Serum selenium, selenoprotein P and glutathione peroxidase 3 as predictors of mortality and recurrence following breast cancer diagnosis: A multicentre cohort study

Kamil Demircan, Ylva Bengtsson, Qian Sun, Annie Brange, Johan Vallon-Christersson, Eddy Rijntjes, Martin Malmberg, Lao H Saal, Lisa Rydén, Åke Borg, Jonas Manjer, Lutz Schomburg, Kamil Demircan, Ylva Bengtsson, Qian Sun, Annie Brange, Johan Vallon-Christersson, Eddy Rijntjes, Martin Malmberg, Lao H Saal, Lisa Rydén, Åke Borg, Jonas Manjer, Lutz Schomburg

Abstract

The trace element selenium is of essential importance for the synthesis of a set of redox active proteins. We investigated three complementary serum selenium status biomarkers in relation to overall survival and recurrence following diagnosis of primary invasive breast cancer in a large prospective cohort study. The Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network - Breast Initiative (SCAN-B) is a prospective population-based study including multiple participating hospitals. Main analyses included 1996 patients with a new diagnosis of primary invasive breast cancer, with blood sampling at the time of diagnosis. In sera of the patients, total serum selenium, selenoprotein P (SELENOP), and glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPx3) activity was analysed. All three biomarkers showed a positive correlation (p < 0.001), supporting the high quality of samples and analytical techniques. During a total of 13,306 person years of follow-up, 310 deaths and 167 recurrent breast cancer events occurred. In fully adjusted Cox models, all three biomarkers correlated inversely with mortality (p trend <0.001) and compared with the lowest quintile, hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for overall survival in the highest quintile of selenium, SELENOP and GPx3 were 0.42 (0.28-0.63), 0.51 (0.36-0.73) and 0.52 (0.36-0.75), respectively. Low GPx3 activity was associated with more recurrences (Q5 vs Q1: fully adjusted HR (95%CI); 0.57 (0.35-0.92), (p trend = 0.005). Patients with low selenium status according to all three biomarkers (triple deficient) had the highest mortality risk with an overall survival probability of ∼50% after 8 years, in particular as compared to those having at least one marker in the highest quintile; fully adjusted HR (95%CI); 0.30 (0.21-0.43). Prediction of mortality based on all three biomarkers outperformed established tumour characteristics like histologic grade, number of involved lymph nodes or tumour size. An assessment of Se status at breast cancer diagnosis identifies patients at exceptionally high risk for a poor prognosis.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Micronutrient; Mortality; Prognostic factors; Prospective study.

Conflict of interest statement

LS holds shares of selenOmed GmbH, a company involved in Se status assessment and supplementation; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart explaining inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Spearman's correlation analysis in patients with primary invasive breast cancer. In the total cohort, all three biomarkers of Se show significant correlations, p<0.001. (A) Total serum Se and SELENOP display a tight correlation, R = 0.604. (B) Total serum Se correlates with the GPx3 activity in sera of the patients, R = 0.294. (C) Serum SELENOP and GPx3 show a similarly strong correlation as total Se and GPx3, with R = 0.279. N (A,B) = 1993, 3 data points missing in the figures, n(C) = 1996, Spearman's R, two-tailed.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Spearman's correlation of biomarkers in patients who display all biomarkers in the first or last quintile. The Venn diagram and the plots in the top section of figure (A,B,C) highlight the significant correlations between the biomarkers in samples of the 121 patients who are assigned to the first quintile regarding each of the three biomarkers. The correlations are non-significant for patients in the highest quintile regarding all three biomarkers, as shown in the lower Venn diagram and the plots in the lower panel of figure (D,E,F). This comparison underlines the saturation of selenoprotein expression under high Se status.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Kaplan Meier curves for overall survival (A,B,C), and for recurrence free survival (D,E,F), by quintiles of the three biomarkers. Log-Rank-Test was used to evaluate differences. Y-axis-limits were set between 0.4 and 1.0 for better visualization, no points are missing. P-value was calculated with log-rank test.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Overall survival (A) and recurrence free survival (B) assessed for the triple deficient group. Triple deficient stands for patients who are in the first quintile regarding all three biomarkers; ∼ (Se < 57 μg/l and SELENOP <3 mg/l and GPx3 <167 U/l). Purple curve stands for patients who are in the fifth quintile regarding at least one biomarker ∼ (Se > 84 μg/l or SELENOP >5 mg/l or GPx3 >248 U/l). Q = Quintile, HR=Hazard ratio, CI=Confidence interval, Fully adj. = Fully adjusted for confounders of breast cancer mortality as listed in Table 3, Table 4 (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Predictive value of Se status for mortality. The first panel (A) compares the predictors individually, (B) compares the predictors in combined models. AUCt (y-axis) was computed at each time of death, marked with the symbol ○. An AUC of 0.5, depicted by the dotted line, represents a random predictor without any value, while an AUC of 1.0 is a prediction model with 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity. iAUC = Integrated area under the curve, Comp. Se = Composite Se status.

References

    1. Carioli G. Trends and predictions to 2020 in breast cancer mortality in Europe. Breast. 2017;36:89–95.
    1. Sung H. Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249.
    1. Broeders M. The impact of mammographic screening on breast Cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies. J. Med. Screen. 2012;19(1_suppl):14–25.
    1. Rakha E.A. The prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2012;118(15):3670–3680.
    1. Curigliano G. De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the st. Gallen international expert Consensus Conference on the primary therapy of early breast Cancer 2017. Ann. Oncol. 2017;28(8):1700–1712.
    1. Harbeck N. Breast cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):66.
    1. Schomburg L. Selenium, selenoproteins and the thyroid gland: interactions in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2011;8(3):160–171.
    1. Rayman M.P. Selenium in cancer prevention: a review of the evidence and mechanism of action. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2005;64(4):527–542.
    1. Klein E.A. Vitamin E and the risk of prostate cancer: the selenium and vitamin E Cancer prevention trial (SELECT) Jama. 2011;306(14):1549–1556.
    1. Lippman S.M. Effect of selenium and vitamin E on risk of prostate cancer and other cancers: the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) Jama. 2009;301(1):39–51.
    1. Duffield-Lillico A.J. Selenium supplementation, baseline plasma selenium status and incidence of prostate cancer: an analysis of the complete treatment period of the Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Trial. BJU Int. 2003;91(7):608–612.
    1. Dorgan J.F. Relationships of serum carotenoids, retinol, α-tocopherol, and selenium with breast cancer risk: results from a prospective study in Columbia, Missouri (United States) Cancer Causes & Control. 1998;9(1):89–97.
    1. Pantavos A. Total dietary antioxidant capacity, individual antioxidant intake and breast cancer risk: the Rotterdam Study. Int. J. Canc. 2015;136(9):2178–2186.
    1. Vinceti M. Selenium for preventing cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018;1(1)
    1. Sandsveden M. Prediagnostic serum selenium levels in relation to breast cancer survival and tumor characteristics. Int. J. Canc. 2020;147(9):2424–2436.
    1. Szwiec M. Serum selenium level predicts 10-year survival after breast Cancer. Nutrients. 2021;13(3)
    1. Combs G.F., Jr. Biomarkers of selenium status. Nutrients. 2015;7(4):2209–2236.
    1. Burk R.F., Hill K.E. Selenoprotein P-expression, functions, and roles in mammals. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1790(11):1441–1447.
    1. Xia Y. Optimization of selenoprotein P and other plasma selenium biomarkers for the assessment of the selenium nutritional requirement: a placebo-controlled, double-blind study of selenomethionine supplementation in selenium-deficient Chinese subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010;92(3):525–531.
    1. Hurst R. Establishing optimal selenium status: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010;91(4):923–931.
    1. Burk R.F., Hill K.E. Regulation of selenium metabolism and transport. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2015;35:109–134.
    1. Schomburg L. The other view: the trace element selenium as a micronutrient in thyroid disease, diabetes, and beyond. Hormones (Basel) 2020;19(1):15–24.
    1. Saito Y. Selenium transport mechanism via selenoprotein P-its physiological role and related diseases. Front Nutr. 2021;8:685517.
    1. Kipp A.P. Revised reference values for selenium intake. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2015;32:195–199.
    1. Schomburg L. Selenium deficiency due to diet, pregnancy, severe illness, or COVID-19-A preventable trigger for Autoimmune disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(16)
    1. Ashton K. Methods of assessment of selenium status in humans: a systematic review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009;89(6):2025s–2039s.
    1. Brueffer C. The mutational landscape of the SCAN-B real-world primary breast cancer transcriptome. EMBO Mol. Med. 2020;12(10):e12118.
    1. Staaf J. Whole-genome sequencing of triple-negative breast cancers in a population-based clinical study. Nat. Med. 2019;25(10):1526–1533.
    1. Saal L.H. The Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network - breast (SCAN-B) Initiative: a large-scale multicenter infrastructure towards implementation of breast cancer genomic analyses in the clinical routine. Genome Med. 2015;7(1) 20-20.
    1. Löfgren L. Validation of data quality in the Swedish national register for breast Cancer. BMC Publ. Health. 2019;19(1):495.
    1. Elston C.W., Ellis I.O. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology. 1991;19(5):403–410.
    1. Hughes D.J. Selenium status is associated with colorectal cancer risk in the European prospective investigation of cancer and nutrition cohort. Int. J. Canc. 2015;136(5):1149–1161.
    1. Hybsier S. Sex-specific and inter-individual differences in biomarkers of selenium status identified by a calibrated ELISA for selenoprotein P. Redox Biol. 2017;11:403–414.
    1. Moghaddam A. Selenium deficiency is associated with mortality risk from COVID-19. Nutrients. 2020;12(7)
    1. Flohé L., Günzler W.A. Assays of glutathione peroxidase. Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:114–121.
    1. Heagerty P.J., Zheng Y. Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves. Biometrics. 2005;61(1):92–105.
    1. Heagerty P.J., Saha-Chaudhuri P., Saha-Chaudhuri M.P. 2012. Package ‘risksetROC’.
    1. van Buuren S., Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. Mice: multivariate imputation by Chained equations in R. J. Stat. Software. 2011;1(3):2011.
    1. White I.R., Royston P., Wood A.M. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat. Med. 2011;30(4):377–399.
    1. Wickham H., Henry L., tidyr . 2018. Easily Tidy Data with'spread %28%29'and'gather %28%29'Functions. R package version 0.8. 0. URL.
    1. Wickham H. dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. R package version 0. 2015;4 3.
    1. Wickham H. ggplot2. WIREs Computational Statistics. 2011;3(2):180–185.
    1. Daniel D. Sjoberg M.C, Margie Hannum, Karissa Whiting and Emily C. Zabor, Gtsummary: Presentation-Ready Data Summary and Analytic Result Tables. R package version 1.3.7. 2021.
    1. Kassambara A. survminer: drawing Survival Curves using'ggplot2. R package version 0. 2017;3:1.
    1. Vallon-Christersson J. Cross comparison and prognostic assessment of breast cancer multigene signatures in a large population-based contemporary clinical series. Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1):12184.
    1. Hu X.F., Chan H.M. Factors associated with the blood and urinary selenium concentrations in the Canadian population: results of the Canadian Health Measures Survey (2007-2011) Int. J. Hyg Environ. Health. 2018;221(7):1023–1031.
    1. Picon-Ruiz M. Obesity and adverse breast cancer risk and outcome: mechanistic insights and strategies for intervention. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2017;67(5):378–397.
    1. Isobe Y. Alcohol intake is associated with elevated serum levels of selenium and selenoprotein P in humans. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2021;8(30)
    1. Ehinger A. Histological grade provides significant prognostic information in addition to breast cancer subtypes defined according to St Gallen 2013. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(1):68–74.
    1. Stoffaneller R., Morse N.L. A review of dietary selenium intake and selenium status in Europe and the Middle East. Nutrients. 2015;7(3):1494–1537.
    1. Hughes D.J. Expression of selenoprotein genes and association with selenium status in Colorectal Adenoma and Colorectal Cancer. Nutrients. 2018;10(11)
    1. Schomburg L. Selenoprotein-P deficiency predicts Cardiovascular disease and death. Nutrients. 2019;11(8):1852.
    1. Hill K.E. Selenoprotein P concentration in plasma is an index of selenium status in selenium-deficient and selenium-supplemented Chinese subjects. J. Nutr. 1996;126(1):138–145.
    1. Kato T. Evidence for intestinal release of absorbed selenium in a form with high hepatic extraction. Am. J. Physiol. 1992;262(5 Pt 1):G854–G858.
    1. Kobayashi Y. Selenosugars are key and urinary metabolites for selenium excretion within the required to low-toxic range. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002;99(25):15932–15936.
    1. Ha H.Y. From selenium absorption to selenoprotein degradation. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2019;192(1):26–37.
    1. Avissar N. Antihuman plasma glutathione peroxidase antibodies: immunologic investigations to determine plasma glutathione peroxidase protein and selenium content in plasma. Blood. 1989;73(1):318–323.
    1. Burk R.F., Hill K.E., Motley A.K. Plasma selenium in specific and non-specific forms. Biofactors. 2001;14(1–4):107–114.
    1. Saito Y., Takahashi K. Characterization of selenoprotein P as a selenium supply protein. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002;269(22):5746–5751.
    1. Hybsier S. Sex-specific and inter-individual differences in biomarkers of selenium status identified by a calibrated ELISA for selenoprotein P. Redox biology. 2017;11:403–414.
    1. Brodin O. Selenoprotein P as biomarker of selenium status in Clinical trials with therapeutic dosages of selenite. Nutrients. 2020;12(4)
    1. Ha E.J., Smith A.M. Plasma selenium and plasma and erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase activity increase with estrogen during the menstrual cycle. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2003;22(1):43–51.
    1. Burk R.F., Hill K.E., Selenoprotein P. An extracellular protein with unique physical characteristics and a role in selenium homeostasis. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2005;25:215–235.
    1. Turanov A.A. Regulation of selenocysteine Content of human selenoprotein P by dietary selenium and insertion of Cysteine in place of selenocysteine. PloS One. 2015;10(10)
    1. Méplan C. Association between polymorphisms in glutathione peroxidase and selenoprotein P genes, glutathione peroxidase activity, HRT use and breast cancer risk. PloS One. 2013;8(9)
    1. Pellatt A.J. SEPP1 influences breast cancer risk among women with greater native american ancestry: the breast cancer health disparities study. PloS One. 2013;8(11)
    1. Lou W. Overexpression of GPX3, a potential biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer, inhibits progression of breast cancer cells in vitro. Canc. Cell Int. 2020;20:378.
    1. Saelee P., Pongtheerat T., Sophonnithiprasert T. Reduced expression of GPX3 in breast Cancer patients in Correlation with Clinical significance. Glob Med Genet. 2020;7(3):87–91.
    1. Renko K. Down-regulation of the hepatic selenoprotein biosynthesis machinery impairs selenium metabolism during the acute phase response in mice. Faseb. J. 2009;23(6):1758–1765.
    1. Ma C., Hoffmann P.R. Selenoproteins as regulators of T cell proliferation, differentiation, and metabolism. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;115:54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.11.006.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren