Analyzing the impact of 23 mg/day donepezil on language dysfunction in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease

Steven H Ferris, Frederick A Schmitt, Judith Saxton, Sharon Richardson, Joan Mackell, Yijun Sun, Yikang Xu, Steven H Ferris, Frederick A Schmitt, Judith Saxton, Sharon Richardson, Joan Mackell, Yijun Sun, Yikang Xu

Abstract

Introduction: Progressive language impairment is among the primary components of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Because expressive and receptive language help to maintain emotional connections to caregivers and support the management of AD patients' functional needs, language plays a critical role in patients' emotional and physical health. Using data from a large prospective clinical trial comparing two doses of donepezil in patients with moderate to severe AD, we performed a post hoc analysis to determine whether a higher dose of donepezil was associated with greater benefits in language function.

Methods: In the original randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 1,467 patients with moderate to severe AD (baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 0 to 20) were randomized 2:1 to receive donepezil 23 mg/day or to continue on donepezil 10 mg/day for 24 weeks. In this post hoc analysis, the Severe Impairment Battery-Language scale (SIB-L) and a new 21-item SIB-derived language scale (SIB[lang]) were used to explore differences in language function between the treatment groups. Correlations between SIB-L and SIB[lang] scores and scores on the severe version of the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living inventory (ADCS-ADL-sev), the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Severity-plus caregiver input/Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change-plus caregiver input (CIBIS-plus/CIBIC-plus) and the MMSE were also investigated.

Results: At week 24, treatment with donepezil 23 mg/day was associated with an improvement in language in the full intention-to-treat population, whereas language function declined in the group treated with donepezil 10 mg/day (SIB-L treatment difference 0.8, P = 0.0013; SIB[lang] treatment difference 0.8, P = 0.0009). Similar results were observed in a cohort of patients with more severe baseline disease (MMSE score 0 to 16). At baseline and week 24, correlations between the SIB-derived language scales and the ADCS-ADL-sev and CIBIC-plus were moderate, but the correlations were stronger between the language scales and the MMSE scores.

Conclusions: Patients with moderate to severe AD receiving donepezil 23 mg/day showed greater language benefits than those receiving donepezil 10 mg/day as measured by SIB-derived language assessments. Increasing the dose of donepezil to 23 mg/day may provide language benefits in patients with moderate to severe AD, for whom preservation of language abilities is especially critical.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00478205.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Least squares (LS) mean change from baseline to week 24 in Severe Impairment Battery-Language scale (SIB-L) scores (A) and 21-item Severe Impairment Battery-derived language scale (SIB[lang]) scores (B). MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; SE = standard error of the mean.

References

    1. Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Bienias JL, Bennett DA, Evans DA. Alzheimer disease in the US population: prevalence estimates using the 2000 census. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:1119–1122. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.8.1119.
    1. Blair M, Marczinski CA, Davis-Faroque N, Kertesz A. A longitudinal study of language decline in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007;13:237–245.
    1. Ferris S, Ihl R, Robert P, Winblad B, Gatz G, Tennigkeit F, Gauthier S. Severe Impairment Battery Language scale: a language-assessment tool for Alzheimer's disease patients. Alzheimers Dement. 2009;5:375–379. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2009.04.1236.
    1. Henry JD, Crawford JR, Phillips LH. Verbal fluency performance in dementia of the Alzheimer's type: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42:1212–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.02.001.
    1. Hendryx-Bedalov PM. Alzheimer's dementia: coping with communication decline. J Gerontol Nurs. 2000;26:20–24.
    1. Potkins D, Myint P, Bannister C, Tadros G, Chithramohan R, Swann A, O'Brien J, Fossey J, George E, Ballard C, Margallo-Lana M. Language impairment in dementia: impact on symptoms and care needs in residential homes. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003;18:1002–1006. doi: 10.1002/gps.1002.
    1. Savundranayagam MY, Hummert ML, Montgomery RJ. Investigating the effects of communication problems on caregiver burden. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005;60:S48–S55.
    1. Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL. A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1984;141:1356–1364.
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.
    1. Schmitt FA, Cragar D, Ashford JW, Reisberg B, Ferris S, Möbius HJ, Stöffler A. Measuring cognition in advanced Alzheimer's disease for clinical trials. J Neural Transm Suppl. 2002;62:135–148.
    1. Panisset M, Roudier M, Saxton J, Boller F. Severe Impairment Battery: a neuropsychological test for severely demented patients. Arch Neurol. 1994;51:41–45.
    1. Saxton J, Kastango KB, Hugonot-Diener L, Boller F, Verny M, Sarles CE, Girgis RR, Devouche E, Mecocci P, Pollock BG, DeKosky ST. Development of a short form of the Severe Impairment Battery. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;13:999–1005.
    1. Schmitt FA, Ashford W, Ernesto C, Saxton J, Schneider LS, Clark CM, Ferris SH, Mackell JA, Schafer K, Thal LJ. The Severe Impairment Battery: concurrent validity and the assessment of longitudinal change in Alzheimer's disease. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11(Suppl 2):S51–S56.
    1. Saxton J, McGonigle-Gibson KL, Swihart AA, Miller VJ, Boller F. Assessment of the severely impaired patient: description and validation of a new neuropsychological test battery. Psychol Assess. 1990;2:298–303.
    1. Emre M, Mecocci P, Stender K. Pooled analyses on cognitive effects of memantine in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2008;14:193–199.
    1. Schmitt FA, Wichems CH. A systematic review of assessment and treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;8:158–159. doi: 10.4088/PCC.v08n0306.
    1. Winblad B, Black SE, Homma A, Schwam E, Moline M, Xu Y, Perdomo C, Swartz J, Albert K. Donepezil treatment in severe Alzheimer's disease: a pooled analysis of three clinical trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25:2577–2587.
    1. Ferris S, Ihl R, Robert P, Winblad B, Gatz G, Tennigkeit F, Gauthier S. Treatment effects of memantine on language in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease patients. Alzheimers Dement. 2009;5:369–374. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2009.05.604.
    1. ARICEPT donepezil hydrochloride tablets.
    1. Mucha L, Shaohung S, Cuffel B, McRae T, Mark TL, Del Valle M. Comparison of cholinesterase inhibitor utilization patterns and associated health care costs in Alzheimer's disease. J Manag Care Pharm. 2008;14:451–461.
    1. Feldman HH, Van Baelen B, Kavanagh SM, Torfs KE. Cognition, function, and caregiving time patterns in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease: a 12-month analysis. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2005;19:29–36. doi: 10.1097/01.wad.0000157065.43282.bc.
    1. Pélissier C, Roudier M, Boller F. Factorial validation of the Severe Impairment Battery for patients with Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2002;13:95–100. doi: 10.1159/000048640.
    1. Farlow MR, Salloway S, Tariot PN, Yardley J, Moline ML, Wang Q, Brand-Schieber E, Zou H, Hsu T, Satlin A. Effectiveness and tolerability of high-dose (23 mg/d) versus standard-dose (10 mg/d) donepezil in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease: a 24-week, randomized, double-blind study. Clin Ther. 2010;32:1234–1251. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.06.019.
    1. Cosentino S, Scarmeas N, Albert SM, Stern Y. Verbal fluency predicts mortality in Alzheimer disease. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006;19:123–129. doi: 10.1097/01.wnn.0000213912.87642.3d.
    1. Mecocci P, Bladström A, Stender K. Effects of memantine on cognition in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease: post-hoc analyses of ADAS-cog and SIB total and single-item scores from six randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;24:532–538. doi: 10.1002/gps.2226.
    1. Burns A, Bernabei R, Bullock R, Cruz Jentoft AJ, Frölich L, Hock C, Raivio M, Triau E, Vandewoude M, Wimo A, Came E, Van Baelen B, Hammond GL, van Oene JC, Schwalen S. Safety and efficacy of galantamine (Reminyl) in severe Alzheimer's disease (the SERAD study): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:39–47. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70261-8.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren