Assessing regulatory emotional self-efficacy in three countries

Gian Vittorio Caprara, Laura Di Giunta, Nancy Eisenberg, Maria Gerbino, Concetta Pastorelli, Carlo Tramontano, Gian Vittorio Caprara, Laura Di Giunta, Nancy Eisenberg, Maria Gerbino, Concetta Pastorelli, Carlo Tramontano

Abstract

The Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy (RESE) scale was developed to assess perceived self-efficacy in managing negative (NEG) and in expressing positive (POS) affect (G. V. Caprara & M. Gerbino, 2001). In this study of young adults, the factorial structure of the RESE scale was found to be similar in Italy, the United States, and Bolivia. In addition to a factor for POS, NEG was represented by a second-order factor of 2 different negative affects: despondency-distress (DES) and anger-irritation (ANG). Overall, there was partial invariance at both metric and scalar levels across gender and countries. Discriminant and convergent validity of the RESE scale was further examined in the Italian sample. Stronger patterns of association of POS with prosocial behavior, of ANG with low aggressive behavior problems and irritability, and of DES with low anxiety/depressive problems and shyness and high self-esteem were found.

(c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Path diagram of the negative Second-Order Factor with two first-order factors and a first-order positive factor in Italy, the United States, and in Bolivia. Unstandardized factor loadings are shown on the straight arrows, whereas factors and error terms intercorrelations are shown on the curved arrows. The parameter estimates refer, respectively, to Italian, U.S., and Bolivian samples. ANG = perceived self-efficacy in managing anger/irritation; NEG = perceived self-efficacy in managing negative affect; DES = perceived self-efficacy in managing despondency/distress; POS = perceived self-efficacy in expressing positive affect; e1–e12 represent error terms.

References

    1. Achenbach TM. Manual for the Youth Self-Report and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry; 1991.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.
    1. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology. 2001;52:1–26.
    1. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Journal of Applied Psychology: An International Review. 2002;51:269–290.
    1. Bandura A. Guide to the construction of self-efficacy scales. In: Pajares F, Urdan T, editors. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing; 2006. pp. 1–43.
    1. Bandura A, Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C, Gerbino M, Pastorelli C. Role of affective self-regulatory efficacy on diverse spheres of psychosocial functioning. Child Development. 2003;74:769–782.
    1. Bandura A, Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C, Pastorelli C, Regalia C. Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001;80:125–135.
    1. Bassi M, Steca P, Delle Fave A, Caprara GV. Academic self-efficacy beliefs and quality of experience in learning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2006;36:301–312.
    1. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long SJ, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993. pp. 136–162.
    1. Caprara GV. Personality psychology: Filling the gap between basic processes and molar functioning. In: von Hofsten C, Backman L, editors. Psychology at the turn of the millennium, Vol. 2: Social, developmental and clinical Perspectives. New York: Psychology Press and Taylor & Francis; 2002. pp. 201–224.
    1. Caprara GV, Caprara M, Steca P. Personality’s correlates of adult development and aging. European Psychologist. 2003;8:131–147.
    1. Caprara GV, Gerbino M. Affective perceived self-efficacy: The capacity to regulate negative affect and to express positive affect. In: Caprara GV, editor. Self-efficacy assessment. Trento, Italy: Edizioni Erickson; 2001. pp. 35–50.
    1. Caprara GV, Pastorelli C, Regalia C, Scabini E, Bandura A. Impact of adolescents’ filial self-efficacy on quality of family functioning and satisfaction. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2005;15:71–97.
    1. Caprara GV, Renzi P, D’Augello D, D’Imperio G, Rielli G, Travaglia G. Interpolating physical exercise between instigation to aggress and aggression: The role of irritability and emotional susceptibility. Aggressive Behavior. 1986;12:83–91.
    1. Caprara GV, Scabini E, Barbaranelli C, Pastorelli C, Regalia C, Bandura A. Perceived emotional and interpersonal self-efficacy and good social functioning. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia. 1999;26:769–789.
    1. Caprara GV, Steca P, Cervone D, Artistico D. The contribution of self-efficacy beliefs to dispositional shyness: On social-cognitive systems and the development of personality dispositions. Journal of Personality. 2003;71:943–970.
    1. Caprara GV, Steca P, Gerbino M, Paciello M, Vecchio G. Looking for adolescents’ well-being: Self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of positive thinking and happiness. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale. 2006;15:30–43.
    1. Caprara GV, Steca P, Zelli A, Capanna C. A new scale for measuring adult prosocialness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2005;21:77–89.
    1. Caspi A. The child is father of the man: Personality continuities from childhood to adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000;78:158–172.
    1. Chan D. Detection of differential item functioning on the Kirton adaptation-innovation inventory using multiple-group mean and covariance structure analyses. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2000;35:169–199.
    1. Cheek JM, Buss AH. Shyness and sociability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1981;41:330–339.
    1. Derryberry D, Rothbart MK. Reactive and effortful processes in the organization of temperament. Development and Psychopathology. 1997;9:633–652.
    1. Duncan E, Grazzani-Gavazzi I. Positive emotional experiences in Scottish and Italian young adults: A diary study. Journal of Happiness Study. 2004;5:359–384.
    1. Eisenberg N, Cumberland A, Spinrad TL, Fabes RA, Shepard SA, Reiser M, et al. The relations of regulation and emotionality to children’s externalizing and internalizing problem behavior. Child Development. 2001;72:1112–1134.
    1. Eisenberg N, Fabes RA, Guthrie IK, Reiser M. Dispositional emotionality and regulation: Their role in predicting quality of social functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000;78:136–157.
    1. Eisenberg N, Spinrad TL. Emotion-related regulation: Sharpening the definition. Child Development. 2004;75:334–339.
    1. Flett GL, Blankstein KR, Obertinsky M. Affect intensity, coping style, mood regulation expectancies, and depressive symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences. 1996;20:221–228.
    1. Folkman S, Moskowitz JT. Positive affect and the other side of coping. American Psychologist. 2000;55:647–654.
    1. Fredrickson BL, Joiner T. Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science. 2002;13:172–175.
    1. Garnefski N, Teerds J, Kraaij V, Legerstee J, Van den Kommer T. Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: Differences between males and females. Personality and Individual Differences. 2004;36:267–276.
    1. Gore PA. Academic self-efficacy as a predictor of college outcomes: Two incremental validity studies. Journal of Career Assessment. 2006;14:92–115.
    1. Istituto Italiano di Statistica [National Institute of Statistics] Annuario statistico italiano 2002 [Italian yearbook of statistics 2002] Rome: ISTAT; 2002.
    1. Jones TL, Prinz RJ. Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: A review. Clinical Psychology Review. 2005;25:341–363.
    1. Kelloway EK. Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
    1. Kitayama S, Markus HR, Kurokawa M. Culture, emotion, and well-being: Good feelings in Japan and the United States. Cognition & Emotion. 2000;14:93–124.
    1. Kline RB. Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press; 1998.
    1. Little T. Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1997;32:53–76.
    1. Markus H, Kitayama S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review. 1991;98:224–253.
    1. Matsumoto D. Cultural similarities and differences in display rules. Motivation and Emotion. 1990;14:195–214.
    1. Matsumoto D. Are cultural differences in emotion regulation mediated by personality traits? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2006;37:421–437.
    1. Matsumoto D, Yoo SH. Toward a new generation of cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2006;1:234–250.
    1. Mesquita B. Culture and emotion: Different approaches to the question. In: Mayne TJ, Bonnano GA, editors. Emotions: Current issues and future directions. New York: Guilford Press; 2001. pp. 214–251.
    1. Mesquita B, Frijda NH. Cultural variations in emotions: A review. Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112:179–204.
    1. Millsap RE, Kwok OM. Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations. Psychological Methods. 2004;9:93–115.
    1. Muris P. Relationships between self-efficacy and symptoms of anxiety disorders and depression in a normal adolescent sample. Personality and Individual Differences. 2002;32:337–348.
    1. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Author; 1998–2007.
    1. Olson SL, Schilling EM, Bates JE. Measurement of impulsivity: Construct coherence, longitudinal stability, and relationship with externalizing problems in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 1999;27:151–165.
    1. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1965.
    1. Russell JA, Carroll JM. On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin. 1999;125:3–30.
    1. Scherer KR. Profiles of emotion-antecedent appraisal. Cognition & Emotion. 1997;11:113–150.
    1. Shiota MN, Campos B, Keltner D, Hertenstein MJ. Positive emotion and the regulation of interpersonal relationships. In: Philippot P, Feldman RS, editors. The regulation of emotion. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2004. pp. 127–155.
    1. Simons JS, Gaher RM. The Distress Tolerance Scale: Development and validation of a self-report measure. Motivation and Emotion. 2005;29:83–102.
    1. Steenkamp JEM, Baumgartner H. Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research. 1998;25:78–90.
    1. Tabachnick BC, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 2001.
    1. Thoits PA. The sociology of emotions. Annual Review of Sociology. 1989;15:317–342.
    1. Vandenberg RJ. Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods. 2002;5:139–158.
    1. Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods. 2000;2:4–69.
    1. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988;54:1063–1070.
    1. Watson D, Tellegen A. Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin. 1985;98:219–235.
    1. Whiteside SP, Lynam DR. The five factor model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences. 2001;30:669–689.
    1. Whiteside SP, Lynam DR. Understanding the role of impulsivity in alcohol abuse: Application of the UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2003;11:210–217.
    1. Widaman KF, Reise SP. Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In: Bryant KJ, Windle M, West SG, editors. The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1997. pp. 281–324.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren