Biomechanical aspects of segmented arch mechanics combined with power arm for controlled anterior tooth movement: A three-dimensional finite element study

Hiroya Ozaki, Jun-Ya Tominaga, Ryo Hamanaka, Mayumi Sumi, Pao-Chang Chiang, Motohiro Tanaka, Yoshiyuki Koga, Noriaki Yoshida, Hiroya Ozaki, Jun-Ya Tominaga, Ryo Hamanaka, Mayumi Sumi, Pao-Chang Chiang, Motohiro Tanaka, Yoshiyuki Koga, Noriaki Yoshida

Abstract

The porpose of this study was to determine the optimal length of power arms for achieving controlled anterior tooth movement in segmented arch mechanics combined with power arm. A three-dimensional finite element method was applied for the simulation of en masse anterior tooth retraction in segmented power arm mechanics. The type of tooth movement, namely, the location of center of rotation of the maxillary central incisor in association with power arm length, was calculated after the retraction force was applied. When a 0.017 × 0.022-in archwire was inserted into the 0.018-in slot bracket, bodily movement was obtained at 9.1 mm length of power arm, namely, at the level of 1.8 mm above the center of resistance. In case a 0.018 × 0.025-in full-size archwire was used, bodily movement of the tooth was produced at the power arm length of 7.0 mm, namely, at the level of 0.3 mm below the center of resistance. Segmented arch mechanics required shorter length of power arms for achieving any type of controlled anterior tooth movement as compared to sliding mechanics. Therefore, this space closing mechanics could be widely applied even for the patients whose gingivobuccal fold is shallow. The segmented arch mechanics combined with power arm could provide higher amount of moment-to-force ratio sufficient for controlled anterior tooth movement without generating friction, and vertical forces when applying retraction force parallel to the occlusal plane. It is, therefore, considered that the segmented power arm mechanics has a simple appliance design and allows more efficient and controllable tooth movement.

Keywords: Segmented arch; finite element method; power arm.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
3D finite element model of maxillary dentition, including PDL, alveolar bone, brackets, and archwire.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Illustration of the segmented power arm mechanics.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The type of controlled anterior tooth movement.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
The relationship between the degree of labiolingual tipping of the maxillary central incisor and the height of retraction force on the power arm.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Loading conditions when controlled anterior tooth movements are performed.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Relationship between the tendency of the anterior tooth movement and the position of the wire end of each segment: (a) if controlled lingual root tipping of the central incisor was achieved and (b) if controlled lingual crown tipping of the central incisor was achieved.

References

    1. Burstone CJ, Koenig HA. Optimizing anterior and canine retraction. Am J Orthod 1976; 70(1): 1–19.
    1. Burstone CJ. The segmented arch approach to space closure. Am J Orthod 1982; 82(5): 361–378.
    1. Bennett JC, McLaughlin RP. Controlled space closure with a preadjusted appliance system. J Clin Orthod 1990; 24(4): 251–260.
    1. Bennett JC, McLaughlin RP. Management of deep overbite with a preadjusted appliance system. J Clin Orthod 1990; 24(11): 684–696.
    1. McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC. The transition from standard edgewise to preadjusted appliance systems. J Clin Orthod 1989; 23(3): 142–153.
    1. McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC. Finishing and detailing with a preadjusted appliance system. J Clin Orthod 1991; 25(4): 251–264.
    1. Kusy RP, Whitley JQ, Prewitt MJ. Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states. Angle Orthod 1991; 61(4): 293–302.
    1. Yoshida N, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Koga Y, et al. Moment/Kraft-Verhältnisse von Kontraktionsbögen während Deaktivierung. Kieferorthop 2004; 18: 175–182.
    1. Choy K, Pae EK, Kim KH, et al. Controlled space closure with a statically determinate retraction system. Angle Orthod 2002; 72(3): 191–198.
    1. El-Bialy T. Segmented and sectional orthodontic technique: review and case report. J Health Spec 2013; 1(2): 90–96.
    1. Sia SS, Koga Y, Yoshida N. Determining the center of resistance of maxillary anterior teeth subjected to retraction forces in sliding mechanics. Angle Orthod 2007; 77(6): 999–1003.
    1. Park YC, Choy K, Lee JS, et al. Lever-arm mechanics in lingual orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 2000; 34(10): 601–605.
    1. Andrews LF. The six keys to optimal occlusion. In: Andrews LF. (ed.) Straight wire: the concept and appliance. San Diego, CA: LA Wells, 1989, pp. 13–24.
    1. Collidge ED. The thickness of the human periodontal membrane. J Am Dent Assoc Dent Cosmos 1937; 24: 1260–1270.
    1. Vollmer D, Bourauel C, Maier K, et al. Determination of the centre of resistance in an upper human canine and idealized tooth model. Eur J Orthod 1999; 21: 633–648.
    1. Reimann S, Keilig L, Jager A, et al. Biomechanical finite-element investigation of the position of the centre of resistance of the upper incisors. Eur J Orthod 2007; 29: 219–224.
    1. Kusy RP. Effect of salivary viscosity on frictional coefficients of orthodontic archwire/bracket couples. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1995; 6: 390–395.
    1. Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Friction between different wire-bracket configurations and materials. Semin Orthod 1997; 3: 166–177.
    1. Nanda R, Ghosh J. Biomechanical considerations in sliding mechanics. In: Nanda R. (ed.) Biomechanics in clinical orthodontics. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Co, 1997, pp. 188–217.
    1. Tominaga JY, Chiang PC, Ozaki H, et al. Effect of play between bracket and archwire on anterior tooth movement in sliding mechanics: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Dent Biomech. Epub ahead of print 17 October 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1758736012461269.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren