Impact of transition from face-to-face to telehealth on behavioral obesity treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic

Kathryn M Ross, Chelsea A Carpenter, Kelsey M Arroyo, Meena N Shankar, Fan Yi, Peihua Qiu, Lisa Anthony, Jaime Ruiz, Michael G Perri, Kathryn M Ross, Chelsea A Carpenter, Kelsey M Arroyo, Meena N Shankar, Fan Yi, Peihua Qiu, Lisa Anthony, Jaime Ruiz, Michael G Perri

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated whether the transition of a face-to-face behavioral intervention to videoconferencing-based telehealth delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significantly smaller weight losses than those typically observed in gold-standard, face-to-face programs.

Methods: Participants were 160 adults with obesity (mean [SD] age = 49.2 [11.9] years, BMI = 36.1 [4.2] kg/m2 ) enrolled in two cohorts of a 16-week comprehensive weight-management program. Cohort 1 began in person and transitioned to telehealth (Zoom) delivery during week 11 of the intervention because of COVID-19; Cohort 2 was conducted completely remotely. A noninferiority approach (using a clinically relevant noninferiority margin of 2.5%) was used to assess whether the weight losses observed were inferior to the 8% losses from baseline typically produced by gold-standard, face-to-face lifestyle interventions.

Results: From baseline to postintervention, participants lost an average of 7.4 [4.9] kg, representing a reduction of 7.2% [4.6%]. This magnitude of weight change was significantly greater than 5.5% (t[159] = 4.7, p < 0.001), and, thus, was within the proposed noninferiority margin.

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that the results of behavioral weight-management interventions are robust, whether delivered in person or remotely, and that individuals can achieve clinically meaningful benefits from behavioral treatment even during a global pandemic. Pragmatic "lessons learned," including modified trial recruitment techniques, are discussed.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

© 2022 The Obesity Society.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Average weight change (a) and proportion of days calorie records kept (b), calorie goals met (c), and physical activity goals met (d) each week during the 16-week intervention, by cohort. NOTE: Dashed lines represent the point at which Cohort 1 transitioned from in-person to telehealth intervention delivered via Zoom. †Self-monitoring records were not returned after the final session on week 16; thus, there are only 15 weeks of self-monitoring data available. ‡Physical activity goals were not set until week 5.

References

    1. Baum A, Kaboli PJ, Schwartz MD. Reduced in-person and increased telehealth outpatient visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Intern Med. January 2021;74:129–131.
    1. Cardel MI, Manasse SM, Krukowski RA, et al. Covid-19 impacts mental health outcomes and ability/desire to participate in research among current research participants. Obesity. 2020;28(12):2272–2281.
    1. Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. Circulation. 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):S102–138.
    1. Befort CA, VanWormer JJ, Desouza C, et al. Effect of behavioral therapy with in-clinic or telephone group visits vs in-clinic individual visits on weight loss among patients with obesity in rural clinical practice: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;325(4):363–372.
    1. Donnelly JE, Smith BK, Dunn L, et al. Comparison of a phone vs clinic approach to achieve 10% weight loss. Int J Obes. 2007;31:1270–1276.
    1. Donnelly JE, Goetz J, Gibson C, et al. Equivalent weight loss for weight management programs delivered by phone and clinic. Obesity. 2013;21(10):1951–1959.
    1. Azar KMJ, Aurora M, Wang EJ, Muzaffar A, Pressman A, Palaniappan LP. Virtual small groups for weight management: an innovative delivery mechanism for evidence-based lifestyle interventions among obese men. Transl Behav Med. 2015;5(1):37–44.
    1. Taetzsch A, Gilhooly CH, Bukhari A, et al. Development of a videoconference-adapted version of the community Diabetes Prevention Program, and comparison of weight loss with in-person program delivery. Mil Med. 2019;184(11-12):647–652.
    1. West DS, Stansbury M, Krukowski RA, Harvey J. Enhancing group-based internet obesity treatment: A pilot RCT comparing video and text-based chat. Obes Sci Pract. 2019;5(6):513–520.
    1. Ammar A, Brach M, Trabelsi K, et al. Effects of COVID-19 home confinement on eating behaviour and physical activity: Results of the ECLB-COVID19 international online survey. Nutrients. 2020;12(6).
    1. Dunton GF, Wang SD, Do B, Courtney J. Early effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical activity locations and behaviors in adults living in the United States. Prev Med Rep. 2020;20:101241.
    1. Pellegrini CA, Webster J, Hahn KR, Leblond TL, Unick JL. Relationship between stress and weight management behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic among those enrolled in an internet program. Obes Sci Pract. 2021;7(1):129–134.
    1. Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) Research Group. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): Description of lifestyle intervention. Dia Care. 2002;25(12):2165–2171.
    1. Ross KM, Wing RR. Concordance of in-home “smart” scale measurement with body weight measured in-person. Obes Sci Pract. 2016;2(2):224–248.
    1. Krukowski RA, Ross KM. Measuring weight with electronic scales in clinical and research settings during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Obesity. 2020;28(7):1182–1183.
    1. Wing RR, Hamman RF, Bray GA, et al. Achieving weight and activity goals among diabetes prevention program lifestyle participants. Obes Res. 2004;12(9):1426–1434.
    1. Ross KM, Hong YR, Krukowski RA, Miller DR, Lemas DJ, Cardel MI. Acceptability of research and health care visits during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Formative Research. 2021;5(6):e27185.
    1. Pew Research Center. Demographics of mobile device ownership and adoption in the United States. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Published 2021. Accessed September 14, 2021.
    1. Rossen LM, Branum AM, Ahmad FB, Sutton P, Anderson RN. Excess deaths associated with COVID-19, by age and race and ethnicity — United States, January 26–October 3, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(42):1522–1527.
    1. Perry BL, Aronson B, Pescosolido BA. Pandemic precarity: COVID-19 is exposing and exacerbating inequalities in the American heartland. PNAS. 2021;118(8).

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren