhan S, Bal E, Palaoglu S, Cila A. Pineal cyst apoplexy: report of an unusual case managed conservatively. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2011;45(6):604–607. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3843(14)60129-8.
    1. Basso MA, Bickford ME, Cang J. Unraveling circuits of visual perception and cognition through the superior colliculus. Neuron. 2021;109(6):918–937. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.01.013.
    1. Berhouma M, Ni H, Delabar V, et al. Update on the management of pineal cysts: case series and a review of the literature. Neurochirurgie. 2015;61(2):201–207. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2013.08.010.
    1. Brooks JX, Cullen KE. Predictive sensing: the role of motor signals in sensory processing. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019;4(9):842–850. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.06.003.
    1. Choque-Velasquez J, Colasanti R, Baluszek S, et al. Systematic review of pineal cysts surgery in pediatric patients. Childs Nerv Syst. 2020;36(12):2927–2938. doi: 10.1007/s00381-020-04792-3.
    1. Choque-Velasquez J, Resendiz-Nieves JC, Baluszek S, Colasanti R, Muhammad S, Hernesniemi J. Functional status of surgically treated pineal cyst patients. Surg Neurol Int. 2020;11:359. doi: 10.25259/SNI_41_2020.
    1. Choque-Velasquez J, Resendiz-Nieves JC, RezaiJahromi B, et al. The microsurgical management of benign pineal cysts: Helsinki experience in 60 cases. Surg Neurol Int. 2019;10:103. doi: 10.25259/SNI-180-2019.
    1. Davidson L. Endoscopic management of pineal cyst-associated aqueductal stenosis. Acta Neurochir. 2020;162(12):2975–2982. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04419-1.
    1. Eide PK, Pripp AH, Ringstad GA. Magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers indicate a central venous hypertension syndrome in patients with symptomatic pineal cysts. J Neurol Sci. 2016;363:207–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.02.038.
    1. Eide PK, Ringstad G. Increased pulsatile intracranial pressure in patients with symptomatic pineal cysts and magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers indicative of central venous hypertension. J Neurol Sci. 2016;367:247–255. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.06.028.
    1. Eide PK, Ringstad G. Results of surgery in symptomatic non-hydrocephalic pineal cysts: role of magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers indicative of central venous hypertension. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017;159(2):349–361. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-3029-4.
    1. El Damaty A, Fleck S, Matthes M, Baldauf J, Schroeder HWS. Pineal cyst without hydrocephalus: clinical presentation and clinical course after infratentorial supracerebellar resection. World Neurosurg. 2019;129:e530–e537. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.200.
    1. Fedorko S, Zweckberger K, Unterberg AW. Quality of life following surgical treatment of lesions within the pineal region. J Neurosurg. Published online March 2, 2018:1–10. 10.3171/2017.7.JNS17260
    1. Fleege MA, Miller GM, Fletcher GP, Fain JS, Scheithauer BW. Benign glial cysts of the pineal gland: unusual imaging characteristics with histologic correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15(1):161–166.
    1. Goehner D, Soyland D, Vuong S, Trumble E. Pineal Cyst apoplexy in an 8-year-old girl: case report and literature review. World Neurosurgery. 2020;142:159–166. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.199.
    1. Gokce E, Beyhan M. Evaluation of pineal cysts with magnetic resonance imaging. World J Radiol. 2018;10(7):65–77. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v10.i7.65.
    1. Golzarian J, Balériaux D, Bank WO, Matos C, Flament-Durand J. Pineal cyst: normal or pathological? Neuroradiology. 1993;35(4):251–253. doi: 10.1007/bf00602604.
    1. Gordon B. Receptive fields in deep layers of cat superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol. 1973;36(2):157–178. doi: 10.1152/jn.1973.36.2.157.
    1. Hasegawa A, Ohtsubo K, Mori W. Pineal gland in old age; quantitative and qualitative morphological study of 168 human autopsy cases. Brain Res. 1987;409(2):343–349. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90720-7.
    1. Jenkinson MD, Mills S, Mallucci CL, Santarius T. Management of pineal and colloid cysts. Practical Neurology. Published online May 26, 2021. 10.1136/practneurol-2020-002838
    1. Jun EJ, Bautista AR, Nunez MD, et al. Causal role for the primate superior colliculus in the computation of evidence for perceptual decisions. Nat Neurosci. Published online June 28, 2021:1–11. 10.1038/s41593-021-00878-6
    1. Kalani MYS, Wilson DA, Koechlin NO, et al. Pineal cyst resection in the absence of ventriculomegaly or Parinaud’s syndrome: clinical outcomes and implications for patient selection. J Neurosurg. 2015;123(2):352–356. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS141081.
    1. Koziarski A, Podgórski A, Zieliński GM. Surgical treatment of pineal cysts in non-hydrocephalic and neurologically intact patients: selection of surgical candidates and clinical outcome. Br J Neurosurg. 2019;33(1):37–42. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2018.1530731.
    1. Leong ATL, Gu Y, Chan Y-S, et al. Optogenetic fMRI interrogation of brain-wide central vestibular pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(20):10122–10129. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812453116.
    1. Maeda M, Shibazaki T, Yoshida K. Labyrinthine and visual inputs to the superior colliculus neurons. In: Granit R, Pompeiano O, eds. Progress in Brain Research. Vol 50. Reflex Control of Posture And Movement. Elsevier; 1979:735–743. 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60870-5
    1. Májovský M, Netuka D, Beneš V. Clinical management of pineal cysts: a worldwide online survey. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016;158(4):663–669. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2726-3.
    1. Májovský M, Netuka D, Beneš V. Conservative and surgical treatment of patients with pineal cysts: a prospective case series of 110 patients. World Neurosurg. 2017;105:199–205. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.155.
    1. Mamourian AC, Towfighi J. Pineal cysts: MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1986;7(6):1081–1086.
    1. Mena H, Armonda RA, Ribas JL, Ondra SL, Rushing EJ. Nonneoplastic pineal cysts: a clinicopathologic study of twenty-one cases. Ann Diagn Pathol. 1997;1(1):11–18. doi: 10.1016/s1092-9134(97)80004-4.
    1. Milton CK, Pelargos PE, Dunn IF. Headache outcomes after surgery for pineal cyst without hydrocephalus: a systematic review. Surg Neurol Int. 2020;11:384. doi: 10.25259/SNI_541_2020.
    1. Mukherjee KK, Banerji D, Sharma R. Pineal cyst presenting with intracystic and subarachnoid haemorrhage: report of a case and review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg. 1999;13(2):189–192. doi: 10.1080/02688699943970.
    1. Nevins EJ, Das K, Bhojak M, et al. Incidental pineal cysts: is surveillance necessary? World Neurosurg. 2016;90:96–102. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.092.
    1. Olivé I, Densmore M, Harricharan S, Théberge J, McKinnon MC, Lanius R. Superior colliculus resting state networks in post-traumatic stress disorder and its dissociative subtype. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39(1):563–574. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23865.
    1. Olivé I, Tempelmann C, Berthoz A, Heinze H-J. Increased functional connectivity between superior colliculus and brain regions implicated in bodily self-consciousness during the rubber hand illusion. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36(2):717–730. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22659.
    1. Patel AJ, Fuller GN, Wildrick DM, Sawaya R. Pineal cyst apoplexy: case report and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(5):E1066–E1066. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000179990.46401.66.
    1. Populin LC. Anesthetics change the excitation/inhibition balance that governs sensory processing in the cat superior colliculus. J Neurosci. 2005;25(25):5903–5914. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1147-05.2005.
    1. Rani S, R A, Kumari SK. Vestibular modulation of postural stability: an update. biomedicalresearch. 2018;29(17). 10.4066/biomedicalresearch.29-18-972
    1. Rincon-Gonzalez L, Selen LPJ, Halfwerk K, Koppen M, Corneil BD, Medendorp WP. Decisions in motion: vestibular contributions to saccadic target selection. J Neurophysiol. 2016;116(3):977–985. doi: 10.1152/jn.01071.2015.
    1. Seifert CL, Woeller A, Valet M, et al. Headaches and pineal cyst: a case–control study. Headache. 2008;48(3):448–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00965.x.
    1. Siemann JK, Veenstra-VanderWeele J, Wallace MT. Approaches to understanding multisensory dysfunction in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 2020;13(9):1430–1449. doi: 10.1002/aur.2375.
    1. Storey M, Lilimpakis K, Grandal NS, Rajaraman C, Achawal S, Hussain M. Pineal cyst surveillance in adults–a review of 10 years’ experience. Br J Neurosurg. 2020;34(5):565–568. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2019.1635989.
    1. Study Quality Assessment Tools | NHLBI, NIH. Accessed July 31, 2021.
    1. Tapp E. The histology and pathology of the human pineal gland. In: Kappers JA, Pévet P, eds. Progress in Brain Research. Vol 52. Elsevier; 1979:481–500. 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)62955-6
    1. Woodward K, Sitaram A, Peters S. Isolated convergence-retraction nystagmus secondary to intralesional haemorrhage of a pineal cyst: an easily missed neurological finding with potentially life-threatening consequences. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13(9). 10.1136/bcr-2019-233469
    1. Yeung JT, Young IM, Profyris C, Katsos K, Sughrue ME, Teo C. Resection of symptomatic pineal cysts provides durable clinical improvement: a breakdown of presenting symptoms and lessons learned. World Neurosurgery. 2021;150:e668–e674. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.087.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren