Sarcome-13/OS2016 trial protocol: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial of mifamurtide combined with postoperative chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed high-risk osteosarcoma

Caroline Brard, Sophie Piperno-Neumann, Jessy Delaye, Laurence Brugières, Lisa V Hampson, Gwénaël Le Teuff, Marie-Cécile Le Deley, Nathalie Gaspar, Caroline Brard, Sophie Piperno-Neumann, Jessy Delaye, Laurence Brugières, Lisa V Hampson, Gwénaël Le Teuff, Marie-Cécile Le Deley, Nathalie Gaspar

Abstract

Introduction: The controversial results on the mifamurtide efficacy associated with chemotherapy, issued from the American INT-0133-study, in localised osteosarcomas, and the underpowered analysis performed separately in metastatic patients, should be clarified to homogenise international use of this promising drug. The European Commission has granted a marketing authorisation to mifamurtide combined with postoperative chemotherapy in localised osteosarcomas but not in metastatic patients, while the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has denied this authorisation.

Methods and analysis: Sarcome-13/OS2016 trial is a multicentre randomised open-label phase II trial evaluating the survival benefit of mifamurtide administered during 36 weeks in combination with postoperative chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, in patients >2 and ≤50 years with newly diagnosed high-risk localised or metastatic osteosarcoma. The main objective is to evaluate the impact on event-free survival (EFS) of mifamurtide on intention-to-treat population. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the impact of mifamurtide on overall survival, to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of the planned treatment, to correlate biology/immunology with the mifamurtide efficacy/toxicity. With a total of 126 enrolled patients and 51 events, the power is 80% if mifamurtide is associated with an 18% improvement of the 3-year EFS (52%vs70%, equivalent to an HR=0.55), with a one-sided logrank test alpha=10%. As relevant historical data are available (aggregate treatment effect from the INT-0133 trial and individual data from the control group of the Sarcome-09/OS2006 trial), a Bayesian analysis is also planned.

Ethics and dissemination: This study was approved by the 'Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France I' (12/06/2018), complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and French laws and regulations, and follows the International Conference on Harmonisation E6 Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. The trial results, even if they are inconclusive, as well as biological ancillary studies will be presented at appropriate international congresses and published in international peer-review journals.

Trial registration number: EudraCT 2017-001165-24, NCT03643133.

Keywords: bayesian analysis; high-risk localised or metastatic osteosarcoma; mifamurtide; power and mixture prior; randomised trial; rare disease.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Treatment scheme according to age.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Individual historical data, from Sarcome-09/OS2006 subgroup of patients who fulfilled the planned Sarcome-13/OS2016 eligibility criteria, on the control arm of the current trial.

References

    1. Le Deley MC, Guinebretière JM, Gentet JC, et al. . SFOP OS94: a randomised trial comparing preoperative high-dose methotrexate plus doxorubicin to high-dose methotrexate plus etoposide and ifosfamide in osteosarcoma patients. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:752–61. 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.10.023
    1. Assi H, Missenard G, Terrier P, et al. . Intensive induction chemotherapy without methotrexate in adult patients with localized osteosarcoma: results of the Institut Gustave-Roussy phase II trial. Curr Oncol 2010;17:23–31. 10.3747/co.v17i6.578
    1. Piperno-Neumann S, Le Deley MC, Rédini F, et al. . Zoledronate in combination with chemotherapy and surgery to treat osteosarcoma (OS2006): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:1070–80. 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30096-1
    1. Isakoff MS, Bielack SS, Meltzer P, et al. . Osteosarcoma: Current Treatment and a Collaborative Pathway to Success. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:3029–35. 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4895
    1. Asano T, McWatters A, An T, et al. . Liposomal muramyl tripeptide up-regulates interleukin-1 alpha, interleukin-1 beta, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 gene expression in human monocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1994;268:1032–9.
    1. Kleinerman ES, Jia SF, Griffin J, et al. . Phase II study of liposomal muramyl tripeptide in osteosarcoma: the cytokine cascade and monocyte activation following administration. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:1310–6. 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.8.1310
    1. Kleinerman ES, Murray JL, Snyder JS, et al. . Activation of tumoricidal properties in monocytes from cancer patients following intravenous administration of liposomes containing muramyl tripeptide phosphatidylethanolamine. Cancer Res 1989;49:4665–70.
    1. Nardin A, Lefebvre ML, Labroquère K, et al. . Liposomal muramyl tripeptide phosphatidylethanolamine: Targeting and activating macrophages for adjuvant treatment of osteosarcoma. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2006;6:123–33. 10.2174/156800906776056473
    1. Pahl JH, Kwappenberg KM, Varypataki EM, et al. . Macrophages inhibit human osteosarcoma cell growth after activation with the bacterial cell wall derivative liposomal muramyl tripeptide in combination with interferon-γ. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2014;33:27 10.1186/1756-9966-33-27
    1. Kurzman ID, MacEwen EG, Rosenthal RC, et al. . Adjuvant therapy for osteosarcoma in dogs: results of randomized clinical trials using combined liposome-encapsulated muramyl tripeptide and cisplatin. Clin Cancer Res 1995;1:1595–601.
    1. Vail DM, MacEwen EG, Kurzman ID, et al. . Liposome-encapsulated muramyl tripeptide phosphatidylethanolamine adjuvant immunotherapy for splenic hemangiosarcoma in the dog: a randomized multi-institutional clinical trial. Clin Cancer Res 1995;1:1165–70.
    1. Kleinerman ES, Snyder JS, Jaffe N. Influence of chemotherapy administration on monocyte activation by liposomal muramyl tripeptide phosphatidylethanolamine in children with osteosarcoma. J Clin Oncol 1991;9:259–67. 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.2.259
    1. Meyers PA, Schwartz CL, Krailo M, et al. . Osteosarcoma: a randomized, prospective trial of the addition of ifosfamide and/or muramyl tripeptide to cisplatin, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2004–11. 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.031
    1. Meyers PA, Schwartz CL, Krailo MD, et al. . Osteosarcoma: the addition of muramyl tripeptide to chemotherapy improves overall survival--a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:633–8. 10.1200/JCO.2008.14.0095
    1. Chou AJ, Kleinerman ES, Krailo MD, et al. . Addition of muramyl tripeptide to chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic osteosarcoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Cancer 2009;115:5339–48. 10.1002/cncr.24566
    1. Anderson PM, Meyers P, Kleinerman E, et al. . Mifamurtide in metastatic and recurrent osteosarcoma: a patient access study with pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety assessments. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014;61:238–44. 10.1002/pbc.24686
    1. Bielack S, Carrle D, Casali PG, et al. . Osteosarcoma: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology 2009;20(Supplement 4):iv137–iv139. 10.1093/annonc/mdp154
    1. Irwin JO. The standard error of an estimate of expectation of life, with special reference to expectation of tumourless life in experiments with mice. J Hyg 1949;47:188–9. 10.1017/S0022172400014443
    1. Royston P, Parmar MK. The use of restricted mean survival time to estimate the treatment effect in randomized clinical trials when the proportional hazards assumption is in doubt. Stat Med 2011;30:2409–21. 10.1002/sim.4274
    1. Mutsvari T, Tytgat D, Walley R. Addressing potential prior-data conflict when using informative priors in proof-of-concept studies. Pharm Stat 2016;15:28–36. 10.1002/pst.1722
    1. Ibrahim JG, Chen M-H. Power prior distributions for regression models. Stat Sci 2000;15:46–60.
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. . SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren