Design of COSMIC: a randomized, multi-centre controlled trial comparing conservative or early surgical management of incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability

Ronald H M A Bartels, Allard J F Hosman, Henk van de Meent, Jeannette Hofmeijer, Pieter E Vos, Willem Bart Slooff, F Cumhur Öner, Maarten H Coppes, Wilco C Peul, André L M Verbeek, Ronald H M A Bartels, Allard J F Hosman, Henk van de Meent, Jeannette Hofmeijer, Pieter E Vos, Willem Bart Slooff, F Cumhur Öner, Maarten H Coppes, Wilco C Peul, André L M Verbeek

Abstract

Background: Incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability is a very devastating event for the patient and the family. It is estimated that up to 25% of all traumatic spinal cord lesions belong to this category. The treatment for this type of spinal cord lesion is still subject of discussion. From a biological point of view early surgery could prevent secondary damage due to ongoing compression of the already damaged spinal cord. Historically, however, conservative treatment was propagated with good clinical results. Proponents for early surgery as well those favoring conservative treatment are still in debate. The proposed trial will contribute to the discussion and hopefully also to a decrease in the variability of clinical practice.

Methods/design: A randomized controlled trial is designed to compare the clinical outcome of early surgical strategy versus a conservative approach. The primary outcome is clinical outcome according to mJOA. This also measured by ASIA score, DASH score and SCIM III score. Other endpoints are duration of the stay at a high care department (medium care, intensive care), duration of the stay at the hospital, complication rate, mortality rate, sort of rehabilitation, and quality of life. A sample size of 36 patients per group was calculated to reach a power of 95%. The data will be analyzed as intention-to-treat at regular intervals, but the end evaluation will take place at two years post-injury.

Discussion: At the end of the study, clinical outcomes between treatments attitudes can be compared. Efficacy, but also efficiency can be determined. A goal of the study is to determine which treatment will result in the best quality of life for the patients. This study will certainly contribute to more uniformity of treatment offered to patients with a special sort of spinal cord injury.

Trial registration: Gov: NCT01367405.

References

    1. Pouw MH, van Middendorp JJ, van Kampen A, Curt A, van de Meent H, Hosman AJ. Diagnostic criteria of traumatic central cord syndrome. Part 3: Descriptive analyses of neurological and functional outcomes in a prospective cohort of traumatic motor incomplete tetraplegics. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:614–622. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.171.
    1. Hohl JB, Lee JY, Horton JA, Rihn JA. A novel classification system for traumatic central cord syndrome: the central cord injury scale (CCIS) Spine Phila Pa. 1976;35:E238–E243. % 2010 Apr 1.
    1. Stevens EA, Marsh R, Wilson JA, Sweasey TA, Branch CL Jr, Powers AK. A review of surgical intervention in the setting of traumatic central cord syndrome. Spine J. 2010;10:874–880. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.07.388.
    1. Yamazaki T, Yanaka K, Fujita K, Kamezaki T, Uemura K, Nose T. Traumatic central cord syndrome: analysis of factors affecting the outcome. Surg Neurol. 2005;63:95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.03.020.
    1. White AA, III, Panjabi MM. In: Clinical Biomechanincs of the Spine. 2nd. White AA III, Panjabi MM, editor. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1990. The problem of clinical instabilityin the human spine: a systematic approach; pp. 278–378. CH 5.
    1. Chen L, Yang H, Yang T, Xu Y, Bao Z, Tang T. Effectiveness of surgical treatment for traumatic central cord syndrome. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;10:3–8. doi: 10.3171/2008.9.SPI0822.
    1. La Rosa G, Conti A, Cardali S, Cacciola F, Tomasello F. Does early decompression improve neurological outcome of spinal cord injured patients? Appraisal of the literature using a meta-analytical approach. Spinal Cord. 2004;42:503–512. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101627.
    1. Bartels RH, Verbeek AL, Benzel EC, Fehlings MG, Guiot BH. Validation of a translated version of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association score to assess outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an approach to globalize outcomes assessment tools. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:1013–1016. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000368391.79314.6F.
    1. Bartels RH, Verbeek AL, Grotenhuis JA. Design of Lamifuse: a randomised, multi-centre controlled trial comparing laminectomy without or with dorsal fusion for cervical myeloradiculopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-111.
    1. Bluvshtein V, Front L, Itzkovich M, Aidinoff E, Gelernter I, Hart J, Biering-Soerensen F, Weeks C, Laramee MT, Craven C, Hitzig SL, Glaser E, Zeilig G, Aito S, Scivoletto G, Mecci M, Chadwick RJ, El Masry WS, Osman A, Glass CA, Silva P, Soni BM, Gardner BP, Savic G, Bergstrom EM, Catz A. SCIM III is reliable and valid in a separate analysis for traumatic spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:292–296. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.111.
    1. Hoang-Kim A, Pegreffi F, Moroni A, Ladd A. Measuring wrist and hand function: common scales and checklists. Injury. 2011;42:253–258. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.050.
    1. Veehof MM, Sleegers EJ, van Veldhoven NH, Schuurman AH, van Meeteren NL. Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV) J Hand Ther. 2002;15:347–354. doi: 10.1016/S0894-1130(02)80006-0.
    1. Fernandez de Rota JJ, Meschian S, Fernandez de Rota A, Urbano V, Baron M. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy due to chronic compression: the role of signal intensity changes in magnetic resonance images. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6:17–22. doi: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.1.4.
    1. Thorburn W. Cases on injury to the cervical region of the spinal cord. Brain. 1887;9:510–543. doi: 10.1093/brain/9.4.510.
    1. Schneider RC, Cherry G, Pantek H. The syndrome of acute central cervical spinal cord injury; with special reference to the mechanisms involved in hyperextension injuries of cervical spine. J Neurosurg. 1954;11:546–577. doi: 10.3171/jns.1954.11.6.0546.
    1. Cadotte DW, Fehlings M. Spinal cord injury: a systematic review of current treatment options. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:732–741. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1674-0.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren