Maternal childbirth experience in induced and spontaneous labour measured in a visual analog scale and the factors influencing it; a two-year cohort study

Katti Adler, Leena Rahkonen, Heidi Kruit, Katti Adler, Leena Rahkonen, Heidi Kruit

Abstract

Background: Poor maternal childbirth experience plays a role in family planning and subsequent pregnancies. The aim of this study was to compare childbirth experiences in induced and spontaneous labor and to investigate the factors influencing the childbirth experience.

Methods: This two-year cohort study included all women with term singleton pregnancies in cephalic presentation aiming for vaginal delivery at Helsinki University Hospital between January 2017 and December 2018. Maternal satisfaction in the childbirth experience was measured after delivery using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. A low childbirth experience score was defined as VAS < 5. The characteristics and delivery outcomes of the study population were collected in the hospital database and analyzed by SPSS.

Results: A total of 18,396 deliveries were included in the study, of which 28.9% (n = 5322) were induced and 71.1% (n = 13 074) were of spontaneous onset. The total caesarean delivery rate was 9.3% (n = 1727). Overall, 4.5% (n = 819) of the women had a low childbirth experience VAS score. The women who underwent labor induction were less satisfied with their birth experience compared to women with spontaneous onset of labor [7.5% (n = 399) vs. 3.2% (n = 420); p < 0.001]. Poor childbirth experience was associated with primiparity [OR 2.0 (95% CI 1.6-2.4)], labor induction [OR 1.6 (95% CI 1.4-1.9)], caesarean delivery [OR 4.5 (95% CI 3.7-5.5)], operative vaginal delivery [OR 3.3 (95% CI 2.7-4.0)], post-partum hemorrhage [OR 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.6)], and maternal infections [OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.3-2.4)].

Conclusions: Poor childbirth experience was associated with labor induction, primiparity, operative delivery, and labor complications, such as post-partum hemorrhage and maternal infections. These results highlight the aspects of care for which patient experience may be improved by additional support and counselling.

Keywords: Childbirth experience; Induction of labor; Maternal satisfaction; Operative delivery; Visual analogue scale.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The distribution of birth experience VAS-score in induced and spontaneous onset of labor (n=18 396)

References

    1. Vuori E, Gissler M. National Institute of Finland for Health and Welfare. Perinatal statistics: parturients, deliveries and newborns 2018.
    1. Zeitlin J, Mohangoo AD, Delnord M, Cuttini M (2013) The second European Perinatal Health Report: documenting changes over 6 years in the health of mothers and babies in Europe. J Epidemiol Community Health 67(12):983–5.
    1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: Final Data for 2017. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018;67(8):1–50.
    1. Mishanina E, Rogozinska E, Thatthi T, Uddin-Khan R, Khan KS, Meads C. Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2014;186(9):665–73. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130925.
    1. Nuutila M, Halmesmäki E, Hiilesmaa V, Ylikorkala O (1999) Women's anticipations of and experiences with induction of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78(8):704–9.
    1. Parratt J (2002) The impact of childbirth experiences on women's sense of self: a review of the literature. Aust J Midwifery 15(4):10–6.
    1. Waldenstrom U, Hildingsson I, Rubertsson C, Radestad I. A negative birth experience: prevalence and risk factors in a national sample. Birth. 2004;31(1):17–27. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.0270.x.
    1. Henderson J, Redshaw M (2013a) Women's experience of induction of labor: a mixed methods study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92(10):1159–67.
    1. Gatward H, Simpson M, Woodhart L, Stainton MC (2010) Women's experiences of being induced for post-date pregnancy. Women Birth 23(1):3–9.
    1. Shetty A, Burt R, Rice P, Templeton A (2005) Women's perceptions, expectations and satisfaction with induced labour–a questionnaire-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 123(1):56–61.
    1. Henry A, Madan A, Reid R, et al. Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-25.
    1. Howard K, Gerard K, Adelson P, Bryce R, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D. Women's preferences for inpatient and outpatient priming for labour induction: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:330. Published 2014. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-330.
    1. Pham CT, Crowther CA. Birth outcomes: utility values that postnatal women, midwives and medical staff express. BJOG. 2003;110(2):121–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02021.x.
    1. Larsson C, Saltvedt S, Edman G, Wiklund I, Andolf E. Factors independently related to a negative birth experience in first-time mothers. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2011;2(2):83–9. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2010.11.003.
    1. Falk M, Nelson M, Blomberg M. The impact of obstetric interventions and complications on women’s satisfaction with childbirth a population based cohort study including 16,000 women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:494. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2633-8.
    1. Wijma K, Wijma B, Zar M. Psychometric aspects of the W-DEQ; a new questionnaire for the measurement of fear of childbirth. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;19(2):84–97. doi: 10.3109/01674829809048501.
    1. Henderson J, Redshaw M. Who is well after childbirth? Factors related to positive outcome. Birth. 2013;40(1):1–9. doi: 10.1111/birt.12022.
    1. Leap N, Sandall J, Buckland S, Huber U (2010) Journey to confidence: women's experiences of pain in labour and relational continuity of care. J Midwifery Womens Health 55(3):234–42.
    1. Rowlands IJ, Redshaw M. Mode of birth and women’s psychological and physical wellbeing in the postnatal period. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:138. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-138.
    1. Schytt E, Hildingsson I. Physical and emotional self-rated health among Swedish women and men during pregnancy and the first year of parenthood. Sex Reprod Health. 2011;2(2):57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2010.12.003.
    1. Heimstad R, Romundstad PR, Hyett J, Mattsson LA, Salvesen KA (2007) Women's experiences and attitudes towards expectant management and induction of labor for post-term pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86(8):950–6.
    1. Soet JE, Brack GA, DiIorio C (2003) Prevalence and predictors of women's experience of psychological trauma during childbirth. Birth 30(1):36–46.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren