Accuracy of clinical neurological examination in diagnosing lumbo-sacral radiculopathy: a systematic literature review

Nassib Tawa, Anthea Rhoda, Ina Diener, Nassib Tawa, Anthea Rhoda, Ina Diener

Abstract

Background: Lumbar radiculopathy remains a clinical challenge among primary care clinicians in both assessment and diagnosis. This often leads to misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment of patients resulting in poor health outcomes, exacerbating this already debilitating condition. This review evaluated 12 primary diagnostic accuracy studies that specifically assessed the performance of various individual and grouped clinical neurological tests in detecting nerve root impingement, as established in the current literature.

Methods: Eight electronic data bases were searched for relevant articles from inception until July 2016. All primary diagnostic studies which investigated the accuracy of clinical neurological test (s) in diagnosing lumbar radiculopathy among patients with low back and referred leg symptoms were screened for inclusion. Qualifying studies were retrieved and independently assessed for methodological quality using the 'Quality Assessment of Diagnostic tests Accuracy Studies' criteria.

Results: A total of 12 studies which investigated standard components of clinical neurological examination of (sensory, motor, tendon reflex and neuro-dynamics) of the lumbo-sacral spine were included. The mean inter-observer agreement on quality assessment by two independent reviewers was fair (k = 0.3 - 0.7). The diagnostic performance of sensory testing using MR imaging as a reference standard demonstrated a sensitivity (confidence interval 95%) 0.61 (0.47-0.73) and a specificity of 0.63 (0.38-0.84). Motor tests sensitivity was poor to moderate, ranging from 0.13 (0.04-0.31) to 0.61 (0.36-0.83). Generally, the diagnostic performance of reflex testing was notably good with specificity ranging from (confidence interval 95%) 0.60 (0.51-0.69) to 0.93 (0.87-0.97) and sensitivity ranging from 0.14 (0.09-0.21) to 0.67 (0.21-0.94). Femoral nerve stretch test had a high sensitivity of (confidence interval 95%) 1.00 (0.40-1.00) and specificity of 0.83 (0.52-0.98) while SLR test recorded a mean sensitivity of 0.84 (0.72-0.92) and specificity of 0.78 (0.67-0.87).

Conclusions: There is a scarcity of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of clinical neurological examination testing. Furthermore there seem to be a disconnect among researchers regarding the diagnostic utility of lower limb neuro-dynamic tests which include the Straight Leg Raise and Femoral Nerve tests for sciatic and femoral nerve respectively. Whether these tests are able to detect the presence of disc herniation and subsequent nerve root compression or hyper-sensitivity of the sacral and femoral plexus due to mechanical irritation still remains debatable.

Keywords: Clinical neurological examination; Diagnostic accuracy; Lumbar radiculopathy.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Search history

References

    1. Scharfer A, Hall T, Briffa K. Classification of low back-related leg pain—A proposed patho-mechanism-based approach. Man Ther. 2007;14(2):222-30.
    1. Lee-Robinson A, Lee AT. Clinical and Diagnostic Findings in Patients with Lumbar Radiculopathy and Polyneuropathy. Am J Clin Med. 2010;7(2):80-5.
    1. Van Boxem K, Cheng J, Patijn J, van Kleef M, Lataster M, Mekhail N, Van Zundert J. Lumbosacral Radicular Pain. Pain Pract. 2010;10(4):339–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00370.x.
    1. Tachihara H, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Sekiguchi M. Does Facet Joint Inflammation Induce Radiculopathy? An Investigation Using a Rat Model of Lumbar Facet Joint Inflammation. Spine. 2007;32(4):406–412. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000255094.08805.2f.
    1. Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, Malkasian D, and Ross JS. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbar Spine in People without Back Pain.
    1. Weiner BK, Patel R. The accuracy of MRI in the Detection of Lumbar Disc Containment. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008;3(2):46-50.
    1. Coster S, de Bruijn FTM, Tavy TLJ. Diagnostic value of history, physical examination and needle electromyography in diagnosing lumbosacral radiculopathy. 2010. J Neurol. 2010;257:332–7.
    1. Manchikanti L, et al. Are diagnostic lumbar medial branch blocks valid? Results of 2-year follow-up. Pain Physician. 2003;6(2):147–53. {D2898}.
    1. Cochrane Style Guide Working Group. Cochrane Style Guide Basics [updated September 2009].
    1. Vroomen PCAJ, de Krom MCTFM, Wilmink JT, Kester ADM, Knottnerus JA. Diagnostic value of history and physical examination inpatients suspected of sciatica due to disc herniation: A systematic review. J Neurol. 1999;246:899–906. doi: 10.1007/s004150050480.
    1. Al Nezari NH, Schneiders AG, Hendrick PA. Neurological examination of the peripheral nervous system to diagnose lumbar spinal disc herniation with suspected radiculopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2013;13(657–674).
    1. Van der Windt DA, Simons E, Riphagen E, Ammendolia C, Verhagen AP, Laslett M, Devillé W, Deyo RA, Bouter LM, de Vet HC, Aertgeerts B. Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2:CD007431.
    1. Albeck MJ. A critical assessment of clinical diagnosis of disc herniation in patients with monoradicular sciatica. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1996;138(1):40–4. doi: 10.1007/BF01411722.
    1. Bertilson BC, Brosjo E, Strender L. Assessment of nerve involvement in the lumbar spine: agreement between magnetic resonance imaging, physical examination and pain drawing findings. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2010. 11(202).
    1. Suri P, Hunter DJ, Katz JN, Li L, Rainville J. Bias in the physical examination of patients with lumbar radiculopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11(275):1471–2474.
    1. Trainor K, Pinnington M. Reliability and diagnostic validity of the slump knee bend neurodynamic test for upper/mid lumbar nerve root compression: a pilot study. Physiotherapy. 2011;97:59–64. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.05.004.
    1. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Boyssut PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res. 2004;3(1):25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25.
    1. Haldeman S, Shouka M, Robboy S. Computed tomography, electrodiagnostic and clinical findings in chronic workers' compensation patients with back and leg pain. Spine. 1998;13(3):345–50. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198803000-00021.
    1. Rabin A, Gerszten PC, Karausky P, Bunker CH, Potter DM, Welch WC. The sensitivity of the seated straight-leg raise test compared with the supine straight-leg raise test in patients presenting with magnetic resonance imaging evidence of lumbar nerve root compression. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2007;88(7):840–3. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.04.016.
    1. Majlesi J, Togay H, Unalan H, Toprak S. The sensitivity and specificity of the Slump and the Straight Leg Raising tests in patients with lumbar disc herniation. J Clin Rheumatol. 2008;14(2):87–91. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e31816b2f99.
    1. Suri P, Rainville J, Katz JN, Jouve C, Hartigan C, Limke J, Pena E, Li L, Swaim B, Hunter DJ. The accuracy of the physical examination for the diagnosis of midlumbar and low lumbar nerve root impingement. Spine. 2011;36(1):63–73. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c953cc.
    1. Petty NJ and Moore AP. Neuromusculoskeletal examination and assessment. A handbook for therapists. 5th Edition. Churchill Livingstone. 2008.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren