Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training

Anthony G Gallagher, E Matt Ritter, Howard Champion, Gerald Higgins, Marvin P Fried, Gerald Moses, C Daniel Smith, Richard M Satava, Anthony G Gallagher, E Matt Ritter, Howard Champion, Gerald Higgins, Marvin P Fried, Gerald Moses, C Daniel Smith, Richard M Satava

Abstract

Summary background data: To inform surgeons about the practical issues to be considered for successful integration of virtual reality simulation into a surgical training program. The learning and practice of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) makes unique demands on surgical training programs. A decade ago Satava proposed virtual reality (VR) surgical simulation as a solution for this problem. Only recently have robust scientific studies supported that vision

Methods: A review of the surgical education, human-factor, and psychology literature to identify important factors which will impinge on the successful integration of VR training into a surgical training program.

Results: VR is more likely to be successful if it is systematically integrated into a well-thought-out education and training program which objectively assesses technical skills improvement proximate to the learning experience. Validated performance metrics should be relevant to the surgical task being trained but in general will require trainees to reach an objectively determined proficiency criterion, based on tightly defined metrics and perform at this level consistently. VR training is more likely to be successful if the training schedule takes place on an interval basis rather than massed into a short period of extensive practice. High-fidelity VR simulations will confer the greatest skills transfer to the in vivo surgical situation, but less expensive VR trainers will also lead to considerably improved skills generalizations.

Conclusions: VR for improved performance of MIS is now a reality. However, VR is only a training tool that must be thoughtfully introduced into a surgical training curriculum for it to successfully improve surgical technical skills.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/1356924/bin/24FF1.jpg
FIGURE 1. Hypothetical model of attention.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/1356924/bin/24FF2.jpg
FIGURE 2. Hypothetical attentional resource benefits of simulation training.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/1356924/bin/24FF3.jpg
FIGURE 3. Hypothetical model of attentional resources used as a function of experience. Rate of reduction of attentional resource utilization is dependent upon the fundamental abilities of the surgeon.

References

    1. Satava RM. Virtual reality surgical simulator: the first steps. Surg Endosc. 1993;7:203–205.
    1. Healy GB. The college should be instrumental in adapting simulators to education. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2002;11:10–12.
    1. Champion H, Gallagher A. Simulation in surgery: a good idea whose time has come. Br J Surg. 2003;90:767–768.
    1. Seymour N, Gallagher A, Roman S, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236:458–464.
    1. Pearson A, Gallagher A, Rosser J, et al. Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:130–137.
    1. Hall J, Ellis C, Hamdorf J. Surgeons and cognitive processes. Br J Surg. 2003;16:1746–1752.
    1. Esysenck M, Keane M. Cognitive Psychology: A Student Handbook. Erlbaum: Hove; 1995.
    1. Broadbent D. Selective and Control Processes. Cognition. 1981;10:53–58.
    1. Ritter E, McClusky D, Gallagher A, et al. Perceptual, visuo-spatial, and psychomotor ability correlates with duration of learning curve on a virtual reality flexible endoscopy simulator. Poster at 2004 Southeastern Surgical Congress, 2004.
    1. McClusky D, Ritter E, Gallagher A, et al. Correlation between perceptual, visuo-spatial, and psychomotor aptitude to duration of training required to reach performance goals on the MIST-VR surgical simulator. Am Surg. 2004. In press.
    1. Gallagher A, Satava R. Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills: learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1746–1752.
    1. Kazdin A. Behavior Modification in Applied Settings. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company; 1998.
    1. Catania A. Learning. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1984.
    1. Rosser J, Rosser L, Savalgi R. Objective evaluation of a laparoscopic surgical skill program for residents and senior surgeons. Arch Surg. 1998;133:657–661.
    1. Metalis S. Effects of massed versus distributed practice on acquisition of video game skill. Percept Motor Skills. 1985;61:457–458.
    1. Louie K, Wilson M. Temporally structured replay of awake hippocampal ensemble activity during rapid eye movement sleep. Neuron. 2001;29:145–156.
    1. Ritter E, McClusky D, Gallagher A, et al. Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:871–878.
    1. Gallagher A, Richie K, McClure N, et al. Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality. World J Surg. 2001;25:1478–1483.
    1. Cass O. Training to competence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a plea for continuous measuring of objective end points. Endoscopy. 1999;9:751–754.
    1. Club TSS. The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1995;170:55–59.
    1. Hanna G, Frank T, Cuschieri A. Objective assessment of endoscopic knot quality. Am J Surg. 1997;174:410–413.
    1. Satava RM, Fried M. A methodology for objective assessment of errors: an example using endoscopic sinus surgery simulator. Otolar CNA. 2002;35:1289–1291.
    1. Darzi A, Smith S, Taffinder N. Assessing operative skill. BMJ. 1999;318:887.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren