Colesevelam HCl improves glycemic control and reduces LDL cholesterol in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on sulfonylurea-based therapy

Vivian A Fonseca, Julio Rosenstock, Antonia C Wang, Kenneth E Truitt, Michael R Jones, Vivian A Fonseca, Julio Rosenstock, Antonia C Wang, Kenneth E Truitt, Michael R Jones

Abstract

Objective: Hyperglycemia is a risk factor for microvascular complications and may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study tested the LDL cholesterol-lowering agent colesevelam HCl (colesevelam) as a potential novel treatment for improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes on sulfonylurea-based therapy.

Research design and methods: A 26-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study was carried out between August 2004 and August 2006 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colesevelam for reducing A1C in adults with type 2 diabetes whose glycemic control was inadequate (A1C 7.5-9.5%) with existing sulfonylurea monotherapy or sulfonylurea in combination with additional oral antidiabetes agents. In total, 461 patients were randomized (230 given colesevelam 3.75 g/day and 231 given placebo). The primary efficacy measurement was mean placebo-corrected change in A1C from baseline to week 26 in the intent-to-treat population (last observation carried forward).

Results: The least squares (LS) mean change in A1C from baseline to week 26 was -0.32% in the colesevelam group and +0.23% in the placebo group, resulting in a treatment difference of -0.54% (P < 0.001). The LS mean percent change in LDL cholesterol from baseline to week 26 was -16.1% in the colesevelam group and +0.6% in the placebo group, resulting in a treatment difference of -16.7% (P < 0.001). Furthermore, significant reductions in fasting plasma glucose, fructosamine, total cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B were demonstrated in the colesevelam relative to placebo group at week 26.

Conclusions: Colesevelam improved glycemic control and reduced LDL cholesterol levels in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving sulfonylurea-based therapy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00147758.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Subject disposition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A: Mean change in A1C (%) from baseline to weeks 6, 12, 18, and 26 (LOCF) in the ITT population. *P < 0.001 vs. placebo. B: Mean percent change in lipid and apo parameters from baseline to week 26 (LOCF) in the ITT population. *P < 0.001 vs. placebo. †Triglycerides (TGs) reported as median rather than mean.

References

    1. Klein R: Hyperglycemia and microvascular and macrovascular disease in diabetes. Diabetes Care 18:258–268, 1995
    1. Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E, Miyata T, Isami S, Motoyoshi S, Kojima Y, Furuyoshi N, Shichiri M: Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 28:103–117, 1995
    1. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 329:977–986, 1993
    1. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352:837–853, 1998
    1. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 352:854–865, 1998
    1. American Diabetes Association: Standards of medical care in diabetes—2007. Diabetes Care 30(Suppl. 1):S4–S41, 2007
    1. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, Hadden D, Turner RC, Holman RR: Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 321:405–412, 2000
    1. Kannel WB, McGee DL: Diabetes and glucose tolerance as risk factors for cardiovascular disease: the Framingham study. Diabetes Care 2:120–126, 1979
    1. Stamler J, Vaccaro O, Neaton JD, Wentworth D: Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Diabetes Care 16:434–444, 1993
    1. Collins R, Armitage J, Parish S, Sleigh P, Peto R: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 361:2005–2016, 2003
    1. Pyorala K, Pedersen TR, Kjekshus J, Faergeman O, Olsson AG, Thorgeirsson G: Cholesterol lowering with simvastatin improves prognosis of diabetic patients with coronary heart disease: a subgroup analysis of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Diabetes Care 20:614–620, 1997
    1. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med 339:1349–1357, 1998
    1. Kennedy AG, MacLean CD, Littenberg B, Ades PA, Pinckney RG: The challenge of achieving national cholesterol goals in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 28:1029–1034, 2005
    1. Zieve FJ, Kalin MF, Schwartz SL, Jones MR, Bailey WL: Results of the glucose-lowering effect of WelChol study (GLOWS): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study evaluating the effect of colesevelam hydrochloride on glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Clin Ther 29:74–83, 2007
    1. Goldberg RB, Fonseca VA, Truitt KE, Jones MR: Efficacy and safety of colesevelam hydrochloride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate glycemic control on insulin-based therapy. Arch Intern Med, in press
    1. Hermansen K, Kipnes M, Luo E, Fanurik D, Khatami H, Stein P: Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin. Diabetes Obes Metab 9:733–745, 2007
    1. Wallace TM, and Matthews DR: Coefficient of failure: a methodology for examining longitudinal beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 19:465–469, 2002
    1. Ginsberg HN, Bonds DE, Lovato LC, Crouse JR, Elam MB, Linz PE, O'Connor PJ, Leiter LA, Weiss D, Lipkin E, Fleg JL: Evolution of the lipid trial protocol of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial. Am J Cardiol 99:56i–67i, 2007
    1. Keech AC, Mitchell P, Summanen PA, O'Day J, Davis TM, Moffitt MS, Taskinen MR, Simes RJ, Tse D, Williamson E, Merrifield A, Laatikainen LT, d'Emden MC, Crimet DC, O'Connell RL, Colman PG: Effect of fenofibrate on the need for laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy (FIELD study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 370:1687–1697, 2007
    1. Garg A, and Grundy SM: Cholestyramine therapy for dyslipidemia in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a short-term, double-blind, crossover trial. Ann Intern Med 121:416–422, 1994
    1. Guzelian P, and Boyer JL: Glucose reabsorption from bile: evidence for a biliohepatic circulation. J Clin Invest 53:526–535, 1974
    1. Chiang JY, Kimmel R, Weinberger C, Stroup D: Farnesoid X receptor responds to bile acids and represses cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase gene (CYP7A1) transcription. J Biol Chem 275:10918–10924, 2000
    1. Saydah SH, Fradkin J, and Cowie CC: Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes. JAMA 291:335–342, 2004

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren