Commentary: Physiological and Psychological Impact of Face Mask Usage during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Jennifer L Scheid, Shannon P Lupien, Gregory S Ford, Sarah L West, Jennifer L Scheid, Shannon P Lupien, Gregory S Ford, Sarah L West

Abstract

In this commentary, we discuss the physiological effects of wearing masks for prolonged periods of time, including special considerations, such as mask wearing among those who engage in exercise training, and concerns for individuals with pre-existing chronic diseases. In healthy populations, wearing a mask does not appear to cause any harmful physiological alterations, and the potentially life-saving benefits of wearing face masks seem to outweigh the documented discomforts (e.g. headaches). However, there continues to be controversy over mask wearing in the United States, even though wearing a mask appears to have only minor physiological drawbacks. While there are minimal physiological impacts on wearing a mask, theoretical evidence suggests that there may be consequential psychological impacts of mask wearing on the basic psychological needs of competence, autonomy, and relatedness. These psychological impacts may contribute to the controversy associated with wearing masks during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. After we discuss the physiological impacts of mask wearing, we will discuss psychological effects associated with wearing masks during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords: COVID-19; basic phycological needs; exercise; face covering; masks; pandemic; physiology.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. WHO WHO Timeline—COVID-19. [(accessed on 23 June 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. Cumulative Cases. [(accessed on 22 July 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. Hauck G., Gelles K., Bravo V., Thorson M. Five months in: A timeline of how COVID-19 has unfolded in the US. USA Today. Jun 23, 2020.
    1. Considerations for Wearing Cloth Face Coverings. [(accessed on 29 June 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. N95 Respirators, Surgical Masks, and Face Masks. [(accessed on 1 July 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. Smith J.D., MacDougall C.C., Johnstone J., Copes R.A., Schwartz B., Garber G.E. Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2016;188:567–574. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150835.
    1. Konda A., Prakash A., Moss G.A., Schmoldt M., Grant G.D., Guha S. Aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in respiratory cloth masks. ACS Nano. 2020;14:6339–6347. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c03252.
    1. Worden L., Wannier R., Blumberg S., Ge A.Y., Rutherford G.W., Porco T.C. Estimation of effects of contact tracing and mask adoption on COVID-19 transmission in San Francisco: A modeling study. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.06.09.20125831.
    1. Beder A., Büyükkoçak Ü., Sabuncuoğlu H., Keskil Z.A., Keskil S. Preliminary report on surgical mask induced deoxygenation during major surgery. Neurocirugía. 2008;19:121–126. doi: 10.1016/S1130-1473(08)70235-5.
    1. Rebmann T., Carrico R., Wang J. Physiologic and other effects and compliance with long-term respirator use among medical intensive care unit nurses. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2013;41:1218–1223. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.02.017.
    1. Roberge R.J., Coca A., Williams W.J., Powell J.B., Palmiero A.J. Physiological impact of the N95 filtering facepiece respirator on healthcare workers. Respir. Care. 2010;55:9.
    1. Scarano A., Inchingolo F., Lorusso F. Facial skin temperature and discomfort when wearing protective face masks: Thermal infrared imaging evaluation and hands moving the mask. IJERPH. 2020;17:4624. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134624.
    1. Chan J.F.-W., Yuan S., Zhang A.J., Poon V.K.-M., Chan C.C.-S., Lee A.C.-Y., Fan Z., Li C., Liang R., Cao J., et al. Surgical mask partition reduces the risk of non-contact transmission in a golden Syrian hamster model for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020:ciaa644. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa644.
    1. Davies A., Thompson K.-A., Giri K., Kafatos G., Walker J., Bennett A. Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: Would they protect in an influenza pandemic? Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 2013;7:413–418. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2013.43.
    1. Teslya A., Pham T.M., Godijk N.G., Kretzschmar M.E., Bootsma M.C.J., Rozhnova G. Impact of self-imposed prevention measures and short-term government-imposed social distancing on mitigating and delaying a COVID-19 epidemic: A modelling study. PLoS Med. 2020;17:e1003166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003166.
    1. Chu D.K., Akl E.A., Duda S., Solo K., Yaacoub S., Schünemann H.J., Chu D.K., Akl E.A., El-harakeh A., Bognanni A., et al. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2020;395:1973–1987. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9.
    1. Roberge R.J., Bayer E., Powell J.B., Coca A., Roberage M.R., Benson S.M. Effect of exhaled moisture on breathing resistance of N95 filtering facepiece respirators. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2010;54:671–677. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meq042.
    1. Kenney W.L., Wilmore J.H., Costill D.L. Physiology of Sport and Exercise. 7th ed. Human Kinetics; Champaign, IL, USA: 2020.
    1. Ong J.J.Y., Bharatendu C., Goh Y., Tang J.Z.Y., Sooi K.W.X., Tan Y.L., Tan B.Y.Q., Teoh H., Ong S.T., Allen D.M., et al. Headaches associated with personal protective equipment—A cross-sectional study among frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19. Headache J. Head Face Pain. 2020;60:864–877. doi: 10.1111/head.13811.
    1. Lim E.C.H., Seet R.C.S., Lee K.-H., Wilder-Smith E.P.V., Chuah B.Y.S., Ong B.K.C. Headaches and the N95 face-mask amongst healthcare providers. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2006;113:199–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00560.x.
    1. Tan K.T., Greaves M.W. N95 acne. Int. J. Dermatol. 2004;43:522–523. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02338.x.
    1. Hu K., Fan J., Li X., Gou X., Li X., Zhou X. The adverse skin reactions of health care workers using personal protective equipment for COVID-19. Medicine. 2020;99:e20603. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020603.
    1. Badri F.M.A. Surgical mask contact dermatitis and epidemiology of conact dermatitis in healthcare workers. Clin. Immunol. 2017;30:183–188.
    1. Roberge R.J., Kim J.-H., Coca A. Protective facemask impact on human thermoregulation: An overview. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2012;56:102–112. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer069.
    1. Luximon Y., Anne Sheen K., Luximon A. Time dependent infrared thermographic evaluation of facemasks. Work. 2016;54:825–835. doi: 10.3233/WOR-162353.
    1. World Health Organization Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Advice for the Public: Myth Busters. [(accessed on 23 July 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. Jetté M., Thoden J., Livingstone S. Physiological effects of inspiratory resistance on progressive aerobic work. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1990;60:65–70. doi: 10.1007/BF00572188.
    1. Fikenzer S., Uhe T., Lavall D., Rudolph U., Falz R., Busse M., Hepp P., Laufs U. Effects of surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01704-y.
    1. Nielsen R., Gwosdow A.R., Berglund L.G., DuBOIS A.B. The effect of temperature and humidity levels in a protective mask on user acceptability during exercise. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 1987;48:639–645. doi: 10.1080/15298668791385336.
    1. Smart N.R., Horwell C.J., Smart T.S., Galea K.S. Assessment of the wearability of facemasks against air pollution in primary school-aged children in London. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:3935. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113935.
    1. Roeckner J.T., Krstić N., Sipe B.H., Običan S.G. N95 filtering facepiece respirator use during pregnancy: A systematic review. Am. J. Perinatol. 2020;37:995. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712475.
    1. Kao T.-W., Huang K.-C., Huang Y.-L., Tsai T.-J., Hsieh B.-S., Wu M.-S. The physiological impact of wearing an N95 mask during hemodialysis as a precaution against SARS in patients with end-stage renal disease. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2004;103:624–628.
    1. Harber P., Bansal S., Santiago S., Liu D., Yun D., Ng D., Liu Y., Wu S. Multidomain Subjective Response to Respirator Use During Simulated Work. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2009;51:38–45. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31817f458b.
    1. What People with Asthma Need to Know about Face Masks and Coverings during the COVID-19 Pandemic. [(accessed on 14 July 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. Muniyappa R., Gubbi S. COVID-19 pandemic, coronaviruses, and diabetes mellitus. Am. J. Physiol. -Endocrinol. Metab. 2020;318:E736–E741. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00124.2020.
    1. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. The Guilford Press; New York, NY, USA: 2008. Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior; pp. 654–678.
    1. Brehm S.S., Brehm J.W. Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. Academic Press; New York, NY, USA: 1981.
    1. Steindl C., Jonas E., Sittenthaler S., Traut-Mattausch E., Greenberg J. Understanding psychological reactance: New developments and findings. Z. Psychol. 2015;223:205–214. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000222.
    1. Hornik R., Jacobsohn L., Orwin R., Piesse A., Kalton G. Effects of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign on Youths. Am. J. Public Health. 2008;98:2229–2236. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.125849.
    1. Rains S.A. The nature of psychological reactance revisited: A meta-analytic review. Hum. Commun. Res. 2013;39:47–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.x.
    1. Smith M.J. The effects of threats to attitudinal freedom as a function of message quality and initial receiver attitude. Commun. Monogr. 1977;44:196–206. doi: 10.1080/03637757709390131.
    1. DeCaro D.A., Janssen M.A., Lee A. Synergistic effects of voting and enforcement on internalized motivation to cooperate in a resource dilemma. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 2015;10:511–537.
    1. Americans Disillusioned with Fellow Citizens’ Response to Pandemic as Denial Mounts. [(accessed on 23 July 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. Baumeister R.F., Leary M.R. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 1995;117:497–529. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.
    1. Tajfel H. Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Sci. Am. 1970;223:96–102. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1170-96.
    1. Misegades L.K. Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions for Influenza-Like Illness: Effectiveness, Behavior Change, and Barriers to Use among Participants Enrolled in the REDI-US Study. University of California; Berkeley, CA, USA: 2009.
    1. Tajfel H., Turner J.C., Austin W.G., Worchel S. Organizational Identity: A Reader. Brooks/Cole; Monterey, CA, USA: 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict; pp. 56–65.
    1. Branscombe N.R., Wann D.L., Noel J.G., Coleman J. In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 1993;19:381–388. doi: 10.1177/0146167293194003.
    1. Palmer C.L., Peterson R.D. Toxic Mask-ulinity: The link between masculine toughness and affective reactions to mask wearing in the COVID-19 era. Politics Gend. 2020:1–14. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X20000422.
    1. Vandello J.A., Bosson J.K. Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychol. Men Masc. 2013;14:101–113. doi: 10.1037/a0029826.
    1. Mahalik J.R., Burns S.M., Syzdek M. Masculinity and perceived normative health behaviors as predictors of men’s health behaviors. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007;64:2201–2209. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.035.
    1. Lau J.T.F., Griffiths S., Choi K.-C., Lin C. Prevalence of preventive behaviors and associated factors during early phase of the H1N1 influenza epidemic. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2010;38:374–380. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.03.002.
    1. Condon B.J., Sinha T. Who is that masked person: The use of face masks on Mexico City public transportation during the Influenza A (H1N1) outbreak. Health Policy. 2010;95:50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.009.
    1. Tang C.S., Wong C. Factors influencing the wearing of facemasks to prevent the severe acute respiratory syndrome among adult Chinese in Hong Kong. Prev Med. 2004;39:1187–1193. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.032.
    1. Capraro V., Barcelo H. The effect of messaging and gender on intentions to wear a face covering to slow down COVID-19 transmission. arXiv. 20202005.05467
    1. Cialdini R.B., Goldstein N.J. Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annu Rev. Psychol. 2004;55:591–621. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015.
    1. Adams J.M. Seriously People- STOP BUYING MASKS! [(accessed on 23 July 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COIVD-19) [(accessed on 23 July 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. Adams J.M. Some Feel Face Coverings Infringe on Their Freedom of Choice-but if More Wear Them, We’ll Have MORE Freedom to Go out. [(accessed on 23 July 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. Breslow J. Fauci: Mixed Messaging on Masks Set U.S. Public Health Response Back. KPCW; Park City, UT, USA: 2020.
    1. Sell T.K., Hosangadi D., Trotochaud M. Misinformation and the US Ebola communication crisis: Analyzing the veracity and content of social media messages related to a fear-inducing infectious disease outbreak. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:550. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08697-3.
    1. Nickerson R.S. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 1998;2:175–220. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.
    1. Baron J. Thinking and Deciding. 4th ed. Cambridge University Press; New York, NY, USA: 2008.
    1. Leffler C.T., Ing E.B., Lykins J.D., Hogan M.C., McKeown C.A., Grzybowski A. Association of country-wide coronavirus mortality with demographics, testing, lockdowns, and public wearing of masks. Update August 4, 2020. Epidemiology. 2020 Aug 4; doi: 10.1101/2020.05.22.20109231.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren