Characteristics and practices of school-based cluster randomised controlled trials for improving health outcomes in pupils in the UK: a systematic review protocol

Kitty Parker, Michael P Nunns, ZhiMin Xiao, Tamsin Ford, Obioha C Ukoumunne, Kitty Parker, Michael P Nunns, ZhiMin Xiao, Tamsin Ford, Obioha C Ukoumunne

Abstract

Introduction: Cluster randomised trials (CRTs) are studies in which groups (clusters) of participants rather than the individuals themselves are randomised to trial arms. CRTs are becoming increasingly relevant for evaluating interventions delivered in school settings for improving the health of children. Schools are a convenient setting for health interventions targeted at children and the CRT design respects the clustered structure in schools (ie, pupils within classrooms/teachers within schools). Some of the methodological challenges of CRTs, such as ethical considerations for enrolment of children into trials and how best to handle the analysis of data from participants (pupils) that change clusters (schools), may be more salient for the school setting. A better understanding of the characteristics and methodological considerations of school-based CRTs of health interventions would inform the design of future similar studies. To our knowledge, this is the only systematic review to focus specifically on the characteristics and methodological practices of CRTs delivered in schools to evaluate interventions for improving health outcomes in pupils in the UK.

Methods and analysis: We will search for CRTs published from inception to 30 June 2020 inclusively indexed in MEDLINE (Ovid). We will identify relevant articles through title and abstract screening, and subsequent full-text screening for eligibility against predefined inclusion criteria. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion. Two independent reviewers will extract data for each study using a prepiloted data extraction form. Findings will be summarised using descriptive statistics and graphs.

Ethics and dissemination: This methodological systematic review does not require ethical approval as only secondary data extracted from papers will be analysed and the data are not linked to individual participants. After completion of the systematic review, the data will be analysed, and the findings disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific meetings.

Prospero registration number: CRD42020201792.

Keywords: community child health; public health; statistics & research methods.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Eldridge S, Kerry S. A practical guide to cluster randomised trials in health services research. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
    1. Donner A, Klar N. Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research. Wiley, 2000.
    1. Campbell MJ Cluster randomized trials in general (family) practice research. Stat Methods Med Res 2000;9:81–94. 10.1177/096228020000900202
    1. Eldridge SM, Ukoumunne OC, Carlin JB. The intra-cluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials: a review of definitions. Int Stat Rev 2009;77:378–94. 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2009.00092.x
    1. Kerry SM, Bland JM. The intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomisation. BMJ 1998;316:1455–60. 10.1136/bmj.316.7142.1455
    1. Eldridge SM, Ukoumunne OC, Carlin JB. The Intra-Cluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials: a review of definitions. Int Stat Rev 2009;77:378–94. 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2009.00092.x
    1. Ukoumunne OC A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials. Stat Med 2002;21:3757–74. 10.1002/sim.1330
    1. Eldridge S, Kerry S. A practical guide to cluster randomised trials in health services research. Wiley, 2012.
    1. Bland JM, Kerry SM, notes S. Trials randomised in clusters. BMJ 1997;315:600 10.1136/bmj.315.7108.600
    1. Kahan BC, Forbes G, Ali Y, et al. . Increased risk of type I errors in cluster randomised trials with small or medium numbers of clusters: a review, reanalysis, and simulation study. Trials 2016;17:438. 10.1186/s13063-016-1571-2
    1. Cornfield J Randomization by group: a formal analysis. Am J Epidemiol 1978;108:100–2. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112592
    1. Walleser S, Hill SR, Bero LA. Characteristics and quality of reporting of cluster randomized trials in children: reporting needs improvement. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:1331–40. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.006
    1. Goesling B A practical guide to cluster randomized trials in school health research. J Sch Health 2019;89:916–25. 10.1111/josh.12826
    1. Crocetti MT, Amin DD, Scherer R. Assessment of risk of bias among pediatric randomized controlled trials. Pediatrics 2010;126:298–305. 10.1542/peds.2009-3121
    1. Thomson D, Hartling L, Cohen E, et al. . Controlled trials in children: quantity, methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of pediatric controlled trials published 1948-2006. PLoS One 2010;5:e13106. 10.1371/journal.pone.0013106
    1. Shackleton N, Hale D, Bonell C, et al. . Intraclass correlation values for adolescent health outcomes in secondary schools in 21 European countries. SSM Popul Health 2016;2:217–25. 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.03.005
    1. Schweig JD, Pane JF, McCaffrey DF. Switching cluster membership in cluster randomized control trials: implications for design and analysis. Psychol Methods 2020;25:516–34. 10.1037/met0000258
    1. Campbell M, Walters S, Design Hto. Analyse and report cluster randomised trials in medicine and health related research. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
    1. Hayes R, Moulton L. Cluster randomised trials. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, 2009.
    1. Murray D Design and analysis of Group-Randomized trials. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
    1. Eldridge SM, Ashby D, Feder GS, et al. . Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care. Clin Trials 2004;1:80–90. 10.1191/1740774504cn006rr
    1. Fiero MH, Huang S, Oren E, et al. . Statistical analysis and handling of missing data in cluster randomized trials: a systematic review. Trials 2016;17:72. 10.1186/s13063-016-1201-z
    1. Ivers NM, Taljaard M, Dixon S, et al. . Impact of consort extension for cluster randomised trials on quality of reporting and study methodology: review of random sample of 300 trials, 2000-8. BMJ 2011;343:d5886. 10.1136/bmj.d5886
    1. Donner A, Brown KS, Brasher P. A methodological review of non-therapeutic intervention trials employing cluster randomization, 1979-1989. Int J Epidemiol 1990;19:795–800. 10.1093/ije/19.4.795
    1. Simpson JM, Klar N, Donnor A. Accounting for cluster randomization: a review of primary prevention trials, 1990 through 1993. Am J Public Health 1995;85:1378–83. 10.2105/AJPH.85.10.1378
    1. Varnell SP, Murray DM, Janega JB, et al. . Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent practices. Am J Public Health 2004;94:393–9. 10.2105/AJPH.94.3.393
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535. 10.1136/bmj.b2535
    1. Taljaard M, McGowan J, Grimshaw JM, et al. . Electronic search strategies to identify reports of cluster randomized trials in MEDLINE: low precision will improve with adherence to reporting standards. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010;10:15. 10.1186/1471-2288-10-15
    1. EndNote [program] Endnote X9 version. Philadelphia, PA: Clarivate, 2013.
    1. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden AGuidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: a product from the ESRC methods programme. 2006.
    1. Stata16 [program] Release 16 version. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC, 2019.
    1. Turner RM, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. Prior distributions for the intracluster correlation coefficient, based on multiple previous estimates, and their application in cluster randomized trials. Clin Trials 2005;2:108–18. 10.1191/1740774505cn072oa
    1. Torgerson D Designing randomised trials in health education and the social sciences: an introduction. Springer, 2008.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren