Combined Protocol for Acute Malnutrition Study (ComPAS) in rural South Sudan and urban Kenya: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Jeanette Bailey, Natasha Lelijveld, Bethany Marron, Pamela Onyoo, Lara S Ho, Mark Manary, André Briend, Charles Opondo, Marko Kerac, Jeanette Bailey, Natasha Lelijveld, Bethany Marron, Pamela Onyoo, Lara S Ho, Mark Manary, André Briend, Charles Opondo, Marko Kerac

Abstract

Background: Acute malnutrition is a continuum condition, but severe and moderate forms are treated separately, with different protocols and therapeutic products, managed by separate United Nations agencies. The Combined Protocol for Acute Malnutrition Study (ComPAS) aims to simplify and unify the treatment of uncomplicated severe and moderate acute malnutrition (SAM and MAM) for children 6-59 months into one protocol in order to improve the global coverage, quality, continuity of care and cost-effectiveness of acute malnutrition treatment in resource-constrained settings.

Methods/design: This study is a multi-site, cluster randomized non-inferiority trial with 12 clusters in Kenya and 12 clusters in South Sudan. Participants are 3600 children aged 6-59 months with uncomplicated acute malnutrition. This study will evaluate the impact of a simplified and combined protocol for the treatment of SAM and MAM compared to the standard protocol, which is the national treatment protocol in each country. We will assess recovery rate as a primary outcome and coverage, defaulting, death, length of stay, average weekly weight gain and average weekly mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) gain as secondary outcomes. Recovery rate is defined across both treatment arms as MUAC ≥125 mm and no oedema for two consecutive visits. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses will be conducted.

Discussion: If the combined protocol is shown to be non-inferior to the standard protocol, updating guidelines to use the combined protocol would eliminate the need for separate products, resources and procedures for MAM treatment. This would likely be more cost-effective, increase availability of services, enable earlier case finding and treatment before deterioration of MAM into SAM, promote better continuity of care and improve community perceptions of the programme.

Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN30393230 . Registered on 16 March 2017.

Keywords: Acute malnutrition; Cluster randomized trial; Community-based management of acute malnutrition; Kenya; Mid-upper arm circumference; Non-inferiority; Ready-to-use therapeutic food; South Sudan.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ComPAS trial was approved by the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) (5 January 2017, ref: 551), the Ministry of Health Internal Review Board, South Sudan (21 November 2016) and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (28 November 2016, ref: 11826). Informed written consent is obtained prior to all surveys and interviews.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ComPAS conceptual framework
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessments
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Analysis flow chart

References

    1. Data and Analytics Section of the Division of Data, Research and Policy, UNICEF; Department of Nutrition for Health and Development, WHO; Development Data Group, World Bank . Levels and trends in child malnutrition: UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Group joint child malnutrition estimates. Washington, D.C.: UNICEF, WHO, World Bank; 2016.
    1. Isanaka S, et al. Improving estimates of numbers of children with severe acute malnutrition using cohort and survey data. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;184(12):861–869. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww129.
    1. Frison S, et al. Anthropometric indices and measures to assess change in the nutritional status of a population: a systematic literature review. BMC Nutr. 2016;2:76. doi: 10.1186/s40795-016-0104-4.
    1. Black RE, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2013;382(9890):427–451. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X.
    1. The State of Acute Malnutrition. Where are we in treating children with SAM? 2018. . Accessed 23 Feb 2018.
    1. Binns PJ, et al. Safety and practicability of using mid-upper arm circumference as a discharge criterion in community based management of severe acute malnutrition in children aged 6 to 59 months programmes. Arch Public Health. 2016;74:24. doi: 10.1186/s13690-016-0136-x.
    1. Maust A, et al. Severe and moderate acute malnutrition can be successfully managed with an integrated protocol in Sierra Leone. J Nutr. 2015;145(11):2604–2609. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.214957.
    1. Bailey J, et al. Combined protocol for SAM/MAM treatment: the ComPAS study. Field Exchange 53. Oxford: ENN; 2016. p. 44–6.
    1. Briend A, et al. Mid-upper arm circumference and weight-for-height to identify high-risk malnourished under-five children. Matern Child Nutr. 2012;8(1):130–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00340.x.
    1. Myatt M, Khara T, Collins S. A review of methods to detect cases of severely malnourished children in the community for their admission into community-based therapeutic care programs. Food Nutr Bull. 2006;27(3 Suppl):S7–23. doi: 10.1177/15648265060273S302.
    1. WHO . IMCI chart booklet. 2014.
    1. Sealed Envelope Ltd . Create a blocked randomisation list. 2016.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren