Death talk: gender differences in talking about one's own impending death

Bragi Skulason, Arna Hauksdottir, Kozma Ahcic, Asgeir R Helgason, Bragi Skulason, Arna Hauksdottir, Kozma Ahcic, Asgeir R Helgason

Abstract

Background: According to common practice based on a generally agreed interpretation of Icelandic law on the rights of patients, health care professionals cannot discuss prognosis and treatment with a patient's family without that patient's consent. This limitation poses ethical problems, because research has shown that, in the absence of insight and communication regarding a patient's impending death, patient's significant others may subsequently experience long-term psychological distress. It is also reportedly important for most dying patients to know that health care personnel are comfortable with talking about death and dying. There is only very limited information concerning gender differences regarding death talk in terminal care patients.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of detailed prospective "field notes" from chaplain interviews of all patients aged 30-75 years receiving palliative care and/or with DNR (do not resuscitate) written on their charts who requested an interview with a hospital chaplain during a period of 3 years. After all study patients had died, these notes were analyzed to assess the prevalence of patient-initiated discussions regarding their own impending death and whether non-provocative evocation-type interventions had facilitated such communication.

Results: During the 3-year study period, 195 interviews (114 men, 81 women) were conducted. According to the field notes, 80% of women and 30% of men initiated death talk within the planned 30-minute interviews. After evoking interventions, 59% (67/114) of men and 91% (74/81) of women engaged in death talk. Even with these interventions, at the end of the first interview gender differences were still statistically significant (p = 0.001). By the end of the second interview gender difference was less, but still statistically significant (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: Gender differences in terminal care communication may be radically reduced by using simple evocation methods that are relatively unpretentious, but require considerable clinical training.Men in terminal care are more reluctant than women to enter into discussion regarding their own impending death in clinical settings. Intervention based on non-provocative evocation methods may increase death talk in both genders, the relative increase being higher for men.

References

    1. Mack JW, Cronin A, Keating NL, Taback N, Huskamp HA, Malin JL, Earle CC, Weeks JC. Associations Between End-of-Life Discussions Characteristics and Care Received Near Death: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Clin Onc. 2012;30 no. 35:4387–4395.
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Palliative Care. .
    1. National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care. .
    1. Peppercorn JM, Smith TJ, Helft PR, DeBono DJ, Berry SR, Wollins DS, Hayes DM, Von Roenn JH, Schnipper LE. American Society of Clinical Oncology statement. Toward individualized care for patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:755–760.
    1. Lo B, Quill T, Tulsky J. Discussing palliative care with patients: ACP-ASIM End-of-Life Care Consensus Panel—American College of Physicians–American Society of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:744–749.
    1. Quill TE. Perspectives on care at the close of life: Initiating end-of-life discussions with seriously ill patients—addressing the “elephant in the room”. JAMA. 2000;284:2502–2507.
    1. Smith TJ, Temin S, Alesi ER, Abernethy AP, Balboni TA, Basch EM, Ferrell BR, Loscalzo M, Meier DE, Paice JA, Peppercorn JM, Somerfield M, Stovall E, Von Roenn JH. American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: The integration of palliative care into standard oncology care. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:880–887.
    1. Wright AA, Zhang B, Ray A, Mack JW, Trice E, Balboni T, Mitchell SL, Jackson VA, Block SD, Maciejewski PK, Prigerson HG. Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA. 2008;300:1665–1673.
    1. Mack JW, Weeks JC, Wright AA, Block SD, Prigerson HG. End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: Predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1203–1208.
    1. Weeks JC, Cook EF, O’Day SJ, Peterson LM, Wenger N, Reding D, Harrell FE, Kussin P, Dawson NV, Connors AF Jr, Lynn J, Phillips RS. Relationship between cancer patients’ predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences. JAMA. 1998;279:1709–1714.
    1. Prigerson HG. Determinants of hospice utilization among terminally ill geriatric patients. Home Health Care Serv Q. 1991;12:81–112.
    1. The AM, Hak T, Koëter G, van Der Wal G. Collusion in doctor-patient communication about imminent death: an ethnographic study. BMJ. 2000;321:1376–81.
    1. Miyaji NT. The power of compassion: truth-telling among American doctors in the care of dying patients. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36:249–64.
    1. Ruddick W. Hope and deception. Bioethics. 1999;13:343–57.
    1. Christakis NA, Iwashyna TJ. Attitude and self-reported practice regarding prognostication in a national sample of internists. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:2389–95.
    1. Gorer G. Death, Grief and Mourning in Contemporary Britain. London: Cresset Press; 1965.
    1. Field D, Copp G. Communication and awareness about dying in the 1990′s. Palliat Med. 1999;13:459–468.
    1. Mount B. In: Cicely Saunders: Founder of the Hospice Movement selected letters 1959–1999. Clark D, editor. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. Foreword.
    1. Saunders C. Care of the Dying 6. When a patient is dying. Nurs Times. 1959. pp. 1129–30.
    1. Saunders C. The last stages of life. Am J Nurs. 1965a;65(3):70–75.
    1. Saunders C. Watch with me. Nurs Times. 1965b. pp. 1615–1617.
    1. Saunders C. In: Death and Dying: Current Issue in the Treatment of the Dying Person. Pearson L, editor. Cleveland: The Press of Case Western Reserve University; 1969. The moment of truth: care of the dying person; pp. 49–78.
    1. Saunders C. In: The Founding Philosophy. Saunders C, Summers DH, Teller N, editor. London: Edward Arnold; 1981.
    1. Saunders C, Baines M. Living with Dying. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1983.
    1. Saunders C. Facing Death. The Way. 1984. pp. 296–304.
    1. Saunders C. Sister death. The Tablet. 1986. 13 December, 1556.
    1. Saunders C. Beyond the Horizon. London: Darton Longman and Todd Ltd.; 1990. p. 99.
    1. Saunders C. In: The Management of Terminal Malignant Disease. Saunders C, Sykes N, editor. London: Edward Arnold; 1993. Introduction-“history and challenge”.
    1. Saunders C. Hospice. Mortality. 1996a;1(3):317–322.
    1. Saunders C. In: Mortally Wounded. Kearney M, editor. Dublin: Marion; 1996b. Foreword; pp. 11–12.
    1. Doka KJ, Martin TL. Grieving Beyond Gender: Understanding the Ways Men and Women Mourn. New York: Routledge; 2010.
    1. Helgason AR, Dickman PW, Adolfsson J, Steineck G. Emotional isolation: Prevalence and the effect on well-being among 50–80 year old prostate cancer patients. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2001;35:97–101.
    1. Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284:2476–2482.
    1. Barry LC, Kasl SV, Prigerson HG. Psychiatric disorders among bereaved persons: the role of perceived circumstances of death and preparedness for death. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002;10:447–457.
    1. Valdimarsdottir U, Helgason AR, Fürst CJ, Adolfsson J, Steineck G. Awareness of husband’s impending death from cancer and long-term anxiety in widowhood: a nationwide follow-up. Palliat Med. 2004;18:432–443.
    1. Emanuel EJ, Fairclough DL, Wolfe P, Emanuel LL. Talking with terminally Ill patients and their caregivers about death, dying, and bereavement. Is it stressful? Is it helpful? Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1999–2004.
    1. Gysels M, Shipman C, Higginson IJ. Is the qualitative research interview an acceptable medium for research with palliative care patients and carers? BMC Med Ethics. 2008;9:7.
    1. Hebert RS, Schulz R, Copeland VC, Arnold RM. Preparing family caregivers for death and bereavement. Insights from caregivers of terminally ill patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;37:3–12.
    1. Valdimarsdotttir U, Kreicberg U, Hauksdottir A, Hunt H, Onelov E, Henter JI, Steineck G. Parents’ intellectual and emotional awareness of their child’s impending death to cancer: a population-based long-term follow-up study. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:706–714.
    1. Zisook S, Shuchter SR, Lyons LE. Predictors of psychological reactions during the early stages of widowhood. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1987;10:355–368.
    1. Hauksdottir A, Steineck G, Fürst CJ, Valdimarsdottir U. Long-term harm of low preparedness for a wife’s death to cancer – a population-based study of widowers 4–5 years after the loss. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172:389–396.
    1. Higginson IJ, Costantini M. Communication in end-of-life cancer care: a comparison of team assessment in three European countries. J Clin Oncol. 2002;17:3674–3682.
    1. Mills ME, Sullivan K. The importance of information giving for patients newly diagnosed with cancer: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs. 1999;8:631–642.
    1. Skulason B, Jonsdottir LS, Sigurdardottir V, Helgason AR. Assessing survival in widowers, and controls-A nationwide, six- to nine-year follow-up. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:96.
    1. Helsing KJ, Szklo M. Mortality after bereavement. Am J Epidemiol. 1981;114:41–52.
    1. Jones DR, Goldblatt PO. Cause of death in widow(er)s and spouses. J Biosoc Sci. 1987;19:107–121.
    1. Martikainen P, Valkonen T. Mortality after death of spouse: Rates and cause of death in a large Finnish cohort. Am J Publ Health. 1996;86:1087–1093.
    1. Smith KR, Zick CD. Risk of mortality following widowhood: Age and sex differences by mode of death. Soc Biol. 1996;43:59–71.
    1. Stroebe MS, Stroebe W, Schut H. Gender differences in adjustment to bereavement: An empirical and theoretical review. Rev Gen Psychol. 2001;5:62–83.
    1. Lichtenstein P, Gatz M, Berg S. A twin study of mortality after spousal bereavement. Psychol Med. 1998;28:635–43.
    1. Mendes de Leon CF, Kasl SV, Jacobs S. Widowhood and mortality risk in a community sample of the elderly: a prospective study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:519–527.
    1. Umberson D, Wortman CB, Kessler RC. Widowhood and depression: Explaining long-term gender differences in vulnerability. J Health Soc Behav. 1992;33:10–24.
    1. Clayton PJ. Mortality and morbidity in the first year of widowhood. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1974;30:747–750.
    1. Bowling A. Mortality after bereavement: An review of the literature on survival periods and factors affecting survival. Soc Sci Med. 1987;24:117–124.
    1. Sanders CM. Risk factors in bereavement outcome. J Soc Iss. 1988;44:97–111.
    1. Stroebe W, Stroebe MS, Abakoumkin G. Does different social support cause sex differences in bereavement outcome? J Comm Appl Soc Psych. 1999;9:1–12.
    1. Tucker JS, Mueller JS. Spouses’ social control of health behaviors: Use and effectiveness of specific strategies. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2000;26:1120–1130.
    1. Good GE, Brooks GR. In: The New Handbook of Psychotherapy and Counseling with Men: A Comprehensive Guide to Settings, Problems, and Treatment Approaches. Good GE, Brooks GR, editor. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc; 2005. Introduction; pp. 1–13.
    1. Levant RF. In: Men in Groups: Insights, Interventions, and Psychoeducational Work. Andronico MP, editor. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1996. The male code and parenting: a psychoeducational approach; p. 229241.
    1. Richard DJ. In: Mythopoetic perspectives of men’s healing work: An anthology for therapists and others. Barton ER, editor. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey; 2000. The therapeutic status of the Mythopoetic approach: A psychological perspective; pp. 157–179.
    1. O’Neal JM. In: Men in transition: Theory and therapy. Solomon K, Levy NB, editor. New York, NY: Plenum; 1982. Gender role conflict and strain in men’s lives: Implications for psychotherapists, psychologists and other human service providers; pp. 5–44.
    1. Nahon D, Lander NR. A clinic for men: challenging individual and social myths. J Mens Health Couns. 1992;14(3):405–416.
    1. Baum M. The male way of mourning divorce: when, what, and how. Clin Soc Work J. 2003;31(1):37–50.
    1. Cavehill PA. Bereaved men: How therapists can help. Psychother Priv Pract. 1997;16(A):1–15.
    1. Robertson JM, Freeman R. Men and emotions: developing masculine-congruent views of affective expressiveness. J Coll Stud Dev. 1995;36(6):606–607.
    1. Heesacker M, Prichard S. In a different voice, revisited: men, women and emotion. J Ment Health Couns. 1992;14:274–290.
    1. Lander NR, Nahon D. An Integrity model perspective on working with occupational stress in men. J Men’s Health. 2008;5(2):141–147.
    1. Burck JR. In: Dictionary of Pastoral Counseling and Care. Hunter RJ, editor. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press; 1990. Verbatim; pp. 1300–1301.
    1. Hall CE. Head and heart: the story of the clinical pastoral education movement. J Past Care Publ Inc. 1992.
    1. Crang M, Cook I, editor. Doing Ethnographies. London, England: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2007. pp. 17–81.
    1. Miller WR, Rollnick SP. Motivational Interviewing. Second edition: Lessons Preparing People for Change. 2. New York: The Guilford Press; 2002.
    1. Rogers C. Client-Centered Therapy. Cambridge Massachusetts: The Riverside Press; 1951.
    1. Skulason B, Helgason AR. Identifying obstacles to participation in a questionnaire survey on widowers’ grief. BMC Palliat Care. 2010;9:7.
    1. Helgason AR, Steineck G, Valdimarsdottir U. Do Men with Cancer have Someone to Confide in? Nordic Men’s Health- Conference Proceedings. June 25 2011.
    1. Fried TR, Bradley EH, O’Leary J. Prognosis communication in serious illness: Perceptions of older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(10):1398–1403.
    1. Forsberg L, Forsberg LG, Lindquist H, Helgason AR. Clinician acquisition and retention of Motivational Interviewing skills: a two-and-a-half-year exploratory study. Subst Abuse Treat, Prev Policy. 2010;5:8.
    1. Vachon MLS. In: Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine ed. 2. Doyle D, Hanks GWC, MacDonald N, editor. Oxford: United Kingdom, Oxford University Press; 1998. The emotional problems of the patient; pp. 883–907.
    1. Fife BL. The conceptualization of meaning in illness. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:309–316.
    1. Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, Grambow S, Parker J, Tulsky JA. Preparing for the end of life: preferences of patients, families, physicians, and other care providers. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;22:727–737.
    1. Helgason AR. Research registries revisited: Is there a home for behavioral and public health research? Health Educ Beh. 2011;38(5):431–432.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren