Non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD using controlled attenuation parameter and 1H-MR spectroscopy

Thomas Karlas, David Petroff, Nikita Garnov, Stephan Böhm, Hannelore Tenckhoff, Christian Wittekind, Manfred Wiese, Ingolf Schiefke, Nicolas Linder, Alexander Schaudinn, Harald Busse, Thomas Kahn, Joachim Mössner, Thomas Berg, Michael Tröltzsch, Volker Keim, Johannes Wiegand, Thomas Karlas, David Petroff, Nikita Garnov, Stephan Böhm, Hannelore Tenckhoff, Christian Wittekind, Manfred Wiese, Ingolf Schiefke, Nicolas Linder, Alexander Schaudinn, Harald Busse, Thomas Kahn, Joachim Mössner, Thomas Berg, Michael Tröltzsch, Volker Keim, Johannes Wiegand

Abstract

Introduction: Non-invasive assessment of steatosis and fibrosis is of growing relevance in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). 1H-Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) and the ultrasound-based controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) correlate with biopsy proven steatosis, but have not been correlated with each other so far. We therefore performed a head-to-head comparison between both methods.

Methods: Fifty patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD and 15 healthy volunteers were evaluated with 1H-MRS and transient elastography (TE) including CAP. Steatosis was defined according to the percentage of affected hepatocytes: S1 5-33%, S2 34-66%, S3 ≥67%.

Results: Steatosis grade in patients with NAFLD was S1 36%, S2 40% and S3 24%. CAP and 1H-MRS significantly correlated with histopathology and showed comparable accuracy for the detection of hepatic steatosis: areas under the receiver-operating characteristics curves were 0.93 vs. 0.88 for steatosis ≥S1 and 0.94 vs. 0.88 for ≥S2, respectively. Boot-strapping analysis revealed a CAP cut-off of 300 dB/m for detection of S2-3 steatosis, while retaining the lower cut-off of 215 dB/m for the definition of healthy individuals. Direct comparison between CAP and 1H-MRS revealed only modest correlation (total cohort: r = 0.63 [0.44, 0.76]; NAFLD cases: r = 0.56 [0.32, 0.74]). For detection of F2-4 fibrosis TE had sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 98.1% at a cut-off value of 8.85 kPa.

Conclusion: Our data suggest a comparable diagnostic value of CAP and 1H-MRS for hepatic steatosis quantification. Combined with the simultaneous TE fibrosis assessment, CAP represents an efficient method for non-invasive characterization of NAFLD. Limited correlation between CAP and 1H-MRS may be explained by different technical aspects, anthropometry, and presence of advanced liver fibrosis.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have read the journal's policy and have the following conflicts: TK received travel grants from Echosens/France. All other authors have declared that no competing interests exist. The authors confirm that this does not alter their adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1. CAP (A) and 1 H-MRS…
Figure 1. CAP (A) and 1H-MRS (B) correlate with hepatic steatosis.
CAP and 1H-MRS values correlate with the amount of hepatic fat and show a stepwise increase compared to the NAS staging (61 and 62 valid measurements available, respectively).
Figure 2. Correlation of CAP and 1…
Figure 2. Correlation of CAP and 1H-MRS.
CAP and 1H-MRS achieved only a modest correlation, especially in patients with concomitant fibrosis (labeled with squares). A total of 61 valid measurements were available.
Figure 3. CAP and TE cut-off values…
Figure 3. CAP and TE cut-off values for clinical use.
Application of published cut-off values for TE (7.9 kPa) and CAP (252 dB/m2) results in high sensitivity for detection of distinct fibrosis and steatosis (A) , . CAP values between 215 dB/m and 300 dB/m require further diagnostic procedures for differentiation of the degree of steatosis (“grey area”) (B).
Figure 4. Positive and negative predictive values…
Figure 4. Positive and negative predictive values as well as proportion of uncharacterized cases as they depend upon prevalence.
S0–1 patients and controls were classified as healthy and S2–3 as sick. The diagnostic procedure made use of CAP where those with values below 215 dB/m were diagnosed as healthy, those with values above 300 dB/m (or 252 dB/m, dashed lines) were diagnosed as sick and those in between were not diagnosed. A total of 61 valid measurements were available.

References

    1. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Diehl AM, Brunt EM, et al. (2012) The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association. Hepatology 55: 2005–2023.
    1. O'Shea RS, Dasarathy S, McCullough AJ (2010) Alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology 51: 307–328.
    1. Ratziu V, Bellentani S, Cortez-Pinto H, Day C, Marchesini G (2010) A position statement on NAFLD/NASH based on the EASL 2009 special conference. J Hepatol 53: 372–384.
    1. Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M, Pagano G (2011) Meta-analysis: natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for liver disease severity. Ann Med 43: 617–649.
    1. Karlas T, Wiegand J, Berg T (2013) Gastrointestinal complications of obesity: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its sequelae. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 27: 195–208.
    1. Tilg H, Moschen AR (2010) Evolution of inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the multiple parallel hits hypothesis. Hepatology 52: 1836–1846.
    1. Adinolfi LE, Restivo L, Marrone A (2013) The predictive value of steatosis in hepatitis C virus infection. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 7: 205–213.
    1. Jin X, Chen Y, Yang Y, Li Y, Zheng L, Xu C (2012) Association between hepatic steatosis and entecavir treatment failure in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B. PLoS ONE 7: e34198.
    1. Musso G, Cassader M, Rosina F, Gambino R (2012) Impact of current treatments on liver disease, glucose metabolism and cardiovascular risk in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Diabetologia 55: 885–904.
    1. Iwasaki T, Yoneda M, Inamori M, Shirakawa J, Higurashi T, et al. (2011) Sitagliptin as a novel treatment agent for non-alcoholic Fatty liver disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Hepatogastroenterology 58: 2103–2105.
    1. Bedossa P, Carrat F (2009) Liver biopsy: the best, not the gold standard. J Hepatol 50: 1–3.
    1. Castera L, Pinzani M (2010) Biopsy and non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis: does it take two to tango? Gut 59: 861–866.
    1. Poynard T, Ratziu V, Naveau S, Thabut D, Charlotte F, et al. (2005) The diagnostic value of biomarkers (SteatoTest) for the prediction of liver steatosis. Comp Hepatol 4: 10.
    1. Bedogni G, Bellentani S, Miglioli L, Masutti F, Passalacqua M, et al. (2006) The Fatty Liver Index: a simple and accurate predictor of hepatic steatosis in the general population. BMC Gastroenterol 6: 33.
    1. Schwenzer NF, Springer F, Schraml C, Stefan N, Machann J, Schick F (2009) Non-invasive assessment and quantification of liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance. J Hepatol 51: 433–445.
    1. Sasso M, Miette V, Sandrin L, Beaugrand M (2012) The controlled attenuation parameter (CAP): a novel tool for the non-invasive evaluation of steatosis using Fibroscan. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 36: 13–20.
    1. Friedrich-Rust M, Romen D, Vermehren J, Kriener S, Sadet D, et al. (2012) Acoustic radiation force impulse-imaging and transient elastography for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis and steatosis in NAFLD. Eur J Radiol 81: e325–331.
    1. Myers RP, Pollett A, Kirsch R, Pomier-Layrargues G, Beaton M, et al. (2012) Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP): a noninvasive method for the detection of hepatic steatosis based on transient elastography. Liver Int 32: 902–910.
    1. Lédinghen V de, Vergniol J, Foucher J, Merrouche W, Le Bail B (2012) Non-invasive diagnosis of liver steatosis using controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and transient elastography. Liver Int 32: 911–918.
    1. Sasso M, Tengher-Barna I, Ziol M, Miette V, Fournier C, et al. (2012) Novel controlled attenuation parameter for noninvasive assessment of steatosis using Fibroscan(®): validation in chronic hepatitis C. J Viral Hepat 19: 244–253.
    1. Kumar M, Rastogi A, Singh T, Behari C, Gupta E, et al. (2013) Controlled attenuation parameter for non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis: Does etiology affect performance? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28: 1194–1201.
    1. Chon YE, Jung KS, Kim SU, Park JY, Park YN, et al. (2014) Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) for detection of hepatic steatosis in patients with chronic liver diseases: a prospective study of a native Korean population. Liver Int 34: 102–109.
    1. Szczepaniak LS, Nurenberg P, Leonard D, Browning JD, Reingold JS, et al. (2005) Magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure hepatic triglyceride content: prevalence of hepatic steatosis in the general population. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 288: e462–468.
    1. Belfort R, Harrison SA, Brown K, Darland C, Finch J, et al. (2006) A placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med 355: 2297–2307.
    1. Thomas EL, Potter E, Tosi I, Fitzpatrick J, Hamilton G, et al. (2007) Pioglitazone added to conventional lipid-lowering treatment in familial combined hyperlipidaemia improves parameters of metabolic control: relation to liver, muscle and regional body fat content. Atherosclerosis 195: e181–190.
    1. Le T, Chen J, Changchien C, Peterson MR, Kono Y, et al. (2012) Effect of colesevelam on liver fat quantified by magnetic resonance in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a randomized controlled trial. Hepatology 56: 922–932.
    1. Wong GL (2013) Transient elastography: Kill two birds with one stone? World J Hepatol 5: 264–274.
    1. Reeder SB, Cruite I, Hamilton G, Sirlin CB (2011) Quantitative assessment of liver fat with magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging 34: 729–749.
    1. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, van Natta M, Behling C, Contos MJ, et al. (2005) Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 41: 1313–1321.
    1. Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph J, Yon S, Fournier C, et al. (2003) Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol 29: 1705–1713.
    1. Castéra L, Foucher J, Bernard PH, Carvalho F, Allaix D, et al. (2010) Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations. Hepatology 51: 828–835.
    1. Hamilton G, Middleton MS, Bydder M, Yokoo T, Schwimmer JB, et al. (2009) Effect of PRESS and STEAM sequences on magnetic resonance spectroscopic liver fat quantification. J Magn Reson Imaging 30: 145–152.
    1. Thörmer G, Bertram HH, Garnov N, Peter V, Schütz T, et al. (2013) Software for automated MRI-based quantification of abdominal fat and preliminary evaluation in morbidly obese patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 37: 1144–1450.
    1. So R, Matsuo T, Sasai H, Eto M, Tsujimoto T, et al. (2012) Best single-slice measurement site for estimating visceral adipose tissue volume after weight loss in obese, Japanese men. Nutr Metab (Lond) 9: 56.
    1. Demerath EW, Shen W, Lee M, Choh AC, Czerwinski SA, et al. (2007) Approximation of total visceral adipose tissue with a single magnetic resonance image. Am J Clin Nutr 85: 362–368.
    1. Irlbeck T, Massaro JM, Bamberg F, O'Donnell CJ, Hoffmann U, Fox CS (2010) Association between single-slice measurements of visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue with volumetric measurements: the Framingham Heart Study. Int J Obes (Lond) 34: 781–787.
    1. Angulo P, Hui JM, Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, George J, et al. (2007) The NAFLD fibrosis score: a noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatology 45: 846–854.
    1. Rosendahl J, Tönjes A, Schleinitz D, Kovacs P, Wiegand J, et al. (2012) A common variant of PNPLA3 (p.I148M) is not associated with alcoholic chronic pancreatitis. PLoS ONE 7: e29433.
    1. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, et al. (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 12: 77.
    1. Fisher RA (1921) On the “Probable Error” of a Coefficient of Correlation deduced from a Small Sample. Metron 1: 3–32.
    1. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44: 837–845.
    1. Wong VW, Vergniol J, Wong GL, Foucher J, Chan HL, et al. (2010) Diagnosis of fibrosis and cirrhosis using liver stiffness measurement in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 51: 454–462.
    1. Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39: 561–577.
    1. Wong VW, Vergniol J, Wong GL, Foucher J, Chan AW, et al. (2012) Liver stiffness measurement using XL probe in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol 107: 1862–1871.
    1. Corwin A, Aresty A, Chong S, Brunsvold M, Evans JR, et al. (2012) Will they fit? Development of a measurement device to assess body habitus compatibility with MRI bore diameter for emergency trauma imaging. Emerg Radiol 19: 141–148.
    1. Kowdley KV, Belt P, Wilson LA, Yeh MM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, et al. (2012) Serum ferritin is an independent predictor of histologic severity and advanced fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 55: 77–85.
    1. Guiu B, Loffroy R, Hillon P, Petit J (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for quantification of hepatic steatosis: urgent need for standardization!. J Hepatol 51: 1082–1083.
    1. Guiu B, Cercueil J (2012) MRI as the new reference standard in quantifying liver steatosis: the need for international guidelines. Gut 61: 1369–1370.
    1. Petta S, Amato MC, Di Marco V, Cammà C, Pizzolanti G, et al. (2012) Visceral adiposity index is associated with significant fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 35: 238–247.
    1. Cournane S, Browne JE, Fagan AJ (2012) The effects of fatty deposits on the accuracy of the Fibroscan® liver transient elastography ultrasound system. Phys Med Biol 57: 3901–3914.
    1. Myers RP, Pomier-Layrargues G, Kirsch R, Pollett A, Beaton M, et al. (2012) Discordance in fibrosis staging between liver biopsy and transient elastography using the FibroScan XL probe. J Hepatol 56: 564–570.
    1. McPherson S, Jonsson JR, Cowin GJ, O'Rourke P, Clouston AD, et al. (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy accurately estimate the severity of steatosis provided the stage of fibrosis is considered. J Hepatol 51: 389–397.
    1. Guiu B, Crevisy-Girod E, Binquet C, Duvillard L, Masson D, et al. (2012) Prediction for steatosis in type-2 diabetes: clinico-biological markers versus 1H-MR spectroscopy. Eur Radiol 22: 855–863.
    1. Dyson JK, McPherson S, Anstee QM (2013) Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: non-invasive investigation and risk stratification. J Clin Pathol 66: 1033–1045.
    1. Angulo P, Bugianesi E, Bjornsson ES, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Mills PR, et al. (2013) Simple Noninvasive Systems Predict Long-term Outcomes of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 145: 782–789.e4.
    1. Vernon G, Baranova A, Younossi ZM (2011) Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 34: 274–285.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren