The prone 12 o'clock position reduces ileal intubation time during colonoscopy compared to the left lateral 6 o'clock (standard) position

Arjuna P De Silva, Ravindu S Kumarasena, Suramya D Perera Keragala, Udaya Kalubowila, Madunil Niriella, Anuradha S Dassanayake, Arunasalam Pathmeswaran, H Janaka de Silva, Arjuna P De Silva, Ravindu S Kumarasena, Suramya D Perera Keragala, Udaya Kalubowila, Madunil Niriella, Anuradha S Dassanayake, Arunasalam Pathmeswaran, H Janaka de Silva

Abstract

Background: Ileal intubation is the gold standard for a complete colonoscopy. However, despite evidence of clinical benefit ileoscopy is not always attempted due to perceived technical difficulty. Our aim was to compare time taken for ileal intubation using a new position-the prone 12 o'clock position (PP) with the standard method (left lateral 6 o'clock position-LLP).

Methods: We performed a pilot study using fluoroscopy to determine the best patient position for ileal intubation. This was the prone 12 o'clock position. Patients were colonoscoped in the left lateral position and then randomized to ileal intubation in the 6 o'clock position(LL) or the 12 o'clock (PP) position.

Results: 202 consecutive patients were referred for colonoscopy. Colonoscopy was performed on 150 patients [82 females, mean (SD) age 53 (16) years]. 75 patients were randomized for ileal intubation in the PP and 75 patients in the LLP. Overall, the ileum was successfully intubated in 145 (96%) patients [74 (98.7%) in the PP and 71 (94.7%) in the LLP]. The median (Interquartile Range) ileal intubation time was 12 (10) seconds in the PP and 87 (82) seconds in the LLP (p < 0.0001; Mann-Whitney U test). The ileum was abnormal in 11 (7.5%) patients.

Conclusions: During colonoscopy, the prone 12 o'clock position gives a more direct approach to the ileo-caecal valve and significantly reduces ileal intubation time.

Trial registry: Sri Lanka Clinical Trial Registry Clinical trial registry number: SLCTR/2009/002.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The 12 o'clock position.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The 6 o'clock position.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Trial profile.

References

    1. Borsh G, Schmidt G. Endoscopy of the terminal ileum: Diagnostic yield in 400 consecutive examinations. Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;28:499–501. doi: 10.1007/BF02554095.
    1. Harwood GC, Mattek NC, Holub JL, Peters D, Lieberman DA. Variation in practice of ileal intubation among diverse endoscopy settings:results from a national endoscopic database. Aliment Pharmocol Ther. 2005;22:571–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02632.x.
    1. Seong HJ, Kwang JL, Yeong BK. Diagnostic value of terminal ileum intubation during colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol and Hepatol. 2008;23:51–5.
    1. Ansari A, Soon SY, Saunders BP, Sanderson JD. A Prospective Study of The Feasibility of Ileoscopy at Colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:1185–7.
    1. Kennedy G, Larson D, Wolff B, Winter D, Petersen B, Larson M. Routine ileal intubation during screening colonoscopy: a useful maneuver? Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2606–2608. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9843-x.
    1. Wijewantha H, Wijesinghe NT, De Silva AP, Kumarasena RS, Dassanayake AS, Senanayake SM, Hewawasam SM, Pathmeswaran A, de Silva HJ. The usefulness of ileoscopy during colonoscopy. Gastrointes Endoscopy. 2011;73 No. 4S: AB340 (abstract)
    1. Kundrotas LW, Clement DK, Kubik CM, Robinson AB, Wolfe PA. A prospective study of successful ileal intubation during routine colonoscopy. Gastrointes Endosc. 1994;40:544–6. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(94)70249-7.
    1. Iacopini G, Frontespezi S, Vitale MA, Villotti G, Bella A, d'Alba L, De Cesare A, Iacopini F. Routine ileoscopy at colonoscopy:a prospective evaluation of the learning curve and skill-keeping line. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:250–256. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.029.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren