Two Hits for Bone Regeneration in Aged Patients: Vertebral Bone Marrow Clot as a Biological Scaffold and Powerful Source of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Francesca Salamanna, Deyanira Contartese, Veronica Borsari, Stefania Pagani, Giovanni Barbanti Brodano, Cristiana Griffoni, Alessandro Ricci, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Milena Fini, Francesca Salamanna, Deyanira Contartese, Veronica Borsari, Stefania Pagani, Giovanni Barbanti Brodano, Cristiana Griffoni, Alessandro Ricci, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Milena Fini

Abstract

Recently, the use of a new formulation of bone marrow aspirate (BMA), the BMA clot, has been described. This product entails a naturally formed clot from the harvested bone marrow, which retains all the BMA components preserved in a matrix biologically molded by the clot. Even though its beneficial effects were demonstrated by some studies, the impact of aging and aging-associated processes on biological properties and the effect of BMA cell-based therapy are currently unknown. The purpose of our study was to compare selected parameters and properties of clotted BMA and BMA-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from younger (<45 years) and older (>65 years) female donors. Clotted BMA growth factors (GFs) expression, MSCs morphology and viability, doubling time, surface marker expression, clonogenic potential, three-lineage differentiation, senescence-associated factors, and Klotho synthesis from younger and older donors were analyzed. Results indicated that donor age does not affect tissue-specific BMA clot regenerative properties such as GFs expression and MSCs morphology, viability, doubling time, surface antigens expression, colony-forming units, osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation, and Klotho and senescence-associated gene expression. Only few differences, i.e., increased platelet-derived growth factor-AB (PDGF-AB) synthesis and MSCs Aggrecan (ACAN) expression, were detected in younger donors in comparison with older ones. However, these differences do not interfere with all the other BMA clot biological properties. These results demonstrated that BMA clot can be applied easily, without any sample processing and avoiding potential contamination risks as well as losing cell viability, proliferation, and differentiation ability, for autologous transplantation in aged patients. The vertebral BMA clot showed two successful hits since it works as a biological scaffold and as a powerful source of mesenchymal stem cells, thus representing a novel and advanced therapeutic alternative for the treatment of orthopedic injuries.

Keywords: aging; bone marrow; clot; orthopedic injuries; regenerative medicine.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Salamanna, Contartese, Borsari, Pagani, Barbanti Brodano, Griffoni, Ricci, Gasbarrini and Fini.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Clotted BMA (A) after the remotion from the disposable plastic graduated container and (B) in the culture flask.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Representative image of (A,C,E) younger and (B,D,F) older MSCs from clotted BMA. (A,B) MSCs from clotted BMA at 6 days of culture; the presence of some red blood cells, platelets, and leucocytes. Magnification ×20. (C,D) MSCs from clotted BMA at 20 days of culture; the homogenous population of spindle-shaped and plastic-adherent cells. Magnification ×4. (E,F) Live/Dead analyses at 20 days of culture; green staining: viable cells; red staining: dead cells.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
TGF-β 1, BMP-2, bFGF, VEGF, PDGF-AB, PDGF-CC protein synthesis after 72 h of the culture of BMAs’ clot from younger and older donors. PDGF-AB: *** younger versus older (***p < 0.0005).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Population doubling time for MSCs from BMAs clot for younger and older donors.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
(A) Comparison of MSCs’ surface markers expression CD44, CD90, CD105, and CD73 for BMAs clot from younger and older donors; (B) representative histogram of the flow cytometry analysis (FACS) of the MSC-related CD surface markers in BMAs clot from younger and older donors. (A) and (B) demonstrated high positive expression of CD44, CD90, CD105, and CD73 in both MSCs from BMAs clot from younger and older donors.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
(A) Comparison of MSCs’ surface markers expression CD31, CD34, CD45 for BMAs clot from younger and older donors; (B) representative histogram of the flow cytometry analysis (FACS) of the MSC-related CD surface markers in BMAs clot from younger and older donors. (A,B) demonstrated negative expression of CD31, CD34, CD45 in both MSCs from BMAs clot from younger and older donors.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Colony-forming units (CFUs) count of MSCs from BMAs’ clot from younger and older donors after 10 days of culture in basal medium. The circle chart indicates the number of positive colonies. Representative images of CFUs onto 12-well plates were observed after 10 days of culture.
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8
(A) Representative images of osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs derived from clotted BMAs from younger donors (left: Alizarin Red S staining, magnification ×10, and Oil red O, magnification ×20; right: LIVE/DEAD fluorescent staining, magnification ×10), (B) from older donors (left: Alizarin Red S staining, magnification ×10 and, Oil red O, magnification ×20; right: LIVE/DEAD fluorescent staining, magnification ×10), and (C) images of chondrogenic differentiation from both younger and older donors (Alcian blue–nuclear fast red staining, magnification ×10) differentiation of MSCs derived from clotted BMAs from both younger and older donors.
FIGURE 9
FIGURE 9
Gene expression measured by semiquantitative PCR of osteogenic (COL1A1, RUNX2, BGLAP), adipogenic (ADIPO Q, PPARγ), and chondrogenic (SOX9, ACAN, COL2A1) markers comparing the differentiation potential of MSCs derived from clotted BMAs from younger and older donors. ACAN: *** younger versus older (***p < 0.0005).
FIGURE 10
FIGURE 10
Gene expression of MSCs derived from clotted BMAs from younger and older donors measured by semiquantitative PCR for Klotho and senescence-associated gene expression (IL1β, IL1α, IL6, IL8, CCL4, CXCL2, TNFα, and MCP-1).

References

    1. Akiyama H., Chaboissier M. C., Martin J. F., Schedl A., de Crombrugghe B. (2002). The Transcription Factor Sox9 Has Essential Roles in Successive Steps of the Chondrocyte Differentiation Pathway and Is Required for Expression of Sox5 and Sox6. Genes Dev. 16 (21), 2813–2828. 10.1101/gad.1017802
    1. Alonso-Goulart V., Carvalho L. N., Marinho A. L. G., de Oliveira Souza B. L., de Aquino Pinto Palis G., Lage H. G. D., et al. (2021). Biomaterials and Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Regenerative Medicine: A Systematic Review. Materials 14 (16), 4641. 10.3390/ma14164641
    1. Baker N., Boyette L. B., Tuan R. S. (2015). Characterization of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Aging. Bone 70, 37–47. 10.1016/j.bone.2014.10.014
    1. Boskey A. L., Coleman R. (2010). Aging and Bone. J. Dent Res. 89 (12), 1333–1348. 10.1177/0022034510377791
    1. Boyette L., Tuan R. (2014). Adult Stem Cells and Diseases of Aging. Jcm 3 (1), 88–134. 10.3390/jcm3010088
    1. Charif N., Li Y. Y., Targa L., Zhang L., Ye J. S., Li Y. P., et al. (2017). Aging of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal/stem Cells: Implications on Autologous Regenerative Medicine. Biomed. Mater. Eng. 28 (s1), S57. 10.3233/BME-171624
    1. Curtis E., Litwic A., Cooper C., Dennison E. (2015). Determinants of Muscle and Bone Aging. J. Cel. Physiol. 230 (11), 2618–2625. 10.1002/jcp.25001
    1. D'Ippolito G., Schiller P. C., Ricordi C., Roos B. A., Howard G. A. (1999). Age-related Osteogenic Potential of Mesenchymal Stromal Stem Cells from Human Vertebral Bone Marrow. J. Bone Miner Res. 14 (7), 1115–1122. 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.7.1115
    1. Dzobo K. (2021). Recent Trends in Multipotent Human Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells: Learning from History and Advancing Clinical Applications. OMICS: A J. Integr. Biol. 25 (6), 342–357. 10.1089/omi.2021.0049
    1. Enarsson M., Erlandsson A., Larsson H., Forsberg-Nilsson K. (2002). Extracellular Signal-Regulated Protein Kinase Signaling Is Uncoupled from Initial Differentiation of central Nervous System Stem Cells to Neurons. Mol. Cancer Res. 1, 147–154.
    1. Fu J., Wang Y., Jiang Y., Du J., Xu J., Liu Y. (2021). Systemic Therapy of MSCs in Bone Regeneration: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stem Cel Res Ther 12 (1), 377. 10.1186/s13287-021-02456-w
    1. Ganguly P., El-Jawhari J. J., Giannoudis P. V., Burska A. N., Ponchel F., Jones E. A. (2017). Age-related Changes in Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Cel Transpl. 26 (9), 1520–1529. 10.1177/0963689717721201
    1. Gibon E., Lu L., Goodman S. B. (2016). Aging, Inflammation, Stem Cells, and Bone Healing. Stem Cel Res Ther 7, 44. 10.1186/s13287-016-0300-9
    1. Grafe I., Alexander S., Peterson J. R., Snider T. N., Levi B., Lee B., et al. (2018). TGF-β Family Signaling in Mesenchymal Differentiation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect. Biol. 10 (5), a022202. 10.1101/cshperspect.a022202
    1. Hernigou P., Poignard A., Manicom O., Mathieu G., Rouard H. (2005). The Use of Percutaneous Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation in Nonunion and Avascular Necrosis of Bone. The J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. volume 87-B (7), 896–902. 10.1302/0301-620x.87b7.16289
    1. Ho S. S., Vollmer N. L., Refaat M. I., Jeon O., Alsberg E., Lee M. A., et al. (2016). Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Promotes Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Survival and Resultant Bone Formation when Entrapped in Photocrosslinked Alginate Hydrogels. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5 (19), 2501–2509. 10.1002/adhm.201600461
    1. Huang Q., Wang Y. D., Wu T., Jiang S., Hu Y. L., Pei G. X. (2009). Preliminary Separation of the Growth Factors in Platelet-Rich Plasma: Effects on the Proliferation of Human Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Chin. Med. J. (Engl) 122, 83–87.
    1. Ikeda T., Kamekura S., Mabuchi A., Kou I., Seki S., Takato T., et al. (2004). The Combination of SOX5, SOX6, and SOX9 (The SOX Trio) Provides Signals Sufficient for Induction of Permanent Cartilage. Arthritis Rheum. 50 (11), 3561–3573. 10.1002/art.20611
    1. Kozhemyakina E., Lassar A. B., Zelzer E. (2015). A Pathway to Bone: Signaling Molecules and Transcription Factors Involved in Chondrocyte Development and Maturation. Development 142 (5), 817–831. 10.1242/dev.105536
    1. Kumar A., Salimath B. P., Stark G. B., Finkenzeller G. (2010). Platelet-derived Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Is Not Involved in Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Tissue Eng. A 16, 983–993. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0230
    1. Kuro-o M. (2012). Klotho in Health and Disease. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 21, 362–368. 10.1097/mnh.0b013e32835422ad
    1. Lefebvre V., Smits P. (2005). Transcriptional Control of Chondrocyte Fate and Differentiation. Birth Defect Res. C 75 (3), 200–212. 10.1002/bdrc.20048
    1. Li Y., Wu Q., Wang Y., Li L., Bu H., Bao J. (2017). Senescence of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 39 (4), 775–782. 10.3892/ijmm.2017.2912
    1. Li Y., Yu X., Lin S., Li X., Zhang S., Song Y. H. (2007). Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Enhances the Migratory Capacity of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun. 356, 780–784. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.03.049
    1. Lim Z. X. H., Rai B., Tan T. C., Ramruttun A. K., Hui J. H., Nurcombe V., et al. (2019). Autologous Bone Marrow Clot as an Alternative to Autograft for Bone Defect Healing. Bone Jt. Res. 8 (3), 107–117. 10.1302/2046-3758.83.bjr-2018-0096.r1
    1. Liu C. F., Lefebvre V. (2015). The Transcription Factors SOX9 and SOX5/SOX6 Cooperate Genome-wide through Super-enhancers to Drive Chondrogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 43 (17), 8183–8203. 10.1093/nar/gkv688
    1. Ma Y., Qi M., An Y., Zhang L., Yang R., Doro D. H., et al. (2018). Autophagy Controls Mesenchymal Stem Cell Properties and Senescence during Bone Aging. Aging Cell 17 (1), e12709. 10.1111/acel.12709
    1. Malaise O., Tachikart Y., Constantinides M., Mumme M., Ferreira-Lopez R., Noack S., et al. (2019). Mesenchymal Stem Cell Senescence Alleviates Their Intrinsic and Seno-Suppressive Paracrine Properties Contributing to Osteoarthritis Development. Aging 11 (20), 9128–9146. 10.18632/aging.102379
    1. Marędziak M., Marycz K., Tomaszewski K. A., Kornicka K., Henry B. M. (2016). The Influence of Aging on the Regenerative Potential of Human Adipose Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cell Int 2016, 2152435. 10.1155/2016/2152435
    1. Muschler G. F., Nitto H., Matsukura Y., Boehm C., Valdevit A., Kambic H., et al. (2003). Spine Fusion Using Cell Matrix Composites Enriched in Bone Marrow-Derived Cells. Clin. Orthopaedics Relat. Res. 407, 102–118. 10.1097/00003086-200302000-00018
    1. Ogino Y., Ayukawa Y., Kukita T., Koyano K. (2006). The Contribution of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor, Transforming Growth Factor-Β1, and Insulin-like Growth Factor-I in Platelet-Rich Plasma to the Proliferation of Osteoblast-like Cells. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontology 101, 724–729. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.08.016
    1. Palta S., Saroa R., Palta A. (2014). Overview of the Coagulation System. Indian J. Anaesth. 58 (5), 515–523. 10.4103/0019-5049.144643
    1. Salamanna F., Contartese D., Giavaresi G., Sicuro L., Barbanti Brodano G., Gasbarrini A., et al. (2020). A Rationale for the Use of Clotted Vertebral Bone Marrow to Aid Tissue Regeneration Following Spinal Surgery. Sci. Rep. 10 (1), 4115. 10.1038/s41598-020-60934-2
    1. Santos Duarte Lana J. F., Furtado da Fonseca L., Mosaner T., Tieppo C. E., Marques Azzini G. O., Ribeiro L. L., et al. (2020). Bone Marrow Aspirate Clot: A Feasible Orthobiologic. J. Clin. Orthopaedics Trauma 11 (Suppl. 5), S789–S794. 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.07.003
    1. Schmittgen T. D., Livak K. J. (2008). Analyzing Real-Time PCR Data by the Comparative CT Method. Nat. Protoc. 3 (6), 1101–1108. 10.1038/nprot.2008.73
    1. Segal J. B., Moliterno A. R. (2006). Platelet Counts Differ by Sex, Ethnicity, and Age in the United States. Ann. Epidemiol. 16 (2), 123–130. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.06.052
    1. Shang F., Yu Y., Liu S., Ming L., Zhang Y., Zhou Z., et al. (2021). Advancing Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Bone Tissue Regeneration. Bioactive Mater. 6, 666–683. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.014
    1. Tokunaga A., Oya T., Ishii Y., Motomura H., Nakamura C., Ishizawa S., et al. (2008). PDGF Receptor β Is a Potent Regulator of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Function. J. Bone Miner Res. 23, 1519–1528. 10.1359/jbmr.080409
    1. Turinetto V., Vitale E., Giachino C. (2016). Senescence in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Functional Changes and Implications in Stem Cell-Based Therapy. Ijms 17 (7), 1164. 10.3390/ijms17071164
    1. Veronesi F., Giavaresi G., Tschon M., Borsari V., Nicoli Aldini N., Fini M. (2013). Clinical Use of Bone Marrow, Bone Marrow Concentrate, and Expanded Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Cartilage Disease. Stem Cell Dev. 22 (2), 181–192. 10.1089/scd.2012.0373
    1. Wilson A. J., Rand E., Webster A. J., Genever P. G. (2021). Characterisation of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Clinical Trial Reports: Analysis of Published Descriptors. Stem Cel Res Ther 12 (1), 360. 10.1186/s13287-021-02435-1
    1. Wirz S., Dietrich M., Flanagan T. C., Bokermann G., Wagner W., Schmitz-Rode T., et al. (2011). Influence of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-AB on Tissue Development in Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Gels. Tissue Eng. Part A 17, 1891–1899. 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0610
    1. Zhang S., Xie D., Zhang Q. (2021). Mesenchymal Stem Cells Plus Bone Repair Materials as a Therapeutic Strategy for Abnormal Bone Metabolism: Evidence of Clinical Efficacy and Mechanisms of Action Implied. Pharmacol. Res. 172, 105851. 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105851
    1. Zhang Y., Ravikumar M., Ling L., Nurcombe V., Cool S. M. (2021). Age-Related Changes in the Inflammatory Status of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Implications for Cell Therapy. Stem Cel Rep. 16 (4), 694–707. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.01.021

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren