A phase 1/2 trial to assess safety and efficacy of a vaporized 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine formulation (GH001) in patients with treatment-resistant depression

Johannes T Reckweg, Cees J van Leeuwen, Cécile Henquet, Therese van Amelsvoort, Eef L Theunissen, Natasha L Mason, Riccardo Paci, Theis H Terwey, Johannes G Ramaekers, Johannes T Reckweg, Cees J van Leeuwen, Cécile Henquet, Therese van Amelsvoort, Eef L Theunissen, Natasha L Mason, Riccardo Paci, Theis H Terwey, Johannes G Ramaekers

Abstract

Background: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a substantial public health burden, but current treatments have limited effectiveness. The aim was to investigate the safety and potential antidepressant effects of the serotonergic psychedelic drug 5-MeO-DMT in a vaporized formulation (GH001) in adult patients with TRD.

Methods: The Phase 1 part (n = 8) of the trial investigated two single dose levels of GH001 (12 mg, 18 mg) with a primary endpoint of safety, and the Phase 2 part (n = 8) investigated an individualized dosing regimen (IDR) with up to three increasing doses of GH001 (6 mg, 12 mg, and 18 mg) within a single day, with a primary endpoint of efficacy, as assessed by the proportion of patients in remission (MADRS ≤ 10) on day 7.

Results: Administration of GH001 via inhalation was well tolerated. The proportion of patients in remission (MADRS ≤ 10) at day 7 was 2/4 (50%) and 1/4 (25%) in the 12 mg and 18 mg groups of Phase 1, respectively, and 7/8 (87.5%) in the IDR group of Phase 2, meeting its primary endpoint (p < 0.0001). All remissions were observed from day 1, with 6/10 remissions observed from 2 h. The mean MADRS change from baseline to day 7 was -21.0 (-65%) and - 12.5 (-40%) for the 12 and 18 mg groups, respectively, and - 24.4 (-76%) for the IDR.

Conclusion: Administration of GH001 to a cohort of 16 patients with TRD was well tolerated and provided potent and ultra-rapid antidepressant effects. Individualized dosing with up to three doses of GH001 on a single day was superior to single dose administration.Clinical Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT04698603.

Keywords: 5-MeO-DMT; clinical trial; individualized dosing; psychedelics; treatment-resistant depression.

Conflict of interest statement

JRe and JRa are scientific consultants to GH Research. TT is an employee and shareholder of GH Research. The authors declare that this study received funding from GH Research. The funder had the following involvement in the study: study design, data analysis and preparation of the manuscript. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2023 Reckweg, van Leeuwen, Henquet, van Amelsvoort, Theunissen, Mason, Paci, Terwey and Ramaekers.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Upper panel (A) shows a diagram of participant flow. The lower panel (B) shows the flow of study assessments from pre-screening (Visit A) through Screening (Visit B), Baseline (Visit C1), after administration (Visit C2), 1 day follow-up (Visit D) to the 7 day follow-up (Visit E). Aside from the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), other scales included C-SSRS, BPRS, and CADSS, while the latter was limited to visits (C) pre and post, D and E. Vital signs included measures of heart rate and blood pressure as detailed in the Supplementary appendix. Measures of cognition included the PVT and DSST. All assessments at Visit C2 were taken between 1–3 h (D0-H2) after administration of GH001, as detailed in the Supplementary appendix. The peak experience (PE) rating was assessed through the Peak Experience Scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean (SE) and individual retrospective ratings of the acute psychedelic experience assessed with the Peak Experience Scale (PES) after single doses of 12 and 18 mg of GH001 and after the individualized dosing regimen (IDR).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Panel (A) shows remission, response and improvement rates after single doses of GH001 and after an individualized dosing regimen (IDR) of GH001. Panel (B) shows mean (SE) of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) ratings at screening (S), at baseline before dosing (D0-B), at 2 h after dosing (D0-H2), and at 1 (D1) and 7 (D7) days follow-up in the Phase 1 part (single dose) and the Phase 2 part (IDR). Grey planes indicate remission as indicated by MADRS ≤ 10. Panel (C) shows mean (SE) MADRS change from baseline at D0-H2, D1, and D7.

References

    1. Ermakova AO, Dunbar F, Rucker J, Johnson MW. A narrative synthesis of research with 5-MeO-DMT. J Psychopharmacol. (2022) 36:273–94. doi: 10.1177/02698811211050543, PMID:
    1. Reckweg JT, Uthaug MV, Szabo A, Davis AK, Lancelotta R, Mason NL, et al. . The clinical pharmacology and potential therapeutic applications of 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine (5‐MeO‐DMT). J Neurochem. (2022) 162:128–46. doi: 10.1111/jnc.15587, PMID:
    1. Shulgin AT, Shulgin A. TIHKAL: the continuation. 1st ed. Berkeley, CA: Transform Press; (1997).
    1. Davis AK, Barsuglia JP, Lancelotta R, Grant RM, Renn E. The epidemiology of 5-methoxy- N, N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) use: benefits, consequences, patterns of use, subjective effects, and reasons for consumption. J Psychopharmacol. (2018) 32:779–92. doi: 10.1177/0269881118769063, PMID:
    1. Uthaug MV, Lancelotta R, van Oorsouw K, Kuypers KPC, Mason N, Rak J, et al. . A single inhalation of vapor from dried toad secretion containing 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) in a naturalistic setting is related to sustained enhancement of satisfaction with life, mindfulness-related capacities, and a decrement of psychopathological symptoms. Psychopharmacology. (2019) 236:2653–66. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05236-w, PMID:
    1. Barsuglia J, Davis AK, Palmer R, Lancelotta R, Windham-Herman AM, Peterson K, et al. . Intensity of mystical experiences occasioned by 5-MeO-DMT and comparison with a prior psilocybin study. Front Psychol. (2018) 9:2459. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02459, PMID:
    1. Reckweg J, Mason NL, van Leeuwen C, Toennes SW, Terwey TH, Ramaekers JG. A phase 1, dose-ranging study to assess safety and psychoactive effects of a vaporized 5-Methoxy-N, N-Dimethyltryptamine formulation (GH001) in healthy volunteers. Front Pharmacol. (2021) 12:760671. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.760671, PMID:
    1. Uthaug MV, Lancelotta R, Szabo A, Davis AK, Riba J, Ramaekers JG. Prospective examination of synthetic 5-methoxy-N, N-dimethyltryptamine inhalation: effects on salivary IL-6, cortisol levels, affect, and non-judgment. Psychopharmacology. (2020) 237:773–85. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05414-w, PMID:
    1. Davis AK, So S, Lancelotta R, Barsuglia JP, Griffiths RR. 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) used in a naturalistic group setting is associated with unintended improvements in depression and anxiety. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. (2019) 45:161–9. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2018.1545024, PMID:
    1. Palhano-Fontes F, Barreto D, Onias H, Andrade KC, Novaes MM, Pessoa JA, et al. . Rapid antidepressant effects of the psychedelic ayahuasca in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Psychol Med. (2019) 49:655–63. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718001356, PMID:
    1. Davis AK, Barrett FS, May DG, Cosimano MP, Sepeda ND, Johnson MW, et al. . Effects of psilocybin-assisted therapy on major depressive disorder: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiat. (2021) 78:481–9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3285, PMID:
    1. Carhart-Harris R, Giribaldi B, Watts R, Baker-Jones M, Murphy-Beiner A, Murphy R, et al. . Trial of psilocybin versus escitalopram for depression. N Engl J Med. (2021) 384:1402–11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032994, PMID:
    1. Nichols DE, Johnson MW, Nichols CD. Psychedelics as medicines: an emerging new paradigm. Clin Pharmacol Therapeut. (2017) 101:209–19. doi: 10.1002/cpt.557, PMID:
    1. Nutt D, Carhart-Harris R. The current status of psychedelics in psychiatry. JAMA Psychiat. (2021) 78:121–2. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2171
    1. Fava M. Diagnosis and definition of treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry. (2003) 53:649–59. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00231-2
    1. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Stewart JW, et al. . Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatr. (2006) 163:1905–17. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905, PMID:
    1. Souery D, Papakostas GI, Trivedi MH. Treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry. (2006) 67:16–22.
    1. Gallimore AR, Strassman RJ. A model for the application of target-controlled intravenous infusion for a prolonged immersive DMT psychedelic experience. Front Pharmacol. (2016) 7:211. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00211
    1. Madsen MK, Fisher PM, Burmester D, Dyssegaard A, Stenbæk DS, Kristiansen S, et al. . Psychedelic effects of psilocybin correlate with serotonin 2A receptor occupancy and plasma psilocin levels. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2019) 44:1328–34. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0324-9, PMID:
    1. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. . The mini-international neuropsychiatric interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. (1998) 59:22–33. PMID:
    1. Desseilles M, Witte J, Chang TE, Iovieno N, Dording C, Ashih H, et al. . Massachusetts General Hospital SAFER criteria for clinical trials and research. Harv Rev Psychiatry. (2013) 21:269–74. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0b013e3182a75cc7, PMID:
    1. Williams JB, Kobak KA. Development and reliability of a structured interview guide for the Montgomery Asberg depression rating scale (SIGMA). Br J Psychiatry. (2008) 192:52–8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.032532, PMID:
    1. Guy W. (1976): ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, pp. 217–222.
    1. Speck RM, Shalhoub H, Wyrwich KW, Yu R, Ayer DW, Ford J, et al. . Psychometric validation of the role function restrictive domain of the migraine specific quality-of-life questionnaire version 2.1 electronic patient-reported outcome in patients with episodic and chronic migraine. Headache. (2019) 59:756–74. doi: 10.1111/head.13497, PMID:
    1. Sackeim HA, Aaronson ST, Bunker MT, Conway CR, Demitrack MA, George MS, et al. . The assessment of resistance to antidepressant treatment: rationale for the antidepressant treatment history form: short form (ATHF-SF). J Psychiatr Res. (2019) 113:125–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.03.021, PMID:
    1. Romeo B, Hermand M, Petillion A, Karila L, Benyamina A. Clinical and biological predictors of psychedelic response in the treatment of psychiatric and addictive disorders: a systematic review. J Psychiatr Res. (2021) 137:273–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.03.002, PMID:
    1. Gieringer D, Laurent J, Goodrich S. Cannabis vaporizer combines efficient delivery of THC with effective suppression of pyrolytic compounds. J Cannabis Therap. (2004) 4:7–27. doi: 10.1300/J175v04n01_02
    1. Abrams DI, Vizoso HP, Shade SB, Jay C, Kelly ME, Benowitz NL. Vaporization as a smokeless cannabis delivery system: a pilot study. Clin Pharmacol Therap. (2007) 82:572–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100200, PMID:
    1. Hazekamp A, Ruhaak R, Zuurman L, van Gerven J, Verpoorte R. Evaluation of a vaporizing device (volcano) for the pulmonary administration of tetrahydrocannabinol. J Pharm Sci. (2006) 95:1308–17. doi: 10.1002/jps.20574, PMID:
    1. Overall JE, Gorham DR. The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychol Rep. (1962) 10:799–812. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799
    1. US Food and Drug Administration . Guidance for industry: suicidality: prospective assessment of occurrence in clinical trials, draft guidance. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; (2012).
    1. Bremner JD, Krystal JH, Putnam FW, Southwick SM, Marmar C, Charney DS, et al. . Measurement of dissociative states with the clinician-administered dissociative states scale (CADSS). J Traum Stress Off Publ Int Soc Traum Stress Stud. (1998) 11:125–36. doi: 10.1023/A:1024465317902
    1. Lim J, Dinges DF. Sleep deprivation and vigilant attention. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2008) 1129:305–22. doi: 10.1196/annals.1417.002
    1. Royer FL, Janowitch L. Performance of process and reactive schizophrenics on a symbol-digit substitution task. Percept Mot Skills. (1973) 37:63–70. doi: 10.2466/pms.1973.37.1.63, PMID:
    1. Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. (1979) 134:382–9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382
    1. Singh JB, Fedgchin M, Daly E, Xi L, Melman C, De Bruecker G, et al. . Intravenous Esketamine in adult treatment-resistant depression: a double-blind, double-randomization. Placebo Controlled Study Biol Psychiatr. (2016) 80:424–31. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.10.018, PMID:
    1. US Food and Drug Administration . Major depressive disorder: developing drugs for treatment. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; (2018).
    1. Roseman L, Nutt DJ, Carhart-Harris RL. Quality of acute psychedelic experience predicts therapeutic efficacy of psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. Front Pharmacol. (2018) 8:974. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00974, PMID:

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren