A Systematic Analysis of Biological, Sociodemographic, Psychosocial, and Lifestyle Factors Contributing to Work Ability Across the Working Life Span: Cross-sectional Study

Patrick D Gajewski, Jennifer A Rieker, Georgios Athanassiou, Peter Bröde, Maren Claus, Klaus Golka, Jan G Hengstler, Thomas Kleinsorge, Michael A Nitsche, Jörg Reinders, Anita Tisch, Carsten Watzl, Edmund Wascher, Stephan Getzmann, Patrick D Gajewski, Jennifer A Rieker, Georgios Athanassiou, Peter Bröde, Maren Claus, Klaus Golka, Jan G Hengstler, Thomas Kleinsorge, Michael A Nitsche, Jörg Reinders, Anita Tisch, Carsten Watzl, Edmund Wascher, Stephan Getzmann

Abstract

Background: As employees age, their physical and mental abilities decline and work ability decreases, enhancing the risk for long-term sick leave or even premature retirement. However, the relative impact of biological and environmental determinants on work ability with increasing age is poorly understood in terms of their complexity.

Objective: Previous research has shown relationships between work ability and job and individual resources, as well as specific demographic and lifestyle-related variables. However, other potentially important predictors of work ability remain unexplored, such as personality traits and biological determinants, including cardiovascular, metabolic, immunological, and cognitive abilities or psychosocial factors. Our aim was to systematically evaluate a wide range of factors to extract the most crucial predictors of low and high work ability across the working life span.

Methods: As part of the Dortmund Vital Study, 494 participants from different occupational sectors, aged between 20 and 69 years, completed the Work Ability Index (WAI) assessing employee's mental and physical resources. A total of 30 sociodemographic variables were grouped into 4 categories (social relationships, nutrition and stimulants, education and lifestyle, and work related), and 80 biological and environmental variables were grouped into 8 domains (anthropometric, cardiovascular, metabolic, immunologic, personality, cognitive, stress related, and quality of life) and have been related to the WAI.

Results: Using the analyses, we extracted important sociodemographic factors influencing work ability, such as education, social activities, or sleep quality, and identified age-dependent and age-independent determinants of work ability. Regression models explained up to 52% of the WAI variance. Negative predictors of work ability were chronological and immunological age, immunological inefficiency, BMI, neuroticism, psychosocial stress, emotional exhaustion, demands from work, daily cognitive failures, subclinical depression, and burnout symptoms. Positive predictors were maximum heart rate during ergometry, normal blood pressure, hemoglobin and monocyte concentration, weekly physical activity, commitment to the company, pressure to succeed, and good quality of life.

Conclusions: The identified biological and environmental risk factors allowed us to evaluate work ability in its complexity. Policy makers, employers, and occupational safety and health personnel should consider the modifiable risk factors we identified to promote healthy aging at work through focused physical, dietary, cognitive, and stress-reduced preventive programs, in addition to well-balanced working conditions. This may also increase the quality of life, commitment to the job, and motivation to succeed, which are important factors to maintain or even enhance work ability in the aging workforce and to prevent early retirement.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05155397; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT05155397.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/32352.

Keywords: aging; cardiovascular system; cognitive aging; immunology; lifestyle; metabolism; mobile phone; occupational safety and health; psychosocial stress; public health; work ability.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Patrick D Gajewski, Jennifer A Rieker, Georgios Athanassiou, Peter Bröde, Maren Claus, Klaus Golka, Jan G Hengstler, Thomas Kleinsorge, Michael A Nitsche, Jörg Reinders, Anita Tisch, Carsten Watzl, Edmund Wascher, Stephan Getzmann. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 19.05.2023.

References

    1. Employment rate by age group. OECD Library. [2023-02-03]. .
    1. Bläsing D, Hinrichsen S, Wurm S, Bornewasser M. Information assistance systems as preventive mediators between increasing customization and mental workload. Work. 2022 Aug 11;72(4):1535–48. doi: 10.3233/wor-211283.
    1. Zolg S, Heiden B, Herbig B. Digitally connected work and its consequences for strain - a systematic review. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021 Sep 22;16(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12995-021-00333-z. 10.1186/s12995-021-00333-z
    1. Feldt T, Hyvönen K, Mäkikangas A, Kinnunen U, Kokko K. Development trajectories of Finnish managers' work ability over a 10-year follow-up period. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009 Jan 19;35(1):37–47. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1301. 1301
    1. Ilmarinen J. Towards a Longer Worklife! Ageing and the Quality of Worklife in the European Union. Helsinki Finland: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH); 2005.
    1. Ilmarinen J. Work ability--a comprehensive concept for occupational health research and prevention. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009 Jan;35(1):1–5. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1304. 1304
    1. Zahiri Harsini A, Bohle P, Matthews LR, Ghofranipour F, Sanaeinasab H, Amin Shokravi F, Prasad K. Evaluating the consistency between conceptual frameworks and factors influencing the safe behavior of Iranian workers in the petrochemical industry: mixed methods study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 May 27;7(5):e22851. doi: 10.2196/22851. v7i5e22851
    1. Topa G, Depolo M, Alcover C. Early retirement: a meta-analysis of its antecedent and subsequent correlates. Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 4;8:2157. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02157.
    1. Stara V, Santini S, Kropf J, D'Amen B. Digital health coaching programs among older employees in transition to retirement: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 24;22(9):e17809. doi: 10.2196/17809. v22i9e17809
    1. Jones C, Smith-MacDonald L, Pike A, Bright K, Bremault-Phillips S. Workplace reintegration facilitator training program for mental health literacy and workplace attitudes of public safety personnel: pre-post pilot cohort study. JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 26;6(4):e34394. doi: 10.2196/34394. v6i4e34394
    1. Sierk A, Travers E, Economides M, Loe BS, Sun L, Bolton H. A new digital assessment of mental health and well-being in the workplace: development and validation of the unmind index. JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Jan 17;9(1):e34103. doi: 10.2196/34103. v9i1e34103
    1. Ilmarinen J. The Work Ability Index (WAI) Occupational Med. 2006 Oct 17;57(2):160. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqm008.
    1. Ilmarinen From work ability research to implementation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 12;16(16):2882. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162882. ijerph16162882
    1. Cadiz D, Brady G, Rineer J, Truxillo DM. A review and synthesis of the work ability literature. Work Aging Retire. 2019 Jan;5(1):114–38. doi: 10.1093/workar/way010.
    1. van den Berg TI, Elders LA, de Zwart BC, Burdorf A. The effects of work-related and individual factors on the Work Ability Index: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2009 Apr 18;66(4):211–20. doi: 10.1136/oem.2008.039883.oem.2008.039883
    1. Rieker JA, Gajewski PD, Reales JM, Ballesteros S, Golka K, Hengstler JG, Wascher E, Getzmann S. The impact of physical fitness, social life, and cognitive functions on work ability in middle-aged and older adults. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2023;96:507–20. doi: 10.1007/s00420-022-01943-8.10.1007/s00420-022-01943-8
    1. Gajewski PD, Getzmann S, Bröde P, Burke M, Cadenas C, Capellino S, Claus M, Genç E, Golka K, Hengstler JG, Kleinsorge T, Marchan R, Nitsche MA, Reinders J, van Thriel C, Watzl C, Wascher E. Impact of biological and lifestyle factors on cognitive aging and work ability in the Dortmund vital study: protocol of an interdisciplinary, cross-sectional, and longitudinal study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Mar 14;11(3):e32352. doi: 10.2196/32352. v11i3e32352
    1. Bender R, Lange S. Adjusting for multiple testing—when and how? J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Apr;54(4):343–9. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00314-0.
    1. Perneger TV. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ. 1998 Apr 18;316(7139):1236–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236.
    1. Rothman KJ. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology. 1990 Jan;1(1):43–6.
    1. Savitz DA, Olshan AF. Multiple comparisons and related issues in the interpretation of epidemiologic data. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Nov 01;142(9):904–8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117737.
    1. Tabachnick B, Fidell L. Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc; 1989.
    1. Vatcheva KP, Lee M, McCormick JB, Rahbar MH. Multicollinearity in regression analyses conducted in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 2016 Apr;6(2):227. doi: 10.4172/2161-1165.1000227. 227
    1. Freude G, Jakob O, Martus P, Rose U, Seibt R. Predictors of the discrepancy between calendar and biological age. Occup Med (Lond) 2010 Jan 10;60(1):21–8. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqp113.kqp113
    1. Ng TW, Feldman DC. The moderating effects of age in the relationships of job autonomy to work outcomes. Work Aging Retirement. 2014 Dec 30;1(1):64–78. doi: 10.1093/workar/wau003.
    1. Pohjonen T. Perceived work ability of home care workers in relation to individual and work-related factors in different age groups. Occup Med (Lond) 2001 May;51(3):209–17. doi: 10.1093/occmed/51.3.209.
    1. Riedel N, Müller A, Ebener M. Applying strategies of selection, optimization, and compensation to maintain work ability-a psychosocial resource complementing the job demand-control model? Results from the representative lidA cohort study on work, age, and health in Germany. J Occup Environ Med. 2015 May;57(5):552–61. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000402.
    1. Airila A, Hakanen J, Punakallio A, Lusa S, Luukkonen R. Is work engagement related to work ability beyond working conditions and lifestyle factors? Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012 Nov 21;85(8):915–25. doi: 10.1007/s00420-012-0732-1.
    1. Fischer FM, Borges F, Rotenberg L, Latorre M, Soares NS, Rosa PL, Teixeira LR, Nagai R, Steluti J, Landsbergis P. Work ability of health care shift workers: what matters? Chronobiol Int. 2006 Jul 07;23(6):1165–79. doi: 10.1080/07420520601065083.J113452L77320M7K
    1. Yong M, Nasterlack M, Pluto R, Elmerich K, Karl D, Knauth P. Is health, measured by work ability index, affected by 12-hour rotating shift schedules? Chronobiol Int. 2010 Jul 19;27(5):1135–48. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2010.490111.
    1. Costa G, Sartori S. Ageing, working hours and work ability. Ergonomics. 2007 Nov;50(11):1914–30. doi: 10.1080/00140130701676054.783632316
    1. Elovainio M, Kuusio H, Aalto A, Sinervo T, Heponiemi T. Insecurity and shiftwork as characteristics of negative work environment: psychosocial and behavioural mediators. J Adv Nurs. 2010 May;66(5):1080–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05265.x.JAN5265
    1. Rotenberg L, Griep RH, Fischer FM, Fonseca M, Landsbergis P. Working at night and work ability among nursing personnel: when precarious employment makes the difference. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009 Jul 14;82(7):877–85. doi: 10.1007/s00420-008-0383-4.
    1. Gharibi V, Mokarami H, Taban A, Yazdani Aval M, Samimi K, Salesi M. Effects of work-related stress on work ability index among Iranian workers. Saf Health Work. 2016 Mar;7(1):43–8. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2015.10.005. S2093-7911(15)00093-1
    1. Haines VA, Hurlbert JS, Zimmer C. Occupational stress, social support, and the buffer hypothesis. Work Occupation. 2016 Aug 17;18(2):212–35. doi: 10.1177/0730888491018002005.
    1. Beck AM, Meyers NM. Health enhancement and companion animal ownership. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996 Jan;17(1):247–57. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.17.050196.001335.
    1. Abbasi M, Zakerian A, Kolahdouzi M, Mehri A, Akbarzadeh A, Ebrahimi MH. Relationship between work ability index and cognitive failure among nurses. Electron Physician. 2016 Mar 25;8(3):2136–43. doi: 10.19082/2136. epj-08-2136
    1. Kaleta D, Makowiec-Dabrowska T, Jegier A. Lifestyle index and work ability. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2006;19(3):170–7. doi: 10.2478/v10001-006-0021-x.
    1. Laitinen J, Näyhä S, Kujala V. Body mass index and weight change from adolescence into adulthood, waist-to-hip ratio and perceived work ability among young adults. Int J Obes (Lond) 2005 Jun 22;29(6):697–702. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802936.0802936
    1. Zamunér AR, Minonzio M, Shiffer D, Fornerone R, Cairo B, Porta A, Rigo S, Furlan R, Barbic F. Relationships between cardiovascular autonomic profile and work ability in patients with pure autonomic failure. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Dec 23;15:761501. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.761501.
    1. Bröde P, Claus M, Gajewski PD, Getzmann S, Golka K, Hengstler JG, Wascher E, Watzl C. Calibrating a comprehensive immune age metric to analyze the cross sectional age-related decline in cardiorespiratory fitness. Biology (Basel) 2022 Oct 27;11(11):1576. doi: 10.3390/biology11111576. biology11111576
    1. Peifer C, Hagemann V, Claus M, Larra MF, Aust F, Kühn M, Owczarek M, Bröde P, Pacharra M, Steffens H, Watzl C, Wascher E, Capellino S. Low self-reported stress despite immune-physiological changes in paramedics during rescue operations. EXCLI J. 2021;20:792–811. doi: 10.17179/excli2021-3617. 2021-3617
    1. McGonagle AK, Fisher GG, Barnes-Farrell JL, Grosch JW. Individual and work factors related to perceived work ability and labor force outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2015 Mar;100(2):376–98. doi: 10.1037/a0037974. 2014-43288-001
    1. Schouteten R. Predicting absenteeism: screening for work ability or burnout. Occup Med (Lond) 2017 Jan 07;67(1):52–7. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqw161.kqw161
    1. Sahlin E, Ahlborg G, Matuszczyk J, Grahn P. Nature-based stress management course for individuals at risk of adverse health effects from work-related stress-effects on stress related symptoms, workability and sick leave. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jun 23;11(6):6586–611. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110606586.
    1. Wu S, Li J, Wang M, Wang Z, Li H. Intervention on occupational stress among teachers in the middle schools in China. Stress Health. 2006 Dec;22(5):329–36. doi: 10.1002/smi.1108.
    1. Wallin S, Rauhala A, Fjellman-Wiklund A, Nyman P, Fagerström L. Occupational self-efficacy and work engagement associated with work ability among an ageing work force: a cross-sectional study. Work. 2021 Oct 26;70(2):591–602. doi: 10.3233/wor-213595.
    1. Lindberg P, Josephson M, Alfredsson L, Vingård E. Promoting excellent work ability and preventing poor work ability: the same determinants? Results from the Swedish HAKuL study. Occup Environ Med. 2006 Feb 01;63(2):113–20. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.022129. 63/2/113
    1. Klasan A, Madzarac G, Milosevic M, Mustajbegovic J, Keleuva S. Predictors of lower work ability among emergency medicine employees: the Croatian experience. Emerg Med J. 2013 Apr 09;30(4):275–9. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200780.emermed-2011-200780
    1. Mokarami H, Cousins R, Kalteh HO. Comparison of the work ability index and the work ability score for predicting health-related quality of life. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022 Jan 05;95(1):213–21. doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01740-9.10.1007/s00420-021-01740-9
    1. Adult education level. OECD. .
    1. Lebrasseur A, Fortin-Bédard N, Lettre J, Raymond E, Bussières E-L, Lapierre N, Faieta J, Vincent C, Duchesne L, Ouellet M, Gagnon E, Tourigny A, Lamontagne M, Routhier F. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on older adults: rapid review. JMIR Aging. 2021 Apr 12;4(2):e26474. doi: 10.2196/26474. v4i2e26474
    1. sustAGE homepage. sustAGE. .
    1. Athanassiou G, Gajewski PD, Ascolese A. Sustainable work through technology-assisted enhancement of cognitive abilities of older employees: the sustAGE approach. Gesundheitswesen. 2021;83((08/09)):662. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731984.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren