Growth Differentiation Factor-15 Predicts Mortality and Heart Failure Exacerbation But Not Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Cardiomyopathy

M Scott Binder, Lisa R Yanek, Wanjun Yang, Barbara Butcher, Sanaz Norgard, Joseph E Marine, Aravindan Kolandaivelu, Jonathan Chrispin, Neal S Fedarko, Hugh Calkins, Brian O'Rourke, Katherine C Wu, Gordon F Tomaselli, Andreas S Barth, M Scott Binder, Lisa R Yanek, Wanjun Yang, Barbara Butcher, Sanaz Norgard, Joseph E Marine, Aravindan Kolandaivelu, Jonathan Chrispin, Neal S Fedarko, Hugh Calkins, Brian O'Rourke, Katherine C Wu, Gordon F Tomaselli, Andreas S Barth

Abstract

Background Heart failure (HF) has been increasing in prevalence, and a need exists for biomarkers with improved predictive and prognostic ability. GDF-15 (growth differentiation factor-15) is a novel biomarker associated with HF mortality, but no serial studies of GDF-15 have been conducted. This study aimed to investigate the association between GDF-15 levels over time and the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias, HF hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality. Methods and Results We used a retrospective case-control design to analyze 148 patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies and primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) from the PROSe-ICD (Prospective Observational Study of the ICD in Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention) cohort. Patients had blood drawn every 6 months and after each appropriate ICD therapy and were followed for a median follow-up of 4.6 years, between 2005 to 2019. We compared serum GDF-15 levels within ±90 days of an event among those with a ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation event requiring ICD therapies and those hospitalized for decompensated HF. A comparator/control group comprised patients with GDF-15 levels available during 2-year follow-up periods without events. Median follow-up was 4.6 years in the 148 patients studied (mean age 58±12, 27% women). The HF cohort had greater median GDF-15 values within 90 days (1797 pg/mL) and 30 days (2039 pg/mL) compared with the control group (1062 pg/mL, both P<0.0001). No difference was found between the ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation subgroup within 90 days (1173 pg/mL, P=0.60) or 30 days (1173 pg/mL, P=0.78) and the control group. GDF-15 was also significantly predictive of mortality (hazard ratio, 3.17 [95% CI, 2.33-4.30]). Conclusions GDF-15 levels are associated with HF hospitalization and mortality but not ventricular arrhythmic events.

Keywords: arrhythmias; biomarkers; heart failure; mortality.

Figures

Figure 1. GDF‐15 (growth differentiation factor‐15) values…
Figure 1. GDF‐15 (growth differentiation factor‐15) values (pg/mL) with respect to time to decompensated heart failure admission (blue dots) or ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (red crosses) event.
Negative numbers indicate days preceding heart failure admission date or ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation event, whereas positive numbers indicate days after the heart failure admission date or ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation event. CHF indicates congestive heart failure; GDF‐15, growth differentiation factor‐15; and VT/VF, ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation.
Figure 2. GDF‐15 (growth differentiation factor‐15) values…
Figure 2. GDF‐15 (growth differentiation factor‐15) values (pg/mL) for heart failure and ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation subgroups at 90 days and 30 days before and after an event, as well as for the control group.
Median GDF‐15 values are shown, with the positive interquartile range shown in the gray box and negative interquartile range in orange. Maximum and minimum values for each group are represented by the whiskers. *P<0.01 from adjusted mixed model. GDF‐15 indicates growth differentiation factor‐15; HF, heart failure; and VT/VF, ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation.
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curve for patient mortality…
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curve for patient mortality stratified by GDF‐15 level.
Values P<0.0001). GDF‐15 indicates growth differentiation factor‐15.

References

    1. Wollert K, Kempf T, Wallentin L. Growth differentiation factor 15 as a biomarker in cardiovascular disease. Clin Chem. 2017;63:140–151. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.255174
    1. Xu X, Li Z, Gao W. Growth differentiation factor 15 in cardiovascular diseases: from bench to bedside. Biomarkers. 2011;16:466–475. doi: 10.3109/1354750X.2011.580006
    1. Kempf T, Haehling S, Peter T, Allhoff T, Cicoira M, Doehner W, Ponikowski P, Filippatos G, Rozentryt P, Drexler H, et al. Prognostic utility of growth differentiation factor‐15 in patients with chronic heart failure. JACC. 2007;50:1054–1060. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.091
    1. George M, Jena A, Srivatsan V, Muthukumar R, Dhandapani VE. GDF 15‐a novel biomarker in the offing for heart failure. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2016;12:37–46. doi: 10.2174/1573403X12666160111125304
    1. Sharma A, Stevens S, Lucas J, Fiuzat M, Adams K, Whellan D, Donahue M, Kitzman D, Pina I, Zannad F, et al. Utility of growth differentiation factor‐15, a marker of oxidative stress and inflammation, in chronic heart failure: insights from the HF‐ACTION study. JACC Heart Fail. 2017;5:724–734. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.07.013
    1. Khan S, Ng K, Dhillon O, Kelly D, Quinn P, Squire I, Davies J, Ng L. Growth differentiation factor‐15 as a prognostic marker in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:1057–1065. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn600
    1. Andersson J, Fall T, Delicano R, Wennberg P, Jansson J. GDF‐15 is associated with sudden cardiac death due to incident myocardial infarction. Resuscitation. 2020;152:165–169. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.05.001
    1. Wallentin L, Hijazi Z, Andersson U, Alexander J, Caterina R, Hanna M, Horowitz J, Hylek E, Lopes R, Asberg S, et al. Growth differentiation factor 15, a marker of oxidative stress and inflammation, for risk assessment in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2014;130:1847–1858. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011204
    1. Santema B, Chan M, Tromp J, Dokter M, Wal H, Emmens J, Takens J, Samani N, Ng L, Lang C, et al. The influence of atrial fibrillation on the levels of NT‐proBNP versus GDF‐15 in patients with heart failure. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020;109:331–338. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01513-y
    1. Marín F, Roldán V. GDF‐15 and risk stratification in atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12:8–9. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.190
    1. Cheng A, Dalal D, Butcher B, Norgard S, Zhang Y, Dickfeld T, Eldadah Z, Ellenbogen K, Guallar E, Tomaselli G. Prospective observational study of implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators in primary prevention of sudden cardiac death: study design and cohort description. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e000083. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.000083
    1. Moss A, Schuger C, Beck C, Brown M, Cannom D, Daubert J, Estes M, Greenberg H, Hall J, Huang D, et al. Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mortality through ICD programming. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2275–2283. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211107
    1. Lourenco P, Cunha FM, Ferreira‐Coimbra J, Barroso I, Guimaraes J, Bettencourt P. Dynamics of growth differentiation factor 15 in acute heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2021;8:2527–2534. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13377
    1. Lok DJ, Klip IT, Lok SI, Porte P, Badings E, Winjngaarden J, Voors A, Boer R, Veldhuisen D, Meer P. Incremental prognostic power of novel biomarkers (growth‐differentiation factor‐15, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein, galectin‐3, and high‐sensitivity troponin‐T) in patients with advanced chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:831–837. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.013
    1. Santhanakrishnan R, Chong JP, Ng TP, Ling L, Sim D, Leong K, Yeo P, Ong H, Jaufeerally F, Wong R, et al. Growth differentiation factor 15, ST2, high‐sensitivity troponin T, and N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14:1338–1347. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs130
    1. Wang TJ, Wollert KC, Larson MG, Coglianese E, McCabe E, Cheng S, Ho J, Fradley M, Ghorbani A, Xanthakis V, et al. Prognostic utility of novel biomarkers of cardiovascular stress: the Framingham heart study. Circulation. 2012;126:1596–1604. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.129437
    1. Xanthakis V, Larson MG, Wollert KC, Aragam J, Cheng S, Ho J, Coglianese E, Levy D, Colucci W, Felker G, et al. Association of novel biomarkers of cardiovascular stress with left ventricular hypertrophy and dysfunction: implications for screening. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e000399. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000399
    1. Wischhusen J, Melero I, Fridman WH. Growth/differentiation factor‐15 (GDF‐15): from biomarker to novel targetable immune checkpoint. Front Immunol. 2020;11:951. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00951
    1. Rochette L, Zeller M, Cottin Y, Vergely C. Insights into mechanisms of GDF15 and receptor GFRAL: therapeutic targets. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2020;31:939–951. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2020.10.004
    1. Conte M, Martucci M, Mosconi G, Chiariello A, Cappucilli C, Totti V, Santoro A, Franceschi C, Salvioli S. GDF15 plasma level is inversely associated with level of physical activity and correlates with markers of inflammation and muscle weakness. Front Immunol. 2020;11:915. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00915
    1. Vocka M, Langer D, Fryba V, Petrtyl J, Hanus T, Kalousova M, Zima T, Petruzelka L. Growth/differentiation factor 15 (GDF‐15) as new potential serum marker in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2018;21:869–874. doi: 10.3233/CBM-170792
    1. Bao X, Borné Y, Muhammad IF, Nilsson J, Lind L, Melander O, Niu K, Orho M, Engstrom G. Growth differentiation factor 15 is positively associated with incidence of diabetes mellitus: the Malmö diet and cancer‐cardiovascular cohort. Diabetologia. 2019;62:78–86. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4751-7
    1. Nair V, Cohen C, Smith M, Bellovich K, Bhat Z, Bobadilla M, Brosius F, Boer I, Essioux L, Formentini I, et al. Growth differentiation factor–15 and risk of CKD progression. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:2233–2240. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016080919
    1. Molfino A, Amabile M, Imbimbo G, Rizzo V, Pediconi F, Catalano C, Emiliani A, Belli R, Ramaccini C, Parisi C, et al. Association between growth differentiation factor‐15 (GDF‐15) serum levels, anorexia and low muscle mass among cancer patients. Cancers. 2021;13:1–10. doi: 10.3390/cancers13010099
    1. Luan H, Wang A, Hilliard B, Carvalho F, Rosen C, Ahasic A, Herzog E, Kang I, Pisani M, Yu S, et al. GDF15 is an inflammation‐induced central mediator of tissue tolerance. Cell. 2019;178:1231–1244. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.033
    1. Yatsuga S, Fujita Y, Ishii A, Fukumoto Y, Arahata H, Kakuma T, Kojima T, Ito M, Tanaka M, Saiki R, et al. Growth differentiation factor 15 as a useful biomarker for mitochondrial disorders. Ann Neurol. 2015;78:814–823. doi: 10.1002/ana.24506
    1. Montero R, Yubero D, Villarroya J, Henares D, Jou C, Rodriguez M, Ramos F, Nascimento A, Ortez C, Campistol J, et al. GDF‐15 is elevated in children with mitochondrial diseases and is induced by mitochondrial dysfunction. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0148709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148709
    1. Formichi P, Cardone N, Taglia I, Cardaiola E, Salvatore S, Gerfo A, Simoncini C, Montano V, Siliciano G, Mancuso M, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 and growth differentiation factor 15 are sensitive biomarkers of mitochondrial diseases due to mitochondrial transfer‐RNA mutations and mitochondrial DNA deletions. Neurol Sci. 2020;41:3653–3662. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04422-5
    1. Zhang Y, Jiang W, Wang L, Lingappan K. Sex‐specific differences in the modulation of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) by hyperoxia in vivo and in vitro: role of Hif‐1α. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2017;332:8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2017.07.016
    1. Andersson‐Hall U, Svedin P, Mallard C, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Holmang A. Growth differentiation factor 15 increases in both cerebrospinal fluid and serum during pregnancy. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0248980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248980

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren