Chlorhexidine gluconate bathing in children with cancer or those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial from the Children's Oncology Group

Danielle M Zerr, Aaron M Milstone, Christopher C Dvorak, Amanda L Adler, Lu Chen, Doojduen Villaluna, Ha Dang, Xuan Qin, Amin Addetia, Lolie C Yu, Mary Conway Keller, Adam J Esbenshade, Keith J August, Brian T Fisher, Lillian Sung, Danielle M Zerr, Aaron M Milstone, Christopher C Dvorak, Amanda L Adler, Lu Chen, Doojduen Villaluna, Ha Dang, Xuan Qin, Amin Addetia, Lolie C Yu, Mary Conway Keller, Adam J Esbenshade, Keith J August, Brian T Fisher, Lillian Sung

Abstract

Background: To the authors' knowledge, information regarding whether daily bathing with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) reduces central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in pediatric oncology patients and those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is limited.

Methods: In the current multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients aged ≥2 months and <22 years with cancer or those undergoing allogeneic HCT were randomized 1:1 to once-daily bathing with 2% CHG-impregnated cloths or control cloths for 90 days. The primary outcome was CLABSI. Secondary endpoints included total positive blood cultures, acquisition of resistant organisms, and acquisition of cutaneous staphylococcal isolates with an elevated CHG mean inhibitory concentration.

Results: The study was stopped early because of poor accrual. Among the 177 enrolled patients, 174 were considered as evaluable (88 were randomized to the CHG group and 86 were randomized to the control group). The rate of CLABSI per 1000 central line days in the CHG group was 5.44 versus 3.10 in the control group (risk difference, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-4.69 [P = .049]). Post hoc conditional power analysis demonstrated a 0.2% chance that the results would have favored CHG had the study fully enrolled. The rate of total positive blood cultures did not differ between groups (risk difference, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, -0.41 to 5.14 [P = .078]). The number of patients demonstrating the new acquisition of resistant organisms did not differ between groups (P = .54). Patients in the CHG group were found to be more likely to acquire cutaneous staphylococcal isolates with an elevated CHG mean inhibitory concentration (P = .032).

Conclusions: The data from the current study do not support the use of routine CHG bathing in children with cancer or those undergoing allogeneic HCT.

Keywords: bacteremia; central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI); chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG); multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO).

Conflict of interest statement

Danielle M. Zerr has received grants from the National Institutes of Health for work performed as part of the current study. Aaron M. Milstone has received grants from Sage Products LLC and personal fees from Becton Dickinson for work performed outside of the current study. Amanda L. Adler has received grants from the National Institutes of Health for work performed as part of the current study. Lu Chen was supported by a Statistics and Data Center Grant from the National Cancer Institute for the Children's Oncology Group (COG) for work performed as part of the current study. Brian T. Fisher has received grants from Pfizer and Merck and has received personal fees from Astellas for serving on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for work performed outside of the current study. The other authors made no disclosures.

© 2020 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram. CHG indicates chlorhexidine gluconate; AE, adverse event.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative incidence of time to first central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Organisms identified from positive blood cultures by infection category and treatment group. The size of the circles represents the number of events. BSI indicates bloodstream infection; CLABSI, central line–associated bloodstream infection; MBI, mucosal barrier injury.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cutaneous adverse events and their attribution by treatment group.

References

    1. Almyroudis NG, Fuller A, Jakubowski A, et al. Pre‐ and post‐engraftment bloodstream infection rates and associated mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2005;7:11‐17.
    1. Sung L, Gamis A, Alonzo TA, et al. Infections and association with different intensity of chemotherapy in children with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2009;115:1100‐1108.
    1. Sung L, Lange BJ, Gerbing RB, Alonzo TA, Feusner J. Microbiologically documented infections and infection‐related mortality in children with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2007;110:3532‐3539.
    1. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) . Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter–related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:e162‐e193.
    1. Raulji CM, Clay K, Velasco C, Yu LC. Daily bathing with chlorhexidine and its effects on nosocomial infection rates in pediatric oncology patients. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2015;32:315‐321.
    1. Bass P, Karki S, Rhodes D, et al. Impact of chlorhexidine‐impregnated washcloths on reducing incidence of vancomycin‐resistant enterococci colonization in hematology‐oncology patients. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41:345‐348.
    1. Addetia A, Greninger AL, Adler A, et al. A novel, widespread qacA allele results in reduced chlorhexidine susceptibility in Staphylococcus epidermidis . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e02607‐e02618.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . CDC/NHSN surveillance definitions for specific types of infections. Accessed May 12, 2015.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2019. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2019.
    1. Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, et al; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America ; Infectious Diseases Society of America . Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:431‐455.
    1. Bleasdale SC, Trick WE, Gonzalez IM, Lyles RD, Hayden MK, Weinstein RA. Effectiveness of chlorhexidine bathing to reduce catheter‐associated bloodstream infections in medical intensive care unit patients. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:2073‐2079.
    1. Cassir N, Thomas G, Hraiech S, et al. Chlorhexidine daily bathing: impact on health care–associated infections caused by gram‐negative bacteria. Am J Infect Control. 2015;43:640‐643.
    1. Climo MW, Yokoe DS, Warren DK, et al. Effect of daily chlorhexidine bathing on hospital‐acquired infection. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:533‐542.
    1. Dixon JM, Carver RL. Daily chlorohexidine gluconate bathing with impregnated cloths results in statistically significant reduction in central line–associated bloodstream infections. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38:817‐821.
    1. Evans HL, Dellit TH, Chan J, Nathens AB, Maier RV, Cuschieri J. Effect of chlorhexidine whole‐body bathing on hospital‐acquired infections among trauma patients. Arch Surg. 2010;145:240‐246.
    1. Munoz‐Price LS, Hota B, Stemer A, Weinstein RA. Prevention of bloodstream infections by use of daily chlorhexidine baths for patients at a long‐term acute care hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30:1031‐1035.
    1. Popovich KJ, Hota B, Hayes R, Weinstein RA, Hayden MK. Effectiveness of routine patient cleansing with chlorhexidine gluconate for infection prevention in the medical intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30:959‐963.
    1. Pallotto C, Fiorio M, De Angelis V, et al. Daily bathing with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate in intensive care settings: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25:705‐710.
    1. Noto MJ, Domenico HJ, Byrne DW, et al. Chlorhexidine bathing and health care–associated infections: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313:369‐378.
    1. Swan JT, Ashton CM, Bui LN, et al. Effect of chlorhexidine bathing every other day on prevention of hospital‐acquired infections in the surgical ICU: a single‐center, randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:1822‐1832.
    1. Huang SS, Septimus E, Kleinman K, et al; ABATE Infection trial team . Chlorhexidine versus routine bathing to prevent multidrug‐resistant organisms and all‐cause bloodstream infections in general medical and surgical units (ABATE Infection trial): a cluster‐randomised trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1205‐1215.
    1. Milstone AM, Elward A, Song X, et al; Pediatric SCRUB Trial Study Group . Daily chlorhexidine bathing to reduce bacteraemia in critically ill children: a multicentre, cluster‐randomised, crossover trial. Lancet. 2013;381:1099‐1106.
    1. Climo MW, Sepkowitz KA, Zuccotti G, et al. The effect of daily bathing with chlorhexidine on the acquisition of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus, and healthcare‐associated bloodstream infections: results of a quasi‐experimental multicenter trial. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1858‐1865.
    1. Vernon MO, Hayden MK, Trick WE, Hayes RA, Blom DW, Weinstein RA; Chicago Antimicrobial Resistance Project (CARP) . Chlorhexidine gluconate to cleanse patients in a medical intensive care unit: the effectiveness of source control to reduce the bioburden of vancomycin‐resistant enterococci. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:306‐312.
    1. Cookson BD, Bolton MC, Platt JH. Chlorhexidine resistance in methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus or just an elevated MIC? An in vitro and in vivo assessment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:1997‐2002.
    1. Sheng WH, Wang JT, Lauderdale TL, Weng CM, Chen D, Chang SC. Epidemiology and susceptibilities of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Taiwan: emphasis on chlorhexidine susceptibility. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;63:309‐313.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren