Effect of robotic tilt table verticalization on recovery in patients with disorders of consciousness: a randomized controlled trial

M J Rosenfelder, V C Helmschrott, L Willacker, B Einhäupl, T M Raiser, A Bender, M J Rosenfelder, V C Helmschrott, L Willacker, B Einhäupl, T M Raiser, A Bender

Abstract

Verticalization is a common therapeutic intervention during rehabilitation of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC). The Erigo®Pro is a robotic tilt-table (RTT) with built-in stepping unit for the lower extremities to prevent orthostatic hypotension during verticalization. In addition, the system also provides functional electrical stimulation (FES) of muscles of the lower extremities. In this randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT), 47 patients with subacute DoC received a 4-week verticalization regime (16 verticalization sessions) and were allocated to one of three experimental groups: (1) verticalization by means of RTT with FES, (2) by means of RTT without FES, or (3) by conventional physiotherapy (CPT). Level of consciousness (LoC), spasticity, functional independence in daily activities, and functional brain connectivity measured by means of high-density quantitative EEG were assessed at baseline, directly after the verticalization program and after 6 months. There was a similar clinical improvement in all three experimental groups. RTT was not associated with an effect on any of the clinical outcomes. Verticalization or mobilization time during the study period was significantly positively correlated with recovery of consciousness (rho = 0.494, p < 0.001) in the short term and showed a statistical trend at the 6 months follow-up (rho = 0.244, p = 0.078). In conclusion, RTT treatment is not more effective in promoting recovery of consciousness than CPT in subacute DoC patients. Yet, our data suggest, that verticalization may be an important and feasible rehabilitation intervention in this group of patients. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT Number NCT02639481, registered on December 24, 2015.

Keywords: Disorders of consciousness; ERIGO®; Functional recovery; Tilt table; Verticalization.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Erigo®Pro (Hocoma AG, Volketswil, Switzerland) robotic tilt table system with cyclic leg movement function with a) 75° and b) 90° tilt, respectively
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CONSORT-guidelines based flow of patients through the study. RTT+F Erigo®Pro treatment with functional electrical stimulation, RTT-F Erigo®Pro treatment without functional electrical stimulation, CPT conventional physiotherapy, T3 time-point after 2 weeks of treatment, T4 time-point of treatment finalization four weeks after inclusion, T5 time-point after treatment follow-up
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Number of patients for whom the level of consciousness (LoC) had (not) increased from baseline (T0) to end of treatment (T4) by at least one category as determined by the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Change of category can be unresponsive wakefulness (UWS) to minimally conscious state minus (MCS-), MCS- to minimally conscious state plus (MCS+), or MCS + to emergence from minimally conscious state (eMCS). RTT+F Erigo®Pro treatment with functional electrical stimulation, RTT-F Erigo®Pro treatment without functional electrical stimulation, CPT conventional physiotherapy
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Change scores in spasticity as measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) between baseline (T0) and end of treatment (T4). The rectangles represent the interquartile range; the bold horizontal lines inside the rectangles show the medians of each group, empty circles indicate potential outliers whereas the whiskers, which represent 1.5 distance from IQR1 and IQR3, are calculated by the default boxplot R function. RTT+F Erigo®Pro treatment with functional electrical stimulation, RTT-F Erigo®Pro treatment without functional electrical stimulation, CPT conventional physiotherapy
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Correlation between verticalization time (minutes) during the four-week treatment period and the change in the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) modified score between baseline and end of treatment. RTT+F/−F = robotic tilt table groups with (+F) and without (−F) functional electrical stimulation of the lower limbs. CPT conventional physiotherapy

References

    1. Owen AM. Disorders of consciousness. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1124:225–238. doi: 10.1196/annals.1440.013.
    1. Edlow BL, Claassen J, Schiff ND, Greer DM. Recovery from disorders of consciousness: mechanisms, prognosis and emerging therapies. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17:135–156. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-00428-x.
    1. Giacino JT, Fins JJ, Laureys S, Schiff ND. Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10:99–114. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.279.
    1. Wilson BA, Dhamapurkar S, Rose A. Assessment and treatment of people with a disorder of consciousness: an account of some recent studies. Psychol Neurosci. 2016;9:221–229. doi: 10.1037/pne0000053.
    1. Rocca A, Pignat JM, Berney L, et al. Sympathetic activity and early mobilization in patients in intensive and intermediate care with severe brain injuries: a preliminary prospective randomized study. BMC Neurol. 2016;16:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0684-2.
    1. Daunoraviciene K, Adomaviciene A, Grigonyte A, et al. Effects of robot-assisted training on upper limb functional recovery during the rehabilitation of poststroke patients. Technol Heal Care. 2018;26:S533–S542. doi: 10.3233/THC-182500.
    1. Sorbera C, Portaro S, Cimino V, et al. ERIGO: a possible strategy to treat orthostatic hypotension in progressive supranuclear palsy? A feasibility study. Funct Neurol. 2019;34:93–97.
    1. Calabrò RS, Naro A, Russo M, et al. Do post-stroke patients benefit from robotic verticalization? A pilot-study focusing on a novel neurophysiological approach. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33:671–681. doi: 10.3233/RNN-140475.
    1. Luther MS, Krewer C, Müller F, Koenig E. Comparison of orthostatic reactions of patients still unconscious within the first three months of brain injury on a tilt table with and without integrated stepping. A prospective, randomized crossover pilot trial. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22:1034–1041. doi: 10.1177/0269215508092821.
    1. Riberholt CG, Olsen MH, Søndergaard CB, et al. Early orthostatic exercise by head-up tilt with stepping vs standard care after severe traumatic brain injury is feasible. Front Neurol. 2021;12:100856. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.626014.
    1. Ancona E, Quarenghi A, Simonini M, et al. Effect of verticalization with Erigo® in the acute rehabilitation of severe acquired brain injury. Neurol Sci. 2019;40:2073–2080. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-03917-0.
    1. Greco A, Carboncini MC, Virgillito A et al (2013) Quantitative EEG analysis in minimally conscious state patients during postural changes. In: Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc EMBS, pp 6313–6316. 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610997
    1. Ng H, King A. A systematic review of head-up tilt to improve consciousness in people with a prolonged disorder of consciousness. Clin Rehabil. 2021;35:13–25. doi: 10.1177/0269215520946696.
    1. Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:2020–2029. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033.
    1. Annen J, Filippini MM, Bonin E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the CRS-R index in patients with disorders of consciousness. Brain Inj. 2019 doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1644376.
    1. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6–18.
    1. Lee KC, Carson L, Kinnin E, Patterson V. The Ashworth Scale: a reliable and reproducible method of measuring spasticity. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 1989;3:205–209. doi: 10.1177/136140968900300406.
    1. Riberholt CG, Olsen MH, Berg RMG, et al. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation during early orthostatic exercise in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: further exploratory analyses from a randomized clinical feasibility trial. J Clin Neurosci. 2021;92:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.07.047.
    1. Chennu S, Annen J, Wannez S, et al. Brain networks predict metabolism, diagnosis and prognosis at the bedside in disorders of consciousness. Brain. 2017;140:2120–2132. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx163.
    1. Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004;134:9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009.
    1. Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen JM. FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011 doi: 10.1155/2011/156869.
    1. Krewer C, Luther M, Koenig E, Möller F. Tilt table therapies for patients with severe disorders of consciousness: a randomized, controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:1–14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143180.
    1. Frazzitta G, Zivi I, Valsecchi R, et al. Effectiveness of a very early stepping verticalization protocol in severe acquired brain injured patients: a randomized pilot study in icu. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:1–15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158030.
    1. Grill E, Klein AM, Howell K, et al. Rationale and design of the prospective German registry of outcome in patients with severe disorders of consciousness after acute brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1870–1876. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.040.
    1. Rusek W, Adamczyk M, Baran J, et al. Feasibility of Using Erigo and Lokomat in Rehabilitation for Patient in Vegetative State: A Case Report. J Clin Case. 2020;10:2–5.
    1. Bartolo M, Bargellesi S, Castion CA, Bonaiuti D. Early rehabilitation for severe acquired brain injury in intensive care unit: multicenter observational study. Michelangelo. 2011;47:381–390.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren