Development of a Smartphone-Enabled Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Management Package to Facilitate Evidence-Based Care Delivery in Primary Healthcare Facilities in India: The mPower Heart Project

Vamadevan S Ajay, Devraj Jindal, Ambuj Roy, Vidya Venugopal, Rakshit Sharma, Abha Pawar, Sanjay Kinra, Nikhil Tandon, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Vamadevan S Ajay, Devraj Jindal, Ambuj Roy, Vidya Venugopal, Rakshit Sharma, Abha Pawar, Sanjay Kinra, Nikhil Tandon, Dorairaj Prabhakaran

Abstract

Background: The high burden of undetected and undertreated hypertension and diabetes mellitus is a major health challenge worldwide. The mPower Heart Project aimed to develop and test a feasible and scalable intervention for hypertension and diabetes mellitus by task-sharing with the use of a mobile phone-based clinical decision support system at Community Health Centers in Himachal Pradesh, India.

Methods and results: The development of the intervention and mobile phone-based clinical decision support system was carried out using mixed methods in five Community Health Centers. The intervention was subsequently evaluated using pre-post evaluation design. During intervention, a nurse care coordinator screened, examined, and entered patient parameters into mobile phone-based clinical decision support system to generate a prescription, which was vetted by a physician. The change in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) over 18 months of intervention was quantified using generalized estimating equations models. During intervention, 6797 participants were enrolled. Six thousand sixteen participants had hypertension (mean systolic blood pressure: 146.1 mm Hg, 95% CI: 145.7, 146.5; diastolic blood pressure: 89.52 mm Hg, 95% CI: 89.33, 89.72), of which 3152 (52%) subjects were newly detected. Similarly, 1516 participants had diabetes mellitus (mean FPG: 177.9 mg/dL, 95% CI: 175.8, 180.0), of which 450 (30%) subjects were newly detected. The changes in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and FPG observed at 18 months of follow-up were -14.6 mm Hg (95% CI: -15.3, -13.8), -7.6 mm Hg (CI: -8.0, -7.2), and -50.0 mg/dL (95% CI: -54.6, -45.5), respectively, and were statistically significant even after adjusting for age, sex, and Community Health Center.

Conclusions: A nurse-facilitated, mobile phone-based clinical decision support system-enabled intervention in primary care was associated with improvements in blood pressure and blood glucose control and has the potential to scale-up in resource poor settings.

Clinical trial registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01794052. Clinical Trial Registry-India: CTRI/2013/02/003412.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus; high blood pressure; hypertension; mHealth; nurse; primary care.

© 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Steps in the development process of mDSS. mDSS indicates mobile phone–based clinical decision support system.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Workflow at the CHCs during the intervention. CHCs indicates Community Health Centers; mDSS mobile phone–based clinical decision support system; NCD, noncommunicable diseases; OPD, outpatient department.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change in mean systolic blood pressure level during 18 months of follow‐up; plotted with 95% confidence interval. Dashed black line: mean systolic blood pressure level among known cases during 18 months of follow‐up. Solid black line: mean systolic blood pressure level among newly diagnosed cases during 18 months of follow‐up.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Change in mean diastolic blood pressure level during 18 months of follow‐up; plotted with 95% confidence interval. Dashed black line: mean diastolic blood pressure level among known cases during 18 months of follow‐up. Solid black line: mean diastolic blood pressure level among newly diagnosed cases during 18 months of follow‐up.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Change in mean fasting blood glucose level during 18 months of follow‐up; plotted with 95% confidence interval. Dashed black line: mean fasting blood glucose level among known cases during 18 months of follow‐up. Solid black line: mean fasting blood glucose level among newly diagnosed cases during 18 months of follow‐up.

References

    1. Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington . Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 (GBD 2013) Data Downloads, GHDx [Internet]. 2013. Available at: . Accessed April 24, 2016.
    1. Prabhakaran D, Jeemon P, Roy A. Cardiovascular diseases in India. Circulation. 2016;133:1605–1620.
    1. Anchala R, Kannuri NK, Pant H, Khan H, Franco OH, Di Angelantonio E, Prabhakaran D. Hypertension in India: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prevalence, awareness, and control of hypertension. J Hypertens. 2014;32:1170–1177.
    1. Anjana RM, Pradeepa R, Deepa M, Datta M, Sudha V, Unnikrishnan R, Bhansali A, Joshi SR, Joshi PP, Yajnik CS, Dhandhania VK, Nath LM, Das AK, Rao PV, Madhu SV, Shukla DK, Kaur T, Priya M, Nirmal E, Parvathi SJ, Subhashini S, Subashini R, Ali MK, Mohan V. Prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance) in urban and rural India: phase I results of the Indian Council of Medical Research‐INdia DIABetes (ICMR‐INDIAB) study. Diabetologia. 2011;54:3022–3027.
    1. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005;365:217–223.
    1. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 7th ed Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2015.
    1. Thankappan KR, Shah B, Mathur P, Sarma PS, Srinivas G, Mini GK, Daivadanam M, Soman B, Vasan RS. Risk factor profile for chronic non‐communicable diseases: results of a community‐based study in Kerala, India. Indian J Med Res. 2010;131:53–63.
    1. Singh AK, Mani K, Krishnan A, Aggarwal P, Gupta SK. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of diabetes among elderly persons in an urban slum of Delhi. Indian J Community Med. 2012;37:236–239.
    1. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Government of India . Indian Public Health Standards (IPHS) Guidelines for Community Health Centres; Revised in 2010. New Delhi: Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Government of India; 2010.
    1. Liang K‐Y, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73:13–22.
    1. Hubert PJ. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions In: Le Cam LM, Neyman J. eds. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1967:221–233.
    1. White H. A heteroskedasticity‐consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica. 1980;48:817–830.
    1. Artinian NT, Flack JM, Nordstrom CK, Hockman EM, Washington OGM, Jen K‐LC, Fathy M. Effects of nurse‐managed telemonitoring on blood pressure at 12‐month follow‐up among urban African Americans. Nurs Res. 2007;56:312–322.
    1. Tobe SW, Pylypchuk G, Wentworth J, Kiss A, Szalai JP, Perkins N, Hartman S, Ironstand L, Hoppe J. Effect of nurse‐directed hypertension treatment among First Nations people with existing hypertension and diabetes mellitus: the Diabetes Risk Evaluation and Microalbuminuria (DREAM 3) randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2006;174:1267–1271.
    1. Jaffe MG, Lee GA, Young JD, Sidney S, Go AS. Improved blood pressure control associated with a large‐scale hypertension program. JAMA. 2013;310:699–705.
    1. Anchala R, Kaptoge S, Pant H, Di Angelantonio E, Franco OH, Prabhakaran D. Evaluation of effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of a clinical decision support system in managing hypertension in resource constrained primary health care settings: results from a cluster randomized trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e001213 doi: .
    1. Tian M, Ajay VS, Dunzhu D, Hameed SS, Li X, Liu Z, Li C, Chen H, Cho K, Li R, Zhao X, Jindal D, Rawal I, Ali MK, Peterson ED, Ji J, Amarchand R, Krishnan A, Tandon N, Xu L‐Q, Wu Y, Prabhakaran D, Yan LL. A cluster‐randomized, controlled trial of a simplified multifaceted management program for individuals at high cardiovascular risk (SimCard Trial) in rural Tibet, China, and Haryana, India. Circulation. 2015;132:815–824.
    1. Tricco AC, Ivers NM, Grimshaw JM, Moher D, Turner L, Galipeau J, Halperin I, Vachon B, Ramsay T, Manns B, Tonelli M, Shojania K. Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet. 2012;379:2252–2261. Available at: . Accessed April 20, 2016.
    1. Shojania KG, Ranji SR, McDonald KM, Grimshaw JM, Sundaram V, Rushakoff RJ, Owens DK. Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta‐regression analysis. JAMA. 2006;296:427–440.
    1. Krishna S, Boren SA, Balas EA. Healthcare via cell phones: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15:231–240.
    1. Ajay VS, Praveen PA, Millett C, Kinra S, Prabhakaran D. Role of mobile phone technology in tobacco cessation interventions. Glob Heart. 2012;7:167–174.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren