Assessing beliefs about emotions: Development and validation of the Emotion Beliefs Questionnaire

Rodrigo Becerra, David A Preece, James J Gross, Rodrigo Becerra, David A Preece, James J Gross

Abstract

People's beliefs about emotions may be grouped into two main categories: beliefs about the controllability of emotions and beliefs about the usefulness of emotions. These beliefs influence emotion regulation efforts and mental health, so the assessment of these beliefs is important. However, few psychometric measures are available, particularly for assessing the usefulness dimension. In this study (N = 161), we address this issue by developing and conducting an initial validation of a 16-item self-report measure called the Emotion Beliefs Questionnaire (EBQ). Confirmatory factor analyses found its structure to consist of three first-order factors: a controllability factor spanning both negatively and positively valenced emotions (General-Controllability), and two valence-specific usefulness factors (Negative-Usefulness, Positive-Usefulness). All first-order factors also loaded together on a higher-order factor, representing an overall maladaptive beliefs about emotions construct. All subscale and composite scores had good levels of internal consistency. Correlational and regression analyses found that EBQ scores related in expected ways with other measures, and were significant predictors of emotion regulation abilities and psychopathology. We conclude that the beliefs about emotions construct is multidimensional, and the EBQ appears to be a promising new tool to assess it.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. A visual representation of the…
Fig 1. A visual representation of the different confirmatory factor analysis models tested for the 16-item EBQ.
Squares represent items and ellipses represent latent factors. All items had an associated error term. Item numbering here reflects the order we recommend items be administered in for the 16-item EBQ. Gen-con = General-Controllability, gen-use = General-Usefulness, neg-con = Negative-Controllability, pos-con = Positive-Controllability, neg-use = Negative-Usefulness, pos-use = Positive-Usefulness.

References

    1. Mauss IB, Levenson RW, McCarter L, Wilhelm FH, Gross JJ. The tie that binds? Coherence among emotion experience, behavior, and physiology. Emotion. 2005. June;5(2):175 10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.175
    1. Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychol Inq. 2015. January 2;26(1):1–26.
    1. Dweck CS. Motivational processes affecting learning. Am psychol. 1986. October;41(10):1040.
    1. Hong YY, Chiu CY, Dweck CS, Lin DM, Wan W. Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: a meaning system approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999. September;77(3):588.
    1. Tamir M, John OP, Srivastava S, Gross JJ. Implicit theories of emotion: Affective and social outcomes across a major life transition. J Personality Soc Psychol. 2007. April;92(4):731.
    1. De Castella K, Goldin P, Jazaieri H, Ziv M, Dweck CS, Gross JJ. Beliefs about emotion: Links to emotion regulation, well-being, and psychological distress. Basic Appl Soc Psych. 2013. November 1;35(6):497–505.
    1. Ford BQ, Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: Why beliefs matter. Can Psychol. 2018. February;59(1):1.
    1. Ford BQ, Gross JJ. Why beliefs about emotion matter: An emotion-regulation perspective. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2019. February;28(1):74–81.
    1. Epictetus. The discourses of Epictetus: With the Encheiridion and fragments Translated, with notes, a life of Epictetus, and a view of his philosophy. London: G. Bell and Sons; 1906.
    1. Hume D. A Treatise of Human Nature. London: John Noon; 1739.
    1. Gross JJ. The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Rev Gen Psychol. 1998. September;2(3):271–99.
    1. Howell AJ, Passmore HA, Holder MD. Implicit theories of well-being predict well-being and the endorsement of therapeutic lifestyle changes. J Happiness Stud. 2016. December 1;17(6):2347–63.
    1. Tamir M, Ford BQ. When feeling bad is expected to be good: Emotion regulation and outcome expectancies in social conflicts. Emotion. 2012. August;12(4):807 10.1037/a0024443
    1. Dennis PA, Halberstadt AG. Is believing seeing? The role of emotion-related beliefs in selective attention to affective cues. Cognition Emotion. 2013. January 1;27(1):3–20. 10.1080/02699931.2012.680578
    1. Linehan M. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press; 1993.
    1. Weiss NH, Gratz KL, Lavender JM. Factor structure and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of difficulties in the regulation of positive emotions: The DERS-Positive. Behav Modif. 2015. May;39(3):431–53. 10.1177/0145445514566504
    1. Preece DA, Becerra R, Robinson K, Dandy J, Allan A. Measuring emotion regulation ability across negative and positive emotions: The Perth Emotion Regulation Competency Inventory (PERCI). Pers Indiv Differ. 2018. December 1;135:229–41.
    1. Zou C, Plaks JE, Peterson JB. Don’t get too excited: Assessing individual differences in the down-regulation of positive emotions. J Pers Assess. 2019. January 2;101(1):73–83. 10.1080/00223891.2017.1339711
    1. Preece D, Becerra R, Robinson K, Dandy J, Allan A. The psychometric assessment of alexithymia: Development and validation of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire. Pers Indiv Differ. 2018. October 1;132:32–44.
    1. Becerra R, Preece D, Campitelli G, Scott-Pillow G. The assessment of emotional reactivity across negative and positive emotions: Development and validation of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale (PERS). Assessment. 2017. February 1:868–879.
    1. Ripper CA, Boyes ME, Clarke PJ, Hasking PA. Emotional reactivity, intensity, and perseveration: Independent dimensions of trait affect and associations with depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Pers Indiv Differ. 2018. January 15;121:93–9.
    1. Quoidbach J, Berry EV, Hansenne M, Mikolajczak M. Positive emotion regulation and well-being: Comparing the impact of eight savoring and dampening strategies. Pers Indiv Differ. 2010. October 1;49(5):368–73.
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed Washington: Author; 2013.
    1. Rimes KA, Chalder T. The Beliefs about Emotions Scale: validity, reliability and sensitivity to change. J Psychosom Res. 2010. March 1;68(3):285–92. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.09.014
    1. Harmon-Jones E, Harmon-Jones C, Amodio DM, Gable PA. Attitudes toward emotions. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011. December;101(6):1332 10.1037/a0024951
    1. Halberstadt AG, Dunsmore JC, Bryant A Jr, Parker AE, Beale KS, Thompson JA. Development and validation of the Parents’ Beliefs About Children’s Emotions Questionnaire. Psychol Assessment. 2013. December;25(4):1195.
    1. Veilleux JC, Salomaa AC, Shaver JA, Zielinski MJ, Pollert GA. Multidimensional assessment of beliefs about emotion: Development and validation of the emotion and regulation beliefs scale. Assessment. 2015. February;22(1):86–100. 10.1177/1073191114534883
    1. Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. J Psychopathol Behav. 2004. March 1;26(1):41–54.
    1. Little TD, Lindenberger U, Nesselroade JR. On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When" good" indicators are bad and" bad" indicators are good. Psychol Methods. 1999. June;4(2):192.
    1. Stevens J. P. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. NJ: Erlbaum; 2002.
    1. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995. March 1;33(3):335–43. 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u
    1. Wang CL, Ahmed PK. The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management. 2004. December 1:7(4):303–313.
    1. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. NY: Guilford; 2016.
    1. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. NY: Guilford; 2015.
    1. Kline P. Psychometrics and psychology. London: Academic Press; 1979.
    1. Gorsuch RL. Factor analysis. NJ: Erlbaum; 1983.
    1. Marsh HW, Hau KT, Wen Z. In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Struct Equ Modeling. 2004. July 1;11(3):320–41.
    1. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. NY: Routledge; 2016.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren