MRI-based radiomics analysis improves preoperative diagnostic performance for the depth of stromal invasion in patients with early stage cervical cancer

Jing Ren, Yuan Li, Jun-Jun Yang, Jia Zhao, Yang Xiang, Chen Xia, Ying Cao, Bo Chen, Hui Guan, Ya-Fei Qi, Wen Tang, Kuan Chen, Yong-Lan He, Zheng-Yu Jin, Hua-Dan Xue, Jing Ren, Yuan Li, Jun-Jun Yang, Jia Zhao, Yang Xiang, Chen Xia, Ying Cao, Bo Chen, Hui Guan, Ya-Fei Qi, Wen Tang, Kuan Chen, Yong-Lan He, Zheng-Yu Jin, Hua-Dan Xue

Abstract

Background: The depth of cervical stromal invasion is one of the important prognostic factors affecting decision-making for early stage cervical cancer (CC). This study aimed to develop and validate a T2-weighted imaging (T2WI)-based radiomics model and explore independent risk factors (factors with statistical significance in both univariate and multivariate analyses) of middle or deep stromal invasion in early stage CC.

Methods: Between March 2017 and March 2021, a total of 234 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IB1-IIA1 CC patients were enrolled and randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 188) and a validation cohort (n = 46). The radiomics features of each patient were extracted from preoperative sagittal T2WI, and key features were selected. After independent risk factors were identified, a combined model and nomogram incorporating radiomics signature and independent risk factors were developed. Diagnostic accuracy of radiologists was also evaluated.

Results: The maximal tumor diameter (MTD) on magnetic resonance imaging was identified as an independent risk factor. In the validation cohort, the radiomics model, MTD, and combined model showed areas under the curve of 0.879, 0.844, and 0.886. The radiomics model and combined model showed the same sensitivity and specificity of 87.9% and 84.6%, which were better than radiologists (sensitivity, senior = 75.7%, junior = 63.6%; specificity, senior = 69.2%, junior = 53.8%) and MTD (sensitivity = 69.7%, specificity = 76.9%).

Conclusion: MRI-based radiomics analysis outperformed radiologists for the preoperative diagnosis of middle or deep stromal invasion in early stage CC, and the probability can be individually evaluated by a nomogram.

Keywords: Cervical cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Radiomics; Risk factor; Stromal invasion.

Conflict of interest statement

Co-Author Chen Xia, Ying Cao, Wen Tang, and Kuan Chen are employees of Beijing Infervision Technology Co. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests. The authors not employed by Beijing Infervision Technology Co. were in control of this study.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Radiomics feature selection using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression method. a The optimal λ was selected as the lowest binomial in the LASSO model using fivefold cross-validation. b LASSO coefficient profiles of the features show vertical lines that are drawn at the value selected using fivefold cross-validation, and the optimal λ results in 5 nonzero coefficients
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ROC curves of combined model, radiomics model, and tumor maximum diameter on MRI for predicting middle or deep stroma invasion in the validation cohort. The senior radiologist’s performance is indicated by the black cross and the junior radiologist’s performance is indicated by the red cross
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Nomogram for individual prediction of the probability of middle or deep stroma invasion in early stage CC. The nomogram was was a visual representation of the combined model in training cohort, which integrated radiomics signature and independent risk factor. The radiomics signature in the nomogram was the linear sum of the selected 5 radiomics features and their corresponding coefficients. (Rsignature: radiomics signature; MTD: maximal tumor diameter on MRI)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Representative images of middle or deep cervical stroma invasion (a) and superficial cervical stroma invasion (b). The lesions in the frames on sagittal T2WI are cervical tumors. a1 a 35-year-old, 2018 FIGO IB2, SCC patient with MTD on MRI of 28.0 mm. The probability of the middle or deep stroma invasion predicted by the nomogram was 98%. a2 a 49-year-old, 2018 FIGO IB1, SCC patient with MTD on MRI of 14.1 mm. The probability of the middle or deep stroma invasion predicted by the nomogram was 77%. b1 a 34-year-old, 2018 FIGO IB2, SCC patient with MTD on MRI of 20.1 mm. The probability of the middle or deep stroma invasion predicted by the nomogram was 33%. b2 a 52-year-old, 2018 FIGO IB1, AC patient with MTD on MRI of 12.2 mm. The probability of the middle or deep stroma invasion predicted by the nomogram was 13%. (MTD: maximal tumor diameter; FIGO: Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics; SCC: squamous cell carcinoma; AC: adenocarcinoma)

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 doi: 10.3322/caac.21660.
    1. Shrestha AD, Neupane D, Vedsted P, Kallestrup P. Cervical cancer prevalence, incidence and mortality in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19:319–324. doi: 10.22034/apjcp.2018.19.2.319.
    1. Cibula D, Pötter R, Planchamp F, et al. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2018;127:404–416. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.03.003.
    1. Bhatla N, Denny L. FIGO cancer report 2018. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;143(Suppl 2):2–3. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12608.
    1. Cao L, Wen H, Feng Z, Han X, Zhu J, Wu X. Role of adjuvant therapy after radical hysterectomy in intermediate-risk, early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31:52–58. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001974.
    1. Allam M, Feely C, Millan D, Nevin J, Davis J, Siddiqui N. Depth of cervical stromal invasion as a prognostic factor after radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:637–641. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.02.029.
    1. Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:297–303. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70074-3.
    1. Querleu D, Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR. 2017 Update on the Querleu-Morrow classification of radical hysterectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:3406–3412. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6031-z.
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Cervical Cancer (Version 1.2020). [cited 2020 Jan 14]. Available from:
    1. Baalbergen A, Veenstra Y, Stalpers LL, Ansink AC. Primary surgery versus primary radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy for early adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006248.pub2:Cd006248.
    1. Landoni F, Colombo A, Milani R, Placa F, Zanagnolo V, Mangioni C. Randomized study between radical surgery and radiotherapy for the treatment of stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: 20-year update. J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28:e34. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e34.
    1. Marth C, Landoni F, Mahner S, McCormack M, Gonzalez-Martin A, Colombo N. Cervical cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:iv72–iv83. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx220.
    1. Moloney F, Ryan D, Twomey M, Hewitt M, Barry J. Comparison of MRI and high-resolution transvaginal sonography for the local staging of cervical cancer. J Clin Ultrasound. 2016;44:78–84. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22288.
    1. Lakhman Y, Akin O, Park KJ, et al. Stage IB1 cervical cancer: role of preoperative MR imaging in selection of patients for fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy. Radiology. 2013;269:149–158. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121746.
    1. Yang Z, Xu W, Ma Y, Liu K, Li Y, Wang D. (18)F-FDG PET/CT can correct the clinical stages and predict pathological parameters before operation in cervical cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:877–884. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.02.010.
    1. Liu S, Xia L, Yang Z, et al. The feasibility of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for predicting pathologic risk status in early-stage uterine cervical squamous cancer. Cancer Imaging. 2020;20:63. doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00340-z.
    1. Pálsdóttir K, Fischerova D, Franchi D, Testa A, Di Legge A, Epstein E. Preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis and deep stromal invasion in women with invasive cervical cancer: prospective multicenter study using 2D and 3D ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:470–475. doi: 10.1002/uog.14643.
    1. Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:441–446. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036.
    1. Wu Q, Wang S, Chen X, et al. Radiomics analysis of magnetic resonance imaging improves diagnostic performance of lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2019;138:141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.035.
    1. Xiao M, Ma F, Li Y, et al. Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;52:885–896. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27101.
    1. Li Z, Li H, Wang S, et al. MR-based radiomics nomogram of cervical cancer in prediction of the lymph-vascular space invasion preoperatively. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49:1420–1426. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26531.
    1. Wu Q, Shi D, Dou S, et al. Radiomics analysis of multiparametric MRI evaluates the pathological features of cervical squamous cell carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49:1141–1148. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26301.
    1. Wang T, Gao T, Guo H, et al. Preoperative prediction of parametrial invasion in early-stage cervical cancer with MRI-based radiomics nomogram. Eur Radiol. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06655-1.
    1. Gui B, Autorino R, Miccò M, et al. Pretreatment MRI radiomics based response prediction model in locally advanced cervical cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021 doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040631.
    1. Fang M, Kan Y, Dong D, et al. Multi-habitat based radiomics for the prediction of treatment response to concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:563. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00563.
    1. Wormald BW, Doran SJ, Ind TE, D’Arcy J, Petts J, deSouza NM. Radiomic features of cervical cancer on T2-and diffusion-weighted MRI: prognostic value in low-volume tumors suitable for trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;156:107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.10.010.
    1. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ. 2015;350:g7594. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7594.
    1. Mongan J, Moy L, Kahn CE., Jr Checklist for artificial intelligence in medical imaging (CLAIM): a guide for authors and reviewers. Radiol Artif Intell. 2020;2:e200029. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2020200029.
    1. Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, et al. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145:129–135. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12749.
    1. Wang M, Xia C, Huang L, et al. Deep learning-based triage and analysis of lesion burden for COVID-19: a retrospective study with external validation. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2:e506–e515. doi: 10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30199-0.
    1. Wei W, Liu Z, Rong Y, et al. A computed tomography-based radiomic prognostic marker of advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer recurrence: a multicenter study. Front Oncol. 2019;9:255. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00255.
    1. Park SH, Lim H, Bae BK, et al. Robustness of magnetic resonance radiomic features to pixel size resampling and interpolation in patients with cervical cancer. Cancer Imaging. 2021;21:19. doi: 10.1186/s40644-021-00388-5.
    1. Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;143(Suppl 2):22–36. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12611.
    1. Li H, Zhu M, Jian L, et al. Radiomic score as a potential imaging biomarker for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:706043. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.706043.
    1. Manganaro L, Lakhman Y, Bharwani N, et al. Staging, recurrence and follow-up of uterine cervical cancer using MRI: updated guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology after revised FIGO staging 2018. Eur Radiol. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07632-9.
    1. Fiset S, Welch ML, Weiss J, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI-based radiomic features in cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2019;135:107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.03.001.
    1. Rai R, Holloway LC, Brink C, et al. Multicenter evaluation of MRI-based radiomic features: a phantom study. Med Phys. 2020;47:3054–3063. doi: 10.1002/mp.14173.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren