Substrate Spatial Complexity Analysis for the Prediction of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

David R Okada, Jason Miller, Jonathan Chrispin, Adityo Prakosa, Natalia Trayanova, Steven Jones, Mauro Maggioni, Katherine C Wu, David R Okada, Jason Miller, Jonathan Chrispin, Adityo Prakosa, Natalia Trayanova, Steven Jones, Mauro Maggioni, Katherine C Wu

Abstract

Background: Transition zones between healthy myocardium and scar form a spatially complex substrate that may give rise to reentrant ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). We sought to assess the utility of a novel machine learning approach for quantifying 3-dimensional spatial complexity of grayscale patterns on late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance images to predict VAs in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Methods: One hundred twenty-two consecutive ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% without prior history of VAs underwent late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance images. From raw grayscale data, we generated graphs encoding the 3-dimensional geometry of the left ventricle. A novel technique, adapted to these graphs, assessed global regularity of signal intensity patterns using Fourier-like analysis and generated a substrate spatial complexity profile for each patient. A machine learning statistical algorithm was employed to discern which substrate spatial complexity profiles correlated with VA events (appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator firings and arrhythmic sudden cardiac death) at 5 years of follow-up. From the statistical machine learning results, a complexity score ranging from 0 to 1 was calculated for each patient and tested using multivariable Cox regression models.

Results: At 5 years of follow-up, 40 patients had VA events. The machine learning algorithm classified with 81% overall accuracy and correctly classified 86% of those without VAs. Overall negative predictive value was 91%. Average complexity score was significantly higher in patients with VA events versus those without (0.5±0.5 versus 0.1±0.2; P<0.0001) and was independently associated with VA events in a multivariable model (hazard ratio, 1.5 [1.2-2.0]; P=0.002).

Conclusions: Substrate spatial complexity analysis of late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance images may be helpful in refining VA risk in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, particularly to identify low-risk patients who may not benefit from prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Visual Overview: A visual overview is available for this article.

Keywords: cardiomyopathy; machine learning; magnetic resonance imaging; sudden cardiac death.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Substrate Spatial Complexity Analysis Workflow. Signal intensity patterns from LGE-CMR imaging were analyzed using a Fourier-like technique for assessment of global irregularity. This analysis generated features that were used in a statistical machine learning algorithm, which yielded a complexity score ranging from 0 to 1, where 0 represents low arrhythmic risk and 1 represents high arrhythmic risk.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Fourier-Like Analysis. Signal intensity patterns from LGE-CMR imaging were analyzed using a novel Fourier-like technique. Eigenvectors (sine-like functions) of varying frequencies oscillating over graphs encoding patient-specific LV size and geometry were compared with signal intensity patterns to generate Fourier coefficients. These coefficients were then used in the ML algorithm. Each panel (A, B and C) shows a different eigenvector frequency. Colors represent amplitude of the sine-like function.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Results of Multivariable Cox Regression Model. In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, the CS was independently associated with VA events on a time-to-event basis and showed a stronger association than any other variable.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Example SCC analysis from 2 patients. Panel A shows the LGE-CMR-derived scar pattern from a patient with a low scar burden (12.1 g) but a high CS (0.99) who ultimately had a VA event. Panel B shows the LGE-CMR-derived scar pattern from a patient with a high scar burden (84 g) but a low CS (0.00) who did not have a VA event.

References

    1. Fishman GI, Chugh SS, Dimarco JP, Albert CM, Anderson ME, Bonow RO, Buxton AE, Chen PS, Estes M, Jouven X, et al. Sudden cardiac death prediction and prevention: report from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Heart Rhythm Society Workshop. Circulation. 2010;122:2335–48.
    1. Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, Bryant WJ, Callans DJ, Curtis AB, Deal BJ, Dickfeld T, Field ME, Fonarow GC, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:1677–749.
    1. Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Klein H, Levine JH, Saksena S, Waldo AL, Wilber D, et al. Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1933–40.
    1. Stecker EC, Vickers C, Waltz J, Socoteanu C, John BT, Mariani R, McAnulty JH, Gunson K, Jui J, Chugh SS. Population-based analysis of sudden cardiac death with and without left ventricular systolic dysfunction: two-year findings from the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1161–6.
    1. Disertori M, Rigoni M, Pace N, Casolo G, Masè M, Gonzini L, Lucci D, Nollo G, Ravelli F. Myocardial Fibrosis Assessment by LGE Is a Powerful Predictor of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Ischemic and Nonischemic LV Dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:1046–55.
    1. Scott PA, Rosengarten JA, Curzen NP, Morgan JM. Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of ventricular tachyarrhythmic events: a meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2013;15:1019–27.
    1. Roes SD, Borleffs CJ, van der Geest RJ, Westenberg JJ, Marsan NA, Kaandorp TA, Reiber JH, Zeppenfeld K, Lamb HJ, de Roos A, et al. Infarct tissue heterogeneity assessed with contrast-enhanced MRI predicts spontaneous ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:183–90.
    1. Estner HL, Zviman MM, Herzka D, Miller F, Castro V, Nazarian S, Ashikaga H, Dori Y, Berger RD, Calkins H, et al. The critical isthmus sites of ischemic ventricular tachycardia are in zones of tissue heterogeneity, visualized by magnetic resonance imaging. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:1942–9.
    1. Piers SR, Tao Q, de Riva Silva M, Siebelink HM, Schalij MJ, van der Geest RJ, Zeppenfeld K. CMR-based identification of critical isthmus sites of ischemic and nonischemic ventricular tachycardia. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:774–84.
    1. Wu KC. Sudden Cardiac Death Substrate Imaged by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: From Investigational Tool to Clinical Applications. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10 pii: e005461. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005461.
    1. Ashikaga H, Sasano T, Dong J, Zviman MM, Evers R, Hopenfeld B, Castro V, Helm RH, Dickfeld T, Nazarian S, et al. Magnetic resonance-based anatomical analysis of scar-related ventricular tachycardia: implications for catheter ablation. Circ Res. 2007;101:939–47.
    1. Schmidt A, Azevedo CF, Cheng A, Gupta SN, Bluemke DA, Foo TK, Gerstenblith G, Weiss RG, Marbán E, Tomaselli GF, et al. Infarct tissue heterogeneity by magnetic resonance imaging identifies enhanced cardiac arrhythmia susceptibility in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 2007;115:2006–14.
    1. Zghaib T, Ipek EG, Hansford R, Ashikaga H, Berger RD, Marine JE, Spragg DD, Tandri H, Zimmerman SL, Halperin H, et al. Standard Ablation Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Ablation in the Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11:e005973.
    1. Coifman RR, Lafon S, Lee AB, Maggioni M, Nadler B, Warner F, Zucker SW. Geometric difusions as a tool for harmonic analysis and structure definition of data: Diffusion Maps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:7426–31.
    1. Coifman R, Lafon S. Diffusion Maps. Appl Comput Harmon Anal. 2006;21:5–30.
    1. Chung F Spectral Graph Theory: CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics; 1997.
    1. Hammond D, Vandergheynst P, Bribonval R. Wavelets on graphs via spectral graph theory. Appl Comput Harmon Anal. 2011;30:129–50.
    1. Dukkipati SR, Choudry S, Koruth JS, Miller MA, Whang W, Reddy VY. Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Structurally Normal Hearts: Indications, Strategies, and Outcomes-Part I. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:2909–23.
    1. Stone GW, Selker HP, Thiele H, Patel MR, Udelson JE, Ohman EM, Maehara A, Eitel I, Granger CB, Jenkins PL, et al. Relationship Between Infarct Size and Outcomes Following Primary PCI: Patient-Level Analysis From 10 Randomized Trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1674–83.
    1. Androulakis AFA, Zeppenfeld K, Paiman EHM, Piers SRD, Wijnmaalen AP, Siebelink HJ, Sramko M, Lamb HJ, van der Geest RJ, de Riva M, et al. Entropy as a Novel Measure of Myocardial Tissue Heterogeneity for Prediction of Ventricular Arrhythmias and Mortality in Post-Infarct Patients. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5:480–489.
    1. Muthalaly RG, Kwong RY, John RM, van der Geest RJ, Tao Q, Schaeffer B, Tanigawa S, Nakamura T1, Kaneko K, Tedrow UB, et al. Left Ventricular Entropy Is a Novel Predictor of Arrhythmic Events in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy Receiving Defibrillators for Primary Prevention. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:1177–1184.
    1. Gould J, Porter B, Claridge S, Chen Z, Sieniewicz BJ, Sidhu BS, Niederer S, Bishop MJ, Murgatroyd F, Ganeshan B, et al. Mean entropy predicts implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy using cardiac magnetic resonance texture analysis of scar heterogeneity. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16:1242–50.
    1. Tandri H, Okada DR. Ventricular Arrhythmias in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Is Imaging-Based Entropy a Biologically Relevant Risk Marker? JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5:490–2.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren