Feasibility of an Immersive Virtual Reality Intervention for Hospitalized Patients: An Observational Cohort Study

Sasan Mosadeghi, Mark William Reid, Bibiana Martinez, Bradley Todd Rosen, Brennan Mason Ross Spiegel, Sasan Mosadeghi, Mark William Reid, Bibiana Martinez, Bradley Todd Rosen, Brennan Mason Ross Spiegel

Abstract

Background: Virtual reality (VR) offers immersive, realistic, three-dimensional experiences that "transport" users to novel environments. Because VR is effective for acute pain and anxiety, it may have benefits for hospitalized patients; however, there are few reports using VR in this setting.

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of VR in a diverse cohort of hospitalized patients.

Methods: We assessed the acceptability and feasibility of VR in a cohort of patients admitted to an inpatient hospitalist service over a 4-month period. We excluded patients with motion sickness, stroke, seizure, dementia, nausea, and in isolation. Eligible patients viewed VR experiences (eg, ocean exploration; Cirque du Soleil; tour of Iceland) with Samsung Gear VR goggles. We then conducted semistructured patient interview and performed statistical testing to compare patients willing versus unwilling to use VR.

Results: We evaluated 510 patients; 423 were excluded and 57 refused to participate, leaving 30 participants. Patients willing versus unwilling to use VR were younger (mean 49.1, SD 17.4 years vs mean 60.2, SD 17.7 years; P=.01); there were no differences by sex, race, or ethnicity. Among users, most reported a positive experience and indicated that VR could improve pain and anxiety, although many felt the goggles were uncomfortable.

Conclusions: Most inpatient users of VR described the experience as pleasant and capable of reducing pain and anxiety. However, few hospitalized patients in this "real-world" series were both eligible and willing to use VR. Consistent with the "digital divide" for emerging technologies, younger patients were more willing to participate. Future research should evaluate the impact of VR on clinical and resource outcomes.

Clinicaltrial: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02456987; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02456987 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6iFIMRNh3).

Keywords: feasibility studies; hospitalization; virtual reality therapy.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Samsung Gear Goggles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study flowchart.

References

    1. Henderson AR. Psychology of hospitalized patients. J Natl Med Assoc. 1976 Sep;68(5):378–383.
    1. Malloy KM, Milling LS. The effectiveness of virtual reality distraction for pain reduction: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Dec;30(8):1011–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.001.
    1. Manzoni GM, Cesa GL, Bacchetta M, Castelnuovo G, Conti S, Gaggioli A, Mantovani F, Molinari E, Cárdenas-López G, Riva G. Virtual reality-enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy for morbid obesity: a randomized controlled study with 1 year follow-up. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016 Feb;19(2):134–140. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0208.
    1. Cesa GL, Manzoni GM, Bacchetta M, Castelnuovo G, Conti S, Gaggioli A, Mantovani F, Molinari E, Cárdenas-López G, Riva G. Virtual reality for enhancing the cognitive behavioral treatment of obesity with binge eating disorder: randomized controlled study with one-year follow-up. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(6):e113. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2441.
    1. Riva G. The key to unlocking the virtual body: virtual reality in the treatment of obesity and eating disorders. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 Mar;5(2):283–292.
    1. McCann RA, Armstrong CM, Skopp NA, Edwards-Stewart A, Smolenski DJ, June JD, Metzger-Abamukong M, Reger GM. Virtual reality exposure therapy for the treatment of anxiety disorders: an evaluation of research quality. J Anxiety Disord. 2014 Aug;28(6):625–631. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.05.010.
    1. Malbos E, Boyer L, Lançon C. [Virtual reality in the treatment of mental disorders] Presse Med. 2013 Nov;42(11):1442–1452. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2013.01.065.
    1. Rothbaum BO, Garcia-Palacios A, Rothbaum AO. Treating anxiety disorders with virtual reality exposure therapy. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2012;5(2):67–70. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2011.05.003.
    1. JahaniShoorab N, Ebrahimzadeh ZS, Nahvi A, Mazluom SR, Golmakani N, Talebi M, Pabarja F. The effect of virtual reality on pain in primiparity women during episiotomy repair: a randomize clinical trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2015 May;40(3):219–224.
    1. Hua Y, Qiu R, Yao W, Zhang Q, Chen X. The effect of virtual reality distraction on pain relief during dressing changes in children with chronic wounds on lower limbs. Pain Manag Nurs. 2015 Oct;16(5):685–691. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2015.03.001.
    1. Morris LD, Louw QA, Grimmer-Somers K. The effectiveness of virtual reality on reducing pain and anxiety in burn injury patients: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2009;25(9):815–826. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181aaa909.
    1. Su WC, Yeh SC, Lee SH, Huang HC. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Access to Learning, Health and Well-Being. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015. A virtual reality lower-back pain rehabilitation approach: system design and user acceptance analysis; pp. 374–382.
    1. Chirico A, Lucidi F, De Laurentiis LM, Milanese C, Napoli A, Giordano A. Virtual reality in health system: beyond entertainment. a mini-review on the efficacy of VR during cancer treatment. J Cell Physiol. 2016 Feb;231(2):275–287. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25117.
    1. Ogourtsova T, Souza SW, Archambault PS, Lamontagne A. Virtual reality treatment and assessments for post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect: a systematic literature review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2015 Dec 1;:1–46. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2015.1113187.
    1. Pedroli E, Serino S, Cipresso P, Pallavicini F, Riva G. Assessment and rehabilitation of neglect using virtual reality: a systematic review. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9:226. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00226.
    1. Nichols S, Patel H. Health and safety implications of virtual reality: a review of empirical evidence. Appl Ergon. 2002 May;33(3):251–271.
    1. Samsung Gear VR User Manual. 2015. [2016-06-16]. .
    1. Ericsson A, Simon HA. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data (Revised Edition) Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1984.
    1. Willis G. Cognitive Interviewing and Questionnaire Design: A Training Manual. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Health Statistics; 1994. [2016-06-16]. .
    1. Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, Sharit J. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Psychol Aging. 2006 Jun;21(2):333–352. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333.
    1. Czaja SJ, Sharit J. Age differences in attitudes toward computers. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1998 Sep;53(5):329–340.
    1. Ellis D, Allaire JC. Modeling computer interest in older adults: the role of age, education, computer knowledge, and computer anxiety. Hum Factors. 1999 Sep;41(3):345–355.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren