Lipoabdominoplasty: repercussions for diaphragmatic mobility and lung function in healthy women

Sandra Fluhr, Armèle Dornelas de Andrade, Emanuel José Baptista Oliveira, Taciano Rocha, Ana Irene Carlos Medeiros, Amanda Couto, Juliana Netto Maia, Daniella Cunha Brandão, Sandra Fluhr, Armèle Dornelas de Andrade, Emanuel José Baptista Oliveira, Taciano Rocha, Ana Irene Carlos Medeiros, Amanda Couto, Juliana Netto Maia, Daniella Cunha Brandão

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of lipoabdominoplasty on diaphragmatic mobility (DM) and lung function in healthy women.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study using high-resolution ultrasound and forced spirometry to assess DM and lung function, respectively, prior to lipoabdominoplasty, as well as on postoperative day (POD) 10 and POD 30. DM was measured under two conditions: during tidal volume breathing and during a VC maneuver.

Results: The sample consisted of 20 women, with a mean age of 39.85 ± 7.52 years and a mean body mass index of 26.21 ± 2.0 kg/m2. Comparing the preoperative and postoperative periods, we found that DM and lung function values were significantly lower after lipoabdominoplasty, the mean DM on POD 10 being 17% and 15% lower during tidal volume breathing and during the VC maneuver, respectively, in comparison with the preoperative mean (p = 0.009 and p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, FEV1, FVC, and PEF were significantly lower on POD 10 than in the preoperative period (p = 0.046, p = 0.002, and p < 0.001, respectively), returning to preoperative values by POD 30.

Conclusions: Lipoabdominoplasty appears to have negative short-term repercussions for DM and lung function in healthy women. However, lung function and DM are both apparently restored to preoperative conditions by POD 30. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02762526 [http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/]).

Figures

Figure 1. Assessment of diaphragmatic mobility by…
Figure 1. Assessment of diaphragmatic mobility by M-mode ultrasound, with the placement of markers for determining diaphragm displacement during the VC maneuver. A, B, and C indicate the beginning, middle, and end of the inspiratory cycle, respectively.
Figure 2. Flowchart of the study design.…
Figure 2. Flowchart of the study design. BMI: body mass index; MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination; and POD: postoperative day.
Figure 3. Diaphragmatic mobility (DM), measured during…
Figure 3. Diaphragmatic mobility (DM), measured during tidal volume breathing (VT) and during a VC maneuver (VC), at the three time points evaluated. Values of p were calculated with two-way repeated-measures ANOVA followed by the Holm-Sidak post hoc test. POD: postoperative day. *p = 0.009 vs. Preoperative. †p < 0.001 vs. Preoperative.
Figure 4. Diaphragmatic mobility (DM) during a…
Figure 4. Diaphragmatic mobility (DM) during a VC maneuver on postoperative day 10, in comparison with the FEV1 and PEF values (both in % of predicted) obtained at the same time point. Values of p were calculated with Pearson’s correlation coefficient. *Significant correlation with DM during the VC maneuver (r = 0.502; p = 0.034). †Significant correlation with DM during the VC maneuver (r = 0.515; p = 0.029).

References

    1. Santos Dos NP, Barnabé AS, Fornari JV, Ferraz RRN. Pain assessment in patients undergoing cosmetic or reconstructive plastic surgery [Article in Portuguese] Rev Bras Cir. Plast. 2012;27(2):190–194.
    1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons . Report of the 2007 statistics: National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Statistics. Arlington Heights (IL): the Society; 2008.
    1. Rohrich RJ, Stuzin JM. Globalization of plastic surgery the world of plastic and reconstructive surgery in Brazil. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(4):967–968. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826703b1.
    1. Nahas FX. A pragmatic way to treat abdominal deformities based on skin and subcutaneous excess. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2001;25(5):365–371. doi: 10.1007/s00266-001-0025-7.
    1. Saldanha OR, Pinto EBS, Matos WN, Jr, Lucon RL, Magalhães F, Bello EML. Lipoabdominoplasty - Saldanha's Technique. Rev Bras Cir Plast. 2003;(2):37–46.
    1. Assumpção GG. Mini-abdominoplasty associated with liposuction and lowering of the umbilical scar without pedicular detachment [Article in Portuguese] Rev Bras Cir. Plast. 2012;27(3):450–456. doi: 10.1590/S1983-51752012000300021.
    1. ROE BB. Prevention and treatment of respiratory complications in surgery. N Engl J Med. 1960;263:547–550. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196009152631106.
    1. Palmon SC, Kirsch JR, Depper JA, Toung TJ. The effect of the prone position on pulmonary mechanics is frame-dependent. Anesth Analg. 1998;87(5):1175–1180.
    1. Rezaiguia S, Jayr C. Prevention of respiratory complications after abdominal surgery [Article in French] Ann Fr Anesth. Reanim. 1996;15(5):623–646. doi: 10.1016/0750-7658(96)82128-9.
    1. Tercan M, Bekerecioglu M, Dikensoy O, Kocoglu H, Atik B, Isik D. Effects of abdominoplasty on respiratory functions a prospective study. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49(6):617–620. doi: 10.1097/00000637-200212000-00011.
    1. Pierri A, Munegato G, Carraro L, Zaccaria F, Tiso E, Zotti EF. Hemodynamic alterations during massive incisional hernioplasty. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;181(4):299–302.
    1. Yamaguti WP, Paulin E, Shibao S, Kodaira S, Chammas MC, Carvalho CR. Ultrasound evaluation of diaphragmatic mobility in different postures in healthy subjects. J Bras Pneumol. 2007;33(4):407–413. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37132007000400009.
    1. Helene A, Junior, Saad R, Junior, Stirbulov R. Avaliação da função respiratória em indivíduos submetidos à abdominoplastia. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2006;33(1):45–50. doi: 10.1590/S0100-69912006000100011.
    1. Grams ST, von Saltiél R, Mayer AF, Schivinski CI, de S Nobre LF, Nóbrega IS, et al. Assessment of the reproducibility of the indirect ultrasound method of measuring diaphragm mobility. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014;34(1):18–25. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12058.
    1. Tonella RM, Araújo S, Silva AM. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the relief of pain related to physical therapy after abdominal surgery [Article in Portuguese] Rev Bras. Anestesiol. 2006;56(6):630–642.
    1. Bozola AR. Abdominoplasty same classification and a new treatment concept 20 years later. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010;34(2):181–192. doi: 10.1007/s00266-009-9407-z.
    1. Pigossi N, Tariki JY, de Cássia H, Calonge F, de Andrade AC, Misawa HT. Tactics in the umbilical approach in abdominoplasties [Article in Portuguese] Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao. Paulo. 1991;46(3):145–147.
    1. Testa A, Soldati G, Giannuzzi R, Berardi S, Portale G, Gentiloni Silveri N. Ultrasound M-mode assessment of diaphragmatic kinetics by anterior transverse scanning in healthy subjects. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37(1):44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.10.004.
    1. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories ATS statement guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111–117. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102.
    1. Duarte AA, Pereira CA, Rodrigues SC. Validation of new brazilian predicted values for forced spirometry in caucasians and comparison with predicted values obtained using other reference equations. J Bras Pneumol. 2007;33(5):527–535. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37132007000500007.
    1. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983;17(1):45–56. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4.
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3 a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146.
    1. Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using Effect Size-or Why the P Value Is Not Enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(3):279–282. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1.
    1. De Troyer A, Estenne M. Functional anatomy of the respiratory muscles. Clin Chest Med. 1988;9(2):175–193.
    1. Sieck GC. Diaphragm muscle structural and functional organization. Clin Chest Med. 1988;9(2):195–210.
    1. De Troyer A, Boriek AM. Mechanics of the respiratory muscles. Compr Physiol. 2011;1(3):1273–1300. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c100009.
    1. De Troyer A, Sampson M, Sigrist S, Kelly S. How the abdominal muscles act on the rib cage. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983;54(2):465–469. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1983.54.2.465.
    1. Luckianow GM, Ellis M, Governale D, Kaplan LJ. Abdominal compartment syndrome risk factors, diagnosis, and current therapy. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012;2012:908169–908169. doi: 10.1155/2012/908169.
    1. Sánchez-Miralles A, Castellanos G, Badenes R, Conejero R. Abdominal compartment syndrome and acute intestinal distress syndrome [Article in Spanish] Med. Intensiva. 2013;37(2):99–109. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2011.11.019.
    1. Talisman R, Kaplan B, Haik J, Aronov S, Shraga A, Orenstein A. Measuring alterations in intra-abdominal pressure during abdominoplasty as a predictive value for possible postoperative complications. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002;26(3):189–192. doi: 10.1007/s00266-001-1469-5.
    1. Perin LF, Saad R, Jr, Stirbulov R, Helene A., Jr Spirometric evaluation in individuals undergoing abdominoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(11):1392–1394. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.02.028.
    1. Rodrigues MA, Nahas FX, Gomes HC, Ferreira LM. Ventilatory function and intra-abdominal pressure in patients who underwent abdominoplasty with plication of the external oblique aponeurosis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37(5):993–999. doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0158-5.
    1. Nozawa E, Kobayashi E, Matsumoto ME, Feltrim MIZ, Carmona MJC, Auler JOC., Júnior Identificação dos fatores de risco que influenciam no desmame de ventilação mecânica em pacientes traqueostomizados após cirurgia cardíaca. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2003;80(3):301–305.
    1. Rodrigues AJ, Évora PRB, Vilela V, Vicente W. Postoperative respiratory complications [Article in Portuguese] Medicina (Ribeirao. Preto) 2008;41(4):469–476. doi: 10.11606/issn.2176-7262.v41i4p469-476.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren