Efficacy of Benzocaine 20% Topical Anesthetic Compared to Placebo Prior to Administration of Local Anesthesia in the Oral Cavity: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Guilherme Camponogara de Freiras, Roselaine Terezinha Pozzobon, Diego Segatto Blaya, Carlos Heitor Moreira, Guilherme Camponogara de Freiras, Roselaine Terezinha Pozzobon, Diego Segatto Blaya, Carlos Heitor Moreira

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of a topical anesthetic to a placebo on pain perception during administration of local anesthesia in 2 regions of the oral cavity. A split-mouth, double-blind, randomized clinical trial design was used. Thirty-eight subjects, ages 18-50 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II, received 4 anesthetic injections each in regions corresponding to the posterior superior alveolar nerve (PSA) and greater palatine nerve (GPN), totaling 152 sites analyzed. The side of the mouth where the topical anesthetic (benzocaine 20%) or the placebo was to be applied was chosen by a flip of a coin. The needle used was 27G, and the anesthetic used for administration of local anesthesia was 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. After receiving the administration of local anesthesia, each patient reported pain perception on a visual analog scale (VAS) of 100-mm length. The results showed that the topical anesthetic and the placebo had similar effects: there was no statistically significant VAS difference between the PSA and the GPN pain ratings. A higher value on the VAS for the anesthesia of the GPN, relative to the PSA, was observed for both groups. Regarding gender, male patients had higher values on the VAS compared with female patients, but these differences were not meaningful. The topical anesthetic and the placebo had similar effects on pain perception for injection of local anesthesia for the PSA and GPN.

Keywords: Dental; Pain; Randomized clinical trial; Topical anesthetic.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pain reported on the VAS (mm), stratified by gender, after anesthesia of the posterior superior alveolar nerve. P = 0.58.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Pain reported on the VAS (mm), stratified by gender, after anesthesia of the greater palatine nerve. P = 0.09.

References

    1. Meechan JG. Intra-oral topical anaesthetics: a review. J Dent. 2000;28:3–14.
    1. Alqareer A, Alyahya A, Andersson L. The effect of clove and benzocaine versus placebo as topical anesthetics. J Dent. 2006;34:747–750.
    1. Rosivack RG, Koenigsberg SR, Maxwell KC. An analysis of the effectiveness of two topical anesthetics. Anesth Prog. 1990;37:290–292.
    1. Vickers ER, Punnia-Moorthy A. A clinical evaluation of three topical anaesthetic agents. Aust Dent J. 1992;37:267–270.
    1. Gill CJ, Orr DL., II A double-blind crossover comparison of topical anesthetics. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979;98:213–214.
    1. Keller BJ. Comparison of the effectiveness of two topical anesthetics and a placebo in reducing injection pain. Hawaii Dent J. 1985;16:10–11.
    1. Martin MD, Ramsay DS, Whitney C, Fiset L, Weinstein P. Topical anesthesia: differentiating the pharmacological and psychological contributions to efficacy. Anesth Prog. 1994;41:40–47.
    1. Bhalla J, Meechan JG, Lawrence HP, Grad HA, Haas DA. Effect of time on clinical efficacy of topical anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 2009;56:36–41.
    1. Nusstein JM, Beck M. Effectiveness of 20% benzocaine as a topical anesthetic for intraoral injections. Anesth Prog. 2003;50:159–163.
    1. Carr MP, Horton JE. Evaluation of a transoral delivery system for topical anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132:1714–1719.
    1. Meechan JG. Intraoral topical anesthesia. Periodontol 2000. 2008;46:56–79.
    1. Malamed SF. Handbook of Local Anesthesia. 5th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby;; 2004.
    1. Seymour RA. The use of pain scales in assessing the efficacy of analgesics in post-operative dental pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1982;23:441–444.
    1. Grimes DA, Schulz KF. An overview of clinical research: the lay of the land. Lancet. 2002;359:57–61.
    1. Stanley K. Design of randomized controlled trials. Circulation. 2007;115:1164–1169.
    1. Montenegro R, Needleman I, Moles D, Tonetti M. Quality of RCTs in periodontology—a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2002;81:866–870.
    1. Kindler CH, Harms C, Amsler F, Ihde-Scholl T, Scheidegger D. The visual analog scale allows effective measurement of preoperative anxiety and detection of patients' anesthetic concerns. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:706–712.
    1. Tiplady B, Jackson SH, Maskrey VM, Swift CG. Validity and sensitivity of visual analogue scales in young and older healthy subjects. Age Ageing. 1998;27:63–66.
    1. Koshi EB, Short CA. Placebo theory and its implications for research and clinical practice: a review of the recent literature. Pain Pract. 2007;7:4–20.
    1. Fillingim RB, King CD, Ribeiro-Dasilva MC, Rahim-Williams B, Riley JL., III Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings. J Pain. 2009;10:447–485.
    1. Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z. Sex differences in pain perception. Gend Med. 2005;2:137–145.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren