Investigating the Lowest Threshold of Vascular Benefits from LDL Cholesterol Lowering with a PCSK9 mAb Inhibitor (Alirocumab) in Patients with Stable Cardiovascular Disease (INTENSITY-HIGH): protocol and study rationale for a randomised, open label, parallel group, mechanistic study

Paul J Cacciottolo, Michalis S Kostapanos, Elena Hernan Sancho, Holly Pavey, Fotini Kaloyirou, Evangelia Vamvaka, Joanna Helmy, Annette Hubsch, Carmel M McEniery, Ian B Wilkinson, Joseph Cheriyan, Paul J Cacciottolo, Michalis S Kostapanos, Elena Hernan Sancho, Holly Pavey, Fotini Kaloyirou, Evangelia Vamvaka, Joanna Helmy, Annette Hubsch, Carmel M McEniery, Ian B Wilkinson, Joseph Cheriyan

Abstract

Introduction: Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a strong independent risk predictor of cardiovascular (CV) events, while interventions to reduce it remain the only evidence-based approach to reduce CV morbidity and mortality. Secondary prevention statin trials in combination with ezetimibe and/or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors showed that there is no 'J shaped curve' in LDL-C levels with regard to CV outcomes. The lowest threshold beyond which reduction of LDL-C confers no further CV benefits has not been identified.The INTENSITY-HIGH study seeks to explore physiological mechanisms mediating CV benefits of LDL-C lowering by PCSK9 inhibition in patients with established cardiovascular disease (CVD). The study examines the changes in measures of endothelial function and vascular inflammation imaging following intervention with PCSK9 and against standard of care.

Methods and analysis: This is a single-centre, randomised, open label, parallel group, mechanistic physiological study. It will include approximately 60 subjects with established CVD, with LDL-C of <4.1 mmol/L on high-intensity statins. All eligible participants will undergo 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (FDG-PET/CT) scanning of the aorta and carotid arteries, as well as baseline endothelial function assessment. Subsequently, they will be randomised on a 1:1 basis to either alirocumab 150 mg or ezetimibe 10 mg/day. Repeat FDG-PET/CT scan and vascular assessments will be undertaken after 8 weeks of treatment. Any changes in these parameters will be correlated with changes in lipid levels and systemic inflammation biomarkers.

Ethics and dissemination: The study received a favourable opinion from the Wales Research Ethics Committee 4, was registered on clinicaltrials.gov and conformed to International Conference for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Good Clinical Practice. The results of this study will be reported through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

Trial registration number: NCT03355027.

Keywords: cardiology; cardiovascular imaging; lipid disorders; preventive medicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Synopsis of the study design. After a screening visit (V1), all eligible volunteers will attend V2 for an FDG PET/CT scan. They will then attend V3, in which they will have predose blood tests and vascular studies, and then will be randomised to either single subcutaneous dose of alirocumab 150 mg or ezetimibe 10 mg once per day. They will then attend three subsequent dosing visits (V4–V6) and undergo a repeat FDG PET/CT scan after 8 weeks of therapy. A final set of vascular studies will be undertaken at V8. FDG PET/CT, 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT; V1, visit 1; V2, visit 2; V3, visit 3; V4, visit 4; V5, visit 5; V6, visit 6; V7, visit 7; V8, visit 8.

References

    1. Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature 2002;420:868–74. 10.1038/nature01323
    1. Sharrett AR, Ballantyne CM, Coady SA, et al. . Coronary heart disease prediction from lipoprotein cholesterol levels, triglycerides, lipoprotein(a), apolipoproteins A-I and B, and HDL density subfractions: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Circulation 2001;104:1108–13. 10.1161/hc3501.095214
    1. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaborators, Mihaylova B, Emberson J, et al. . The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet 2012;380:581–90. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60367-5
    1. Oesterle A, Laufs U, Liao JK. Pleiotropic effects of statins on the cardiovascular system. Circ Res 2017;120:229–43. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308537
    1. Kostapanos MS, Milionis HJ, Elisaf MS. An overview of the extra-lipid effects of rosuvastatin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2008;13:157–74. 10.1177/1074248408318628
    1. Mäki-Petäjä KM, Booth AD, Hall FC, et al. . Ezetimibe and simvastatin reduce inflammation, disease activity, and aortic stiffness and improve endothelial function in rheumatoid arthritis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:852–8. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.076
    1. Lind L, Berglund L, Larsson A, et al. . Endothelial function in resistance and conduit arteries and 5-year risk of cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2011;123:1545–51. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.984047
    1. Hingorani AD, Cross J, Kharbanda RK, et al. . Acute systemic inflammation impairs endothelium-dependent dilatation in humans. Circulation 2000;102:994–9. 10.1161/01.CIR.102.9.994
    1. Lee KH, Jeong MH, Kim HM, et al. . Benefit of early statin therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction who have extremely low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1664–71. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.057
    1. Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, et al. . Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2387–97. 10.1056/NEJMoa1410489
    1. Sabatine MS, Wiviott SD, Im K, et al. . Efficacy and safety of further lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients starting with very low levels: a meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol 2018;3:823–8. 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.2258
    1. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL. ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. August 2019;2019.
    1. Kostapanos MS, Cacciottolo PJ, Hubsch A, et al. . Investigating the lowest threshold of vascular benefits from LDL cholesterol lowering with a PCSK9 mAb inhibitor (alirocumab) in healthy volunteers - a mechanistic physiological study (INTENSITY-LOW): protocol and study rationale. J Drug Assess 2019;8:167–74. 10.1080/21556660.2019.1677673
    1. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, et al. . Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1713–22. 10.1056/NEJMoa1615664
    1. Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, et al. . Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2097–107. 10.1056/NEJMoa1801174
    1. Kubota R, Yamada S, Kubota K, et al. . Intratumoral distribution of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in vivo: high accumulation in macrophages and granulation tissues studied by microautoradiography. J Nucl Med 1992;33:1972–80.
    1. Tawakol A, Migrino RQ, Bashian GG, et al. . In vivo 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging provides a noninvasive measure of carotid plaque inflammation in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1818–24. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.076
    1. Rudd JHF, Myers KS, Bansilal S, et al. . 18Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging of atherosclerotic plaque inflammation is highly reproducible. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:892–6. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.05.024
    1. Rudd JHF, Warburton EA, Fryer TD, et al. . Imaging atherosclerotic plaque inflammation with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Circulation 2002;105:2708–11. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000020548.60110.76
    1. Davies JR, Rudd JHF, Fryer TD, et al. . Identification of culprit lesions after transient ischemic attack by combined 18F fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke 2005;36:2642–7. 10.1161/01.STR.0000190896.67743.b1
    1. Figueroa AL, Abdelbaky A, Truong QA, et al. . Measurement of arterial activity on routine FDG PET/CT images improves prediction of risk of future cv events. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:1250–9. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.08.006
    1. Ogawa M, Magata Y, Kato T, et al. . Application of 18F-FDG PET for monitoring the therapeutic effect of antiinflammatory drugs on stabilization of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1845–50.
    1. Wu Y-W, Kao H-L, Huang C-L, et al. . The effects of 3-month atorvastatin therapy on arterial inflammation, calcification, abdominal adipose tissue and circulating biomarkers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012;39:399–407. 10.1007/s00259-011-1994-7
    1. Sun ZDY, Cheriyan J. Non-invasive measurements of arterial function: what? when? why should we use them? Heart 2019;105:1203–11. 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-312970
    1. Green DJ, Jones H, Thijssen D, et al. . Flow-Mediated dilation and cardiovascular event prediction does nitric oxide matter? 2011.
    1. Ben-Shlomo Y, Spears M, Boustred C, et al. . Aortic pulse wave velocity improves cardiovascular event prediction: an individual participant meta-analysis of prospective observational data from 17,635 subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:636–46. 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.063
    1. McEniery CM, Cockcroft JR. Does arterial stiffness predict atherosclerotic coronary events? Adv Cardiol 2007;44:160–72. 10.1159/000096728
    1. Mattace-Raso FUS, van der Cammen TJM, Hofman A, et al. . Arterial stiffness and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: the Rotterdam study. Circulation 2006;113:657–63. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.555235
    1. Deanfield JE, Halcox JP, Rabelink TJ. Endothelial function and dysfunction: testing and clinical relevance. Circulation 2007;115:1285–95. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.652859
    1. Kinlay S, Libby P, Ganz P. Endothelial function and coronary artery disease. Curr Opin Lipidol 2001;12:383–9. 10.1097/00041433-200108000-00003
    1. Frey RS, Ushio-Fukai M, Malik AB. Nadph oxidase-dependent signaling in endothelial cells: role in physiology and pathophysiology. Antioxid Redox Signal 2009;11:791–810. 10.1089/ars.2008.2220
    1. Mäki-Petäjä KM, Elkhawad M, Cheriyan J, et al. . Anti-Tumor necrosis factor-α therapy reduces aortic inflammation and stiffness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Circulation 2012;126:2473–80. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.120410
    1. Dupuis J, Tardif JC, Cernacek P, et al. . Cholesterol reduction rapidly improves endothelial function after acute coronary syndromes. The RECIFE (reduction of cholesterol in ischemia and function of the endothelium) trial. Circulation 1999;99:3227–33. 10.1161/01.cir.99.25.3227
    1. Gori T, Muxel S, Damaske A, et al. . Endothelial function assessment: flow-mediated dilation and constriction provide different and complementary information on the presence of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2012;33:363–71. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr361
    1. Lind L. Relationships between three different tests to evaluate endothelium-dependent vasodilation and cardiovascular risk in a middle-aged sample. J Hypertens 2013;31:1570–4. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283619d50

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren