Effect of the trajectory of exertional breathlessness on symptom recall and anticipation: A randomized controlled trial

Viktor Elmberg, Magnus Ekström, Viktor Elmberg, Magnus Ekström

Abstract

Background: Breathlessness is a major cause of physical limitation. Recalled breathlessness intensity may differ from experienced intensity and be influenced by the intensity trajectory including the 'peak-end rule'. The primary aim was to test if adding two minutes of low intensity exercise at the end of an exercise test would change the recalled breathlessness. Secondary aims included to analyse the impact of the peak and end exertional breathlessness intensity on breathlessness recall.

Methods: Randomized controlled trial of 92 adults referred for exercise testing who were randomized (1:1), at test end, to 2 minutes of additional low intensity exercise (intervention; n = 47) or stopping at peak exertion (control; n = 45). Experienced breathlessness during the test and recalled intensity (30 min after the test) was assessed using the Borg CR10 scale.

Results: Participants were aged a mean 59 years; 61% men; 79% reported a mMRC ≥1. There was no between-group difference in recalled breathlessness intensity, 5.51 ([95% CI] 5.00 to 6.01) vs. 5.73 (5.27 to 6.20; p = 0.52) in controls, even though the intervention group had a significantly lower end breathlessness (mean difference 0.96; 0.24 to 1.67; p = 0.009). Recalled exertional breathlessness was most strongly related to peak breathlessness (r2 = 0.43). When analyzed together, end breathlessness did not add any explanatory value above that of peak breathlessness.

Conclusion: Adding an episode of two minutes of lower exercise and breathlessness intensity at the end of an exercise test did not affect symptom recall, which was most strongly related to peak breathlessness intensity.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03468205).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. CONSORT participant flow diagram.
Fig 1. CONSORT participant flow diagram.
Fig 2. Breathlessness during the exercise test…
Fig 2. Breathlessness during the exercise test by study group.
Mean trajectory of breathlessness by study group. Each point shows the mean breathlessness score (Borg CR10) related to percentage of maximal workload (W). The last point marked ‘50%*’, shows the breathlessness score in the intervention group, at the end of the two minutes of low intensity exercise (about 50% of the maximal workload). Peak breathlessness was similar between the groups. End breathlessness was significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group, mean difference 0.96 (95% CI, 0.24 to 1.67). Error bars shows 1 SD. The first two SD for the intervention group was omitted from the graph for legibility (0.66 for 0.5 minutes and 1.05 for 1.5 minutes respectively). Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; Borg CR10, Borg Category-ratio scale (0–10).

References

    1. Gronseth R, Vollmer WM, Hardie JA, Olafsdottir IS, Lamprecht B, et al. (2014) Predictors of dyspnoea prevalence: results from the BOLD study. Eur Respir J 43: 1610–1620. 10.1183/09031936.00036813
    1. Parshall MB, Schwartzstein RM, Adams L, Banzett RB, Manning HL, et al. (2012) An official American Thoracic Society statement: update on the mechanisms, assessment, and management of dyspnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 185: 435–452. 10.1164/rccm.201111-2042ST
    1. Sundh J, Ekström M, Respiratory M, Allergology, Lund U, et al. (2016) Persistent disabling breathlessness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International Journal of COPD 11: 2805 10.2147/COPD.S119992
    1. Ramon MA, Ter Riet G, Carsin AE, Gimeno-Santos E, Agusti A, et al. (2018) The dyspnoea-inactivity vicious circle in COPD: development and external validation of a conceptual model. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL 52: 1800079 10.1183/13993003.00079-2018
    1. Redelmeier DA, Katz J, Kahneman D (2003) Memories of colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Pain 104: 187–194. 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00003-4
    1. Sandberg J, Ekström M (2019) Differences between experienced and recalled breathlessness: a review. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care 13: 161–166. 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000448
    1. Kahneman D. Experienced Utility and Objective Happiness: A Moment-Based Approach In: Kahneman D and Tversky A (Eds.) Choices, Values and Frames. New York: Cambridge University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation; 2000.
    1. Muller UWD, Witteman CLM, Spijker J, Alpers GW (2019) All's Bad That Ends Bad: There Is a Peak-End Memory Bias in Anxiety. Front Psychol 10: 1272 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01272
    1. Meek PM, Lareau SC, Anderson D (2001) Memory for symptoms in COPD patients: how accurate are their reports? Eur Respir J 18: 474–481. 10.1183/09031936.01.00083501
    1. Stulbarg MS, Carrieri-Kohlman V, Gormley JM, Tsang A, Paul S (1999) Accuracy of recall of dyspnea after exercise training sessions. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 19: 242–248. 10.1097/00008483-199907000-00005
    1. Bolton CE, Bevan-Smith EF, Blakey JD, Crowe P, Elkin SL, et al. (2013) British Thoracic Society guideline on pulmonary rehabilitation in adults: accredited by NICE. Thorax 68: ii1–ii30. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203808
    1. Garcia-Aymerich J, Lange P, Benet M, Schnohr P, Anto JM (2006) Regular physical activity reduces hospital admission and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population based cohort study. Thorax 61: 772–778. 10.1136/thx.2006.060145
    1. Katajisto M, Kupiainen H, Rantanen P, Lindqvist A, Kilpelainen M, et al. (2012) Physical inactivity in COPD and increased patient perception of dyspnea. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 7: 743–755. 10.2147/COPD.S35497
    1. Waschki B, Kirsten A, Holz O, Müller K-C, Meyer T, et al. (2011) Physical activity is the strongest predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with COPD: A prospective cohort study. Chest 140: 331–342. 10.1378/chest.10-2521
    1. Hayen A, Herigstad M, Pattinson KT (2013) Understanding dyspnea as a complex individual experience. Maturitas 76: 45–50. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.06.005
    1. Borg GAV (1982) Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 14: 377–381.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D (2010) CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340: c332 10.1136/bmj.c332
    1. Puente-Maestu L, Palange P, Casaburi R, Laveneziana P, Maltais F, et al. (2016) Use of exercise testing in the evaluation of interventional efficacy: an official ERS statement. European Respiratory Journal 47: 429–460. 10.1183/13993003.00745-2015
    1. (2003) ATS/ACCP Statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167: 211–277. 10.1164/rccm.167.2.211
    1. Brudin L, Jorfeldt L, Pahlm O (2014) Comparison of two commonly used reference materials for exercise bicycle tests with a Swedish clinical database of patients with normal outcome. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 34: 297–307. 10.1111/cpf.12097
    1. Bestall JC, Paul EA, Garrod R, Garnham R, Jones PW, et al. (1999) Usefulness of the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale as a measure of disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 54: 581–586. 10.1136/thx.54.7.581
    1. Hareendran A, Leidy NK, Monz BU, Winnette R, Becker K, et al. (2012) Proposing a standardized method for evaluating patient report of the intensity of dyspnea during exercise testing in COPD. International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 7: 345–355. 10.2147/COPD.S29571
    1. Johnson MJ, Bland JM, Oxberry SG, Abernethy AP, Currow DC (2013) Clinically important differences in the intensity of chronic refractory breathlessness. J Pain Symptom Manage 46: 957–963. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.01.011
    1. Meek PM, Lareau SC, Anderson D (2001) Memory for symptoms in COPD patients: how accurate are their reports? European Respiratory Journal 18: 474–481. 10.1183/09031936.01.00083501
    1. Spruit MA, Singh SJ, Garvey C, ZuWallack R, Nici L, et al. (2013) An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 188: e13–64. 10.1164/rccm.201309-1634ST

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren