Feasibility of the Figure-of-8-Suture as Venous Closure in Interventional Electrophysiology: One Strategy for All?

Christoph J Jensen, Miriam Schnur, Sebastian Lask, Philipp Attanasio, Michal Gotzmann, Kaffer Kara, Christoph Hanefeld, Andreas Mügge, Alexander Wutzler, Christoph J Jensen, Miriam Schnur, Sebastian Lask, Philipp Attanasio, Michal Gotzmann, Kaffer Kara, Christoph Hanefeld, Andreas Mügge, Alexander Wutzler

Abstract

Background: Venous vascular access with higher sheath size is common in interventional electrophysiology. In contrast to arterial vascular access, no dedicated closure devices exist for closure after venous access with higher sheath sizes. The Figure-of-8-Suture, an easy to apply suture, may be as a feasible approach for closure venous puncture. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of closure of femoral venous access. Methods: From November 2016 to February 2018, patients undergoing electrophysiological procedures, closure of left atrial appendage or patent foramen ovale were included. Until May 2017, manual compression was performed to achieve haemostasis at venous access site (control group). From May 2017, patients were treated with a Figure-of-8-Suture (treatment group, Figure 1). Turnaround time and incidence of vascular complications were compared between the two groups. Results: In total, 290 patients were included, 132 in the control group and 158 in the Figure-of-8-Suture group. Hemostasis after sheath removal was achieved in 100% of the cases in the control group by manual compression and in 98.7% of the cases with the Figure-of-8-Suture (p=0.2). Vascular complications were more common in the control group (6.8 vs. 1.3 %, p=0.01). Turnaround time was significantly lower in the Figure-of-8-Suture group (58.6 ± 14 vs. 77 ± 33.9 min, p=0.004). In a sub-analysis in obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 (Figure-of-8 n=45, controls n=35), vascular complications were significantly more common in the control group (9.4 vs 0%, p=0.045). Conclusion: The Figure-of-8-Suture is an easy-to-apply, effective approach for venous closure after electrophysiological procedures.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

© The author(s).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Application of the Figure-of-8-Suture. With the sheath in position (A) a 0 non-absorbable, braided polyester suture is passed caudal the skin puncture site under the sheath through subcutaneous tissue (B).After exiting the skin the needle is crossed over the sheath and enters the subcutaneous tissue cranial the skin puncture site in subcutaneous tissue above the sheath (C, D). During sheath removal a knot is tied with the two ends across the puncture (E, F, G). Final result shows the involution of the encompassed tissue by the suture which results in slight vasoconstriction of the vein and hence complete closure of the access site (H).

References

    1. Mohanty S, Trivedi C, Beheiry S, Al-Ahmad A, Horton R, Della Rocca DG, Gianni C, Gasperetti A, Abdul-Moheeth M, Turakhia M, Natale A. Venous access-site closure with vascular closure device vs. manual compression in patients undergoing catheter ablation or left atrial appendage occlusion under uninterrupted anticoagulation: a multicentre experience on efficacy and complication. Europace. 2019;21:1048–1054.
    1. Bohnen M, Stevenson WG, Tedrow UB, Michaud GF, John RM, Epstein LM, Albert CM, Koplan BA. Incidence and predictors of major complications from contemporary catheter ablation to treat cardiac arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:1661–6.
    1. Pracon R, Bangalore S, Henzel J, Cendrowska-Demkow I, Pregowska-Chwala B, Tarnowska A, Dzielinska Z, Chmielak Z, Witkowski A, Demkow M. A randomized comparison of modified subcutaneous "Z"-stitch versus manual compression to achieve hemostasis after large caliber femoral venous sheath removal. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91(1):105–112.
    1. Mylonas I, Sakata Y, Salinger M, Sanborn TA, Feldman T. The use of percutaneous suture-mediated closure for the management of 14 French femoral venous access. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006;18:299–302.
    1. Aytemir K, Canpolat U, Yorgun H, Evranos B, Kaya EB, Şahiner ML, Özer N. Usefulness of 'figure-of-eight' suture to achieve haemostasis after removal of 15-French calibre femoral venous sheath in patients undergoing cryoablation. Europace. 2016;18(10):1545–1550.
    1. Lakshmanadoss U, Wong WS, Kutinsky I, Khalid MR, Williamson B, Haines DE. Figure-of-eight suture for venous hemostasis in fully anticoagulated patients after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017;17(5):134–139.
    1. Corbin CL, Kelley SW, Schwartz RW. Concepts in servicemarketing for healthcare professionals. Am J Surg. 2001;181:1–7.
    1. Agarwal S, Gallo JJ, Parashar A, Agarwal KK, Ellis SG, Khot UN, Spooner R, Murat Tuzcu E, Kapadia SR. Impact of lean six sigma process improvement methodology on cardiac catheterization laboratory efficiency. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 2016;17:95–101.
    1. Sinreich D, Marmor Y. Ways to reduce patient turnaround time and improve service quality in emergency departments. J Health Organ Manag. 2005;19:88–105.
    1. Payne J, Bickel T, Gautam S. Figure-of-eight sutures for hemostasis result in shorter lab recovery time after ablation for atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018.
    1. WHO. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. World Health Organization. 2000.
    1. Winkle RA, Mead RH, Engel G, Kong MH, Fleming W, Salcedo J, Patrawala RA. Impact of obesity on atrial fibrillation ablation: Patient characteristics, long-term outcomes, and complications. Heart Rhythm. 2017 Jun;14(6):819–827.
    1. Emami M, Barlow M, Leitch J, Wilsmore B, Mills M, Cambourn M, Meakes S, Davies A, Attia J, Boyle A, Jackson N. Body Mass Index and Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Predicts Vascular Access Complications in Electrophysiology Procedures. Heart, Lung and Circulation. 2016;25:S139–S140.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren