The utility of diagnostic selective nerve root blocks in the management of patients with lumbar radiculopathy: a systematic review

Rebecca Beynon, Martha Maria Christine Elwenspoek, Athena Sheppard, John Nicholas Higgins, Angelos G Kolias, Rodney J Laing, Penny Whiting, William Hollingworth, Rebecca Beynon, Martha Maria Christine Elwenspoek, Athena Sheppard, John Nicholas Higgins, Angelos G Kolias, Rodney J Laing, Penny Whiting, William Hollingworth

Abstract

Objective: Lumbar radiculopathy (LR) often manifests as pain in the lower back radiating into one leg (sciatica). Unsuccessful back surgery is associated with significant healthcare costs and risks to patients. This review aims to examine the diagnostic accuracy of selective nerve root blocks (SNRBs) to identify patients most likely to benefit from lumbar decompression surgery.

Design: Systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Eligibility criteria: Primary research articles using a patient population with low back pain and symptoms in the leg, SNRB administered under radiological guidance as index test, and any reported reference standard for the diagnosis of LR.

Information sources: MEDLINE (Ovid), MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, Biosis, LILACS, Dissertation abstracts and National Technical Information Service from inception to 2018.

Methods: Risk of bias and applicability was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed random-effects logistic regression to meta-analyse studies grouped by reference standard.

Results: 6 studies (341 patients) were included in this review. All studies were judged at high risk of bias. There was substantial heterogeneity across studies in sensitivity (range 57%-100%) and specificity (10%-86%) estimates. Four studies were diagnostic cohort studies that used either intraoperative findings during surgery (pooled sensitivity: 93.5% [95% CI 84.0 to 97.6]; specificity: 50.0% [16.8 to 83.2]) or 'outcome following surgery' as the reference standard (pooled sensitivity: 90.9% [83.1 to 95.3]; specificity 22.0% [7.4 to 49.9]). Two studies had a within-patient case-control study design, but results were not pooled because different types of control injections were used.

Conclusions: We found limited evidence which was of low methodological quality indicating that the diagnostic accuracy of SNRB is uncertain and that specificity in particular may be low. SNRB is a safe test with a low risk of clinically significant complications, but it remains unclear whether the additional diagnostic information it provides justifies the cost of the test.

Keywords: diagnostic accuracy of selective nerve root blocks (SNRB); low back pain; lumbar decompression surgery; lumbar radiculopathy.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of diagnostic study selection process. SNRB, selective nerve root block.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC plot displaying diagnostic accuracy results of included studies. CI, control injection reference standard; IO, intraoperative reference standard; PS, postsurgical reference standard; ROC, receiver-operating characteristic.

References

    1. Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 2000;84:95–103. 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00187-6
    1. Jacobs WC, van Tulder M, Arts M, et al. . Surgery versus conservative management of sciatica due to a lumbar herniated disc: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2011;20:513–22. 10.1007/s00586-010-1603-7
    1. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. . Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008;358:794–810. 10.1056/NEJMoa0707136
    1. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. . Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA 2006;296:2441–50. 10.1001/jama.296.20.2441
    1. Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, van den Hout WB, et al. . Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2245–56. 10.1056/NEJMoa064039
    1. Peul WC, van den Hout WB, Brand R, et al. . Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation: two year results of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;336 10.1136/bmj.a143
    1. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Chang Y, et al. . Surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: five-year outcomes from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study. Spine 2001;26:1179–87.
    1. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management (NG59), 2016.
    1. Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Godil SS, et al. . Incidence of Low Back Pain After Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Disc and Its Effect on Patient-reported Outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015;473:1988–99. 10.1007/s11999-015-4193-1
    1. Baber Z, Erdek MA. Failed back surgery syndrome: current perspectives. J Pain Res 2016;9:979–87. 10.2147/JPR.S92776
    1. Deyo RA, Diehl AK. Lumbar spine films in primary care: current use and effects of selective ordering criteria. J Gen Intern Med 1986;1:20–5.
    1. Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Wilmink JT, et al. . Diagnostic value of history and physical examination in patients suspected of lumbosacral nerve root compression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:630–4. 10.1136/jnnp.72.5.630
    1. Rubinstein SM, van Tulder M. A best-evidence review of diagnostic procedures for neck and low-back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2008;22:471–82. 10.1016/j.berh.2007.12.003
    1. Boswell MV, Trescot AM, Datta S, et al. . Interventional techniques: evidence-based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2007;10:7–111.
    1. Beynon R, Hawkins J, Laing R, et al. . The diagnostic utility and cost-effectiveness of selective nerve root blocks in patients considered for lumbar decompression surgery: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 2013;17:1–88. v-vi 10.3310/hta17190
    1. Datta S, Everett CR, Trescot AM, et al. . An updated systematic review of the diagnostic utility of selective nerve root blocks. Pain Physician 2007;10:113–28.
    1. Datta S, Manchikanti L, Falco FJ, et al. . Diagnostic utility of selective nerve root blocks in the diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain: systematic review and update of current evidence. Pain Physician 2013;16(2 Suppl):SE97–124.
    1. Everett CR, Shah RV, Sehgal N, et al. . A systematic review of diagnostic utility of selective nerve root blocks. Pain Physician 2005;8:225–33.
    1. Leeflang MM, Scholten RJ, Rutjes AW, et al. . Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:234–40. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.014
    1. Whiting P, Westwood M, Beynon R, et al. . Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:602–7. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.006
    1. Beynon R, Leeflang MM, McDonald S, et al. . Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;9:MR000022 10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3
    1. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. . QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:529–36. 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
    1. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp, LLC; 2017.
    1. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–88. 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
    1. Harbord RM, Whiting P. Metandi: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy using hierarchical logistic regression. Stata J 2009;9:211–29. 10.1177/1536867X0900900203
    1. McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, et al. . Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement. JAMA 2018;319:388–96. 10.1001/jama.2017.19163
    1. Yeom JS, Lee JW, Park KW, et al. . Value of diagnostic lumbar selective nerve root block: a prospective controlled study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1017–23. 10.3174/ajnr.A0955
    1. Schutz H, Lougheed WM, Wortzman G, et al. . Intervertebral nerve-root in the investigation of chronic lumbar disc disease. Can J Surg 1973;16:217–21.
    1. Dooley JF, McBroom RJ, Taguchi T, et al. . Nerve root infiltration in the diagnosis of radicular pain. Spine 1988;13:79–83. 10.1097/00007632-198801000-00019
    1. Williams AP, Germon T. The value of lumbar dorsal root ganglion blocks in predicting the response to decompressive surgery in patients with diagnostic doubt. Spine J 2015;15(3 Suppl):S44–9. 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.004
    1. Sasso RC, Macadaeg K, Nordmann D, et al. . Selective nerve root injections can predict surgical outcome for lumbar and cervical radiculopathy: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:471–8.
    1. North RB, Kidd DH, Zahurak M, et al. . Specificity of diagnostic nerve blocks: a prospective, randomized study of sciatica due to lumbosacral spine disease. Pain 1996;65:77–85. 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00170-0
    1. Stalcup ST, Crall TS, Gilula L, et al. . Influence of needle-tip position on the incidence of immediate complications in 2,217 selective lumbar nerve root blocks. Spine J 2006;6:170–6. 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.009
    1. Ghahreman A, Ferch R, Bogduk N. The efficacy of transforaminal injection of steroids for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. Pain Med 2010;11:1149–68. 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00908.x
    1. Jönsson B, Strömqvist B, Annertz M, et al. . Diagnostic lumbar nerve root block. J Spinal Disord 1988;1:232–5.
    1. Ng LC, Sell P. Outcomes of a prospective cohort study on peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2004;13:325–9. 10.1007/s00586-003-0649-1
    1. Quinn SF, Murtagh FR, Chatfield R, et al. . CT-guided nerve root block and ablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:1213–6. 10.2214/ajr.151.6.1213
    1. Tajima T, Furukawa K, Kuramochi E. Selective lumbosacral radiculography and block. Spine 1980;5:68–77. 10.1097/00007632-198001000-00013

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren