Prognostic values of optic nerve sheath diameter for comatose patients with acute stroke: An observational study

Sha Zhu, Chao Cheng, Liu-Liu Wang, Dian-Jiang Zhao, Yuan-Li Zhao, Xian-Zeng Liu, Sha Zhu, Chao Cheng, Liu-Liu Wang, Dian-Jiang Zhao, Yuan-Li Zhao, Xian-Zeng Liu

Abstract

Background: Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement is one of the non-invasive methods recommended for increased intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring.

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the roles of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and ONSD/eyeball transverse diameter (ETD) ratio in predicting prognosis of death in comatose patients with acute stroke during their hospitalization.

Methods: A total of 67 comatose patients with acute stroke were retrospectively recruited. The ONSD and ETD were measured by cranial computed tomography (CT) scan. All patients underwent cranial CT scan within 24 h after coma onset. Patients were divided into death group and survival group according to their survival status at discharge. The differences of the ONSD and ONSD/ETD ratio between the two groups and their prognostic values were compared.

Results: The ONSD and ONSD/ETD ratio were 6.07 ± 0.72 mm and 0.27 ± 0.03 in the comatose patients, respectively. The ONSD was significantly greater in the death group than that in the survival group (6.32 ± 0.67 mm vs 5.65 ± 0.62 mm, t = 4.078, P < 0.0001). The ONSD/ETD ratio was significantly higher in the death group than that in the survival group (0.28 ± 0.03 vs 0.25 ± 0.02, t = 4.625, P < 0.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.760 (95%CI: 0.637-0.882, P < 0.0001) for the ONSD and 0.808 (95%CI: 0.696-0.920, P < 0.0001) for the ONSD/ETD ratio.

Conclusion: The mortality increased in comatose patients with acute stroke when the ONSD was > 5.7 mm or the ONSD/ETD ratio was > 0.25. Both indexes could be used as prognostic tools for comatose patients with acute stroke. The ONSD/ETD ratio was more stable than the ONSD alone, which would be preferred in clinical practice.

Keywords: Coma; Eyeball transverse diameter; Intracranial pressure; Optic nerve sheath diameter; Prognosis; Stroke.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Measurement methods for optic nerve sheath diameter and eyeball transverse diameter. A: The optic nerve sheath diameter was measured at 3 mm behind the eyeball by the cranial computed tomography (CT) scan; B: Eyeball transverse diameter was measured by the cranial CT scan.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic curves for comparing the efficiency of the optic nerve sheath diameter and optic nerve sheath diameter/eyeball transverse diameter ratio in predicting prognosis of comatose patients with acute stroke. ONSD: Optic nerve sheath diameter; ETD: Eyeball transverse diameter.

References

    1. Wu S, Wu B, Liu M, Chen Z, Wang W, Anderson CS, Sandercock P, Wang Y, Huang Y, Cui L, Pu C, Jia J, Zhang T, Liu X, Zhang S, Xie P, Fan D, Ji X, Wong KL, Wang L China Stroke Study Collaboration. Stroke in China: advances and challenges in epidemiology, prevention, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:394–405.
    1. Wang W, Jiang B, Sun H, Ru X, Sun D, Wang L, Jiang Y, Li Y, Wang Y, Chen Z, Wu S, Zhang Y, Wang D, Feigin VL NESS-China Investigators. Prevalence, Incidence, and Mortality of Stroke in China: Results from a Nationwide Population-Based Survey of 480 687 Adults. Circulation. 2017;135:759–771.
    1. Harary M, Dolmans RGF, Gormley WB. Intracranial Pressure Monitoring-Review and Avenues for Development. Sensors (Basel) 2018;18
    1. Killer HE, Laeng HR, Flammer J, Groscurth P. Architecture of arachnoid trabeculae, pillars, and septa in the subarachnoid space of the human optic nerve: anatomy and clinical considerations. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:777–781.
    1. Hassen GW, Bruck I, Donahue J, Mason B, Sweeney B, Saab W, Weedon J, Patel N, Perry K, Matari H, Jaiswal R, Kalantari H. Accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement by emergency physicians using bedside ultrasound. J Emerg Med. 2015;48:450–457.
    1. Vaiman M, Sigal T, Kimiagar I, Bekerman I. Noninvasive assessment of the intracranial pressure in non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;34:177–181.
    1. Bekerman I, Sigal T, Kimiagar I, Ben Ely A, Vaiman M. The quantitative evaluation of intracranial pressure by optic nerve sheath diameter/eye diameter CT measurement. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34:2336–2342.
    1. Sekhon MS, Griesdale DE, Robba C, McGlashan N, Needham E, Walland K, Shook AC, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Gupta AK, Menon DK. Optic nerve sheath diameter on computed tomography is correlated with simultaneously measured intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1267–1274.
    1. Vaiman M, Gottlieb P, Bekerman I. Quantitative relations between the eyeball, the optic nerve, and the optic canal important for intracranial pressure monitoring. Head Face Med. 2014;10:32.
    1. Du J, Deng Y, Li H, Qiao S, Yu M, Xu Q, Wang C. Ratio of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter to Eyeball Transverse Diameter by Ultrasound Can Predict Intracranial Hypertension in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Prospective Study. Neurocrit Care. 2020;32:478–485.
    1. Bender M, Lakicevic S, Pravdic N, Schreiber S, Malojcic B. Optic nerve sheath diameter sonography during the acute stage of intracerebral hemorrhage: a potential role in monitoring neurocritical patients. Ultrasound J. 2020;12:47.
    1. Raffiz M, Abdullah JM. Optic nerve sheath diameter measurement: a means of detecting raised ICP in adult traumatic and non-traumatic neurosurgical patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35:150–153.
    1. Jenjitranant P, Tunlayadechanont P, Prachanukool T, Kaewlai R. Correlation between optic nerve sheath diameter measured on imaging with acute pathologies found on computed tomography of trauma patients. Eur J Radiol. 2020;125:108875.
    1. Naldi A, Pivetta E, Coppo L, Cantello R, Comi C, Stecco A, Cerrato P, Lesmeister M, Lochner P. Ultrasonography Monitoring of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and Retinal Vessels in Patients with Cerebral Hemorrhage. J Neuroimaging. 2019;29:394–399.
    1. Zhao L, Huang Q, Huang P, Zhao Q, Xie H, Wang R. Optic nerve sheath diameter and eyeball transverse diameter as a useful tool for the clinical prognosis in patients with stroke during hospitalization. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019;31:1242–1246.
    1. Kim DH, Jun JS, Kim R. Measurement of the Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Its Association with Eyeball Diameter in Healthy Adults. J Clin Neurol. 2018;14:345–350.
    1. Kim DH, Jun JS, Kim R. Ultrasonographic measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter and its association with eyeball transverse diameter in 585 healthy volunteers. Sci Rep. 2017;7:15906.
    1. Vaiman M, Sigal T, Kimiagar I, Bekerman I. Intracranial Pressure Assessment in Traumatic Head Injury with Hemorrhage Via Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter. J Neurotrauma. 2016;33:2147–2153.
    1. Youm JY, Lee JH, Park HS. Comparison of transorbital ultrasound measurements to predict intracranial pressure in brain-injured patients requiring external ventricular drainage. J Neurosurg. 2022;136:257–263.
    1. Bartsikhovsky T, Klar MM, Bekerman I, Nagieva S, Tal S. Diagnostic tool for initial evaluation of the intracranial pressure on computed tomography in pediatric patients with headache. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0216812.
    1. Zhu S, Cheng C, Zhao D, Zhao Y, Liu X, Zhang J. The clinical and prognostic values of optic nerve sheath diameter and optic nerve sheath diameter/eyeball transverse diameter ratio in comatose patients with supratentorial lesions. BMC Neurol. 2021;21:259.
    1. Bekerman I, Sigal T, Kimiagar I, Vaiman M. Initial evaluation of the intracranial pressure in cases of traumatic brain injury without hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci. 2016;368:285–289.
    1. Feigin VL, Norrving B, Mensah GA. Global Burden of Stroke. Circ Res. 2017;120:439–448.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren