Optimisation of a metabotype approach to deliver targeted dietary advice

Elaine Hillesheim, Miriam F Ryan, Eileen Gibney, Helen M Roche, Lorraine Brennan, Elaine Hillesheim, Miriam F Ryan, Eileen Gibney, Helen M Roche, Lorraine Brennan

Abstract

Background: Targeted nutrition is defined as dietary advice tailored at a group level. Groups known as metabotypes can be identified based on individual metabolic profiles. Metabotypes have been associated with differential responses to diet, which support their use to deliver dietary advice. We aimed to optimise a metabotype approach to deliver targeted dietary advice by encompassing more specific recommendations on nutrient and food intakes and dietary behaviours.

Methods: Participants (n = 207) were classified into three metabotypes based on four biomarkers (triacylglycerol, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and glucose) and using a k-means cluster model. Participants in metabotype-1 had the highest average HDL-cholesterol, in metabotype-2 the lowest triacylglycerol and total cholesterol, and in metabotype-3 the highest triacylglycerol and total cholesterol. For each participant, dietary advice was assigned using decision trees for both metabotype (group level) and personalised (individual level) approaches. Agreement between methods was compared at the message level and the metabotype approach was optimised to incorporate messages exclusively assigned by the personalised approach and current dietary guidelines. The optimised metabotype approach was subsequently compared with individualised advice manually compiled.

Results: The metabotype approach comprised advice for improving the intake of saturated fat (69% of participants), fibre (66%) and salt (18%), while the personalised approach assigned advice for improving the intake of folate (63%), fibre (63%), saturated fat (61%), calcium (34%), monounsaturated fat (24%) and salt (14%). Following the optimisation of the metabotype approach, the most frequent messages assigned to address intake of key nutrients were to increase the intake of fruit and vegetables, beans and pulses, dark green vegetables, and oily fish, to limit processed meats and high-fat food products and to choose fibre-rich carbohydrates, low-fat dairy and lean meats (60-69%). An average agreement of 82.8% between metabotype and manual approaches was revealed, with excellent agreements in metabotype-1 (94.4%) and metabotype-3 (92.3%).

Conclusions: The optimised metabotype approach proved capable of delivering targeted dietary advice for healthy adults, being highly comparable with individualised advice. The next step is to ascertain whether the optimised metabotype approach is effective in changing diet quality.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Cluster analysis; Metabotypes; Personalised nutrition; Targeted nutrition.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© The Author(s) 2020.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart for the assessment and optimisation of the metabotype approach
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relative frequency of dietary messages assigned according to optimised metabotype approach and individualised manual approach. a Metabotype 1. b Metabotype 2. c Metabotype 3. Blue lines represent the relative frequency of dietary advice assigned using the optimised metabotype approach. Red lines represent the relative frequency of dietary advice assigned using the individualised manual approach. Green numbers represent the range of the relative frequency. Grey numbers represent the dietary messages as follows: 1—Choose fibre-rich carbohydrates, 2—Eat five servings of fruit and vegetables per day, 3—Limit processed meats and high-fat food products, 4—Choose lean meats, 5—Choose low-fat dairy products, 6—Eat oily fish twice a week, 7—Reduce the intake of high-fat foods, 8—Low-fat cooking advice, 9—Limit the intake of foods high in added sugar to once or twice a week, 10—Choose low-salt products, 11—Limit the salt added during cooking and take it off the table, 12—Do not skip breakfast and avoid eating in the night-time, 13—Reduce the size of food servings, 14—Exercise for 30 min per day, 15—Exercise for 60–90 min per day, 16—Aim to keep your healthy body weight, 17—Aim for a gradual weight loss, 18—Limit alcohol intake to one unit per day, 19—Eat more beans and pulses, 20—Eat more dark green vegetables, 21—Eat three servings of dairy products per day, and 22—Have a small daily handful of seeds and nuts

References

    1. Celis-Morales C, Lara J, Mathers JC. Personalising nutritional guidance for more effective behaviour change. Proc Nutr Soc. 2015;74:130–138. doi: 10.1017/S0029665114001633.
    1. Ordovas JM, Ferguson LR, Tai ES, Mathers JC. Personalised nutrition and health. BMJ. 2018;361:k2173. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2173.
    1. Adams SH, Anthony JC, Carvajal R, Chae L, Khoo CSH, Latulippe ME, et al. Perspective: guiding principles for the implementation of personalized nutrition approaches that benefit health and function. Adv Nutr. 2020;11:25–34.
    1. Brennan L. Use of metabotyping for optimal nutrition. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2017;44:35–38. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.10.008.
    1. Muirhead LJ, Kinross J, Fitzmaurice TS, Takats Z, Darzi A, Nicholson JK. Surgical systems biology and personalized longitudinal phenotyping in critical care. Per Med. 2012;9:593–608. doi: 10.2217/pme.12.70.
    1. Holmes E, Wilson ID, Nicholson JK. Metabolic phenotyping in health and disease. Cell. 2008;134:714–717. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.026.
    1. Hillesheim E, Brennan L. Metabotyping and Its Role in Nutrition Research. Nutr Res Rev. 2019 doi: 10.1017/S0954422419000179.
    1. Riedl A, Wawro N, Gieger C, Meisinger C, Peters A, Roden M, et al. Identification of comprehensive metabotypes associated with cardiometabolic diseases in the population-based KORA study. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2018;62:e1800117. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201800117.
    1. Riedl A, Wawro N, Gieger C, Meisinger C, Peters A, Rathmann W, et al. Modifying effect of metabotype on diet-diabetes associations. Eur J Nutr. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s00394-019-01988-5.
    1. Fiamoncini J, Rundle M, Gibbons H, Thomas EL, Geillinger-Kastle K, Bunzel D, et al. Plasma metabolome analysis identifies distinct human metabotypes in the postprandial state with different susceptibility to weight loss-mediated metabolic improvements. FASEB J. 2018;32:5447–5458. doi: 10.1096/fj.201800330R.
    1. O'Donovan CB, Walsh MC, Nugent AP, McNulty B, Walton J, Flynn A, et al. Use of metabotyping for the delivery of personalised nutrition. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2015;59:377–385. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201400591.
    1. O'Donovan CB, Walsh MC, Woolhead C, Forster H, Celis-Morales C, Fallaize R, et al. Metabotyping for the development of tailored dietary advice solutions in a European population: the Food4Me study. Br J Nutr. 2017;118:561–569. doi: 10.1017/S0007114517002069.
    1. Morris C, O'Grada C, Ryan M, Roche HM, Gibney MJ, Gibney ER, et al. Identification of differential responses to an oral glucose tolerance test in healthy adults. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e72890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072890.
    1. Ryan MF, O'Grada CM, Morris C, Segurado R, Walsh MC, Gibney ER, et al. Within-person variation in the postprandial lipemic response of healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97:261–267. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.047936.
    1. Bingham SA, Welch AA, McTaggart A, Mulligan AA, Runswick SA, Luben R, et al. Nutritional methods in the European prospective investigation of cancer in Norfolk. Public Health Nutr. 2001;4:847–858. doi: 10.1079/PHN2000102.
    1. Welch AA, Luben R, Khaw KT, Bingham SA. The CAFE Computer program for nutritional analysis of the EPIC-Norfolk food frequency questionnaire and identification of extreme nutrient values. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2005;18:99–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2005.00593.x.
    1. Riedl A, Hillesheim E, Wawro N, Meisinger C, Peters A, Roden M, et al. Evaluation of the metabotype concept identified in an Irish population in the German KORA Cohort Study. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2020;64:e1900918. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201900918.
    1. Forster H, Walsh MC, O'Donovan CB, Woolhead C, McGirr C, Daly EJ, et al. A dietary feedback system for the delivery of consistent personalized dietary advice in the web-based multicenter Food4Me study. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e150. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5620.
    1. American Diabetes Association 5. Lifestyle management: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):46–60. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S005.
    1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Rosei EA, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3021–3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
    1. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas C, Casula M, Badimon L, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:111–188. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455.
    1. Schutz DD, Busetto L, Dicker D, Farpour-Lambert N, Pryke R, Toplak H, et al. European practical and patient-centred guidelines for adult obesity management in primary care. Obes Facts. 2019;12:40–66. doi: 10.1159/000496183.
    1. Wright JL, Sherriff JL, Dhaliwal SS, Mamo JC. Tailored, iterative, printed dietary feedback is as effective as group education in improving dietary behaviours: results from a randomised control trial in middle-aged adults with cardiovascular risk factors. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:43. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-43.
    1. Del Valle MO, Martín-Payo R, Cuesta-Briand B, Lana A. Impact of two nurse-led interventions targeting diet among breast cancer survivors: results from a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018;27:e12854. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12854.
    1. Celis-Morales C, Livingstone KM, Marsaux CF, Macready AL, Fallaize R, O'Donovan CB, et al. Effect of personalized nutrition on health-related behaviour change: evidence from the Food4Me European randomized controlled trial. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:578–588.
    1. Bianchi CM, Mariotti F, Lluch A, Journet C, Stehr Y, Beaussier H, et al. Computer-based tailored dietary counselling improves the nutrient adequacy of the diet of french pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2020;123:220–231. doi: 10.1017/S0007114519002617.
    1. Moschonis G, Michalopoulou M, Tsoutsoulopoulou K, Vlachopapadopoulou E, Michalacos S, Charmandari E, et al. Assessment of the effectiveness of a computerised decision-support tool for health professionals for the prevention and treatment of childhood obesity. Results from a randomised controlled trial. Nutrients. 2019;11:706. doi: 10.3390/nu11030706.
    1. Mitchell LJ, Capra S, Macdonald-Wicks L. Structural change in medicare funding: Impact on the dietetics workforce. Nutr Diet. 2009;66:170–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0080.2009.01362.x.
    1. Shrimpton R, du Plessis LM, Delisle H, Blaney S, Atwood SJ, Sanders D, et al. Public health nutrition capacity: Assuring the quality of workforce preparation for scaling up nutrition programmes. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19:2090–2100. doi: 10.1017/S136898001500378X.
    1. World Health Organization . Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization Press; 2011.
    1. World Health Organization . Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. (WHO Technical Report Series 916) Geneva: World Health Organization Press; 2002.
    1. Jerdén L, Dalton J, Johansson H, Sorensen J, Jenkins P, Weinehall L. Lifestyle counseling in primary care in the United States and Sweden: a comparison of patients' expectations and experiences. Glob Health Action. 2018;11:1438238. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1438238.
    1. Brotons C, Drenthen AJ, Durrer D, Moral I, EUROPREV Beliefs and attitudes to lifestyle, nutrition and physical activity: the views of patients in Europe. Fam Pract. 2012;29(Suppl 1):49–55. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr091.
    1. Cass S, Ball L, Leveritt M. Australian practice nurses' perceptions of their role and competency to provide nutrition care to patients living with chronic disease. Aust J Prim Health. 2014;20:203–208. doi: 10.1071/PY12118.
    1. Brotons C, Björkelund C, Bulc M, Ciurana R, Godycki-Cwirko M, Jurgova E, et al. Prevention and health promotion in clinical practice: the views of general practitioners in Europe. Prev Med. 2005;40:595–601. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.07.020.
    1. Wynn K, Trudeau JD, Taunton K, Gowans M, Scott I. Nutrition in primary care: current practices, attitudes, and barriers. Can Fam Physician. 2010;56:e109–e116.
    1. Hamilton K, Henderson J, Burton E, Hagger MS. Discussing lifestyle behaviors: perspectives and experiences of general practitioners. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2019;7:290–307. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2019.1648216.
    1. Shrimpton R, Hughes R, Recine E, Mason JB, Sanders D, Marks GC, et al. Nutrition capacity development: a practice framework. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17:682–688. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013001213.
    1. Ball L, Johnson C, Desbrow B, Leveritt M. General practitioners can offer effective nutrition care to patients with lifestyle-related chronic disease. J Prim Health Care. 2013;5:59–69. doi: 10.1071/HC13059.
    1. Chan BC, Jayasinghe UW, Christl B, Laws RA, Orr N, Williams A, et al. The impact of a team-based intervention on the lifestyle risk factor management practices of community nurses: outcomes of the community nursing SNAP trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:54. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-54.
    1. Tzeng CR, Chang YC, Wang CW, Chen CH, Hsu MI. Cluster analysis of cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors in women of reproductive age. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:1404–1410. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.023.
    1. Bucci CM, Legnani WE, Armentano RL. Clinical values dataset processing through cluster analysis to find cardiovascular risk. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2016;705:012033.
    1. Huang RC, Mori TA, Burke V, Newnham J, Stanley FJ, Landau LI, et al. Synergy between adiposity, insulin resistance, metabolic risk factors, and inflammation in adolescents. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:695–701. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1917.
    1. Ventura AK, Loken E, Birch LL. Risk profiles for metabolic syndrome in a nonclinical sample of adolescent girls. Pediatrics. 2006;118:2434–2442. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1527.
    1. van Bochove K, van Schalkwijk DB, Parnell LD, Lai CQ, Ordovas JM, de Graaf AA, et al. Clustering by plasma lipoprotein profile reveals two distinct subgroups with positive lipid response to fenofibrate therapy. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e38072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038072.
    1. Li K, Brennan L, McNulty BA, Bloomfield JF, Duff DJ, Devlin NF, et al. Plasma fatty acid patterns reflect dietary habits and metabolic health: a cross-sectional study. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016;60:2043–2052. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201500711.
    1. Bingham SA, Gill C, Welch A, Cassidy A, Runswick SA, Oakes S, et al. Validation of dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of EPIC using weighed records, and 24-hour urinary nitrogen and potassium and serum vitamin C and carotenoids as biomarkers. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26(Suppl 1):137–151. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.suppl_1.S137.
    1. McKeown NM, Day NE, Welch AA, Runswick SA, Luben RN, Mulligan AA, et al. Use of biological markers to validate self-reported dietary intake in a random sample of the european prospective investigation into cancer United Kingdom Norfolk Cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;74:188–196. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/74.2.188.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren