Identifying and reducing errors with surgical simulation

M P Fried, R Satava, S Weghorst, A G Gallagher, C Sasaki, D Ross, M Sinanan, J I Uribe, M Zeltsan, H Arora, H Cuellar, M P Fried, R Satava, S Weghorst, A G Gallagher, C Sasaki, D Ross, M Sinanan, J I Uribe, M Zeltsan, H Arora, H Cuellar

Abstract

The major determinant of a patient's safety and outcome is the skill and judgment of the surgeon. While knowledge base and decision processing are evaluated during residency, technical skills-which are at the core of the profession-are not evaluated. Innovative state of the art simulation devices that train both surgical tasks and skills, without risk to patients, should allow for the detection and analysis of errors and "near misses". Studies have validated the use of a sophisticated endoscopic sinus surgery simulator (ES3) for training residents on a procedural basis. Assessments are proceeding as to whether the integration of a comprehensive ES3 training programme into the residency curriculum will have long term effects on surgical performance and patient outcomes. Using various otolaryngology residencies, subjects are exposed to mentored training on the ES3 as well as to minimally invasive trainers such as the MIST-VR. Technical errors are identified and quantified on the simulator and intraoperatively. Through a web based database, individual performance can be compared against a national standard. An upgraded version of the ES3 will be developed which will support patient specific anatomical models. This advance will allow study of the effects of simulated rehearsal of patient specific procedures (mission rehearsal) on patient outcomes and surgical errors during the actual procedure. The information gained from these studies will help usher in the next generation of surgical simulators that are anticipated to have significant impact on patient safety.

References

    1. Arch Surg. 1999 Nov;134(11):1203-8
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Jul;189(1):114-27
    1. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000 Jan;42(1 Pt 1):106-12
    1. Laryngorhinootologie. 2000 Jan;79(1):34-8
    1. Comput Aided Surg. 2000;5(2):120-30
    1. Am J Surg. 2000 Apr;179(4):320-4
    1. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2000 Nov;85(11):14-8
    1. World J Surg. 2001 Nov;25(11):1478-83
    1. Surg Endosc. 2002 Mar;16(3):406-11
    1. Surg Endosc. 2002 Dec;16(12):1746-52
    1. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2002 Dec;35(6):1289-301
    1. Am J Rhinol. 2004 Mar-Apr;18(2):87-92
    1. Laryngoscope. 1987 Nov;97(11):1270-3
    1. Endoscopy. 1992 Jul;24 Suppl 2:542-3
    1. Radiol Clin North Am. 1993 Jan;31(1):21-32
    1. Am J Surg. 1993 Mar;165(3):358-61
    1. Surg Endosc. 1993 May-Jun;7(3):203-5
    1. BMJ. 1994 Apr 23;308(6936):1054-5
    1. J Otolaryngol. 1995 Jun;24(3):154-9
    1. Surg Endosc. 1996 Feb;10(2):173-4
    1. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;39:167-79
    1. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;39:518-28
    1. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998;50:399-405
    1. Comput Aided Surg. 1998;3(1):20-6
    1. Laryngoscope. 1998 Nov;108(11 Pt 1):1643-7
    1. Endoscopy. 1998 Sep;30(7):617-20
    1. Perception. 1998;27(5):505-40
    1. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999 Mar;108(3):221-6
    1. Am J Surg. 1999 Feb;177(2):171-5
    1. Endoscopy. 1999 May;31(4):310-3
    1. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1999;62:221-7
    1. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1999;62:337-43
    1. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999 Jul;81(4):281-6

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren